Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 73 10.8%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 96 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.0%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.0%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 70 10.4%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    674
Looking for help with my Kayla project from kiwi farmers with experience making AI covers of songs using voice samples. If you are such a farmer (or know of any), please DM me indicating your interest (or recommendation of who I should reach out to).

I know what I want and can provide voice samples if needed, but am open to creative input. DMs are being used to keep it a surprise for when the post is finished. I do plan to include all submissions in some form in the post (within reason and with the creator's permission) to showcase the creativity of KF.

This is not integral to the project and there is no rush to complete it. To give interested parties an idea, I am approaching the midway point of approximately 200 pieces of media (mostly clips). This is looking to be much larger than the Drexel OP. I will try to trim it down as much as possible, but no promises.
 
Pages 5-8. I've switched to Notepad++ so I can use a darker theme due to eyestrain and to use multiple views for ease of copying/pasting/editing mostly repeated sections. Hopefully there are no errors remaining from my Replace All operations.

Page 8 was especially bad for legibility. Puzzling out some of the words in the second half of that page was a true challenge.
Pages 9-15. I did not transcribe a few things I felt were not significant to discussion here. If you really want to see who the kid's doctor is or the current caseworkers, the raw document is still there.

I've also already found some errors in things I transcribed before, and fixed some of the illegible notations with the correct text. I am still open to corrections, just message me or post it to my profile so we do not shit up the thread with sperging about edits. I will probably compile this document's text later tonight and post it in its entirety.

The ADHD medication name was very difficult to read, but I think I have the correct one.

I am not sure if I will do the other documents in their entirety if they are largely the same as this. Maybe I will just transcribe portions that significantly differ. I haven't looked at them yet.

Page 9:
Services Provided to Parent or Custodian

Based on the most current assessment of the parent's needs, select any applicable or identified areas of need, and if known, list the name of the current or possible service providers as well as the status of the service:
(Select all that apply)
Current Needs | Specific Service Provider(s) | Status of Service
Participation in Family Group Decision Making | (Safety Meetings) KCHHS | Currently participating
Mental health services | TBD | Not completed
Chemical health assessment | TBD | Not completed
Further explanation of reasonable/active efforts | Supervised Visitation at KCHHS or Harmony Visitation Center | Currently participating


Support and Services for Child Detail
What are the child's identified safety, well-being, and permanency needs while in out-of-home placement?
The child is in need of a home that is free from all drugs not prescribed to them and care givers and household members that are not under the influence or using drugs in the home. The child also needs to attend any medical and educational appointments.

What specific services, programs, and supports will the child participate in to meet their safety, well-being, and permanency needs? Include the agency's reasonable or active efforts to locate and utilize culturally and tribally appropriate services:
-Supervised Visitation
-Court
-Safety planning meetings
-Church

What reasonable or active efforts will the agency make to support the child's ability to engage and participate in services?
-Case planning
-Supervised Visitation
-Transportation help

How frequently will the child's participation in services be reviewed to ensure their safety and well-being needs are appropriately met and that adequate progress is made towards timely permanency?
Formally every 6 months and informally every visit.

Services Provided to Child
Based on the most current assessment of the child's needs, select any applicable or identified areas of need, and if known, list the names of the current or tentative service providers, as well as the status of the service:
(Select all that apply)
Current Needs | Specific Service Provider(s) | Status of Service
Child development assessment | PSC | Not completed
Establishing and maintaining connections | Supervised visitation (KCHHS or Harmony Visitation Center) | Currently participating

Page 10:

Support and Services for Foster Providers Detail
(Includes both foster homes and facilities)
What are the needs of the foster care provider(s) related to supporting placement stability and ensuring the child's safety, well-being, and permanency needs are met while in out-of-home placement?
Shelter 1 has not identified any needs to assist with the child's safety or wellbeing. The agency will be making referrals to any services that may be needed and assist with supervised visitation and transportation as needed.

What specific services, programs, and supports will be provided to the foster care provider to ensure their ability to meet the child's safety, well-being, and permanency needs? Include the agency's reasonable or active efforts to locate and utilize culturally and tribally appropriate services:
-Monthly foster care payments
-Foster care licensing

What will the agency do to support the foster care provider's ability to engage and participate in services?
The agency will have at least monthly contact with Shelter 1 regarding any services or help that may be needed.

How frequently will their participation in services be reviewed to ensure the child's safety and well-being needs are appropriately met and adequate progress is being made towards timely permanency?
Progress will be reviewed every month during home visits.

Services Provided for Foster Care Providers
Based on the most currents assessment of the foster care provider's needs, select any applicable or identified areas of need, and if known, list the names of the current or tentative service providers, as well as the status of the services. This may include the foster care provider's own respective needs, as well as services needed to support their ability to meet the child's needs while the child is in out-of-home placement:
(Select all that apply)
Current Needs | Specific Service Provider(s) | Status of Service
Monthly caseworker visits | KCHHS | Currently participating

Supportive and Important Relationships and Connections
What are the relationships to establish, maintain, and support between the child and their parents, legal guardians, relatives, members of their tribe, other important people who are considered family members, and other committed adults:
(Select all that apply)
*Child has a relationship with a birth parent or legal guardian where continuing contact is needed
*Child has sibling(s) living in the same home
*Child has a relationship with a birth relative, kin, or other important person where continuing contact is needed
*Child has a positive relationship with their current foster care provider

Specifically describe how the foster care provider supports contact with the birth family and other people important to the child:
Shelter 1 has coordinated for the children to spend time with [redacted] Shelter 1 is also supportive of visitation with Mr. And Mrs. Rekieta and is willing to supervise visitation.

To assist with supporting and preserving this child's relationships and connections to their parents, siblings and relatives, and other important people, the agency:
*Shall maintain visitation between the child and their parents, their siblings, or their other relatives in order to support preserved relationships.

Page 11:
Visitation Status and Plan
Detail individuals with whom the child may have an existing important relationship or with whom the child would like to establish a relationship who may have contact and/or visit with the child, This may include, but is not limited to, the child's minor or adult siblings and relatives, including non-biological relatives/kin and/or either individuals with whom the child has lived or has a significant relationship as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 260C.007.

Detail who will visit the child, the frequency of the visits, where the visits will take place, the transportation plan for the child and the visitor, and if needed due to safety and/or well-being concerns, who will supervise the visits:
Visitor/Contact | Contact Type | Location | Supervised?
Relationship | Frequency | Transportation Plan | Supervisor
[redacted] | In person, phone | At their home or foster parents home | No
[redacted] | TBD | TBD | N/A
Nick and Kayla Rekieta | In person, zoom, phone |Agency or Harmony Visitation Center | Yes
Parents | (In person) 1-2x/week | Foster Parents | KCHHS or Harmony Visitation Center

If the agency has identified safety concerns about specific individuals with whom the child has an important relationship and contact and/or visitation is determined to be in the child's best interests, with appropriate conditions, detail the specific concerns for each individual and the agency's efforts to support an appropriate level of contact and/or visitation that adequately maintains the child's safety and well-being:
The agency has concerns regarding the drugs found in the home around the children and that the children would be endangered when sobriety isn't established.

Health Care Providers
Medical Providers
[Not transcribing this because it is not significant to discussion here, one physician (probably primary care or pediatrician) is listed]

Health Status
(Select all that apply)
*Screening identified no physical health needs and child only requires routine care and follow-up
*Screening identified no dental health needs and child only requires routine care and follow-up
*Screening identified no vision needs and child only requires routine care and follow-up
*Screening identified no hearing needs and child only requires routine care and follow-up
*Screening identified no need for mental health services
*Has no known allergies

Allergies or medical problems
*Takes medication for ADHD

Specifically describe the child's medical (physical, vision, hearing), dental, mental, and chemical health care. Include information about the selected areas of health needs, the frequency of care or required interventions or treatments:
The child only requires regular medical appointments.

Page 12:
Immunization and Medication Information
Immunization Record
Child is current on all age-recommended immunizations? Yes
Agency has a copy of the child's immunization record? Yes
Medication
Is the child prescribed psychotropic medication? Yes
If yes, how many psychotropic medications is the child taking concurrently: 1
Provide detail regarding the child's medication, including the type/name, dosage, and frequency: Prescribed Methylphenidate
Summarize the plan to ensure oversight of prescription medication for mental or behavioral health issues, including ensuring a foster child is seen regularly by a physician and regular follow up with the foster parents/caregivers and foster child about administering medication appropriately and the child's experience (possible side effects) with the medication:
Shelter 1 will administer the medications for the child and will participate in any medical appointments for the child. Shelter 1 will ensure that the children are taking all prescribed medications on time and as prescribed by following the instructions on the medicine container.

Education Detail
Education Status
(Select all that apply)
*Other setting
Describe the alternative education setting and plan:
The parents home school the children.

Permanency Plan
Length of Time in Foster Care
Statewide cumulative placement: 11
Days in current continuous placement: 11
Primary Permanency Plan
Plan Name: Reunify with parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
Plan established date: 05/23/2024
Concurrent Permanency Plan
Plan Name: Not yet determined
Plan established date: 05/23/2024
Describe the agency's reasonable or active efforts to involve the child, parent(s), siblings, relatives and extended family, and tribe in developing an appropriate permanency plan:
The agency has started a relative search and the children are placed in a concurrent relative placement.

Page 13:

Monthly Caseworker Visitation Plan
Detail the plan for who will be responsible for conducting monthly visits with the child/youth to ensure their safety, well-being and permanency needs are met while in placement. This includes both agency caseworkers AND, if applicable, another person from a separate agency whom the responsible social services agency has designated to be responsible for monthly caseworker visits:

[Two Agents listed from KCHHS, not Aleisha Sweep, I am not sure they are significant to discussion]

Page 14:
[blank]

Page 15:
[Signature Setup form with Nick, Kayla, the Guardian ad litem, Foster care provider, caseworkers and their supervisor listed]
 
After careful inspection of Minnesota court rules, I have no clear evidence that taking pictures of the public terminals is a rules violation. The court itself is prohibited from making the documents remotely accessible but can give copies out.

Part of keeping the records accessible only on the terminals or by making a copy request is to prevent mass scraping. The case of someone posting it to the Internet isn't really what the rules are trying to stop. In fact, the court can open a case to remote access if it gets enough requests by the public because the court doesn't want to become burdened by a high profile case.

(As an aside, part of the reasoning to prevent scraping is to avoid people NOTICING what groups are committing crimes.)

However, it was also clear that posting the document containing the mandatory and volunteer reporters' names was against the rules. In case anyone had doubts.
 
So Rekieta has made his Locals free for 2 months. Looks like he is getting desperate to regain some of that old income - if I remember right the only reason his locals popped off was because he gave a free year?
He lied about the locals gift but more than that, what's the point? his locals is a joke, like Spoony's patreon, people will keep supporting him but they'll barely get any new streams, and even those streams are the most low effort that Nick has ever done. Standing in a kitchen and eating, seething and coping while making excuses for his life, talking about butter dishes and bullshit that no one cares about. It's fun for us (because it makes him easier to mock) but it can't be fun for the people who still like him.
 
Spoony's patreon
I've thought about this too. For those not in the know, Noah Antwiler aka The Spoony One spent years producing literally nothing but screaming on Twitter about Trump and his hatred for Christmas trees. He still made several hundred a month on his patreon from a handful of spergs convinced he was going to review Final Fantasy XV any day now.

Nick's probably going to end up in the same situation, locals members convinced the evil liberals running Minnesota were out to get their based lawyer man.
 
I'm surprised nobody mentioned it but it appears the next review date noted on the documents is in late November!

While I can't speak to MN, children in custody in my state wouldn't be able to return to their parents until AFTER the review date noted.

I've never heard of a review being completed ahead of schedule UNLESS there is an issue with the placement. Even then, that review would be specific to the placement issues, and they wouldn't place the kids back with their parents until the parental review is conducted...

So looks like Nick won't have to parent his kids 24/7 until Thanksgiving or later...
 
I'm surprised nobody mentioned it but it appears the next review date noted on the documents is in late November!

While I can't speak to MN, children in custody in my state wouldn't be able to return to their parents until AFTER the review date noted.

I've never heard of a review being completed ahead of schedule UNLESS there is an issue with the placement. Even then, that review would be specific to the placement issues, and they wouldn't place the kids back with their parents until the parental review is conducted...

So looks like Nick won't have to parent his kids 24/7 until Thanksgiving or later...
They probably could have moved it along faster if Nick would admit to doing drugs and cooperate with the process, but since he refuses to "incriminate himself" the CPS knows nothing can be done until after he's convicted of possession.
 
Imagine how much money he'd be raking in from super chats talking about the Trump assassination attempt.
Probably not that much, TBH. Though maybe a few hundred bucks from the super faithful. More than the pittance he's been getting for months.

I think some people don't realize we're way beyond the point where he can simply go back to what he did before. His reputation is shattered, his brain is fried.

Why would you watch his retarded coked-up ass these days for anything news related instead of... well, pretty much anybody else? Sean seemed to do a reasonably good job. I am sure others did so as well.

It would be like unironically watching Ethan Ralph for news commentary in 2024.

And like Ralph, Nick is not going to regain his former glory. That ship has sailed. He blew it.

Lawcow dream team tonight

View attachment 6198828
I am surprised it took him this long to have Barnes on considering Barnes is his biggest propagandist in the criminal case.

Let the propaganda commence!

My kingdom for Sean to streamsnipe this.
This. I think he'd genuinely wreck Barnes's shit, and make it funny.

Andrew has kinda done it, but criminal law isn't his thing, where it is for Sean.
 
I'm surprised nobody mentioned it but it appears the next review date noted on the documents is in late November!
Timeline makes sense for MN rules on CHIPs. Progress hearing has to be done with 6 months. Attached is their timeline for CHIPs cases.
 

Attachments

IMG_7560.jpeg

What did he mean by this?

Tweet / archive

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Attempting to decipher the bizarre tweets yesterday could benefit from some context: if that 4:23 timestamp in your screenshot is Nick's timezone (or anything close), then it would have been shortly after leaving his CHIPS pretrial hearing with Judge Hanson (no longer Helgeson) at 3:00 PM CST yesterday. The seemingly spiraling tone of the tweets makes one wonder if perhaps that hearing didn't go very well for him, so let's take a look at exactly what Nick tried to accomplish there, shall we?

Apparently, at 3:43 PM on Friday just one business day before the hearing with little chance for the state to respond, and with no affidavits building a record or even so much as a proposed order, Nick's crack legal team slipped in a motion revealing that after the Rekietas took those oft-mentioned May hair follicle tests and then oddly revoked MMI's consent to disclose those tests' results to any state agency, the Guardian ad Litem (GAL) somehow managed to get her hands on those results anyway and also gave them to other parties. Because the Rekietas apparently took those May hair follicle tests at the suggestion of their then-counsel, the motion cites to "attorney work product doctrine" to beg the judge to deem those test results inadmissible as evidence and also order all parties to never ever ever speak of them again. Oh, and the motion also asked that the GAL be fired for her dastardly deeds obtaining that highly relevant information in the first place. Anybody want to hazard a guess as to why Nick would try so very hard to suppress those test results if they came back negative?

As you'll see from the motion, Nick also appears to think he's done more than enough work on his case plans for the judge to simply order that the kids can move back in ASAP, or at least order that the grandparents and children can all move into Nick's home, which would seem pretty crowded unless that plan would include Nick and Kayla simultaneously moving over to April's house or elsewhere. Nick's also apparently seething enough for the motion to yet again ask the judge to unilaterally order the presumptively public case file to be made confidential across the board because he's such a grandiose "public figure" deserving special treatment, even though a judge already refused the same request weeks ago (in a denial previously on here at Post #111,393) and had deferred that issue to a motion and hearing that's already been scheduled to August 9th.

The result? Sadly there's still no written order as yet and it's possible that there was only a ruling from the bench or various things taken under advisement, but as you'll see in the attached, it at least doesn't seem like Judge Hanson agreed to firing the GAL so far, as she followed up with filing her trial exhibit list later in the afternoon than the hearing. It also doesn't seem like Judge Hanson agreed to exclude the May hair test results either, as the GAL's filing later that afternoon planned to introduce the results at trial. Nor does it seem like Judge Hanson was very receptive to the idea of returning the kids to the parental home immediately, and instead the trial was simply postponed from late July to late August for some reason. Nor does it seem like Judge Hanson agreed to unilaterally seal the file this time around either, because we're still sitting here looking at it. Better luck next time, Nick!

Going to guess Nick was at least periodically helping himself to their meds.

I'll leave it to the few lab geeks ITT to elaborate, but the most common test panels that would detect adderall, dexedrine, vyvanse, etc. don't ordinarily detect ritalin, so we can only speculate. Of course, Nick could just as easily put an end to any baseless speculation in that regard by simply going on stream to own the haters by walking us through his surely negative hair test results once and for all, rather than publicly begging a judge to bury them. How does someone supposedly so ensconced in internet culture as Nick somehow behave in a manner so oblivious to the Streisand Effect?
 

Attachments

  • Sweepitupjanny.jpg
    Sweepitupjanny.jpg
    482.7 KB · Views: 109
I used to be excited to see Nick was streaming because it meant he'd say crazy shit and give us funny clips. Now it's exciting to see whether or not there's going to be another based documents drop on his punk ass.
 
As you'll see from the motion, Nick also appears to think he's done more than enough work on his case plans for the judge to simply order that the kids can move back in ASAP, or at least order that the grandparents and children can all move into Nick's home, which would seem pretty crowded unless that plan would include Nick and Kayla simultaneously moving over to April's house or elsewhere.
🍺:really:
Your honour, I moved all my liquor and snow out of the house (to the one my concubine occupies) and I've been sober for, anyway. Gimme them keedz back.

Before anyone asks, a hair follicle test can detect methylphenidate and won't confuse it with cocaine &/or metabolites associated with it.
 
So looks like Nick won't have to parent his kids 24/7 until Thanksgiving or later...
This is good considering he obviously hates his KEEEEEEEDS and the worst part of his life is that he sometimes had to drive them around. MUH KEEEEDS I had to drive them around after midnight to get MUH COCAINE!.

It was a very bad time for poor Nick to have to drive HEEZ KEEDZ around at 3 in the morning to their cello recitals or whatever in St. Paul.
 
Back