Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 153 40.4%

  • Total voters
    379
That’s a very interesting theory. It’s probably the least bad explanation for the kid’s positive hair test - if residual smoke can do that.
If so, why did none of the other kids test positive?

It's all a copekieta, crack smoke won't give you the metabolite result that having used funny powder would, and even if it did, it would show up on everyone who was in the house. He gave his 9 year old cocaine.
 
That’s a very interesting theory. It’s probably the least bad explanation for the kid’s positive hair test - if residual smoke can do that.
Every single possible explanation for how his child tested positive for cocaine except for the ones indicating foul play, e.g. the sample not being from the child and just from some other person leads to the same conclusion: neglect.

If it's his child and someone gave them cocaine, neglect.
If he did give them the cocaine directly, neglect.
If his child took the cocaine and they knew it, neglect. If they didn't know it, still neglect.
Smoked crack cocaine near the child? Neglect.
Surrounded by so much cocaine that it contaminated her hair? Neglect.

Again, if the hair is from someone who isn't Nick's family, that should be something Nick would want to tell everyone, but he's not. Right now he's saying it's impossible to get that result.

But it's not impossible, if you had cocaine in your fucking house and you were neglecting your children. And everything we've seen points to that being the reason. Outside of it not even being his child's hair sample, it doesn't matter how she tested positive for that amount. Any option Nick wants to suggest how it happened outside of the one I've mentioned is fucking bad. I'm hoping they add more charges to what he did, or more specifically, what he didn't do.

The only correct and acceptable amount of cocaine in a child's system is fucking zero, not 5,000. I'd like to see his crackpot theories play out in trial, but more importantly, I'd like to hear what the child would say about how it happened. I feel deep within my balls that the answer the child would give would sink Nick.
 
I'd like to hear what the child would say about how it happened. I feel deep within my balls that the answer the child would give would sink Nick.

Didn't Nick already reveal a CPS trial expert witness to deal with this issue? Someone who could testify that what children would say would be influenced by outside factors including CPS?

Nick is already sunk in the CPS/family court part of the process. The most interesting question is if with that test of that child if the prosecutors bump up the criminal charges related to the children to a felony.
 
She is 31.
31 going on 61. What a sad slag.
The wall hasn't been the same since her mom hit it, what the actual fuck!? Is her mother 300 years old?
Holy fuck, I bet the wall itself aged 1,000 years when this mummy hit it. Now it's the Wailing Wall.
 
So what could truly ruin the day of a drug abusing narcissist like Nicky?
Health problems: Some long term guaranteed mortality issue like some form of cancer.
Rabies from Those Raccoons. He got bitten on the toe (should've worn steel toed boots) and never got the rabies vaccine, and the rabies has been crawling up through his nervous system ever since.
 
The mother seems to be Michaelene Thompson and she is 69 years old.
She reminds me of a very well loved leather purse. Which is horrifying. God damn.

And the fake boobs are odd looking, Keanu, please DONT get implants, they will look hilarious with your body shape.

Her Dad is Tom Thompson of Melrose pyrotechnics. (Sweet job no lie)
 
I have some memory of Nick saying he is a bit of a "nudist" and hates wearing clothes. Did these asshats while playing scenes from BobandCarolTedandAlice cavort around the "adult" wing of the house in the buff, snorting coke off Aprils flat ass? Does Aaron have even more incriminating photo's?
I doubt there was an "adult wing" of the house. I think these repulsive freaks just cavorted about naked in front of children because only a prude would think that was inappropriate.
Marvin Heemeyer may be dead, but the Killdozer's legacy lives on.
It will take a Killdozer to annihilate the vile site of the 120 Days of Balldo Manor from existence.
But it's not impossible, if you had cocaine in your fucking house and you were neglecting your children. And everything we've seen points to that being the reason.
This is part of the reason that abuse/neglect is presumptive when a household is this full of drugs and guns. The inhabitants are nearly subhuman, their testimony can't be trusted, and they're just fucking scum everyone hates.

So at that point, when you have a house full of filthy, stinking kids complaining about not having eaten, and the "adults" are drugged out lunatics with brain damage who can't even function, don't show up to court dates, and are basically retards, they just assume abuse and neglect. The burden then shifts to the defendants to prove otherwise, and they can't, because look at them.
image (6).png
 
Last edited:
No some obscure nigga streamer.
Right. Q was a frequent guest during Nick's early years.
He had ongoing debt cases where Nick represented him brilliantly into loss and bankruptcy. He also got into the 2020 election grift and got nuked by YouTube. He also 'borrowed' 10-15k USD from Doug Tennapel and 'forgot' to say anything for months.
Q, Beehizy, and Doug were all 2020 election cope dispensers making videos on how Trump could still win. They probably got more traction because of how hard Youtube cracked down on them. Doug hit 500k subs off that grift until that channel was nuked. He tried doing another one where he exclusively referred to himself as Richard Taco, but that got gotted too. His last resort was a literal sockpuppet show that ended up gone as well. He later said that Beehizy guy was reporting him to Youtube - but Doug likes to play the victim so I take that with a grain of salt. The month after the election was a wild time.

I remember Nick being asked if he'd have Doug on in late 2020 and he said he couldn't because Youtube had "anti Doug TenNapel" robots going around flagging anything with his face in it.
Himedall didn’t destroy it, but she hastened the fall that would inevitably happen with Rekieta not streaming for months.
Nick being denied his locals wine mom thirstposting AND finding out the 20-something sexy mechanic gamer girl was a middle aged man were blows he never recovered from.
I bet this is the gay ops he was using to push his sad excuse for a PR offensive the past week or so.
I hope he invested in that tankless water heater Sean recommended with all the shower calls he's no doubt making. He wants to get ahead of the body cam footage and his hearing. I have to wonder if his coke-addled brain realized what he was admitting to by pushing the revenge porn issue. Probably not.
 
So at that point, when you have a house full of filthy, stinking kids complaining about not having eaten, and the "adults" are drugged out lunatics with brain damage who can't even function, don't show up to court dates, and are basically retards, they just assume abuse and neglect. The burden then shifts to the defendants to prove otherwise, and they can't, because look at them.
View attachment 6252530
1722358827297.png

Does this look like the face of a man who does cocaine and neglects his children? What are you, Stephen Hawking? Jumping to conclusions even though you can't walk?
 
View attachment 6252642
Does this look like the face of a man who does cocaine and neglects his children? What are you, Stephen Hawking? Jumping to conclusions even though you can't walk?
That picture smells of greasy BO and cuckoldry through a monitor. Nick is so disgusting that his stink transcends space and time. Also, he has whiskey dick and has to pleasure women with a testicle cage. He should definitely kill himself.
 
2 glass containers and a metal pan also tested positive for cocaine. Some methods to cook crack involve a Pyrex in a pan as a double boiler like melting chocolate. Another method for cooking crack is posted below. Nick is a crackhead, they probably smoked crack constantly around a sleeping 9 year old which would explain the hair sample testing so high.

:really: Judge, there was no abuse going on. I was just cooking some crack.
nick 19.png And that brat chose to bathe in that crack smoke like it was a fucking sauna instead of cleaning her own clothes! The prick!
nick 2.png So, as you can see, I'm innocent. And people are just assuming things. People are so weird.
 
Q, Beehizy, and Doug were all 2020 election cope dispensers making videos on how Trump could still win. They probably got more traction because of how hard Youtube cracked down on them. Doug hit 500k subs off that grift until that channel was nuked. He tried doing another one where he exclusively referred to himself as Richard Taco, but that got gotted too. His last resort was a literal sockpuppet show that ended up gone as well. He later said that Beehizy guy was reporting him to Youtube - but Doug likes to play the victim so I take that with a grain of salt. The month after the election was a wild time.

Doug was fully leaning into the worst aspects of the post-election 2020 politics. It wasn't just one person reporting him to Youtube that was the problem. It was doug blowing up and becoming highly visible on youtube that was the problem. Doug got enormous traction and channel growth from pushing the envelope and playing with fire. Everyone including him knew he was playing with fire and when he refused to tone down the grift (repeadly) they banned him (repeatedly). He could have survived if he had just backed off a little. But nearly all his growth came from him not backing off and not doing what smarter people were doing to survive.

Doug is a really cynical guy who really likes the sound of his own voice. The more I watched him over time, the more I got the sense that he is a really hollow guy who doesn't really believe in anything. He is also really in love with moral grandstanding gestures often related to causes that are bad. Like standing up for Nick. Doug has this thing where if anyone does something really wrong and gets judged by the public for doing it, Doug will run in to be their "friend". Its not clear if he really supports what the person did or that he really cares about the person or if he would even pick up a phone if he got a call from that person. He just has this sense that nobody should judge anyone else for doing something wrong. Its a real hollywood sort of a approach where even if you see the degeneracy going on around you, you just pretend you didn't see anything and get on with your day.
 
Back