Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[AltisticRight]

I guess that's why you should have children, you can literally 100x your stash by harvesting their hair.

Maybe that's why Balldo had 5 kids. It's not to beef up his access to the trust fund.

Maybe that's why he had a haircut.

 

[Desktop User2]

Okay so the number it gave would mean that 1/100th of the cocaine you took ends up being found in literally every single microgram of your hair. That would mean the human body actually generates more cocaine than it ingests to the tune of at least 100x. It's an absolutely ridiculous answer that's several orders of magnitude off anything remotely plausible.

ChatGTP is retarded and not helpful for this.

I think it returned that ridiculously low number because he informed the 5000pg/ml and ChatGPT probably considered that was the amount of cocaine in blood. It still doesn´t make sense but, dunno.

 

[mailfrawd]

30kg child, 5000pg/mg not ml... you would have to have the child density to extrapolate consumption from there LOL. The math if everything is conserved and the coke is evenly distributed around the body and not metabolized at all in the hair is 150mg or 0,15g and people already claimed it is impossible to calculate because that´s not how it works.

Ok, so my prompt is incorrect (and I'm retarded, and perhaps so is GPT, but whatever). However, we're just trying to ballpark here, not get into criminal forensic level of details.

It's probably safe to say that this was more than just an incidental exposure (assuming this wasn't a lab screwup, which it probably wasn't).

 

[Owlbear]

OK you fucks. The ChatGPT spam made me angry, so I looked it up. Here's a good review article on how cocaine works:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032145/

They even have a section for poly-drug enthusiasts. Apparently the metabolism of cocaine is very different when it is used with alcohol. Cocaine metabolism has a lot of different paths, and the results are different. Many of the metabolites have a similar molecular weight to cocaine, but there are many different pathways here that make quantity hard to estimate.

The math if everything is conserved and the coke is evenly distributed around the body and not metabolized at all in the hair is 150mg or 0,15g and people already claimed it is impossible to calculate because that´s not how it works.

Metabolism happens in the liver and other organs, not in the hair, and then the metabolized products are moved around the body. Everything is not conserved during metabolism. It's also known to be unevenly distributed. So yes, if you make wrong assumptions, the calculation is easy.

If you assume all that, you get 150 mg of coke, but the confidence interval on that number is laughably large, and sadly leans toward the higher end.

 

[Desktop User2]

OK you fucks. The ChatGPT spam made me angry, so I looked it up. Here's a good review article on how cocaine works:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032145/

They even have a section for poly-drug enthusiasts. Apparently the metabolism of cocaine is very different when it is used with alcohol. Cocaine metabolism has a lot of different paths, and the results are different. Many of the metabolites have a similar molecular weight to cocaine, but there are many different pathways here that make quantity hard to estimate.

Metabolism happens in the liver and other organs, not in the hair, and then the metabolized products are moved around the body. Everything is not conserved during metabolism. It's also known to be unevenly distributed. So yes, if you make wrong assumptions, the calculation is easy.

If you assume all that, you get 150 mg of coke, but the confidence interval on that number is laughably large, and sadly leans toward the higher end.

The CPS report doesn´t help as well since they reported "Cocaine" concentration, just the parental drug. Isn´t it they reporting just the enzymatic test for brevity sake?

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

But why did Nick's daughter steal April's credit cards to make lines of coke on her dad's nightstand?

 

[Fapcop]

Charge him. Get info. Give him a plea deal. He has made enough self incriminating statements. It’s that simple.

Hmm… Yes, I’m sure the local prosecutor can’t wait to nail Aaron for all the crimes he did! Oh wait. That’s right… None of what he has admitted to is actually a prosecutable crime.

I respectfully disagree. According to Minnesota Criminal Code, Aaron would be considered a caregiver (see Sec. 609.376 MN Statutes). “Caretaker” means an individual who has responsibility for the care of a child as a result of a family relationship or who has assumed responsibility for all or a portion of the care of a child.

This is retarded.

I may not be a lawyer, but even I can tell that this is nonsense. Visiting a friend does not make you a “caretaker” nor does heating up a can of spaghettiOs mean that you’ve “assumed responsibility for the care of a child.”

You really should call the local prosecutor and explain your novel legal theory. The guy has been working hard, he certainly deserves a good chuckle.

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

@Kandinsky

Stay with me here. What you are talking about is neglect. Neglect is different from most crimes because it doesn't involve something you did, but rather something you failed to do.

In order to be guilty of neglect, you need to have a duty of care to the vulnerable person you neglected. Otherwise, I would be guilty of neglect if my neighbour is failing to feed his kid and I don't rush in there and feed the child. Here are some ways you can have a duty of care to a vulnerable person:
- The person is a child, and you are the parent.
- The person is a child, and you are a formal caregiver (e.g. daycare worker)
- The person is elderly and you are a nursing home employee.
- The person is seriously disabled and you are responsible for his daily needs.

Here are interactions that would generally not create a duty of care:
- The person is a child. You are a guest in the parent's home. You make the kids some lunch.
- Your neighbour is a disabled adult. You go over there and help him tidy up.

What is the difference? In the former, you have assumed responsibility for the vulnerable person, in whole or in part. In the latter, you've provided some temporary assistance.

I understand that you want this to be true and it makes sense to you. But when children are neglected, the state does not then prosecute every useless friend that the parents had over because they half-heartedly helped out.

 

[Lawltism]

Why do I get the feeling the people writing up these demented child sex predictions are all jilted parasocial former fans who were sending daddy his superberries when he was scoring dunks on Amber Hearst and Ron Toye but now they're upset because he didn't turn out to be the father figure they thought he was?

Nick was always a dumb smug alcoholic asshole, and now he just looks like a regular child-neglecting narc cokehead to anyone who isn't emotionally compromised.

While I don't want to limit anyone's speech, I think these idiots at least deserve for us to join together in calling them a stupid fag.

 

[AnotherPleb]

Bro are you stupid? We're talking about the trace molecules left in somebodies hair follicle months after they metabolised the shit, not the fat line she snorted in the first place.

Have you seen Nick's spindly arms? There's no way he could stop that 8 year old Tony Montana.

 

[AnOminous]

According to the code, Aaron would be considered a caregiver (see Sec. 609.376 MN Statutes – “Caretaker” means an individual who has responsibility for the care of a child as a result of a family relationship or who has assumed responsibility for all or a portion of the care of a child).

I think you'd need to do something more than open a can of Spaghetti-Os to become a caregiver.

Am I correct in my surmise that Nick is a nightmare client?

It depends what kind of lawyer. If you're a public defender or a flat fee lawyer, yes, obviously.

If you bill by the hour up front? Lawyers who defend this kind of client look at a Gumped out retard like Nick and just see a giant bag of money to be emptied into their bank account.

 

[Baldos Revenge]

that fucking body cam footage sure is taking a long time to be released..

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

that fucking body cam footage sure is taking a long time to be released..

If the Kandiyohi Machine was really trying to take Rekeita down the footage would've already been released.

 

[Mikoyan]

that fucking body cam footage sure is taking a long time to be released..

It was always going to take forever. That's how this stuff just goes.

 

[shaverinocory]

If the Kandiyohi Machine was really trying to take Rekeita down the footage would've already been released.

Shitwater counties take a LONG time to do anything. Everyone that is a county employee probably only works partial shifts 4 days a week and then gets fucked up the rest of the time.

 

[CertifiedFedBot]

How fucked up do you think he had to be to essentially admit to his 9-year old eating his coke on stream? I mean I'm glad he did, it makes child protective services job to relocate the kids to relatives easier but considering he is a lawyer it seems a pretty entry level fuck up.
I also think people aren't talking enough about the wife, there are two parents in that house and neither of them cared enough to hide the blow between cucking sessions? Any bets on if he'll fuck up his life even harder with intravenous injections or is nose candy Nick content with powders?

While I don't want to limit anyone's speech, I think these idiots at least deserve for us to join together in calling them a stupid fag.

Be careful when you admonish their masturbatory fantasies they get really uppity, especially the ones with lolicon pfps. They lose their ability to parse sentences.

 

[bad_ideas]

For everyone debating drug dosage and detection level in kids.
mg/kg is how drugs are dosed. pg/mg is how metabolites are measured in the hair. Both dosing and detection are already proportional to body weight.
A kid testing 10x the positive cutoff means they did the same proportion of drugs it would take an adult to test 10x the positive cutoff. AKA they have tolerance and are doing a shitload of coke.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

How fucked up do you think he had to be to essentially admit to his 9-year old eating his coke on stream? I mean I'm glad he did, it makes child protective services job to relocate the kids to relatives easier but considering he is a lawyer it seems a pretty entry level fuck up.

He's an idiot who claims to have a made up disorder that says he just HAAASS to be an asshole to people. It's a disorder, can't help it and telling him to improve or stop is just wrong of you.

His lawyer literally can't stop him from being a complete fucking moron. He should have demanded control over all of Racket's social media accounts as a condition of taking the case.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Before he became an internet personality he had his life pretty together though. It's when he started hanging out with certain characters and living internet cool guy lifestyle that shit went south, and quick.

He had his life put together, like being a bank teller for less than half a year, representing for a bunch of cases no one cared about, and zero employment history beyond that.
Sure.

>Juju and etc ruined his life
Sureeeeeeee. The grown man had no agency. Prior to his stupid streams, he wasn't fellating daddy daxipad in his Facebook group and he wasn't whining about racist Obama jokes. He didn't whine about his parents never exhibiting their sexual intercourse to him when he was young and he wasn't addicted to porn.

It's all Juju.

Be not forgetful of his lucrative days at Circuit City and Target!

 

[Raspy]

For everyone debating drug dosage and detection level in kids.
mg/kg is how drugs are dosed. pg/mg is how metabolites are measured in the hair. Both dosing and detection are already proportional to body weight.
A kid testing 10x the positive cutoff means they did the same proportion of drugs it would take an adult to test 10x the positive cutoff. AKA they have tolerance and are doing a shitload of coke.

The theory of the Baldo's using coke as ADHD "Medicine" more and more likely
When all you have is coke every problem looks like a opportunity