Why are there so many retards obsessed with Rekieta's kids being raped?
The better informed are not jumping to child rape fantasy's. But. This drug finding raises some alarming red flags that CPS and the police investigators will be looking into.
We have no direct signs of child sexual abuse that we, morons on the internet, have been able to observe. In part because Nick has mostly kept his kids off camera. We really only learned of Nick and Kayla's embarasing child naming conventions from unredacted court documents. So we have no direct knowledge of the kids, their current state of abuse or neglect, etc. It's not something we can evaluate.
But! The scenatio where 1 child out of 5, the 8-9 year old girl, tests unexpectedly positive for cocaine is outside the norm, and raises major red flags for investigators.
Add that it is a house full of unrelated adults engaged in deviant sexual behavior, and alarms and warning bells will be going off in the investigators brains. I'm not saying child sexual abuse was happening. But we have reached a set of circumstances where it is statistically a higher probability than not. As horrifying as that may be.
Hopefully the Rekeita's are the exception to the rule in this case.
Regardless something well outside the norm was going on with the 9 year old daughter. We should not assume rape or child sex trafficing. But still we can't simply dismiss the thought as "we have seen no evidence of...". This is the point we let the investigators do their job.
Jesus Christ. When the argument becomes is this child doing fat rails or is the house so contaminated that they got it from food/salves/surfaces. Lazy fucking cunts probably did it off kitchen worktop or something. I am truly MATI, hope his next baggie is mixed with fent.
The other 4 kids in the same environment tested negative or had negligable exposure levels. Including the youngest, who would be expected to have the most contact with the parents and environment. The positive test is just the middle daughter.
I agree with all of that except that the kids are in foster care, not with meemaw and pawpaw.
Minnesota Law requires that CPS (whatever its called) make a determined effort to place the kids with family. And some of the local relatives are licensed foster care providors. By law, barring some exceotional circumstances the kids are almost certainly with one of the sets of grandparents.
Some of you guys need a hobby instead of debating on the 9 year old is being sex trafficked. Nothing in either filling has suggested sexual trauma, that's probably the first thing they search for during situations like this. Could further evidence indicate such things happen, maybe but it's gross and irresponsible to suggest that without anything substantial.
See above. The finding of a not inconsequential amount of cocaine in the 9 year old girl and only the 9 year old girl IS an possible, and often strong indication of CSA. Enough that it has almost certainly triggered the investigators to start looking.
The person who probably should be most worried there is Aaron. Because the first degenerate sexual deviant that they will be looking at will be the unrelated male living in the house. The only one giving the kids spaghettiO's. (Yeah people, you never want to be the unrelated male living with someone else's young kids. It just can have complications.)
We won't be seeing any of this investigation. Things like interviews with the kids. That's all going to be sealed from creation. We won't know anything until or unless they drop more charges.
But concern or speculation, while it should not be taken to extremes, is not completely unwarranted. We don't have specific evidence of CSA. But we have a broad set of circumstances were CSA is not uncommon.
Stop jumping to either extreme. There is ground between "omg Child Rape Happened" and "absolutely no evidence of anything". Based on what we know there is sufficient cause for the investigators to look into the question. There is enough to put it on their radar. But not enough to say whether it was occurring.
