Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 24.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 79 30.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 83 32.2%

  • Total voters
    258
The Emergency Protective Care hearing on the children is as its name implies something that happens without any notice or generally time to prepare. Since its a family court hearing, they have to provide the parents with some reasonable opportunity to have legal representation. There is generally in the US system a constitutional right to attorney in a court proceeding. That right gets balanced in this situation against the fact that its an emergency hearing.
In this case the kids were removed on May 24. The hearing was originally set for May 28 but Balldos continued it. The hearing finally took place on June 7. That's more than enough time to hire someone.

The right to appointed counsel in child removal proceedings was only created by statute in Minnesota in 2021, before that poor parents were shit out of luck.
Screenshot_2024-07-13-13-15-35-68_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
In Nick's case, none of these attorneys would be free. He would have to pay them.
These were appointed panel attorneys. They put their name on a list and get appointed by the court in cases where the public defender doesn't handle that type of case, has a conflict, etc. They bill the state at some set hourly or case rate.

It's possible that the judge appointed them counsel and made the state pay for it regardless of their financial situation because judges can do whatever they want. But the code is black and white: the Balldos had no right to appointed counsel unless they qualified under the financial guidelines.
 
That makes no sense. Why would the neighbor decline to murder Kevin Spacey if he rapes the teenager?

Possible explanation: self-hating gay neighbor interprets not sleeping with the girl as confirmation that Lester is gay and had a relationship with his son (which upsets him for multiple reasons) and so pulls the trigger.

The thought process is likely that the neighbor who killed Lester was initially upset because he thought his son was in a gay relationship with Lester. Testing the waters for his own reasons, the neighbor tries to make a move on Lester and Lester declines. This would muddy the waters as to Lester's sexuality to the neighbor.

Lester not sleeping with the girl signals to the neighbor that Lester is gay, confirming the gay relationship with his son, angering the self-hating gay neighbor, leading him to pull the trigger.

Not saying the interpretation is correct or that it even makes sense. Just the most likely explanation if having sex with the girl would prevent his murder at the hands of the self-hating gay neighbor.

Wouldn't save him from other characters who wanted him dead though.

You guys are overthinking this. He likes the film because Mena Suvari is hot and you get to see her tits.

Anything else is him trying to make excuses for it, but he just likes Mena Suvari‘s tits.

He could just google a picture of them but he’s too much of a boomer to understand that, so he watches an entire film.

Nick certainly has a type.

In the clip below from November 2022, Nick and Kayla are discussing actor filmographies they want to see.

Kayla mentions Kevin Costner because he likes playing the good guy. Nick laughs and chooses Emma Stone (amateur, professional, and leaked stuff) and talks about watching a scene in the movie Easy A on repeat. The scene has Emma, playing a high schooler, walking at the pool and wearing a school uniform that is "3 sizes too small" and Nick thinks it is the hottest she has ever looked.



For reference, here is a picture of Emma in that scene where her character says that her outfit is "2 sizes too small" where her short shorts are trying to imply she has hips. The support for her chest is such that it looks like a shelf in the silliest way, tenting out from her body as her chest appears to be more bra than anything.

Smaller clothes are emphasizing her weaker aesthetic points thereby making her come across as a tryhard developing female (which the character is). Apparently, this is to Nick's tastes (so is the school uniform).

Easy A Pool.pngEasy A Pool shelf.png

Been learning more about Nick's ideal female: "slender white-girl body type". Given April's proportions (or lack thereof) it is becoming more understandable why Nick is attracted to her.

TL/DR: Nick's fixations seem to be telegraphing sexual frustration during his high school years in addition to something much worse.
 
The film really wanted to be about a middle-age guy discovering he is gay, losing any interest in his wife & family & suburban hetro life and then pedo creeping on a young boy only to be murdered by the boy's closeted father. But nobody would have funded a big-budget film like that (at least at that time).
Sounds like a retarded, more american version of Death in Venice lol
 
Guy was fucking savage and effective. Sadly, most criminal defendants are not that lucky
It was baffling to watch, hyper aggressive cross examine about absolutely fuck all for two days, using all the time up and boring everyone senseless. And then in the last 10 minutes, BOOM, some bullshit we sneaked past the retarded police department, case dismissed.
 
Himedall forever doomed to being misgendered and called a man when she (allegedly) is a (cis)woman.
And have her handle pronounced as Hime doll instead of He may doll

We all have our crosses to bear in life... It is oddly familiar situation because my family name is mispronounced all the time as well due to ambiguity as to where the stress should fall. It is a good Shibboleth for marketing agents and scammers on the telephone because legitimate institutions take the effort to get it correct.

All of Balldo's YouTube money is probably gone so in his name he's broke. In reality, trust fund got him covered for life.

I lean in that direction as well, but the fact that he has limited bills (i.e. no mortgage or student loans) AND the trust from his parents means we will probably never know for sure. I think we can say that he certainly does NOT have the disposable income he once did.

2023 might have been his most successful year in his life--never to be repeated. How many holidays did he take? 8? He was gone for weeks at a time and missed streaming even his drunken panel streams of degeneracy.
 
We all have our crosses to bear in life... It is oddly familiar situation because my family name is mispronounced all the time as well due to ambiguity as to where the stress should fall. It is a good Shibboleth for marketing agents and scammers on the telephone because legitimate institutions take the effort to get it correct.



I lean in that direction as well, but the fact that he has limited bills (i.e. no mortgage or student loans) AND the trust from his parents means we will probably never know for sure. I think we can say that he certainly does NOT have the disposable income he once did.

2023 might have been his most successful year in his life--never to be repeated. How many holidays did he take? 8? He was gone for weeks at a time and missed streaming even his drunken panel streams of degeneracy.
We might find out when the movie comes out. We will probably get movies about internet retards (like That guy with the glasses) in the 2030s. Like Queen documentaries/ movies for our Gen.
 
American Beauty was written by a very gay guy who hates hetrosexuality, hetrosexual relationships, hetrosexual families and has a death obsession. If you want to really understand the motivations and the ideas behind the film, replace Mena Suvari's character with a young boy. Probably the "Ricky" character because the Ricky character is a self-insert for young Alan Ball (the writer) and his relationship with his own closeted gay father.

The film really wanted to be about a middle-age guy discovering he is gay, losing any interest in his wife & family & suburban hetro life and then pedo creeping on a young boy only to be murdered by the boy's closeted father. But nobody would have funded a big-budget film like that (at least at that time).
And Nick Rekieta is an extremely gay man who obsesses over penises and anuses, has gay sex with his bulls like Aaron, prances around naked at the gay bar covered in glitter, and visits gay bays in the sodomy barn. Of course he likes this movie.
Been learning more about Nick's ideal female: "slender white-girl body type". Given April's proportions (or lack thereof) it is becoming more understandable why Nick is attracted to her.
Then why did Nick solicit all the ass/boob pics from fat out of shape crusty wine moms?
 
Been learning more about Nick's ideal female: "slender white-girl body type". Given April's proportions (or lack thereof) it is becoming more understandable why Nick is attracted to her.

TL/DR: Nick's fixations seem to be telegraphing sexual frustration during his high school years in addition to something much worse.
I still think he has some kind of underlying homosexual tendencies, possibly even some tranny ideation, which the Sailor Goon incident lends at least some credibility too. He fits the histrionic narc profile of a gay man, seldom have I seen fully straight men act like him.

Gay men tend to idealize boyishly built women with minimal secondary sex characteristics. The entire fashion industry is founded on it. To me I think it's very likely with Nick that he wants male company and opening the marriage put that possibility on the table. I think once he brought in all the degenerate sex acts and situations, it upped the threshold for what he could wave off and funny and weird, without coming out as gay or bi.

Aaron would never confirm if anything gay happened between them so that confirmation unfortunately is not available.
 
Okay, which one of you did this
(apologies if posted already)
I was not ready for the Gunt to have Boogies used car salesman tier teeth.
That was fucking horrifying.
Nick certainly has a type.
Mena Suvari looks about 16 in that movie. Thora Birch was 16 when they filmed American Beauty.
Thats around my daughters age ffs.
Nicks only a couple years younger than me.
Its fucking weird. He's a fucking total creep.
Guys in his 40's creeping on teenage girls.
 
Last edited:
Is this the straight version of 2M-1F 'not gay if the balls don't touch' cope logic for porn?

Not porn if it is in an artsy media setting.
As long as there's a woman 2M-1F isn't gay. Some incidental contact of cock and balls touching is bound to happen. As long as both penises are going into a female orifice its ok. Preferably separate female orifices and not sandwiched together in the same orifice. A penis panini is never good.
 
The latest document from @MNPublicRecords confirms something that was obvious but flew under the radar. Dawn Weber and John Mueller, the Balldos attorneys in the Emergency Protective Care (EPC) proceeding were court appointed.
It's possible that the judge appointed them counsel and made the state pay for it regardless of their financial situation because judges can do whatever they want. But the code is black and white: the Balldos had no right to appointed counsel unless they qualified under the financial guidelines.
The order assigning them the attorneys is dated May 24. They were arrested on May 23 and arraigned and released the next day, so this would have been either when they were still in jail or just after being released.

I also noticed that the order appointing the attorneys was also signed by the same person who on the same day presided over Nick and Kayla's arraignment. It's possible that with the CHIPS case he was concerned about the insane lunatic Balldoman also wanting to represent himself and his wife and appointed separate counsel to prevent this from occurring. At the arraignment Nick stated his intent to represent himself and his co-defendant wife as well as his live-in girlfriend who he thought was a co-defendant but charges were already dropped, even though this was clearly not ethically permissible due to the inherent conflict of interest at play.
 
Himedall forever doomed to being misgendered and called a man when she (allegedly) is a (cis)woman.
Himedall is a computer virus. Nick clicked on Waifu.png when looking at old lady porn in his Locals, it made it all disappear, and that's when he complained to Josh about it.

It also turned all American speak on his computer into British speak.
 
Last edited:
Here:


Incidentally, I disagreed with @soy_king's opinion at the time, and still do. I don't think Rekieta entrapped Tonka. I think he gave Tonka a lot of rope, and the dumb injun hanged himself with it. It was rather masterful, and convinced a lot of people he might be a good lawyer. Even @soy_king changed his opinion later, IIRC.

Not everything the man did has to be retroactively judged as dogshit.

It's just a pity we didn't know then what we know now.
I just logged in today after months being off here, and no, I still think the Tonka entrapment was real. If you look at the video and you see Rekieta winking at the camera when it happens, he knows what's up. He decided to pull an internet Jerry Springer, but unlike Jerry Springer, Rekieta always pretended that he was a virtuous Christian when he was so clearly not, which is the worst type of religious person.

I think I stopped arguing because I wasn't going to change people's minds at the time and it got too exhausting, but I'm kinda glad I got vindicated about how much of a piece of shit Rekieta is. Shame about his kids, I hope they're ok.
 
to be fair, why would he spend money on trying to get his children back when he can spend it on things he actually cares about like coke and hookers?
Or paying out the ass to Randazza, all so his ego doesn't have to be wounded from admitting he said a very vile and untrue thing.

"Explain this to me SEAN. Why do the kiwis complain when I don't feed my kids, then they complain when I feed them cocaine?! Tell me SEAN I know you know!"
ANSWER THE QUESTION SEAN!!!

While I generally agree, Nick's great win in Rittenhouse and Depp (to a lesser extent, other trials) was bringing in insightful and well-practiced lawyers who could comment on the happenings. Nick on his own wasn't that insightful, and only entertaining in cases when there were obvious jokes or charismatic witnesses (as in Depp). Trials are long, often are boring, and a panel is a good way to cut through the dead air. That most of them were only clout-chasing demons was irrelevant, the super berries went to Nick.
I agree. Two points that need to be highlighted here:

1. Nick has no actual intrinsic talent that allowed him to do what he did. He wasn't terribly insightful himself during any of his trial streams. He was just lucky in that he had a biggest channel, and other members of Lawtube were happy to join his panel shows for the exposure.

With that in mind, nearly any member of Lawtube can now do what he did and reap the financial and viewership benefits as he did.

2. He's only gotten worse since then. Way worse. To the point I think he would make most panels outright uncomfortable. I don't think anybody really wants to hear the equivalent of Maya diaper fetish jokes during the serious portions of the Baldwin trial. They more likely want decent legal analysis that is educational in nature (occasional irreverence is fine).

Sean and his panel, I think, did a pretty good job the other day. More like that, and I could see Sean being close to where Rekieta was at years ago.

That makes no sense. Why would the neighbor decline to murder Kevin Spacey if he rapes the teenager?
Bro, it's Nick. It doesn't make sense because his brain is fried.
 
I remember Nick saying multiple times his favorite pornstar is Kenzie Reeves. I will leave that to you to google.
I am not going to claim i didn't hand wave it away but the fact he had a favorite porn star was a wtf moment for me when it came to Nick. That is something i thought was just a bad tv and movie trope. In my life i have never had the need to know porn star names let alone have a favorite.
 
I remember Nick saying multiple times his favorite pornstar is Kenzie Reeves. I will leave that to you to google.
I really wish I didn’t look up who that is. She doesn’t have an attractive face, she has shitty tattoos, one on her chest the other is a half finished dreamcatcher coverup on her thigh and labia in her asshole. 🤮
 
Last edited:
Back