It wouldn't surprise me if Nick makes efforts to try and photograph/dox everyone who enters/leaves the courthouse. He is petty enough to try it, but I don't think he has the ability to actually do it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never mind testifying in court against your own parents.This is because children are notoriously unreliable as witnesses, are easily coached/led, and it is widely accepted in the legal profession that testifying in court is extremely stressful to children.
I will now quote Balldo of Crackets:Remember, Rekieta is totally NOT SALTY about any one of you going to his public court hearing.
View attachment 6315668 (Xeet / Archive)
It wouldn't surprise me if Nick makes efforts to try and photograph/dox everyone who enters/leaves the courthouse. He is petty enough to try it, but I don't think he has the ability to actually do it.
In an August 2024 web story, FOX 9 out of Minneapolis-St.Paul called the Kiwi Farms web board, a “Stalker Site,” to which Moon strongly objects.
“You could very easily say that Facebook is a stalker website or Instagram is a stalking website. It is really an inferior way to describe what amounts to a gossip forum,” Moon expounded, “It implies a level of criminality to it that doesn't exist.”
"You may call me.... The Polock"Everyone who attends, have a fake username ready to give when he asks. Feel free to use mine if you draw a blank.
You're not going to get held in contempt for it or anything but if you're willing to get facedoxed you might as well at least look decent.For fuck sake. Just wear clean clothes without fucking holes in them.
Jeans and a polo, or a nice shirt, is more than proper for spectating in court
True. Laces could be used to rope if you’re a skeletal drug and boozed addicted Balldo wearing faggot.Beg to differ, just look at the pages of discussion about what is or is not appropriate for court.
Now, shoes. Laces or loafers? Do they consider laces to be potential weapons? I know the aglet part at the end serves a sinister purpose.
Mother fuu... Throw all the clocks you want at me, but if you can read Rekietish, you see he's talking about the main house. You know, the one owned by the trust? I.e. not "our (their) house"? Weaselly little fuck. So it doesn't matter if it was under one or both of their care, the house ownership gives them an "out" if you think like a wet-brained, technically-was-lawyer imbecile.With the amount of linguistic shenanigans Nick attempts to pull off, I wouldn't be surprised if he's trying to leave an out (of sorts) if the kids were exposed to illegal substances if they were in the care of only ONE of them (i.e. not in "our" care)... That way the little shithead can still claim he was TECHNICALLY being honest...
Sending Chris, Cobes, and DSP as the lolcow suicide squad to document the trial would be the funniest outcome.I know just the guy for the job
View attachment 6315650
We're all John.Everyone who attends, have a fake username ready to give when he asks. Feel free to use mine if you draw a blank.
For full credit heres the link to their website.KADN just published a story including a statement by Null. It’s full of gems, including “live-in nanny,” April Imholte (now Anderson).
the byline for the author says sports director which is interestingKADN just published a story including a statement by Null. It’s full of gems, including “live-in nanny,” April Imholte (now Anderson).
He should go ahead with full Ralphattire. He’s already acting like it.I’d fucking cackle if Nick shows up to the trial with a hat calling Josh a predator, better yet he should wear a hat that reads “I WAS FRAMED”, please do it Nick it’ll help your case so much.
why would you wear a hat in what is 90 degree weather.