Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
Nick making some genious claims again on twitter
1724278006803.png
Archive, X, Nitter

I remember this very differently
1724278197192.png
Archive, X, Nitter

Learn to read Nick
1724278434314.png
Archive, X, Nitter

"I watched his video" -cop
1724278735160.png
He never said that specifically, as pointed out by others in the thread

Edit* And Nick cares if what he says is accurate
1724279748867.png
Archive, X, Nitter
 
Last edited:
He's just going to argue that the passively constructed sentence he doesn't understand implies something that it doesn't, namely that the statement that someone "able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites" means that the person making the statement had to directly view the video on Nick's channel.... which is not at all what it says.
The only thing he's arguing is that the video watched was uploaded by a different channel controlled by Cog, not Rekieta.

He has not alleged any material changes in the video uploaded by Cog.
Bingo!
bingo.png (Xeet / Archive)
 
View attachment 6332731
This is the life kiwibros that we are missing out on.

Posted by Piggy himself - archive

The Quover has chosen... another...

First she had to hug him and now she's forced to huff gunt pit. Will the humiliation never end?

Also, in addition to all the smaller scabs on his legs, there's whatever this is. Wtf is Nick doing to his legs?
View attachment 6332810

Looks like picking scabs to me, but I am not a doctor.
 
The warrant doesnt say they watched the backup does it? I thought it says they watched it on Nick's YouTube? So did the cops lie or did Nick just make it up because he thinks he privated it before anyone watched it?
Does the entire stream being preserved by Nick on his Odyssey come into play? Surely the cops must know about that by now?

Just because CPS decided not to investigate further doesnt mean the cops couldnt? If part of the reporting was dealing with intoxication and then Nick is doing cocaine on stream that adds up to warrant city does it not?
I still don’t understand the mindset behind the argument.
Like, okay you admitted that you hid evidence and are claiming a different watermark counts as “editing” the video. Even if the judge sides with this stupid point, the police can just get a warrant and demand that Nick give them the original footage since he admits to still having it. They don’t need to subpoena YouTube. At all. OR, the judge will force Nick to supply the original video as part of his evidence against the police, which in turn will show that there was no material editing.
The upload source Nick is claiming the cops used didn’t label the video “Nick Rekieta Coke stream.” Or “Nick Rekieta on Cocaine” it was “Nick Rekieta drunk stream after losing his appeal.” It doesn’t imply any criminal activity.

The whole thing also ignores the rest of the warrant application.
The cop is very clear in the application that he watched multiple streams, noticed all the signs of someone on drugs, and then did further viewings to determine for a fact that Nick broadcasts from his home, which is was able to be verified in the coke stream. He covered his bases with a valid and reasonable explanation for why someone with his level of experience would suspect cocaine use as he’s been trained to notice signs of it, and explained how he conducted the investigation. He mentions Aaron and the Coke stream mainly as elements to paint the narrative of Nick’s decline, not to say that these were the smoking gun that made him conduct the arrests and the house search. I genuinely believe that, based on the warrant application alone, the entire Coke stream could be removed and it wouldn’t invalidate the warrant.

Same issue with him constantly bringing up the kids. The cop was made aware of Nick because of the pastor’s report of suspected child neglect, but he started investigating him for drugs after the fact. The kids are ultimately irrelevant to the warrant itself and the cops said as much, which is why they won’t use them to testify.

The “you had no warrant for the guns so you can’t take them” is also beyond braindead. They were seized because possessing firearms around drugs is illegal in MN. And they were literally in the same room as each other, so of course they’re gonna add that charge and seize the firearms:


The fact the best Nick could do is cry about Aaron, who is irrelevant to the warrant but might be a witness against him, cry that April spoke after being Miranda’ed(correct me if I’m wrong, but if you choose to talk after saying you won’t, that doesn’t mean the cops can’t use it as she waived her right to remain silent), cry about a watermark on an otherwise unedited video, and cry about “they had no right to take my guns” is just pathetic. This is all he could do?

Like I get it, he’s not a real lawyer and has no courtroom experience outside of motions to dismiss and taking plea deals, but I still expected something better. Barnes may be a bumbling idiot, but there’s no way Barnes would have told him to go this route
 
View attachment 6332731
This is the life kiwibros that we are missing out on.

Posted by Piggy himself - archive
this photo proves that none of these idiots have learned a single thing from all of this. He knows the cat is out of the bag that he's a narcissistic lying degenerate cokehead and him posing for a photo op groping his human fleashlight on one side while the pathetic failure of a """mother""" stands by him on the other as the disgusting demonic hog that went after their kids wraps his arm around her is 100% this faggots way of saying "yeah i did it. fuck you" to the haters.

If they aren't already i guarantee you they will all be back on the drugs and alcohol within the year. especially if they don't see jailtime.

i legit don't know what has to happen to make these idiots reevaluate their life choices but i hope they do eventually because (and i say this with the utmost sincerity) everyone in this photo and all of their loved ones would be better off with all 4 of them dead in the ground then continuing on the paths they're on right now.

April dressed up like a prostitute from the early 2000s.
i legitimately would not be surprised if nick had her dress like a whore for the photo just to own the "incel prudes" on the internet.
 
Lol, people are assmad that Nick Rekieta is a lolbert hedonist doing lolbert hedonist things like swinging and being a cokehead. This is a mountain, molehill scenario if ever there was one, but now that Ethan "Gunt" Ralph has entered the picture Kiwiniggers are going to be whipped up into a frenzy over it.

EDIT: Lol I forgot how to spell his name
 
I remember this very differently
1724278197192.png
As do I. I was in Weebwars on day fucking one.

At best he said something like "lawsuits aren't a sure thing." Which is true, and he should get credit for that, I suppose.

But pessimistic? GTFO. He argued consistently that Vic's case was practically a slam dunk.

Which, in retrospect, is what you would expect from somebody who wanted to keep the money flowing. Both the GFM money for Ty, and his own Superchats.
 
Honestly, this went as well as it could have gone for Nick short of the judge having a moment and throwing the case out. Evidence has already been thrown out and the path for getting even more evidence thrown out is straight ahead. Any case of neglect is over. It's all going to come down to how much coke there was and if it the search was legal.
 
Nick making some genious claims again on twitter
View attachment 6332871
Archive, X, Nitter

If pressed at some point in the future - he will claim he isn't lying here, because it wasn't a "mountain" of cocaine because a mountain is TECHNICALLY "A mountain is an elevated portion of the Earth's crust, generally with steep sides that show significant exposed bedrock." and his cocaine stash did not have bedrock in it nor was it an elevated portion of the Earth's crust.
 
What evidence has been thrown out?
Seriously? All of it. It was all lies. Where have you been? All the loli avatar kiwifarmers talking mountains of cocaine. First of all, have you ever seen a mountain? It’s HUGE! Do you have any idea how long it’d take to snort an entire mountain of cocaine? It’d be impossible. Plus where would the cops have an evidence locker big enough for a MOUNTAIN? You Kiwifarmers need to work on your social skills because you can’t understand this.

🥃:really:
 
Honestly, this went as well as it could have gone for Nick short of the judge having a moment and throwing the case out. Evidence has already been thrown out and the path for getting even more evidence thrown out is straight ahead. Any case of neglect is over. It's all going to come down to how much coke there was and if it the search was legal.
This account is so consistently, arrogantly wrong that it smells like a Rekieta sock.
 
Back