Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
I absolutely believe that if defendants want closed trials outside of public figures or morally outrageous cases they should be allowed to receive them. I genuinely believe Nick Rekieta should have a closed off and non public trial if he wants one.


But he will never be able to claim to support a public and open justice system ever again. He claimed he wanted cameras and microphones in every courtroom when it suited him, now all of a sudden circumstances along with his beliefs on the matter have changed. No matter how you slice it, Nick is an extreme hypocrite.
Having trials conducted behind closed doors in secret is a bad idea, it sets a precedent that governments will inevitably use against their own citizens.
You know who had closed off and non public trials? Stalin. Mao. A whole host of other guys that used government power and the courts to opress their people.
Theres a reason that the Justice System should be open to observers.

You're right about Nick though. He is the worst type of hypocrite. He's on record multiple times stating his belief that trials should be viewable and televised. Because he wanted to grift off other peoples legal problems. But when its his legal problems, thats when he wants everthing hidden away so the only side og the story people get is from him.
And his fucking virtue signalling about muh minors is bullshit, he made tens of thousands of dollars streaming Rittenhouses trial, Kyle was a minor at the time.

Fuck Nick Rekieta. Kick Nick Rekieta down the stairs etc...
 
Last edited:
What most baffles me from this all, is that Nick used all these stupid arguments, when the most important one he didn't make.
Look at this signature:
jewmon sig.png
How can the court accept a document with such atrocious signature?
It must be DENIED.
 
This bitch really said he didn't want to reward people like "kids who've already had their hand in the cookie jar" when he's accused of starving his kids, in the briefing that uses his kids as a shield against publicising his degeneracy. What a pathetic excuse of a "man", I wish Nick the very best of testicular fucking torsion.

Whatever impotent and incompetent briefing he files, he will forever be an embarrassment and laughing stock to his family, acquaintances, local and internet community... and he thinks he's winning! Someone needs to tell Emperor Balldo about his new set of clothes (...and they're probably already dirty on the floor of his coom dungeon).
 
"...the public will have the right to attend, only they may not be able to attend from the comfort of their recliners and in their pajamas."

"...public access does not require every proceeding be rendered into ones and zeroes with unfettered abandon."

"Allowing the recording and broadcasting of these proceedings would be like punishing a child who raided the cookie jar by giving him the rest of the cookies."


What an absolute drama queen. Is this kind of flamboyant prose typical in court filings?
what kind of legal argument is this anyhow lmfao. "its like giving children cookies!" A+ filing there. Literally Patrick/Greer Tier filing. Is rackets coked up when he submits this shit to his lawyer to file?

Nick wrote those parts. Calling it now.

They absolutely can. I'm pretty sure this is what is typically done and there are different ways of doing this.

For example, Ronnie Oneal's son testified via a Webcam that did not show his face (at least on the livestream), only his hands on a table and upper body. His voice was clear. This was Florida.

And another example: the brother of Dylan Groves testified and could be heard clearly, but was not shown at all. This was Ohio.

It's not impossible.

The Chauvin case cited had minor witnesses and was televised.

Also, Nick mentioning 'loli avatars' in his messages with Josh was 100% hinting at what his argument was going to be.

This is true. Nick is a drama fag.

Main argument is some retard pedophile said he works for Jersh.

For the kid's privacy, when other trials have been televised and a kid gets on the stand they just don't show em on camera. It's not like there being kids just automatically means no cameras.

Also don't see why the fuck he's bringing up Trump's federal trials not being televised when federal cases basically never are.

See above note on Chauvin case. As for Trump, it is a cheap appeal to the democratic judge.
 
Also yes. This is just a Chewbacca defense about why the proceedings shouldn’t be public.
There is a pedo on the farm.
But the pedo is also on the locals.
THAT MAKES NO SENSE
How did the child get into the cocaine stash?
What does this have to do with Kiwis?
THAT MAKES NO SENSE

Therefore you must acquit.
 
Last edited:
Congrats @mitro for making Nick post this Locals screenshot to prove Qriist is not a paypig. He is very hung up on this pedo today. I hope Nick streams tonight because if he goes in front of a camera in the mood he's currently in it's going to be kino.
View attachment 6311302
Nick thinks this is a win. All it does is prove that this convicted child abuser at least wasn't funding Nick's abuse and neglect of his own children. Maybe he's turned over a new leaf?
 
What the fuck is a "Kiwifarms Volunteer Member" anyway?

Didn’t you read the sign up sheet? Youre obligated to serve in the Kiwi Farms Volunteer People’s Militia and when you die the Kiwi Farms Skeleton Army
The 88th Volunteer Kiwi Brigade was a unit of the 14th Shitposting Division that to this day The Hague wants to bring to trial for their war crimes during the Special Autism Operation of 2022.
 
Last edited:
All it does is prove that this convicted child abuser at least wasn't funding Nick's abuse and neglect of his own children.
I brought it up before but what if he just inspect element'd the amount? If we could compare the page that he showed with another that is $0 then maybe it could be confirmed if he was really not paying for Nick's coke, also proving Nick is a liar yet again
 
Why couldnt they just broadcast/record the court proceedings and censor/pause the recording if a child witness is called???
Courts take evidence in camera and exclude the media for those portions all the time. Nick knows full well that it's not only possible but common.
 
Back