Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 24.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 79 30.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 83 32.2%

  • Total voters
    258
Ok, bad choice. Qayla? Barnes could roleplay as the Grand Nagus, she could be the dabo girl, and they could LARP as guests at a Betazoid wedding. Oh shit. I need a lobotomy. That was entirely too much Trek that I recalled.
> :feels: by Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears
User name checks out.
Personally I’d cast Kayla as one of those lady Klingons.

IMG_7596.jpeg
 
NGL, the leaker would be more effective at fucking with Nick if he dropped them as soon as Nick goes on or like within 5 mins of the start time
Dude, that's literally what he's doing.
Its been a few hours before, i thought
It varies, I think.

I do agree it might be funny if, next time, @MNPublicRecords / @MNPublicRecords2 followed your suggestion though.

I thought Null mentioned why he’s going for the body cam footage when hr first announced the mission: to see the condition of Nick’s house. And Nick can just consent to the footage being released.
He did, but Barnes doesn't care about the truth. He's running retarded damage control. That involves disparaging the Farms.

This is so because, clearly marked speculation aside, the Farms is far more truthful than he is.

In terms of public relations, the release of the body came footage is very much in Nick's own interests. I suspect what is in the footage will never live up to what people imagine is in the footage. If the house is not in as bad shape as people expect and the state of things is not as bad as they expect, that would only tend to help the public view of him and his case.
I am personally less interested in the condition of the house, and more interested his behavior. The report suggested he lost his shit at several points. Including throwing the warrant on the ground.
 
I am personally less interested in the condition of the house, and more interested his behavior. The report suggested he lost his shit at several points. Including throwing the warrant on the ground.
I want to watch this noodle man, this skinny alchie in his cuckold shirt and half finished snek tattoo, have a total bitchfit that leads to him getting his door rammed in.
Why?
Because I find it amusing.
 
I want to watch this noodle man, this skinny alchie in his cuckold shirt and half finished snek tattoo, have a total bitchfit that leads to him getting his door rammed in.
Why?
Because I find it amusing.
When Nick goes to jail. I'd like a livestream where we can watch nick in his cell. And send TTS messages to him for a small fee that would go to his children.
 
Anyone think Father of the Year could have worked much harder than that to get his kids back sooner?
Much harder. It’s clear from the last two info-drops that the current plan is to attack the lab that did the hair testing. Nick is requesting curriculum vitae (a career summary, think of a resume synopsis,) for all technicians involved in the testing, as well as his other obnoxious requests. Obnoxious meaning just that, compared to owning up to his crimes & potentially having his kids back home asap, maybe even by now. Instead, Nick is trying to create some spectacle, refusing to comply with a simple test, home tour, and getting his children home, in favor of partying and spending all his time on his own online reputation.

Hell, he even has time to spend on spinning lies about other’s reputations, such as Null, Kiwi Farms, ex-lawtube peers, public employees unfortunate enough to be assigned his case (that Sweep lady,) & other faultily perceived enemies. Nick Rekieta has demonstrated that getting his children back in a timely manner (in the least disruptive way to the children’s lives) is not even a ranking priority for him. It’s not even on his To Do list based on what he spends his time doing when streaming since his arrest. Basing that on his own words & actions. He sure does have plenty of time to drink mystery beverages from his 40 Oz pewter mug while acting as a yes-man for Barnes (who is not even his lawyer,) as Barnes fantasizes about Ol Balldo’s perceived enemies on a late night livestream.

Nick is surely trying hard, though not for his five children.
 
The whole Barnes vs Jewsh situation seems kind of sussy to me. Barnes only started being a dick to Josh once the Rekieta stuff started. And Barnes is washing Rekietas balls so aggressively that he might as well be his acting lawyer. Feels like Barnes is being used as an attack dog to damage Joshes/kiwifarms reputation at the behest of Rekieta. They're both lawyers and know shit talking a client isn't acceptable so I have no choice but to assume its intentional and that a bar complaint / lawsuit is desired. My theory is that Rekieta wants a lawsuit to happen because theres something he can get from Josh, such as the removal of his thread in exchange for settling the suit to stop bleeding Josh dry. Rekieta was definietly trying to out-money Monte so I don't see why he woulden't do it again. He would probally try to press the issue that court documents are being leaked here as an attack vector. Or maybe Barnes is just a fat retard and this is just another theory. A skitzo theory.
That was basically the strategy during the Vic lawsuit except Nick was in the attack dog role with failed attorney Ty Beard in the passive role. Nick alluded to it a bit that the purpose behind the constant coverage of Ron, Monica, Marchie, etc. was to illicit a response. Maybe he was hoping to get them upset and get then to act in any unprofessional way that could be used in court to bolster the case. Nick was being fed information from the court that nobody should have been able to obtain otherwise, likely from Ty and rebroadcasting it to upset the opposing counsel and clients.

This is the same playbook in some regards except Nick is in a lot weaker position and the information coming out now further taints his credibility with each release.

Barnes is going to ruin this grift he's been building by latching on to David Freiheit like a lamprey and using this sphere as a money raising scheme for his Free America Law Center. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...aw-center-falc-to-combat-free-speech-threats/

If you hitch your reputation to Nick and he gets convicted in court of anything that can be interpreted as child abuse while being on coke you are going to watch your donations for your gay legal fund dry up from people horrified you defended this for Internet clout. As it stands right now I would never consider donating to Barnes and would advise anybody else against it as well.
 
That was basically the strategy during the Vic lawsuit except Nick was in the attack dog role with failed attorney Ty Beard in the passive role. Nick alluded to it a bit that the purpose behind the constant coverage of Ron, Monica, Marchie, etc. was to illicit a response. Maybe he was hoping to get them upset and get then to act in any unprofessional way that could be used in court to bolster the case. Nick was being fed information from the court that nobody should have been able to obtain otherwise, likely from Ty and rebroadcasting it to upset the opposing counsel and clients.

This is the same playbook in some regards except Nick is in a lot weaker position and the information coming out now further taints his credibility with each release.
Nick acts closer to Ron Toye who was known for refusing to talk (including whenever he'd show up here) about his take on the Vic situation beside how "the truth will come out" and he will tell "his and Monica's truth" once the lawsuit was over (to this day he still never has). It's really uncanny the way he dodges the simplest questions in exactly the same way Ron does. I hope one of several lawyers who will take a deposition from him ask Ty Beard's opening question to Ron Toye "Are you a pedophile?" Monty's lawyer should do it IMO.

Really, think of how sad that is. Nick built his career on trashing that creepy wife beating cuck and it turns out Nick was far, far worse in terms of both how he's a cuck and how he treats his family.
Barnes is going to ruin this grift he's been building by latching on to David Freiheit like a lamprey and using this sphere as a money raising scheme for his Free America Law Center. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...aw-center-falc-to-combat-free-speech-threats/

If you hitch your reputation to Nick and he gets convicted in court of anything that can be interpreted as child abuse while being on coke you are going to watch your donations for your gay legal fund dry up from people horrified you defended this for Internet clout. As it stands right now I would never consider donating to Barnes and would advise anybody else against it as well.
Is Nick actually being funded by this? What does a dispute over evidence admissibility have to do with free speech? We already know that Nick is a junkie addicted to cocaine in addition to MDMA, alcohol, and other substances. That won't change if his charges get dismissed on a technicality. I can't think of a more unsympathetic person to be defending than Nick Rekieta. Even if you're a true and honest Article 4 Free Inhabitant, why would you want some rich asshole to get all of Barnes's attention instead of some normie hauled into an admiralty court under the gold-fringed flag for travelling?
 
Is Nick actually being funded by this?
I'm going to say I doubt he is. This is Barnes grift he cooked up and started promoting when he began streaming with Viva. He started this then a few months later in the same year he would start his weekly streams with Viva. I assume the donation stream to his law center were not coming in initially so he began his entry point into the lawtube sphere to gain more audience and donators. Here is episode one of the Viva Barnes Live
My speculation is this is separate but Barnes relies on the YouTube audience he's been building to support it financially. I see his support of Nick as wholly self serving. He probably doesn't truly care beyond funding his pet project. I just think he will torpedo the momentum he's built on this project by latching himself to Rekieta.
 
When Nick goes to jail. I'd like a livestream where we can watch nick in his cell. And send TTS messages to him for a small fee that would go to his children.
Nick would actually love that. He's a narcissist. As long as he any kind of attention it will feed his ego.

Being cut off from the internet and his legion of simps for a high number of months or years is what he actually fears. He will be told when he must wake up, when he must go to sleep, what chores he must do. His trust fund, his polycule, and all his e-fame won't mean shit except for having a fully loaded commissary balance. In prison the commissary balance means he'll be just another inmate waiting in line for the same overpriced bag of pretzels or microwave burrito.

His youtube/locals fans, desperate for their next dopamine hit will move on to their next e-daddy. Nick Rekieta won't be able to tell them daily that he is an innocent God fearing man. They will eventually come to their senses and realize that he actually was a drugged up, lying, child neglecting POS all along. When he gets released and comes back to youtube, most of the audience will be gone. They moved on with their lives and don't need him anymore.

This is the point where Nick will actually hit rock bottom. He could actually grow at this point into a functional human being and see the value of his family instead of chasing sex, drugs, and e-fame, or he could simply neck himself.
 
Much harder. It’s clear from the last two info-drops that the current plan is to attack the lab that did the hair testing. Nick is requesting curriculum vitae (a career summary, think of a resume synopsis,) for all technicians involved in the testing, as well as his other obnoxious requests. Obnoxious meaning just that, compared to owning up to his crimes & potentially having his kids back home asap, maybe even by now. Instead, Nick is trying to create some spectacle, refusing to comply with a simple test, home tour, and getting his children home, in favor of partying and spending all his time on his own online reputation.

Nick is trying to be petty and make as big a stink as he can. I can understand wanting to hold the government into account for following their rules, but this smacks more of a child maliciously complying with a parent's rule that they hate. He is intentionally making this process more difficult than it needs to be in order to get to the same result. This does nothing but delay and spend more public funds on the .0000001% chance he could get out of it.

Nick was being fed information from the court that nobody should have been able to obtain otherwise, likely from Ty and rebroadcasting it to upset the opposing counsel and clients.

He admitted that Ty was giving him information. Funny how Nick thought transparency was helpful there but not here...

Is Nick actually being funded by this? What does a dispute over evidence admissibility have to do with free speech? We already know that Nick is a junkie addicted to cocaine in addition to MDMA, alcohol, and other substances. That won't change if his charges get dismissed on a technicality. I can't think of a more unsympathetic person to be defending than Nick Rekieta. Even if you're a true and honest Article 4 Free Inhabitant, why would you want some rich asshole to get all of Barnes's attention instead of some normie hauled into an admiralty court under the gold-fringed flag for travelling?

He is not receiving funds. He would have boasted about it.
 
Much harder. It’s clear from the last two info-drops that the current plan is to attack the lab that did the hair testing. Nick is requesting curriculum vitae (a career summary, think of a resume synopsis,) for all technicians involved in the testing, as well as his other obnoxious requests.

This is retarded. The hair testing will have no bearing on his possession charges. My guess is that they just used those to get a baseline to inform the Child Protection issues. In terms of possession, they caught him red handed with the dope scattered all over his bedroom. It'd look worse if he tested negative -- he'd just look like a dealer then. But I also imagine the government has the various clips of him boasting about his drug use on live streams.

I always had my suspicions about Rekieta never being a practicing lawyer. This kind of retardation just restates his complete lack of competence.
 
He admitted that Ty was giving him information. Funny how Nick thought transparency was helpful there but not here...
If I remember correctly, the "Mr. Toye are you a pedophile?" depositions that Nick went over in-depth were leaked to him by Ty. That was back when Ty was hailed here as a strategic genius and "the manliest of lawyers." Before the dark times. Before the late filings and incorrect form usage.

Incidentally, I will avoid powerlevel and just say broadly that I was involved in a lengthy civil situation a while ago. I had a very experienced lawyer, and among other things, he told me in most cases depositions exactly like Ty did were done just to pad out legal expenses and don't do jack in court. He said anything that gets asked in a deposition like that is often far more effective to ask in court. I thought about that one once the wheels started coming off Vic's lawsuit.
 
If you hitch your reputation to Nick and he gets convicted in court of anything that can be interpreted as child abuse while being on coke you are going to watch your donations for your gay legal fund dry up from people horrified you defended this for Internet clout. As it stands right now I would never consider donating to Barnes and would advise anybody else against it as well.
As I said a month ago when the test results got leaked, this is why you never go full force in publicly defending somebody who has legal issues. Because the situation always has the capability to get publicly worse and you'll ruin yourself in the process.

Barnes is a complete moron for repeatedly doubling down on this in the almost two months since the arrest occurred. He has no one but himself to blame for the issues that are going to afflict him over this.
This is retarded. The hair testing will have no bearing on his possession charges. My guess is that they just used those to get a baseline to inform the Child Protection issues. In terms of possession, they caught him red handed with the dope scattered all over his bedroom. It'd look worse if he tested negative -- he'd just look like a dealer then. But I also imagine the government has the various clips of him boasting about his drug use on live streams.

I always had my suspicions about Rekieta never being a practicing lawyer. This kind of retardation just restates his complete lack of competence.
If Nick was a serious lawyer he wouldn't have been on YouTube in the first place. Real professionals don't usually have time to have a regularly scheduled streaming career.
 
To be fair to the defense lawyers involved. When you don't have an actual case, the best you can do is go through the checklist and make sure the state didn't fuck up somewhere along the line. Its sort of the least they can do if their client won't settle.

What's going to be really funny though is if all of Nick's sperging about the doc drops and body cams gets him legally found to be a public figure and strips away most of his defamation protections. You know Nick would love to start going after the detractors if he somehow gets away with the crack den.
 
I thought about that one once the wheels started coming off Vic's lawsuit.

I knew deep in my bones that things were going to go south with all that when Ty started the "dammit Nick, we lost the case again" shit and made t shirts and stuff immortalizing it. It's like that "Picard" show meme whith the admiral saying "Sheer. Fucking. Hubris." Because he and Nick were just begging for divine intervention to smack them down, and man did the gods deliver. Too bad that Vic got caught in the divine smiting.

So yeah. Nick has learned literally nothing from all that. At least Ty had the grace to fuck off and slink off in disgrace back to his protected Twitter.
 
I knew deep in my bones that things were going to go south with all that when Ty started the "dammit Nick, we lost the case again" shit and made t shirts and stuff immortalizing it. It's like that "Picard" show meme whith the admiral saying "Sheer. Fucking. Hubris." Because he and Nick were just begging for divine intervention to smack them down, and man did the gods deliver. Too bad that Vic got caught in the divine smiting.

So yeah. Nick has learned literally nothing from all that. At least Ty had the grace to fuck off and slink off in disgrace back to his protected Twitter.
I'll admit I was once a beardguard. It came down to Ty actually going on Nick's show to say losing the case was entirely his fault, and then he seemingly fucked off the Internet forever. He might've been incompetent and cost Vic 350k and as arguably hurt his reputation even more but at least he apologized and left.

Then he shows up again as one of Nick's jannies and starts sweeping in chat, going full balldowasher. What a faggot.
 
That reminds me: the Ferengi (the big eared people who live and die by greed) were accused of being a caricature of Jews. The writers responded that they were supposed to be a parody of Americans. Remind me, (((who))) runs America? It's on the tip of my tongue. ;)

As for Nick's comments about "fat lumpy retards" who "don't understand how Minnesota law works". (That comment is rich coming from "this was never a law channel".)
There's really no point even trying to make any sense of the constant outrageous lies flying out of the mouth of this cursed, skeletal faggot. "Hurr this was never a law channel" "durrr I'm a LAW POPE" bla bla bla gibberish. Just assume whatever he's saying isn't even worth listening to other than to laugh at what a fucking idiot he is and how dumb his lies are.
 
Back