Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 60 16.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 139 38.7%

  • Total voters
    359
Nick must be even more desperate for cash than we realized if he’s cutting corners like this on his legal efforts.
I have little "hard numerical data" to support this, but I think White's hourly rate would normally be less than Randazza's. I think they are two very different attorneys in terms of quality and the fees they could command.

The whole Monty thing, and using Randazza to fight it, is a very stupid money sink. He's even admitted it himself.
 
⏰Sorry I just discovered the house⏰
I was going to do a whole sperg but it started to get so excessive I had to scrap it.

Not even going to mention the well water rust stains in like every sink and...the murder shower.

I just want to say that you do not need wax melters for scent in four rooms in a house that smells ok.
There are cobwebs everywhere(look at the doorframes). The kitchen is disgusting. There is shit dripping down the cabinets and dishwasher. There are dead bugs all over the place.

There is one door someone forced open with their shoulder and one door someone punched.

Like...someone in the throuple looked at this house and thought Yeah this is presentable.

If this is the state of the alternate residence the body cam footage of the primary villa must be a glimpse into hell.
 
Last edited:
Aren't there AI tools you can run these all through, a long with "White's motion," that would calculate a probability of whether they were all written by the same person?
I'm pretty sure there are Python modules that can do this. I'd have to find some of White's motion work for a real comparison, but I would start by checking the case records in the county that his law firm is in to try and find dockets where he was cousnel.
 
⏰Sorry I just discovered the house⏰
I was going to do a whole sperg but it started to get so excessive I had to scrap it.

Not even going to mention the well water rust stains in like every sink and...the murder shower.

I just want to say that you do not need wax melters for scent in four rooms in a house that smells ok.
There are cobwebs everywhere. The kitchen is disgusting. There is shit dripping down the cabinets and dishwasher. There are dead bugs all over the place.

There is one door someone forced open with their shoulder and one door someone punched.

Like...someone in the throuple looked at this house and thought Yeah this is presentable.

If this is the state of the alternate residence the body cam footage of the primary villa must be a glimpse into hell.
To really hammer this home, this is the home Nick thinks looks presentable AFTER being cleaned up to list for sale.

Their other home must be akin to one of those hoarder homes you used to see on cable television or that one furry owl guy who used to do competent documentaries.
 
Aaron briefly talked about the vag wash in April’s shower, and pled the fifth on exactly how bad she smells. Starting at 8:33 of this clip.

“There are intimate details I have…. There are some details I will not share with the world… I will not share smells. I won’t do that to people.”

i was wondering how he landed her. chronic stinky pussy will definitely limit your options.
 
They are expected to address the following issues:
  • The issue of Cog's archive on BackwardsInternet being "digitally altered".
  • The issue of Aaron Imholte's statements being represented as that of a "concerned citizen" and not Rekieta's "blood enemy" (Ralph's language).
  • The issue of the Pastor's CPS report being used as a basis for probable cause when CPS chose not to investigate those claims.

The warrant doesnt say they watched the backup does it? I thought it says they watched it on Nick's YouTube? So did the cops lie or did Nick just make it up because he thinks he privated it before anyone watched it?
Does the entire stream being preserved by Nick on his Odyssey come into play? Surely the cops must know about that by now?

Just because CPS decided not to investigate further doesnt mean the cops couldnt? If part of the reporting was dealing with intoxication and then Nick is doing cocaine on stream that adds up to warrant city does it not?
 
The warrant doesnt say they watched the backup does it? I thought it says they watched it on Nick's YouTube? So did the cops lie or did Nick just make it up because he thinks he privated it before anyone watched it?
Does the entire stream being preserved by Nick on his Odyssey come into play? Surely the cops must know about that by now?

Just because CPS decided not to investigate further doesnt mean the cops couldnt? If part of the reporting was dealing with intoxication and then Nick is doing cocaine on stream that adds up to warrant city does it not?
The warrant states that the cop viewed the video that was "taken off of" Nick's youtube. It states that the video had been removed from the channel before the Officer's viewing, thus implying that the Officer retrieved it from an alternative source. It didn't list where the Officer got the video, but elsewhere in the trial the state has used screenshots taken from an archive on Cog's channel, thus Nick's counsel argues that that is likely the archive viewed by the Officer initially.
 
His writing is so shit he picked a profession in which the opposing party has to read what you wrote just to get an audience.

Sad, pathetic, Non-Practicing Creative Writing Major.
🌈 It will show a livestream of Nick, his wife and his kids happily having tea and biscuits that their nanny April made for them. While he expertly and eloquently explains the law on the Internet. 🌈
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
To really hammer this home, this is the home Nick thinks looks presentable AFTER being cleaned up to list for sale.

Their other home must be akin to one of those hoarder homes you used to see on cable television or that one furry owl guy who used to do competent documentaries.
Oh I can hammer it home.
Let us play a game:
Is it blood or soup?
1724270503170.png
The post I was making got up to about thirty images just documenting the filth. A couple of choice ones:
1724270702407.png1724270746258.png
Rank stench coverup montage:
1724270837010.png
1724270861744.png
1724270896911.png
1724270948845.png

And finally since I have them:
1724270991363.png
1724271012997.png
1724271030097.png
1724271051831.png
1724271077148.png
Seriously every fucking doorway has some level of cobweb.

I think from this brief sperg you can tell how ridiculous the post was.
 
Here are three filings drafted by Francis White. Note that there are two briefs in federal appeals which are co-authored with Robert Barnes. The other brief is a sentencing appeal in a criminal case, drafted by White alone. I might try and find a trial docket for some motions by White to compare, since these are appellate briefs rather than pretrial motions. But they all look better than Rekieta's last filing imo.

Awesome. So, I took a look at the sentencing appeal written by White alone. I have excluded the Barnes co-authored briefs due to the collaboration. Some things I noted that stick out to me between the two White-exclusive filings.

The motion to suppress is very "fluffy," and full of grandiose language/claims. The substance of the sentencing appeal was about one page in length. Now I do not practice criminal law, but based on the respondent's brief, it was not something that could really be adequately developed in one page. That sentencing appeal was from last year, so it's not like White would have naturally developed such a difference in style in this period of time. The difference in writing styles between the two samples makes me question if external influences guided him in the motion to suppress.

The motion to suppress uses italicized citations while the sentencing appeal uses underlined citations. I checked the local rules applicable to both filings, and I do not see one or the other being preferred. This could be nothing, but most attorney's who draft a lot of briefs are dead set on keeping their filings consistent. This is also a habit that forms over time. This could also be nothing.

The motion to suppress is not neatly divided into subsections like the sentencing appeal. Again, just another "housekeeping" thing. You want to divide your sections (statement of facts, arguments, legal standards, etc.) into neat parcels for the judge.

I was thinking that one or the other could have been written by one of White's associates, but from his website, it looks as though he does not have any associates. Even if he did, Balldo is clearly a *very* needy client in that he will likely demand his attorney's full attention. I do not think White would pawn this off on one of his associates if he had one, for fear of Balldo firing him/threatening bar complaints.

The two filings DO look very different, however, in form and tone. It could be that it was ghostwritten by another attorney and simply filed by White. Now, this is speculation, but Balldo/barnes/anyone could have drafted the motion and given it to White to file. I am not familiar with how this specific court views ghostwriters, if they even care at all. This is not an uncommon practice, and might explain the stylistic differences.

IMO, gun to my head, I'd guess that the motion to suppress was written or heavily influenced by another. The Respondent's brief in the sentencing appeal was really nice, by the way. Props to Sarah Vokes.
 
I'm definitely leaning towards Nick having had a large influence on the writing of the filing for the omnibus hearing if only because of the idiosyncratic horrific organization of the motions.
Maybe in terms of what substance was decided to be added, but these prior filings make me guess that Nick was not heavily involved in the research, statements of law, or general composition of the text / style. Maybe Nick has upped his game in the six years since these were filed, but I do think that there exists a night-and-day difference in terms of how good White's Motion is compared to 2018 Nick.

I am not saying White's Motion is any good. It sucks. But to me a lot of it sucks by intentionality, like a more experienced, but still fairly mediocre practitioner humoring his shithead client by focusing a good amount of his argument on whatever specious bullshit his client wants in the motion.

Nick's 2018 Motions are on another level of suck. Like, most first year law students doing their first legal writing in their first semester would do better. I can't tell if this is do the limits of Nick's ability or just that he only wanted to put forth the bare minimum effort. Probably a combination of both. The paragraphs are not even justified.

If I read Nick's motions blind, I would be shocked to hear that they were written by an attorney. I would sooner guess a Sovereign Citizen.
 
Aren't there AI tools you can run these all through, a long with "White's motion," that would calculate a probability of whether they were all written by the same person?
Sort of. I don't think Balldo has every written enough legal documents to have a useful comparison point...

If I had access to maybe 50-100 filings from White and Rekieta that would be enough for me to take a look, but I don't have access to Pacer and idk if Nick has ever filed that much publicly.
 
Sort of. I don't think Balldo has every written enough legal documents to have a useful comparison point...
unfortunately after years of nonpracticing and brain pickling balldo can only write everything like he's writing a snarky response to the kiwifags (who all looked more clean, photogentic, and less gay than rackets did at the hearing)
 
Awesome. So, I took a look at the sentencing appeal written by White alone. I have excluded the Barnes co-authored briefs due to the collaboration. Some things I noted that stick out to me between the two White-exclusive filings.
I was tagged to do a write up I will be running some of these samples when I get home
Here are some more White-only motion examples. He does seem to enjoy block quotations, which does accord with the use of block quotes in Nick's motion to suppress.
 

Attachments

I am not saying White's Motion is any good. It sucks. But to me a lot of it sucks by intentionality, like a more experienced, but still fairly mediocre practitioner humoring his shithead client by focusing a good amount of his argument on whatever specious bullshit his client wants in the motion.

An attorney is limited by the facts of the case and White currently has the problem of having nothing to go on and his client being fucked. You can't write a good motion to dismiss with nothing to justify the dismissal. I would expect even a really good attorney to flounder through a paper-thin motion to dismiss (that he pawned off on a junior or intern) and then tell his client that he needs to take the fucking plea deal. I'm sure Rackets had plenty to say to him about what he should write, though. He's the most successful lawyer on the internet, after all.
 
Back