Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 100 25.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 70 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 159 40.2%

  • Total voters
    396
The motion that Hardin filed (with attached affidavits) is asking for audio-video recordings of the proceedings. Nothing that would allow that to happen. No two way communication between the public and the court.

In fact, the potential for disruption if people were to have to attend is (rather shrewdly) cited as a reason WHY the motion should be granted.

Hardin's filing is actually brilliant. Especially in light of Nick's attorney's bitching about what happened during Nick's initial appearance (see the transcripts MPR dropped). He's further hoisted by his own petard in mentioning Nick's views on trials needing to be public.


Lol.

Part of me also thinks that Barnes would want this to grift off of. I know he's not technically in charge, but he's got a lot of influence over Nick right now.

I think if Nick opposed this, it would cause friction between Barnes and Nick. Nick wants to try and save his reputation and concoct a narrative. For him, not having this trial filtered solely through him would be bad. Whereas Barnes, might not give shit how this plays out as long as he gets money and attention. It's not his head on the chopping block. It's Nick's. He could always just scream about government corruption if it doesn't go his way and he'll retain enough dumb rubes that believe him.
Mi companero, it is called a joke.
 
As long as they can prove that you were physically there and agreed to whatever you were signing it's cool.
The X is a time honored tradition.

Ashton and Andy are walking King Phil, also known as DSP, through Nick's Balldo review video right now. This is surreal.

https://kick.com/kinocasinogaming

View attachment 6281157

DSP on Rekieta: "Once you put the clown makeup on, it doesn't come off. How can anyone treat him seriously as a lawyer, content creator? He's just going to be a joke from now on."

DSP on his longevity as a content creator:
"This is what I don't do," referring to the above video.

DSP is now reviewing the massage story:
"Wait, that's his wife? And he's laughing?"

View attachment 6281206

DSP reviews shirtless Nick Rekieta almost licking Aaron:
View attachment 6281220

"No. I would not be licking my friends."

"Is it worth it for this being your legacy?"

King Phil blames drugs.
MAN, the day DSP can laugh at you and mock you.
You've truly gone down the drain.
 
Oh April, don't be a dumb hole your entire life. Kayla's been offered a plea deal, Nick is heavily implying "Someone" else must have brought the coke into the house

I know they're probably promising you they're going to take care of you, they've got your back. "Coppers ain't got shit on us so long as you keep your trap shut"

They're married, you aren't anything other than a moderately amusing new set of orifices to play with.

They're going to heap all of the drug possession charges on you.

Nick knows Kayla will get most of not all in a divorce if she cries "He's an abusive drunk/druggie" so his first "loyalty"/act of self preservation will always defer to her.
He's not going to kick her to the curb and promote you to Main-Hoe instead of Side-bitch.

Start thinking of your exit plan sooner rather than "Your honour both me and my wife agree, all the coke was that bitches, we may have partook a little every now and then and for that we're sorry, but it was all hers and it's her fault the child managed to get into it"
 
BREAKING NEWS: King Phil just solved Rekieta's Denny's joke: "I've known a lot of very stupid people in my life, so I usually can decipher what this gibberish is."

It's supposed to be about the Denny's menu being too hard to understand.

View attachment 6281306

I am not a fan of thr Casino, but this stream looks kino from the clips. They have too much good chemistry than should be reasonably expected and Nick is felted so hard.

What's the difference between a cop at Denny's and a Kiwi Farmer?
To get to the other side.

You got me. It's wasn't funny, but fair is fair, I was completely baited.

It doesn't say that in what you quote. It says the investigation needs to be closed, not the case in court.

Corrected. I conflated the terms.

Is there some other proof that case =/= investigations though? Or have we drawn in inference from the clerks silence?

2. During negotiation, state had a "no drug users association" clause and explicitly noted they had to keep April out of the houe and away from kids. Nick objected as she wasn't accused of doing drugs, no tests of drugs, no criminal history. Prosecutor was forced to file charges against April to make sure they would be violating the terms of plea if she's around

I doubt this. I also believe that if you look at the bind conditions on the form 702 in the Binder, you will see that 'unconditional bail is just that'--with the obvious stipulation of not breaking laws an appearing for court dates.

I don't know if the court can use the omnibus to accept a plea or if it could happen sooner. I think the fact they mailed/served the plea "offer" to Kayla is an indication that it's already negotiated, in final written form, and a done deal for both Nick and Kayla.

The prosecutor can make any offer and Nick could accept at any time. He could theoretically reach out and offer to do the max sentence without trial if he wanted, or the prosecutor could just drop all charges. This is how plea agreements work to save judicial resources.

There is nothing magical about the court room that all attorney communications must happen there in the case.

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu wrote:


Who's the guy Balldo is talking to in those first few clips(the one from the "1776 legal centre")?

I swear I've seen his face before in a lulzy context (Pretty sure it was on an article/blogpost justifying the actions of some sovran citizen/s, but I can't swear to that).

Speaking of sovran citizens, Balldoman is sounding more and more like one of them. Would not be surprised if he starts invoking maritime law one of these days.

Robert Barnes. He has a thread on the board 'Viva Barnes General'. Blovoating lawyer whose claim to fame was getting Wesley Snipes off on tax violations by pleading to misdemeanors , then quitting before more serious charges were lost. He followed this up by getting fired from the Rittenhouse defense team, to the point his team had to issue a PR statement that his crazy shit talk was bot associated with them.
 
Start thinking of your exit plan sooner rather than "Your honour both me and my wife agree, all the coke was that bitches, we may have partook a little every now and then and for that we're sorry, but it was all hers and it's her fault the child managed to get into it"
Since cocaine residue was found on April's credit cards it would be fairly straightforward (probably unsuccessfully) for Rackets to argue that April brought the cocaine and that it was kept in the safe to keep it away from the children. However, that SLATTERNLY WHORE April was corrupting their children by tempting the nine year old with booger sugar.
 
You too can print the signature of your idol Jewi-Mon in your shirts, cups and hats.

Remember to use responsibly.
View attachment 6280139
And remember chYat, buy a hat for your hat, presenting the exclusive Jewi Mon line of premium american hats:
View attachment 6280218View attachment 6280219
New documents just dropped, can anyone verify?
TheCheddarFiles.png
 
couple things I'm gonna pull out of my ass but make sense to me.

1. Kayla's plea agreement is identical to an agreement offered Nick. Negotiated by Nick's attorney. State put agreement in writing and sent to White and Kayla.
2. During negotiation, state had a "no drug users association" clause and explicitly noted they had to keep April out of the houe and away from kids. Nick objected as she wasn't accused of doing drugs, no tests of drugs, no criminal history. Prosecutor was forced to file charges against April to make sure they would be violating the terms of plea if she's around
3. Nick wants the plea agreement in place before any hearing where prosecutor could present evidence in court. Any court appearance will be quick "one and done."
4. Plea is likely deferred adjudication. After court acceptance, he will be on probation. His kids will return after plea is executed subject to a shitload of conditions tied to probation.

I don't know if the court can use the omnibus to accept a plea or if it could happen sooner. I think the fact they mailed/served the plea "offer" to Kayla is an indication that it's already negotiated, in final written form, and a done deal for both Nick and Kayla.

this is the most boring outcome and so i think as a result that it is most likely.
 
Oh April, don't be a dumb hole your entire life. Kayla's been offered a plea deal, Nick is heavily implying "Someone" else must have brought the coke into the house

I know they're probably promising you they're going to take care of you, they've got your back. "Coppers ain't got shit on us so long as you keep your trap shut"

They're married, you aren't anything other than a moderately amusing new set of orifices to play with.

They're going to heap all of the drug possession charges on you.

Nick knows Kayla will get most of not all in a divorce if she cries "He's an abusive drunk/druggie" so his first "loyalty"/act of self preservation will always defer to her.
He's not going to kick her to the curb and promote you to Main-Hoe instead of Side-bitch.

Start thinking of your exit plan sooner rather than "Your honour both me and my wife agree, all the coke was that bitches, we may have partook a little every now and then and for that we're sorry, but it was all hers and it's her fault the child managed to get into it"
The thing about marriage is that it ties everything you own and also your kids into one neat convenient legally-protected package.

Breaking that package up, for any reason, is pretty explosive of your regular life.

When your regular life is already under external attack due to external circumstances... no matter how things are between spouses, you notice they overwhelmingly tend to stick together for that reason. Honour amongst thieves, and adulterous spouses.

You would think someone who identifies as poly would be poly-savvy enough to understand why the unicorn is always the one that carries the can when the primary nesting relationship is threatened.

But apparently not.
 
Will Nick's ego actually allow him to take it though. Everyone whos supported him about his tirade against the goverment framing him and instead of fighting it, he just takes the plea. It'll be interesting. I presume we'll find out more whenever the court date is.
I think if the plea doesn't have prison time (very likely) he'd probably take it. Then he'd spin it to the audience that he did it because he specifically didn't trust the government not to lie about him at trial, that this is the best option to keep his family together, he's doing this for the kids, etc.
 
I think if the plea doesn't have prison time (very likely) he'd probably take it. Then he'd spin it to the audience that he did it because he specifically didn't trust the government not to lie about him at trial, that this is the best option to keep his family together, he's doing this for the kids, etc.
Any deal will require frequent drug tests, drug abuse counseling program, etc.
 
Back