Disaster Microplastics are infiltrating brain tissue, studies show: ‘There’s nowhere left untouched’ - Twenty-four brain samples collected in early 2024 measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight

Source / Archive
Douglas Main
Wed 21 Aug 2024 15.00 CEST, Last modified on Thu 22 Aug 2024 22.13 CEST

A growing body of scientific evidence shows that microplastics are accumulating in critical human organs, including the brain, leading researchers to call for more urgent actions to rein in plastic pollution.
Studies have detected tiny shards and specks of plastics in human lungs, placentas, reproductive organs, livers, kidneys, knee and elbow joints, blood vessels and bone marrow.

Given the research findings, “it is now imperative to declare a global emergency” to deal with plastic pollution, said Sedat Gündoğdu, who studies microplastics at Cukurova University in Turkey.
Humans are exposed to microplastics – defined as fragments smaller than 5mm in diameter – and the chemicals used to make plastics from widespread plastic pollution in air, water and even food.
"There’s much more plastic in our brains than I ever would have imagined or been comfortable with" Matthew Campen, University of New Mexico

The health hazards of microplastics within the human body are not yet well-known. Recent studies are just beginning to suggest they could increase the risk of various conditions such as oxidative stress, which can lead to cell damage and inflammation, as well as cardiovascular disease.

Animal studies have also linked microplastics to fertility issues, various cancers, a disrupted endocrine and immune system, and impaired learning and memory.

There are currently no governmental standards for plastic particles in food or water in the United States. The Environmental Protection Agency is working on crafting guidelines for measuring them, and has been giving out grants since 2018 to develop new ways to quickly detect and quantify them.

Finding microplastics in more and more human organs “raises a lot of concerns”, given what we know about health effects in animals, studies of human cells in the lab, and emerging epidemiological studies, said Bethanie Carney Almroth, an ecotoxicologist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. “It’s scary, I’d say.”

The pre-print brain study led by Campen also hinted at a concerning link. In the study, researchers looked at 12 brain samples from people who had died with dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease. These brains contained up to 10 times more plastic by weight than healthy samples. (The latest version of Campen’s study, which contains these findings, was not yet posted online when this story was published.)

“I don’t know how much more plastic our brain can stuff in without it causing some problems,” Campen said.

The paper also found the quantity of microplastics in brain samples from 2024 was about 50% higher from the total in samples that date to 2016, suggesting the concentration of microplastics found in human brains is rising at a similar rate to that found in the environment. Most of the organs came from the office of the medical investigator in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which investigates untimely or violent deaths.

“You can draw a line – it’s increasing over time. It’s consistent with what you’re seeing in the environment,” Campen said.

Many other papers have found microplastics in the brains of other animal species, so it’s not entirely surprising the same could be true for humans, said Almroth of the University of Gothenburg, who was not involved in the paper.

When it comes to these insidious particles, “the blood-brain barrier is not as protective as we’d like to think”, Almroth said, referring to the series of membranes that keep many chemicals and pathogens from reaching the central nervous system.

Explosion of research​

Adding to the concerns about accumulation in the human body, the Journal of Hazardous Materials published a study last month that found microplastics in all 16 samples of bone marrow examined, the first paper of its kind. All the samples contained polystyrene, used to make packing for peanuts and electronics, and almost all contained polyethylene, used in clear food wrap, detergent bottles and other common household products.

Another recent paper looking at 45 patients undergoing hip or knee surgery in Beijing, China, found microplastics in the membranous lining of every single hip or knee joint examined.

A study published on 15 May in the journal Toxicological Sciences found microplastics in all 23 human and 47 canine testicles studied, finding that samples from people had a nearly threefold greater concentration than those from dogs. A higher quantity of certain types of plastic particles – including polyethylene, the main component of plastic water bottles – correlated with lower testicular weights in dogs.

‘Pretty alarming’​

In one of the latest studies to emerge – a pre-print paper still undergoing peer review that is posted online by the National Institutes of Health – researchers found a particularly concerning accumulation of microplastics in brain samples.

An examination of the livers, kidneys and brains of autopsied bodies found that all contained microplastics, but the 91 brain samples contained on average about 10 to 20 times more than the other organs. The results came as a shock, according to the study’s lead author Matthew Campen, a toxicologist and professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of New Mexico.

The researchers found that 24 of the brain samples, which were collected in early 2024, measured on average about 0.5% plastic by weight.

“It’s pretty alarming,” Campen said. “There’s much more plastic in our brains than I ever would have imagined or been comfortable with.”

The study describes the brain as “one of the most plastic-polluted tissues yet sampled”.

Another paper, which appeared on 19 June in the International Journal of Impotence Research, detected plastic particles in the penises of four out of five men getting penile implants to treat erectile dysfunction.

“The potential health effects are concerning, especially considering the unknown long-term consequences of microplastics accumulating in sensitive tissues like the reproductive organs,” said Ranjith Ramasamy, the study’s lead author and a medical researcher and urologist at the University of Miami.

Meanwhile, a Chinese group published a study in May showing small quantities of microplastics in the semen of all 40 participants. An Italian paper from a few months prior reported similar results.

A handful of studies have also now found contamination in human placentas. A study that appeared in the May issue of Toxicological Sciences reported finding micro- and nanoplastics in all 62 placental samples, though the concentration ranged widely.

In Italy, researchers followed 312 patients who had fatty deposits, or plaques, removed from their carotid artery. Almost six in 10 had microplastics, and these people fared worse than those who did not: Over the next 34 months, they were 2.1 times as likely to experience a heart attack or stroke, or die.

‘Nowhere left untouched’​

The Food and Drug Administration says in a statement on its website that “current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health.”

Still, researchers say that individuals should try to reduce their exposure by avoiding the use of plastic in preparing food, especially when microwaving; drinking tap water instead of bottled water; and trying to prevent the accumulation of dust, which is contaminated with plastics. Some researchers advise eating less meat, especially processed products.

Leonardo Trasande, a medical researcher at New York University, said much remains unknown about the impacts of microplastic accumulation in humans. The negative health impacts of chemicals used in plastics, such as phthalates, are better established, though, he said. A study he co-authored found exposure to phthalates had increased the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in the United States, causing $39bn or more in lost productivity per year.

Microplastic particles can be contaminated with and carry such chemicals into the body. “The micro- and nanoplastics may be effective delivery systems for toxic chemicals,” Trasande said.

The American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic and chemical manufacturers, did not directly respond to questions about the recent studies finding microplastics in human organs. Kimberly Wise White, a vice-president with the group, noted that “the global plastics industry is dedicated to advancing the scientific understanding of microplastics”.

The United Nations Environment Assembly agreed two years ago to begin working toward a global treaty to end plastic pollution, a process that is ongoing.

Several news reports in the last week suggest that the Biden administration has signaled that the US delegation involved in the discussions will support measures to reduce global production of plastics, which researchers say is critical to getting a handle on the problem.

“There’s nowhere left untouched from the deep sea to the atmosphere to the human brain,” Almroth said.

This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group
 
We've already managed to get the structures of a few enzymes that can degrade polymers, site directed mutagenesis is going to be the next step. A few years ago I remember my PI at the time showing me this paper. This might be my personal bias shining through, but I think an answer if not the answer to microplastics will be enzymes modified to have specific substrates and to make easier to handle products for recycling. Issue is I think the vector, scale, etc.

The worry there is the enzymes or bacteria getting out of control and eating all plastics. There's been books about this doomsday scenario for 50 years.


 
planned obsolescence and graph must go up.
One of my pet peeves. I want to buy things that last. I will pay extra for them. Sell me a washing machine that’s built like a 1950s one and I’ll pay. Sell me a phone that lasts, I’ll pay. Please, please make clothes out of better fabrics - I know it’s possible becasue I sew and the things I’ve made for myself are over a decade old and still fine. Everything is worse quality a I have some T shirts I bought from primark back almost twenty years ago and the quality of the cotton is so much better. Old jeans last longer. Old boots and shoes I have have lasted. Everything’s worse. Planned obsolescence should be a crime. I needed a new fridge at the start of the year, old one just out of warranty. Can it be fixed? Apparently not. Why not? Oh just buy a new one apparently.
And the people who are forcing us to buy things that break and need to be fully replaced are the ones lecturing us and taking our freedom?
they can definitely end up in a fetus
There was a similar paper to the one in the OP about particles in placenta as well a while back.
And not just plastics - the chemicals we cover ourselves in daily are bad too. Siloxanes on hair products just one example
 
After looking more into it, biodegradable plastics are fucked up.
I think I remember reading scientists were creating species of bacteria and fungi that could eat plastic PET/PE. We should invest into breeding these and genetically modifying them to eat even more types of plastic.
I, for one, welcome our new Grey Goo overlords. Before they mutate and eat the entire planet.
 
Glass is nice and all, but we are running out of the kind of sand needed to make it so we only have recycled glass now pretty much - at least for reasonable price. For food manufacturers, this means the glass shatters easily in temperature changes like pasteurization which often happens in the container. Most manufacturers like glass also but they switched due to excessive glass breakage on their lines which is super hard to clean up/be sure no fragments got into any open product. I don’t think it was intended for health destruction.
 
Siloxanes on hair products just one example
It is very difficult to find conditioners without silicone-based material. That shit becomes cancerous when heated up (in your hot shower, when you're straightening your hair, etc... The fumes it releases at that heat that smell GREAT are actually the cancerous part).

The conditioners I've found without it are way thicker, in smaller containers, and are more expensive. It's ridiculous
 
Ceramics? Poisonous ceramic glazes have been a whoopsie for almost every civilization that ever had ceramics.

Glass has microparticulate issues of its own. Silicosis is a specific lung condition resulting from the inhalation of silicates (aka sand, glass, quartz).
 
Ceramics? Poisonous ceramic glazes have been a whoopsie for almost every civilization that ever had ceramics.

Glass has microparticulate issues of its own. Silicosis is a specific lung condition resulting from the inhalation of silicates (aka sand, glass, quartz).
Agree, nothing is without its issues. Find a piece of broken glass in your kid’s milk one time and you’ll scream for plastic milk jugs for life.
 
And leftoids talk about muh climate. The spread of microplastics will very likely cause the sterilisation of major populations of most species on this planet, but these idiots chose to worry about some lines on a made up graph.
The people concerned about climate change are also usually concerned about microplastics and other pollutants. They are not mutually exclusive things to be worried about.
 
Look up micro glass particles lmao. Same exact "issue" as microplastics but in glass flavor. I just looked it up and the results are weirdly not related but it might be the search engine I used because one of the results IS about it basically being wedged in bodies/poisoning marine life.
Glass particles are inert and don't interact with your body, meaning they pass through without causing harm. Even if they get stuck, they don't cause much damage. In contrast, plastics can break down into substances that mimic hormones and disrupt biological processes. While glass is harmless, plastics have the potential to interfere with your biology.

TL;DR:
Microplastics will make you trans.
 
Ceramics? Poisonous ceramic glazes have been a whoopsie for almost every civilization that ever had ceramics.

Glass has microparticulate issues of its own. Silicosis is a specific lung condition resulting from the inhalation of silicates (aka sand, glass, quartz).
Maybe Uncle Ted was right, the only solution is to live in the woods with stocks and rocks and eat fresh kills and berries daily...
 
Glass particles are inert and don't interact with your body, meaning they pass through without causing harm. Even if they get stuck, they don't cause much damage. In contrast, plastics can break down into substances that mimic hormones and disrupt biological processes. While glass is harmless, plastics have the potential to interfere with your biology.

TL;DR:
Microplastics will make you trans.




Inhaled silica particles are a Group 1 carcinogen (the most certain to be linked to cancer). It's a hell of a lot less dangerous to work in a plastics factory than to work with glass all day. Silicosis is nothing to fuck with (RIP grandpa).

Inert particles create inflammatory response.

Asbestos is also "inert."
 



Inhaled silica particles are a Group 1 carcinogen (the most certain to be linked to cancer). It's a hell of a lot less dangerous to work in a plastics factory than to work with glass all day. Silicosis is nothing to fuck with (RIP grandpa).

Inert particles create inflammatory response.

Asbestos is also "inert."
True, but fine silica dust doesn’t fly around in nature willy-nilly. This is a danger that people who work with glass or stone have to consider, which is often ignored. Funnily enough, it’s an ancient sculptor's practice to wet stone before working to minimize dust.

Regular asbestos rocks lying around aren’t a big problem either, but if you turn them into dust or a material that constantly releases dust, it becomes problematic.
 
Glass is nice and all, but we are running out of the kind of sand needed to make it so we only have recycled glass now pretty much - at least for reasonable price. For food manufacturers, this means the glass shatters easily in temperature changes like pasteurization which often happens in the container. Most manufacturers like glass also but they switched due to excessive glass breakage on their lines which is super hard to clean up/be sure no fragments got into any open product. I don’t think it was intended for health destruction.
Sand is sand. This is complete bullshit.
 
There is a difference in terms of quality depending on the sands. IIRC something like beach sand can be used to make glass but it will suffer from discoloration unless the natural iron is removed from it.
Well yes. Iron is what gives glass that greenish tint. Iron-free glass is more expensive and is used for things like art and aquariums. There is also a special glass for Pyrex, but it’s not used anymore, at least in the United States (this is why modern Pyrex and Corningware is not fireproof; the old stuff was). The formula changed in the 90s for some reason, probably cost.

It’a true that raw sand doesn’t make nice, clear glass. But sand can be purified and then doped to make the ideal glass for a given need. This is how we make fiber optic cables, and that makes it more expensive than regular glass fibers, but that doesn’t mean there’s a risk of running out of it.
 
I remember how fun it was to gently press the foil across candy bars to get an impression of the logo.
Man I forgot about doing this as a kid. Youve unlocked a memory from the recesses of my brain. I remember how chocolate bars used to a bit thinner (I think) but a lot wider, and that foil was almost soft. Could make a mirror like finish by pressing the foil down over the candy bar if you were careful

remember those bubble gum pouches like Big League or Big Chew, idr, that was shredded gum that emulated a bag of dip? And those cans of shredded beef jerky? So good. And when they used to print under bottle caps if you won a prize or not, leading people to opening up all the sodas to check the caps before buying?
 
I’m glad to see people here understanding that this is actually a bad thing. 80% of microplastics in human bodies are from two sources: car tyre dust and synthetic fibres in your clothes.

You can’t do too much about the tyre dust except really try not to live next to a major road, but you can absolutely minimize synthetic fibres in your clothes.

You should start with your underwear. I am not joking: polyester underwear has literally been studied as a contraceptive for men and found to be 100% effective.

Start there and toss any plastic underwear you own. Then, begin replacing any old clothing with natural fibres when you buy new, prioritising items that sit closest to your skin (t shirts etc). I don’t believe it’s necessary to replace outerwear like boots and jackets, though.
 
I’m glad to see people here understanding that this is actually a bad thing. 80% of microplastics in human bodies are from two sources: car tyre dust and synthetic fibres in your clothes.

You can’t do too much about the tyre dust except really try not to live next to a major road, but you can absolutely minimize synthetic fibres in your clothes.

You should start with your underwear. I am not joking: polyester underwear has literally been studied as a contraceptive for men and found to be 100% effective.

Start there and toss any plastic underwear you own. Then, begin replacing any old clothing with natural fibres when you buy new, prioritising items that sit closest to your skin (t shirts etc). I don’t believe it’s necessary to replace outerwear like boots and jackets, though.
The tire issue is only going to get orders of magnitude worse as well. The entire goddamn world has collectively decided that basic ass 3000lbs hatchback bad and polluting, 6000lbs electric crossover with enough power to do four wheel peels good and environment saving.
 
Recently i've been telling friends and family that microplastics are a real reason why shit like birth defects, cancer and mental illnesses have been slowly but steadily increasing throughout the decades. It's not natural to have plastic particles in your body that stay there and breaks down inside you.
 
Back