Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

I am gonna take wild-ass guess the moving the next hearing to November was made on the motion of Nick.

Unless Monty has something crazy going on in his side, I can't think of a reason why his side would want a delay.

I like to believe that Fischer was smiling inwardly when she set the next date. Fully aware of what Nick is going through.
The dream scenario is Nick is already in prison by the time the trial comes along and has to appear in Monty's case in prison orange in manacles. That would be a hoot. They'd probably let him wear a suit actually but the concept is still funny of him having to get carted to and fro and then go back to his new barry home.
 
Well, that, and also I am sure that the thought that Minnesota still technically doesn't have an anti-SLAPP played some role.
Even if Monty sued Nick in federal court in Minnesota (pretty sure venue wouldn't be proper except in Minnesota), it would still be a diversity jurisdiction case and so the federal court would be applying Minnesota law anyways. Maybe there's an argument that a federal judge would be more amenable to applying a foreign state's law than a Minnesota state judge, but the mere fact that it was in federal court wouldn't mean anything as long as the court would be applying Minnesota law (including Minnesota's law on determination of choice of law).
 
The dream scenario is Nick is already in prison by the time the trial comes along and has to appear in Monty's case in prison orange in manacles. That would be a hoot. They'd probably let him wear a suit actually but the concept is still funny of him having to get carted to and fro and then go back to his new barry home.
I hate to ask a really stupid and uninformed question, but if a citizen is convicted for a crime and still has a pending case related to another matter, are they transported by the state to the court? Or, given the modern day, will he be attending from his prison via zoom? I suppose I question whether Rekieta will even be able to feasibly attend. I do not know whether there will be a jurisdiction conflict if he is held somewhere else and then needs to attend a separate case. My layman's thinking is that the state will not foot the bill for transportation for an unrelated matter, but I could be 100% wrong.
 
I hate to ask a really stupid and uninformed question, but if a citizen is convicted for a crime and still has a pending case related to another matter, are they transported by the state to the court?

I think the details are a state by state thing. Usually the person has to convince another judge that there is some compelling reason for their attendance in person at a civil trial. Giving testimony in person at trial can be a compelling reason (at a judge's discretion). From looking around, alot of the cases where this comes up are divorce cases where one person is in prison.

But its all up to a judge. The judge can decide that a deposition done in prison is good enough participation. If they have to leave prison to participate in a trial, the transport would obviously be done by the state.
 
I hate to ask a really stupid and uninformed question, but if a citizen is convicted for a crime and still has a pending case related to another matter, are they transported by the state to the court?
Generally, yes. They can't just force you to default on a case. Considering the case is local, there's really no logistical issue getting him there.
 
I guess at the very least we'll figure out if Randazza is still on the case. I'm thinking yes.
I wonder how much of Nick's income is now being paid out to lawyers. Randazza. Two lawyers for CPS & criminal charges. One for his wife. One for himself.

If April is hung out to dry, she will turn tail and squeal on Nick and Kayla. She is completely financially dependent on Nick. Live-in-Nanny job with no children. Lives in his 2nd house rent free. She does have some money from her divorce. But it appears that isn't enough as she was trying to shake down more money on the advice of Nick after the ink was dry on the divorce decree.

So what is April doing for legal aid. Public Defender? Would she even qualify for that? Nick is going to have to foot her legal bills until his criminal case is over, or else she will have to turn on him. He has no other choice (other than the obvious sane plea deal for rehab).

Hell, a settlement of the Montegraph case would be incredibly smart and cheaper right now. But his ego won't let him swallow some year old crow. Having Nick's ego is extremely expensive. It must be nice when you can afford it.

Nick's Rumble contract is gone. He can barely manage to stream. He has turned off the majority of his audience who no longer respects him and are tired of being lied to and gaslit.

I have a strong feeling that Grandpa Reiketa is footing the legal bills for these criminal charges. Otherwise Nick would be hot footing it to produce good regular streaming content that people like. The way Nick is acting is as if he knows that it is a good idea. But he just doesn't have to. Someone else will save (enable) him.
 
Does anyone know if Nick ever paid up the $300 he owed to Montagraph?
I was planning on asking that question too. Thought about it the other day. I presume not.

Nigger "forgets" to pay his damn property taxes. Monty. Government. Both things he hates. Probably not in any hurry to pay what he owes.
 
So what is April doing for legal aid. Public Defender? Would she even qualify for that? Nick is going to have to foot her legal bills until his criminal case is over, or else she will have to turn on him. He has no other choice (other than the obvious sane plea deal for rehab).
Kayla doesn't even have an attorney making an appearance in her criminal case (last time I checked) despite being Nick's wife and despite (according to Geno Bisconte) having "Nick" tattooed on her chest. I really don't think the mistress will get Nick paying for an attorney.
 
@Balldo's Gate I am pretty sure that Kayla has her own separate lawyer on record for her criminal case now that has show up in court records. I am NOT surprised that they are sharing a lawyer for the CPS case.
No, she has a separate lawyer for the CHIPS case. Though they've both been signing their names to some of the interesting matters of public record that have been posted in the Nick Rekieta thread.

I don't believe she has a lawyer in the criminal case, at least not one who has filed anything yet.

Kayla’s lawyer is Mueller, Nick’s is Weber.
Neither of them are involved anymore. Those were court-appointed counsel whom Nick and Kayla replaced at some point after the June 6th hearing.

Nick replaced Weber with Frank the Barneswalker (the same attorney he retained in the criminal case) and Kayla eventually replaced her court-appointed attorney with some lawyer from the county over,

Does anyone know if Nick ever paid up the $300 he owed to Montagraph?
I don't think there's anywhere that shows whether it has been paid or not, not sure if it will ever be confirmed unless Monty's counsel complains about it not being paid.
 
Does anyone know if Nick ever paid up the $300 he owed to Montagraph?
A 4k subscriber account claiming to be Monty confirms in the below comment on @elb's channel that he has NOT been paid the $300 he owes from Nick Rekieta.

motnagraph.png

The comment was made in the below clip from Nick's stream on Thursday night where Nick spent most of the time staring in the corner where April Anderson usually sits.

 
Last edited:
Back