You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
TrashfireMNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Did anyone speculate about the kids ingesting the drugs or testing positive for substantial use in the initial thread? Not just incidental/trace amounts but full blown daily use of the substance Nick introduced to their environment? I'm slowly reading through the entire thread but if someone called it they should get a nod, or a giant fucking medal.
It wouldn’t be high if she consistently ate off a contaminated surface. It requires a few “ifs”, but I imagine the only clean surface in the crack den was likely where they snorted lines off of. The amount they measured would be moderate daily use for an adult, for a kid it would either be OD’ing once or getting a gummer every so often to treat “ADHD”.
If the kid goes to raid the snack drawer and the cuck fridge then eats them off that surface it could get elevated from doing that when Nick or Kayla aren’t aware. The two youngest didn’t go to school anymore, if Kayla passed out during their “homeschooling” and Nick was doing god knows what then the kid has a window to go steal some food for herself.
Again this is probably not what happened, but it’s the only way I could theorize it not being the kid imitating Nick and doing drugs, getting fed drugs by Kayla or Nick, or worst case scenario.
Whatever hypothesis is correct, I think we can agree that Nick's drug addiction is affecting his kids. Also Nick is a retarded. drug addicted, balldo wearing degenerate who needs to jump feet first into a woodchipper.
Listen, this is a tiny town. This is the biggest scandal they’ve seen in a generation. Even Shaniqua paid attention this time, for the gossip if nothing else.
True but its a lot easier to just wash up crack with bicarbonate than it is to make freebase, fucking around with ammonia. Freebase is also dangerous to wash up and Nicks a retard. I think thats how Richard Pryor set himself on fire now I remember it.
Nick would probably set his house on fire in a clumsy drunken stupor.
That's why I think crack is more likely, but not necessary. Also the ammonia isn't the really dangerous part of freebase, it's the diethyl ether used to reclaim the base from the solution. That's something fairly unusual you'd expect the cops would have found had he been doing that, if he wasn't just buying freebase.
The danger is the highly flammable ether. You're supposed to wait until that evaporates. That doesn't take that long, but cokeheads are not known for their patience or caution. Ether is also heavier than air so it can "pool" on the floor and get set off by a stray spark. Or the cokehead can try heating it to speed up evaporation at too high a heat and kaboom.
(Pryor claimed he actually deliberately set himself on fire with 151 proof rum although he was also freebasing at the time.)
Whatever hypothesis is correct, I think we can agree that Nick's drug addiction is affecting his kids. Also Nick is a retarded. drug addicted, balldo wearing degenerate who needs to jump feet first into a woodchipper.
If the rest of my post, and a lifetime of being told not to use drugs by society in general, wasn't enough to put them off, I'd just rather they not kill their soul a key bump at a time without realizing it. A frank explanation of the reality of habitual drug use is usually better at putting people off than just telling them 'no'.
I do have a cope for the kid on cocaine. Aaron bought Kayla a snack fridge for crack den. Supposedly they had charcuterie and other shit in it per the Kino Kasino.
Also the ammonia isn't the really dangerous part of freebase, it's the diethyl ether used to reclaim the base from the solution. That's something fairly unusual you'd expect the cops would have found had he been doing that, if he wasn't just buying freebase.
Incidentally, this is really stupid unless he's still on cocaine in which case it just doesn't matter. CPS isn't a criminal court and it isn't like taking the Fifth where a court can't use that against you. CPS can and has taken it into account and drawn an adverse inference from it. They're just going to conclude that yes, you're on coke still.
Once you're in this particular spiderweb where they've decided no, you're an unfit piece of shit who shouldn't be allowed access to your children, it is up to you to prove your innocence.
Since taking kids away is supposed to be a protective measure for the kids, not a punishment of the parents, I'm not sure "guilty until proven innocent" is necessarily the obvious wrong it is with criminal matters.
If the rest of my post, and a lifetime of being told not to use drugs by society in general, wasn't enough to put them off, I'd just rather they not kill their soul a key bump at a time without realizing it. A frank explanation of the reality of habitual drug use is usually better at putting people off than just telling them 'no'.
Since taking kids away is supposed to be a protective measure for the kids, not a punishment of the parents, I'm not sure "guilty until proven innocent" is necessarily the obvious wrong it is with criminal matters.
When theres kids at risk in a filthy environment, hungry and unwashed, and then one comes back dropping positive tests for coke use I'd say leaning on the side of caution is the better option.
It just shows what an utter prick Rekieta is, he must have known about that positive test since it came back and he's made driving around in his shitty Mustang and cope posting on Xitter, he gives zero fucks for his kids.
Whatever bullshit reasons he tries to give don't matter to those kids, his kids are going to know their Dad chose coke over them and thats why they can't go home.
He's such a fucking cocksucker. Literally probably given how much he likes the Sodomy Barn.
I agree with you, but also knowing addicts the way I do, I am 100% certain the children have witnessed the parents snorting.
For the normies: if your parents smoked cigarettes, how old were you the first time you put one in your mouth? If they drank beer, how old were you when you first tried to sip it? Probably younger than 9, right?
Back around like 92 the comedian and radio host Ron Bennington hung up a jacket in the hallway and his kid went into his pocket and took what he thought was candy out of his dad's pocket and ate it. Ronnie then had to rush his kid to the hospital for eating Quaaludes.
Here's a link to the study. The specificity (ability to detect healthy individuals) of hair follicle drug tests is more than 90%, meaning that false positives effectively don't exist. However, the sensitivity (ability to detect unhealthy individuals) of the test is lower.
This is to say that the test gives false negatives, but only very rarely false positives.
There was a very good post some pages back speculating that Kayla became the pilled out living corpse she is now because she could not cope with her failure as a mother to protect her children
Without power leveling I have seen the scenario you describe play out. You were spot on in your line of reasoning, it was a very good post and I would have quoted it directly. There's another possibility that Kayla slid further into drug use to try and keep Nick's attention on her and away from the children, this is all speculation of course since True and Honest Nick seems very adamant about not disclosing anything despite his demands for transparency from the state.
wonder why Nick didn't ask for a second test if he's so sure it's wrong. The little bitch didn't even deny the results, just complained they were leaked.
So his kid testing positive made me think of a moment I remembered from Aaron's appearance on Kino Casino.
Starting at 2:48:50: PPP: "...did Nick share coke with anyone other than you and April?" *Aaron takes a long pause, during which he nervously bites his tongue and lips, stress sighs, and looks down as he begins to answer* Aaron: "Not that I ever saw... not that I ever saw. I can't say yes, can't say no, but not that I ever experienced or saw."
I did find this very odd live, and wondered why he looked so nervous while answering a question that wouldn't incriminate or embarrass him. Was there something he knew about, but couldn't mention?
Pop Quiz fellow Mandatory Reporters; what question or scenario immediately springs to mind given this set of facts? Why does only the 8-9 year old girl seem to have been involved with the drugs, in a house full of sexual deviants?
Nick is a hedonist who fancies himself an epicurean, hence getting schmammered on expensive whisky where Evan Williams would serve as well. I bet he overpays for his coke and ecstacy, too.
Both are self-regarding philosophies, but where the epicurean seeks a peaceful and enjoyable life, the hedonist pursues the most immediate pleasure without regard consequences. True epicureans either avoid having children to avoid unwanted responsibility, or do their best as parents, because a good child can be a joy. The hedonist impregnates because condoms suck and women in estrus are extra horny. They have lots of kids whom they ignore unless the kids can make them feel good. Many such cases of carefully crafted facebook posts to.uae the kiddoes to get that dopamine hit.
Any Rhodes scholars know which hormone cocaine acts on?
It's hard enough keeping a kid out of the sweets. Source: trust me bro. And sugar doesn't hold a candle to moon sugar.
She got it in her as there is a constant cloud of cocaine floating around the house!" Well, why did no other kids test positive? Also, this immediately reveals to me who hasn't been around hard drugs or hard drug users. Junkies like the Nick polycule can be the biggest slobs on Earth, but the one thing they aren't sloppy with is their cocaine!
Nick is exactly the kind of guy to think "wow, the drug warriors have been lying to me about this coke shit just like they lied about weed for decades, I feel great! Coke is amazing!"
So the “problem child” was the one always hungry, never bathed or clothed, is also the one allegedly given cocaine? I’m sensing a specific pattern of abuse here.
I hope this was just him medicating the kid in a lolbertardian way. If it was the kids pilfering the stash, why only one?
Lets autistically analyze. Its what we do.
Balldoguarding theories:
1: She just accidentally headbutted some coke dust.
Problem: Why her and not any of the other kids?
I find this theory the least likely of them all.
2: She emulated daddy and stole some of his nose candy. Keeeds are a drag mang!
Problem: One of the other kids would likely have noticed this or partook with her, unless she was the ostracised sibling to a unusual degree.
Never the less this is a more likely balldowashing theory.
Lolbertarian retardation:
3: Rekieta or any of his polycule were on board and gave her the stuff. They could have found out and just went along with it after she OD.
Problem: Coke addicts are not sharers.
This is moderately likely too.
4: Rekieta the Genious Internet Man and Kaylee the New Age Whore tried to self medicate her with coke.
This is my Occam's Razor choice. It is equally retarded and fits their arrogance.
Horrorcow stuff:
5: Sexual abuse. All the circumstancials are there, the pattern is set, like a pedomancer's summoning circle. But it could have been anyone of the four, not just Nick. Didn't Kayla and April Imholte the human fleshlight like lezzing out? It ain't incest if there is no dick involved! Or even any 5th person, like their many sex pest buddies that had access to the house.
Problem: If it was the Quad Qoomers, they would have used bentos or ketamine. But if it was a family friend, who only knew where the cocaine was...
This I rate mid on the likelyhood.
Only the favourite getting it? Check.
Only the one that sleeps with the 4 in the bed? Check.
Rich degenerate coomers with drugs? Check.
I really hope it was Dr. Nick's Cocaine Drops and not uncle Drexel or Juju or any other's funny naked playtime.
Right. Even if the polycule didn't intend to, they were blasted on hard drugs and huge amounts of alcohol all the time. They weren't mentally or physically capable of being careful around the kids anymore given they couldn't even take care of them on a basic level. It's not like they were brewing up some kava and smoking a J on the back deck.
For the normies: if your parents smoked cigarettes, how old were you the first time you put one in your mouth? If they drank beer, how old were you when you first tried to sip it? Probably younger than 9, right?
Not until I was an adult, actually. I never had access to any tobacco my parents had, although back then candy cigarettes were still sold in stores. Not that those had anything to do with it, of course, just an idea of the era.
I want to say I tasted my first beer around 9 or 10 but I didn't drink any appreciable amounts until I was in college. I've never been a really heavy drinker though, mostly because it just makes me feel like shit the next day usually worse than others.
Most of those are only half ether with the other half stuff like heptane and oils and other stuff you really don't want. Also even if Nick got a source of pure ether it's not like he'd have the sense to put it in the garage with other car-related stuff. He'd just leave it in the bedroom or the kitchen like a retard, where it would look unusual especially in combination with a couple glass dicks and a mountain of cocaine.
Since taking kids away is supposed to be a protective measure for the kids, not a punishment of the parents, I'm not sure "guilty until proven innocent" is necessarily the obvious wrong it is with criminal matters.
It doesn't specifically apply because it isn't a criminal adjudication of guilt. It is, however, an abrogation of a fundamental right, so there does have to be some due process involved. It just doesn't implicate the presumption of innocence in a criminal context.
For the normies: if your parents smoked cigarettes, how old were you the first time you put one in your mouth? If they drank beer, how old were you when you first tried to sip it? Probably younger than 9, right?
Yeah I sure would hate to have heptane in the chemical I use to refine an addictive poison to make it even more poisonous and addictive when I voluntarily consume it constantly for months at a time.
Yes, they noticed that the kids were wearing old clothes and were sometimes hungry. Literally nobody went: “Oh and that nine year old? She’s sleeping constantly whenever she isn’t tweaking!”
In order words, they noticed general neglect. Not drug abuse among the kids.
Also, none of the kids who apparently trusted the priest enough to confide in him, went: “Also, my sister keeps partying with mom and dad and takes stuff!”
Rekieta’s kids may be autistic, but they sure as fuck aren’t so retarded that they DONT NOTICE THEIR SISTER TAKING COKE.
How the fuck would he know what has happened? Are you seriously so dumb that you lack theory of mind?
Nick, doesn’t have perfect knowledge of all events, and wasn’t in the lab when the test was done.
All he knows is she tested positive. She could have gotten in his stash for all he knows. The time to crow about a false positive is after the kid was tested again. Not when he doesn’t know what the fuck is going on.
The mind of a retard, ladies and gents: Nick lies constantly. He can’t be trusted! Unless he says something I agree with, in which case you can take it to the bank!
But you’re still praying for this mythical lab fuckup.
Nope. I don’t give a fuck. But I’m also not retarded, and buy into every halfassed theory that comes along. And unless there’s more proof that they partied with a nine year old, it’s just a theory.
One more time for the cheap seats: if it was environmental exposure, all the kids would’ve tested positive
Not necessarily, unless you think that a giant cloud of cocaine was present in the house. And frankly, with your post I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re dumb enough to believe that.
Environmental exposure can be (gasp!) something only she touched.
Rekeita's reaction ensures that isn't the truth. If it was a false positive and he was reasonably confident about that he'd be shouting that from the rooftops.
I don't think he was balldowashing, just putting out the fact that this specific company has a high rate of mix-ups because of those factors. Just putting out possible scenarios for a kid testing so hot. Nick has basically confirmed those tests weren't false positives/a mix-up, just continuing the line that "IT'S A CONSPIRACY!"
From a small town, you can't fart in public without everyone and their second cousins knowing. If you are a known cunt to everyone, people stop doing business with you, they won't tow you out of the snow, etc. One guy in town stole a drainpipe and no-one would sell him gas or groceries. This doesn't mean that the local cops planted coke in your house and inside your 9 year old. They're being harsh on him because he did in fact do these crimes and they want to prosecute to get this degenerate behind bars and out of the town.
"It's funny because it's true!"
