Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[that_monika]

Say the 9-year old has a medical issue like narcolepsy or ADHD, I think these idiots were legitimately attempting to use cocaine to treat their child.

It's crazy that even people who hate Nick far more than I do are having a tough time accepting or believing this possibility, as horrifying as it may seem.

I don't think it's a matter of how horrifying it is. I think people have a hard time accepting something so outrageously retarded. There's a difference between an addict lying to themselves about being able to control their addiction, and someone thinking cocaine can help ADHD. One's denial, the other is profound stupidity.

Is it impossible that they tried to use cocaine as a home remedy? No, but it's so stupid that I think a simpler explanation is more likely. It's possible the girl saw how much her dad liked snorting coke, gave it a try, and accidentally got hooked on it. Read stories from former cokeheads, and you'd be amazed how easily it can sink it's hooks in you. "Just one try" turns into "gotta get more" really quick.

I'm not even going to speculate on him giving it to her deliberately, and what else might go along with that. For all his faults, I don't think he'd do that.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

I'm not saying he definitely did, but we can be pretty much certain the kid is being abused, and this paints a very disturbing picture that we've seen more than a few times before of who could be doing it. I really really hope I'm wrong.

I'd also like to assert that according to Aaron, Nick has a non functioning penis and can only watch. How does one diddle without a Pp? Also, Aaron asserted everyone was zonked out of their minds. He was the only sober one. Nobody else had their wits about them. He was completely alone. Aaron also asserted he was the one who fed the kids every now and again. Aaron also asserted he was the responsible one, and yet some kid was tweaking on his watch.

You know, I'm just saying if a diddle kit did test positive, Aaron has exclusive access to the kids, completely unsupervised, and was fully about his wits at all times. On top of it, he has a motive for revenge against Nick for destroying his marriage. It also doesn't help that he looks like Jared Fogle and polycules have a tendency to end up this way.

 

[GotMail_2000]

A lot of people seemed like they wanted someone to look up to. Nick basically had the perfect ideal life so they’d disregard him when he said he wasn’t perfect, he fought against people image of him constantly even when this situation wasn’t happening. But a lot of people refused to see it. And then you’ve got people that come in late or don’t stay for everything so do not see these bits. You saw it with Mindset and many others thanks to the Turkey Tom.doc many people didn’t know all this stuff. It’s not that Nick was trying to hide it per se, it’s just there was so much content and people only paid attention spradically that they missed stuff or did not know..

And they really wanted that image they’d made in their head. It’s why Metokur is so sad about everything. A perfrct guy with the best life seems to have just exploded out the blue.

I guess that people see what they want to, but at the same time, the dude started out making law videos, and over time progressively started talking more about drinking, how much he lusts for women, and a different life than he has, which people would consider to be "ideal." To be honest I thought that there was a 30% chance that in 10 years time, or maybe 5, he'd be a stoner, or a boozer, divorced, and banging a 25 year old or something, as that's the vibe I got from his insinuations in that "I see other women... then me and lady rackets... we have a good time" video from several years back.
I didn't expect him to freak out and be bottle licking, doing coke and neglecting his kids, but if someone is into weird sex shit at all, something bad always comes out. There's a reason why you react with such revulsion to swingers, and especially polyamourous people in shared relationships with multiple men and women, doubly so with kids involved.

 

[Baldos Revenge]

I don't think it's a matter of how horrifying it is. I think people have a hard time accepting something so outrageously retarded. There's a difference between an addict lying to themselves about being able to control their addiction, and someone thinking cocaine can help ADHD. One's denial, the other is profound stupidity.

Is it impossible that they tried to use cocaine as a home remedy? No, but it's so stupid that I think a simpler explanation is more likely. It's possible the girl saw how much her dad liked snorting coke, gave it a try, and accidentally got hooked on it. Read stories from former cokeheads, and you'd be amazed how easily it can sink it's hooks in you. "Just one try" turns into "gotta get more" really quick.

I'm not even going to speculate on him giving it to her deliberately, and what else might go along with that. For all his faults, I don't think he'd do that.

he could be exposed as a high ranking member of The Finders and it would not surprise me. e-celebs are garbage 99% of the time.

 

[Lubby Smith]

Based on the way this was leaked could this entire report get thrown out if it went to trial due to jury bias or something? I know Nick is trying to get the warrant thrown out but could this get thrown out as well in the criminal and/or CPS trials because someone illegally leaked these?

This unprecedented leak of privileged, confidential material perpetrated by a cadre of illegitimate and corrupt leftist bureaucrats in small town Minnesota--the very people Nick Rekieta just happened to have been working tirelessly to expose before the election, mind you--violates every single constitutional provision.

We're looking at a blatant 3rd Amendment violation with the perjurious and slatternly "Mrs. Sweep" being quartered in Nick's home during peacetime against his will. We've got multiple 5th Amendment infringements including the taking of the child's hair without any compensation whatsoever, probably already been made into a wig for one of Hunter Biden's chinamen cronies, and a substantive due process violation with the government trampling the right of Nick--and every American parent--to give their children whatever substances they so please, which the Constitution reserves to The People by way of the 9th Amendment. Illegally releasing the document is obviously cruel and unusual punishment, which the 8th Amendment forbids. The 13th Amendment says the government can't force someone to take drugs tests because that's tantamount to slavery. The 21st Amendment says the government can't prohibit any intoxicating substances. We have clearcut 6th AND 7th amendment problems with this CPS case being tried without a jury in some modern day Star Chamber just like the King of England used to do before patriots like Nick told him to take a hike back in 1776.

So not only will this result in both the criminal and CPS cases being thrown out, all these civil rights violations--done by nefarious state actors under color of law--exposes the state and its henchmen to Section 1983 liability and Nick will win a million dollars.

 

[DumbDude43]

Aaron also asserted he was the responsible one, and yet some kid was tweaking on his watch.

we can't know that for certain
aaron had been out of the house for, what, 6 weeks before the arrest? it's possible that the kid only started getting into the coke after aaron was already out of the picture.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

Here's a link to the study. The specificity (ability to detect healthy individuals) of hair follicle drug tests is more than 90%, meaning that false positives effectively don't exist. However, the sensitivity (ability to detect unhealthy individuals) of the test is lower.

This is to say that the test gives false negatives, but only very rarely false positives.

Exactly - analytical techniques all have detection limits, but if your result is more than ten times higher than the detection limit, you can be confident in that result being correct. Only sabotage or gross incompetence could explain such a reading being false.

 

[GotMail_2000]

I'd also like to assert that according to Aaron, Nick has a non functioning penis and can only watch. How does one diddle without a Pp? Also, Aaron asserted everyone was zonked out of their minds. He was the only sober one. Nobody else had their wits about them. He was completely alone. Aaron also asserted he was the one who fed the kids every now and again. Aaron also asserted he was the responsible one, and yet some kid was tweaking on his watch.

You know, I'm just saying if a diddle kit did test positive, Aaron has exclusive access to the kids, completely unsupervised, and was fully about his wits at all times. On top of it, he has a motive for revenge against Nick for destroying his marriage. It also doesn't help that he looks like Jared Fogle and polycules have a tendency to end up this way.

^ Bingo.

Not saying that anyone was doing anything to the kids, but the fact that Aaron has spoken about being responsible makes him look worse and worse as more comes out. I think that he thought of this as one of those scenes in a film where one detatches a burning train car and sails away with the engine, but Aaron, the fire was far past your car buddy, and we keep discovering more, and all the shit that you said makes you look worse and worse.

I wonder how his ex wife will take this? Wasn't Aaron within striking distance of still moving in next to Nick and doing the commune parenting thing where all their kids would starve and get no spaghetti-o s?

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

we can't know that for certain
aaron had been out of the house for, what, 6 weeks before the arrest? it's possible that the kid only started getting into the coke after aaron was already out of the picture.

Probably not, it's gay theorizing. It could also could've been a complete surprise to Nick and Kayla and they only found out when they were arrested.

 

[GotMail_2000]

Exactly - analytical techniques all have detection limits, but if your result is more than ten times higher than the detection limit, you can be confident in that result being correct. Only sabotage or gross incompetence could explain such a reading being false.

Not in Nick's defence but the dosage seems kind of high, so I wouldn't be surprised if the test is somehow off, or samples got mixed up.
Obviously I think the verdict is legit, but something is off about the amount.

 

[daniel day]

While its fun to quibble about the details, sometime I think der farmers misses the forest for the trees. There was a test, it tested something, there is confirmed cocaine residue on a child, or in a child. Does it really matter wether it was on or in the child? Its vile as fuck either way. If nick said tomorrow, "well ackshully the cocaine was just on her hair cuz I had some on my hand and I brushed her hair", THATS NOT ANY BETTER! Even if its true! There was cocaine near enough to a child to show up on a drug test: whether she was al pacino'ing that shit, got into something she shouldnt have by accident, or some other third thing, NICK STILL HAD COCAINE ON HIS FUCKING KID.

Anyway, nick is a bit of a stinker. Not a big fan.

 

[GotMail_2000]

Probably not, it's gay theorizing. It could also could've been a complete surprise to Nick and Kayla and they only found out when they were arrested.

To be real with you I genuinely think that once you get into situations like that, the fact that it isn't normal comes as kind of a surprise. Like Nick kept up his soverign persona when the cops were at the door, as if he had a moral position greater than the cops.

Genuinely I do think that when people are down bad, their senses almost adjust to their new level, so being zonked out on drugs is their new normal, being drunk is their new normal, they need more sex to feel normal, and their house is dirty but the house has been dirty so long that it's not unusual to them now. Like Aaron said, and I do take his word with a shaker of salt, the Rekietas were pulling clothes out of big piles of laundry around the house. I've been in some pretty fucked up houses before, it's not abnormal to the people doing it until they have a sudden realization, then it's all either change or damage control.

Not necessarsily saying they were giving the children coke or why, but just neglecting their kids and being drugged out for good portions of the day was probably normal at that point.

 

[Harm]

How does one diddle without a Pp?

What do you even mean? Children can be sexually molested even if the abuser is flaccid during the molestation. I don't believe men with erectile dysfunction are incapable of molesting children.

I'm still not convinced that there was sexual abuse, but I don't find this a very cogent line of argumentation against molestation.

 

[DavidS877]

I spent a few minutes between avoiding work today and looked at the MN code about this stuff.

I don't think this is a "leak". I think it's public. Anyone in MN can likely go to the courthouse terminal and see this file and per the rules below, copy it.

Things like the Foster Parent's names are supposed to be confidential, and don't appear in this order. Which leads me to believe this is the public order and while there is likely a corresponding confidential file with more detail this document, itself, is not confidential.

You would think the children's names would be omitted, but apparently it's only required in cases of sexual assult and similar. I suspect if the judge had known the scrutiny he may have redacted the full names.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/rule/jurjpp-8/

Rule 8.01.Presumption of Access to Juvenile Protection Case Records.​

Except as otherwise provided in Rule 8.04 of these rules and the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch, all juvenile protection case records relating to any juvenile protection matters, as those terms are defined in Rule 2.01, are presumed to be accessible to any party, participant, or member of the public for inspection and copying. Any order prohibiting access to all juvenile protection records of a particular case, or any portion of a juvenile protection case record, shall be accessible to the public, parties, and participants.

8.04 Subd. 2.Confidential Documents and Confidential Information.​

The following juvenile protection case records are confidential documents or confidential information and are accessible to the public, parties, and participants only as specified in subdivision 3:
(a) official transcripts of testimony taken during proceedings that are closed by the presiding judge;
(b) audio or video recordings of a child alleging or describing physical abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect of any child;
(c) victims' statements;
(d) portions of juvenile protection case records that identify reporters of abuse or neglect;
(e) records of HIV testing, portions of records that reveal any person has undergone HIV testing, or any reference to any person's HIV status;
(f) medical records, chemical dependency evaluations and records; psychological evaluations and records; and psychiatric evaluations and records;
(g) sexual offender treatment program reports;
(h) portions of photographs that identify a child;
(i) notices of change of foster care placement;
(j) the identity of a minor victim or perpetrator of an alleged or adjudicated sexual assault;
(k) notice of pending court proceedings provided by the petitioner pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. section 1912, and any response to that notice from an Indian tribe or the Bureau of Indian Affairs as to whether the child is eligible for tribal membership, including documents such as family ancestry charts, genograms, and tribal membership information;
(l) records or portions of records which the court in exceptional circumstances has deemed to be inaccessible to the public through a protective order issued under Rule 8.07;
(m) the name, address, home, or location of any shelter care facility or foster care in which a child is currently placed pursuant to law or court order, except in documents consenting to adoption or transferring permanent legal and physical custody to a foster care provider or relative;
(n) signature pages containing signatures of foster parents or children whose identities are confidential;
(o) documents provided to the court to give notice of a hearing for a child under state guardianship pursuant to Rule 27.07, subd. 2; and
(p) names, addresses, e-mail addresses, or telephone numbers that would endanger a person if disclosed in a public court filing.

Subd. 3.Access to Juvenile Protection Case Records by Public, Parties, and Participants.​

(a) Public. The public shall have access to inspect and copy all juvenile protection case records in the court file, except those listed in subdivision 2(a)-(p) and subdivision 4 of this rule.

 

[feral cat #6385]

I'd also like to assert that according to Aaron, Nick has a non functioning penis and can only watch. How does one diddle without a Pp?

Fingers, mouth, a balldo, anything that can be inserted into an orifice. You don't need a dick to sexually assault someone. Not being able to get it up could add to the rage. And Nick has developed a recent predilection to pedophile jokes. Is it really surprising that someone as degenerate as Rekieta would decide to give children a try. Look at all the moral lines Nick has crossed. Is pedophilia/incest that far out of line?

With how things are progressing I wouldn't be shocked if that weren't the next shoe to drop.

 

[Trigger Me Timbers]

I don’t buy the “molesterchu” arch just because in Nicks house there was;

A) Alcohol
B) Ketamine
C) Cocaine
D) Molly

Now presented as the multiple-choice and the question being “if you needed to numb someone to molest them, please chose ABC or D”. Cocaine arguably seems like the worst choice. Yeah that’s exactly what you want in a rape victim, them constantly moving around and not being able to shut the fuck up.

 

[mindlessobserver]

To be real with you I genuinely think that once you get into situations like that, the fact that it isn't normal comes as kind of a surprise. Like Nick kept up his soverign persona when the cops were at the door, as if he had a moral position greater than the cops.

There is being a Libertarian and as a rule viewing the Government, even its most mundane front line foot soldiers like the county Sheriff's department with suspicion. And then there is being a Lolbertarian who believes there is no proper role for such things in the first place. Nick apparently has slipped into the latter. He views the Government not as an overweening tyrant prone to abuse by conniving agents. He views it as a buzzkill nanny, out to stop his fun and interfere with his hedonistic lifestyle. For completely bogus reasons like "Protecting HIS kids."

His moral compass is completely fucked, and possibly always was. All his success did for him was enable him to do all the things he wished he could have done had he the means to do so. He achieved unimaginable success, and he threw it all away.

Rekieta is turning into a walking Parable. What Profits a man, if he gains the whole world and forfeits his own soul?

 

[6MillionCoofs]

I guess that people see what they want to.

Frequently. Parasocial relationships ate bad for that very reason. It clouds people bad.

 

[Swole McPole]

Cocaine is a weak base and is therefore poorly absorbed through the stomach when you eat it. You therefore wouldn’t see levels that high.

What you buy when you buy cocaine isn't actually cocaine, but cocaine hydrochloride. Not a base at all.

It doesn't cross the blood/brain barrier so well when taken orally though. Sniffing, smoking, injecting are all much more effective.

 

[Artaius]

someone was giving it to her to numb her out for sexual exploitation.

Darkest of outcomes. The fallout would be awful. There would be no mercy for Nick, his wife, the Imholtes, Dick Masterson, Barnes and every noseguard would either have to accept it or worse: Double down. They would have to look deadpan into a camera and say what Nick did. It wouldn't be funny anymore. I don't even think PPP and Warski would have the energy to properly cover it without breaking down.

It might be the first time in history where there might be a Kiwi endorsed public lynching unless the justice system gets him behind bars fast enough.