- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
"I'm sick of men who want dick".
Homophobia is not cool bro.
Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet
- Thread starter Meiwaku
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Homophobia is not cool bro.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
I thought we couldn't tell?? Or is it only if you're a tranny you get like, special troon vision that can spot other troons or something? I'm very confused with all the conflicting science.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
Kinda sounds like she’s trying to pull a Gruffin:
Seems like a cow to keep an eye on.
Gotta also say that I find the mental image of these two weirdos in the sack pretty hilarious. A woman pretending to have a penis, trying to have sex with a man pretending to have a vagina.
At some point one of them had to have burst out laughing during sex.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
I’m picturing a room full of preds keeping their eyes on the door, waiting for an actual child or teenager to walk in, while trying to figure out how to beat the other preds to the prize.I thought we couldn't tell?? Or is it only if you're a tranny you get like, special troon vision that can spot other troons or something? I'm very confused with all the conflicting science.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
“Why hello lovely ladies!”
Kent Allard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2023
“Why hello lovely ladies!”
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
Look out, Batman—it’s the Penguin!
RIPRhongoBongo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
"You'll never find the bodies"
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
There are no grown men with the name Oliver. The only Olivers that exist are fictional boys and British schoolboys that died mysteriously in childhood.
Spergy girls exist. It's just more socially acceptable to be obsessed with dolls, books, and horses over Sonic and model trains. Girls who have "male sperg" interests are ostracized by everyone.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
Old school tranny commiting a big L on boomer TV by going on the howard stern show.
Enjoy.
How do they meassure arousal in females? I know how they do it in males. Clitoral swelling probably with a similar device?
Besides one contention about this phenomenological definition of orientation, I immediately conjured up:
How do they account for people who have these complex patterns which not only hinge upon looking at naked people but for example that whole "I-need-to-dress-and-feel-like-a-woman" thing? As far as I remember, it is often said that these men get boners only when looking at women but are, not always, engaging in homosexual activity too - so a layperson would call that bi-sexual but in literature it's called straight with a fetish (transvestic fetishism or later: agp) - that seems kind of stupid to me because this means that we now have a situation in which we must stop calling homosexuality an orientation because it doesn't always converge with an exclusive homosexual visual stimulus - conversely, however it is tested, I also recall reading repeatedly that women, in general, are aroused by both, naked females and males or sexual themed picture in general - so what I'm asking is, do you have some neat, up to date studies or kiwi posts to point me and others itt (@California Newt ) to?
Edit: Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't see that you were done with the topic and already posted the sapolski lectures.
Not a backhanded question, I really don't know:
How do they meassure arousal in females? I know how they do it in males. Clitoral swelling probably with a similar device?
Besides one contention about this phenomenological definition of orientation, I immediately conjured up:
How do they account for people who have these complex patterns which not only hinge upon looking at naked people but for example that whole "I-need-to-dress-and-feel-like-a-woman" thing? As far as I remember, it is often said that these men get boners only when looking at women but are, not always, engaging in homosexual activity too - so a layperson would call that bi-sexual but in literature it's called straight with a fetish (transvestic fetishism or later: agp) - that seems kind of stupid to me because this means that we now have a situation in which we must stop calling homosexuality an orientation because it doesn't always converge with an exclusive homosexual visual stimulus - conversely, however it is tested, I also recall reading repeatedly that women, in general, are aroused by both, naked females and males or sexual themed picture in general - so what I'm asking is, do you have some neat, up to date studies or kiwi posts to point me and others itt (@California Newt ) to?
Edit: Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't see that you were done with the topic and already posted the sapolski lectures.
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2024
I think areas of your brain probably light up in response to a clearly sexual situation, but that doesn't necessarily equate to desire. Just your brain/body recognizing the situation.
Straight with a fetish doesn't make sense to me and never has. It's always been a bisexual thing. Whether that bisexuality is "induced" over time or was always there is a separate question. Pseudo-bisexuality due to degeneracy and having no boundaries is def a thing but you can't call yourself or others "straight" if they do not straight things. People want to call it that because they usually want to make abnormal sexual acts and interests seem more normal than they are.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
Precisely and I don't see them put mobile scanners (since they don't exist) on people doing whatever they're into outside of a lab in the wild. They still don't account for smells, touch and lots of other stuff which just looking at pictures doesn't recreate.
But it IS true, scientifically, with the standing definition of orientation in the few cases which were examined afiak.
I think that is what @California Newt thinks this shallow definition of "looks at certain picture, spots a tent" is doing (on purpose).
And another one as food for thought: what does even count as sexual? Do animal researchers consider two males jacking each other off homosexual or is it only when one butt rapes the other? Because culturally, in humans, everything is thrown together but maybe true and honest "straight" guys who are into anal and "brain-scan-gays" who are really into it too, have more in common than is admitted/known so far. (Think down low and actual in-prison gay).
When does having such a persistent fetish for buttsecks qualify as an orientation (in the scientific meaning)?
I'm also beginning to drift over to thinking "orientation" might be a pozzed rubbish term.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2024
Well, my take is basically that you can be "trained" to act sexually in different ways than is otherwise natural (you can brainwash someone into believing/doing most anything, I don't know why some people like to pretend your sexuality is somehow immune to this in a manner which no other behaviors are). Some people are more receptive to that happening the same way some people are more receptive to cults. Thus "pseudo-bisexuality". Some people are severe perverts/degens because they have no boundaries, and some people also lack boundaries around sexual stuff because of abuse (being hypersexual due to abuse isn't unknown though it's usually a phase grown out of) and that can be easily taken advantage of. I legit think some people can be a legit homosexual, and like the hypothesis it's a sort of attraction target fuck up. It doesn't make sense that would be genetic as a lot of our sexuality is influenced by culture and environment. A brain wiring mishap of some sort honestly seems the most likely to me. Nonetheless they don't really "get out of it" and that's where I disagree with people that advocate you can get them to turn straight. It's different from someone who started out normal and got fucked up and did weird shit and then decided to "correct their ways".
A lot of the people studying sexuality are sex pests though, so there studies have to be taken with a grain of salt in a lot of cases. People who aren't sex pests don't wake up one day and decides to study that type of thing. Most of us find all that pretty self-evident and instinctual, it's not like studying cancer lol
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
Because many of the same scientists who strapped measuring devices to people of dick to test for le sexual orientation also dabbled in conversion therapy and it didn't work.
Or at least the "arousal" pattern remained - what a surprise.
Turns out just torturing people, or rather, operand conditioning them into what they should get hard to is at best a mixed bag of results.
But instead of admitting failure of their methods, they just said: "oh well, if we can't change it profoundly, it must be in the
Shows you the political power of "scientist" cabals opining.
So, you had interesting points, tho, as already said, I wouldn't call it pseudo bisexuality, if you have sex with both, it's not really pseudo, is it? But I get what you meant by it and I think there's truth to it. But maybe, these men who don't have their brain light up like a christmas tree by looking at henry cavill and still do prison homo stuff on the down low are just into it for the butt stuff on it's on (not talking about me, I'm weirder) and are just acting opportunistic but that wouldn't necessarily mean that it's less legit (but probably coincides with being unhinged or having a somehow low ick-barrier) than what you'd call legit homosexuality. They only thing I can say about myself is that I just never interacted with other boys like most other boys do, left to my own devices, with others like me, I would have just acted more intimately, it's hard to explain but I don't understand the distance straight guys put between each other intuitively - acting like drunk college girl "besties" would be my default and I don't sexually precive men the same way in which I also precive women, on the surface, women were always hotter or more erotic to me and men more often than not rigster like meh, going by visuals and the way most carry themselves alone. Women are just prettier and more elegant, except for a few really beautiful men - but then, actually being close with men, even when "meh", does more for me than beiing with women and I'm not really into fucking that much in general and that is very male a-typical, I would think. I would def. ping bi sexual in some lab test rig, maybe even more straight but that wouldn't really explain what I actually do and how I navigate intimacy irl. I just always seemed to lack a certain set of instincts and interests, esp. in so called male hirachy games, almost like someone half assed my puberty.
Btw, I don't consider stuff like this powerleveling, it's on topic (for our exchange) and for me it's not much different from peeps saying they have a wife and kids and a house where it fits.
It may also elucidate my investment in these topics. And I want "deviant", not "islamic", pls.
Btw, I don't consider stuff like this powerleveling, it's on topic (for our exchange) and for me it's not much different from peeps saying they have a wife and kids and a house where it fits.
It may also elucidate my investment in these topics. And I want "deviant", not "islamic", pls.
Last edited:
Drunk Chipmunk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
"I lived most of the year stealth at a women's homeless shelter so I think I pass pretty well."
Translation: "I spent most of the year making a bunch of vulnerable women uncomfortable in a situation where they were essentially powerless, as they rightly feared losing their housing or even facing violence for twansphobiaaaaa if they dared state the obvious or do anything other than pretend to see me as a true and honest laydee."
Man, fuck this ugly predatory male-ass motherfucker. He was only "stealth" in whatever coom-soaked pornified fantasyland he inhabits in his tiny walnut brain. He's either delusional, or he knows exactly how he looks and gets off on having the power to force women to pretend otherwise.
I'm MATI. I won't PL except to say that this particular one hits close to home, and he can go choke on a thousand girldicks. These fools need to leave women's spaces alone, especially the ones women end up in when things have gone catastrophically wrong for them, usually in a way that leaves them especially vulnerable. Rape centers, DV services, homeless shelters, etc. Fuck every fetishist who tries to force his way in, and fuck every handmaiden who lets him.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
Who would cross the Bridge of Death must answer me these questions three, ere the other side he see.
Metal Slime 20x6
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2023
His wife must be the most handmaiden-y woman in existence because he just sounds exhausting to be around.
