Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Correct, this is a very, very important clarification. The judge can set a lot of conditions on release or as a result of pretrial violations because you are supposed to be held in jail until trial by default. Bail is a privilege, not a right.
I'm not even referring to the court case in general or bail conditions. If CPS wants drug testing a judge will order them to not cut their hair.

Wonder when he will realize that under CPS rule he has to PAY for the stuff they want done and pay for them having his children.
 
He's complaining about procedure (like he knows a damn thing about it) and not just outright denying these results could possibly be true.
That's what I find most fascinating about this whole debacle. If I'm remembering right, he's only ever said (maybe once or twice at most) in the vaguest possible terms "it's not true, fuck the government!" but has otherwise never actually refuted any specific charge or assertions of fact in the police reports and other documents included in the state's case against him.

He's exclusively attacking procedural shit, which has always struck me as the last refuge of a scoundrel. A genuinely innocent person who's also a public figure will generally make some effort (ill-advised or not) to directly deny at least the general accusations if not the actual, specific charges. Nick doesn't seem to have done that.

Doesn't he realize how fucking guilty that makes him look in the court of public opinion? He can claim that doesn't matter to him, but losing his audience would be a major narcissistic injury for him and that's a likely outcome if all his procedural wrangling fails (which it probably will) and everything comes out anyway.
 
Let it be known that I was right yet again.
I said it, I said that the people Balldogaurding would be so completely, irreparably, unfathomably, irrevocably, ontologically fucked because something like this would come out.
I thought it would be the bodycam, but it looks like I was more right than I even knew.
In short, I told ya’ so.
 
I'm not even referring to the court case in general or bail conditions. If CPS wants drug testing a judge will order them to not cut their hair.
Good point, I didn't even think of that.

Wonder when he will realize that under CPS rule he has to PAY for the stuff they want done and pay for them having his children.
Depends on the state but he might also have to pay for probation appointments and pretrial investigation in connection with the trial too. Even if ultimately found not guilty, he still wouldn't get reimbursed for those.
 
I miss when it was Sargon being accused of cocaine use.
I would take Sargon as a dad over Nick and most of the other lolcows. Yes he’s an idiot and yes he’s a bit of a goof but he seems like the type that actually would care and try.
yep, the parents drug testing basically impairs their CPS case and Nick looks like he couldnt give less of a fuck.
He seems quite happy to have them off his hands. What a pos.
 
I really hoped the arrest would be a wakeup call and at the very least get him to shut up and quit making things worse for himself, but that sure as shit didn't happen.
Nick, in additional a crippling addiction to alcohol and cocaine, has crippling addition to attention. So does Aaron.

At least the women are keeping their mouths shut.
 
It's fascinating watching all these faggots work together behind the scenes to spin a yarn of corruption.
You have to remember that Juju the Cow lies for attention.

Here is what he did:
1718816239837.png
1718816245204.png

15%. First result on Google. Wow. I wonder why this is the first result?

1718816336222.png

They sell expert testimony for attorneys. Their job is to say "wow this test is sooooo inaccurate, and here's why" to try and get people off. i.e. Nick Rekieta is their sales demographic.

Reality is less fun.

1718816427791.png

This study (n=360) indicates that not only is hair follicle testing best for finding cocaine specifically, but also insensitive. It's more likely to give a false negative.

n=613
1718816637111.png

This one backs up that cocaine testing by hair follicle sample is extremely accurate. Out of the 609 cocaine users who self-reported taking it, not a single one was missed by the test. If you have recently taken cocaine, the test will know.


Assessment of Unsuspected Exposure to Drugs of Abuse in Children from a Mediterranean City by Hair Testing

This one looks at unintended exposures in a poor area. The levels at which they can detect cocaine in the child's system is insane. Also interesting, none of the children tested for accidental exposure reach as high as Rekieta's child. She had over 5ng and even the highest in this chart has 3.75ng

In case of children hair samples, results were considered positive not on the basis of recommended cut-offs—which indeed do not exist for paediatric samples—but when analyte concentration was equal of higher than the confirmatory analysis limit of quantification. The reason was that the international cut-offs for positivity to drugs of abuse were established considering values for adult population of consumers and non consumers of those substances. Conversely, in case of children we considered that none of them could have been assimilated to a consumer (even if accidental intake could not be excluded) since they were younger than 10 years of age, nor intrauterine exposure could have been occurred since they were older than 2 years of age and examined hair strand was of 4 cm, corresponding to the previous 4–5 months.

It's not happening. The result is not false. The only way it can be false is if they mixed samples.
 
Okay Kiwi Spergs, some of you skipped statistics 101.

The null hypothesis is the inverse of whatever your hypothesis is. If your hypothesis is "monkeys like bananas" the null hypothesis is "we will not find that monkeys like bananas".

Type 1 errors, in short are false positive results of a test. In more technical terms, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is erroneously affirmed that there is a statistical difference.

Type 2 errors are false negatives. The null hypothesis is erroneously affirmed.

Drug testing optimizes for type 2 errors, not type 1 errors. I found this study that says when it comes to cannabis follicle testing, they expect 0 (with 95% confidence) instances of false positive (meaning the person was erroneously found to have drugs in their system when they did not), and many more false negatives.

I would expect the balldowashers to come out in droves to say "'nooo follicle testing has an x% chance of being wrong" while completely misunderstanding (or lying) about the fact that those are false negatives, not false positives.
If anything it could be speculated that any of the other four kids' tests were false negatives.
 
I have no idea how hair tests work but could the 10x result be due to some scale difference in adults and children?
No. They take 4-6cm of hair because human hair roughly grows at 1cm a month. Children's hair grows slightly slower but not significantly. Your hair grows fastest between 15 and 30.

The metabolites are determined by nanogram per milligram of human hair sample. They do specific lengths instead of whole hair strands because the more hair, the smaller the ng/mg sample is, and there are cutoffs. If you take too much, you will get a false negative. There's nothing you can do to get a false positive. Only by ingesting cocaine does your hair get the metabolites.
 
Let it be known that I was right yet again.
I said it, I said that the people Balldogaurding would be so completely, irreparably, unfathomably, irrevocably, ontologically fucked because something like this would come out.
I thought it would be the bodycam, but it looks like I was more right than I even knew.
In short, I told ya’ so.
The insane part is that if everything was 100% confirmed and he was convicted by a trial of his peers they would still wash his balldo unconditionally until their last breath. Subhumans.
 
Oddly enough, due to personal experience I somewhat believe Nick saying Sweeps made shit up,
Due to actions by my ex wife, CPS wanted to talk to my daughter, the long story short is my ex wife’s boyfriend sexually abused by daughter and my ex wife tried to cover it up. When I finally got a copy of the CPS report to file with my custody modification, (which in my state, they will not give to anyone except guardians and DA’s, and the copy I was given had heavy redactions), it claimed they had talked to me over the phone three months before my first ever contact with CPS. The report claimed I told CPS everything was fine and there is no reason for them to talk to my daughter about these allegations. I knew this wasn’t true, I even pulled my phone records from Verizon. I asked my CPS case worker about this, I left many voicemails and many text messages about it, she completely ghosted me and I never heard from her again. I even brought this up with the District Attorney that prosecuted the case, and she couldn’t get CPS to answer anything about it either.

TLDR: CPS does make shit up

Comparing these situations however, you're describing a situation where a CPS worker was too credulous towards a woman, took her word on things, and then tried to cover her ass as all public employees do. This is a case of a drug test. It's gonna be a lot harder for a shifty CPS worker to fake 5 drug tests and have it entered in that one of the kids tested positive. Even look at how the CPS worker acted in your story, it was the least effort choice possible for her, ignore it. For this, we'd have to expect a CPS worker to go through a whole bunch of easily verifiable hoops and do a bunch of extra work to do what? Prove Nick is a druggie shithead parent? I'm not really buying it. That's too much effort for a public employee.
 
Good point, I didn't even think of that.


Depends on the state but he might also have to pay for probation appointments and pretrial investigation in connection with the trial too. Even if ultimately found not guilty, he still wouldn't get reimbursed for those.
I'm from Minnesota. The PTI cost is taken care by the county, but it is a lot of time/paperwork.

He would have to pay for probation and if he is ordered to go to rehab and/or put on house arrest/home monitoring. If he does get put on house arrest, the ankle bracelets also check for alcohol. Since technically he works from home, he would only be able to leave the house for scheduled valid doctors appointments and a 3 hour block each week to run errands.
 
He cares far more about his drugs and banging his side piece than he does his five kids, but we already knew that. I think ppl just hoped a few weeks post arrest he might get sober and start giving a fuck about his kids, but nothing has changed.
Nick has officially crossed the "no turning back" point that all lolcows eventually face. This is where the public reputation is beyond repair and no amount of work can get people back on their side. For as much crap and drama that has occurred over the last two years with Nick, if he had four weeks ago said he was taking a break from the internet and going to rehab to fix his issues nearly everyone on here would have cheered him on because doing that would have shown redeemable traits in him.

Instead his arrest and the fallout from it has permanently taken away any sympathy good human beings can have for Nick. Even if he does clean his life up, which in all likelihood he won't, it would be because he was forced by government force to do so. The arrest has proved what we all speculated about Nick: he is a weak, reckless and abusive asshole who only cares about pleasuring himself. Even at the expense of damaging and harming his children.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back