Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

I deeply apologise for my interruption since this just boggles the mind.
Men succeeding in love does not make women's expectations reasonable nor their demands possible, and it does not undo the adversarial lens Feminism warps everything in.
I am sorry but what do you know about womens demands in dating since you are outed as a faggot?

You like men but somehow you know more about dating women than bully hunter there . Please explain sir?
 
you inferring that any of what you sourced is somehow indicative of women being able to sniff out these abusive men is disingenuous
It’s an extrapolation I’ve made from the available data.
Can intuition be correct? Absolutely. But stop presenting women's intuition as if its some divine blessing bestowed upon them by God.
I disagree that intuition is a “gift from god.” It’s just more reliable than any other measurable factor. My position is a woman’s intuition about abuse is the most effective factor we know of in predicting violent abuse. I have extrapolated this fact to inform my opinion on a woman’s “ick.” I think there’s just something in their brain that ticks them off to male abuse. Just like you can’t exactly qualify how a person can look at a troon and know it’s a man.

I agree that intuition is fallible but I also think it has proven “reliable enough” from an evolutionary perspective.
Can you elaborate? I haven't really seen a massive change in women's voting habits, will be a great whitepill if true but I am sceptical.
I’m referring to the rise of the “far right” parties that they’re currently trying to clamp down on in the UK, France, and Germany.
I deeply apologise for my interruption since this just boggles the mind.
It’s okay, I won’t report you. You’re very based and you’re also objective evidence that conservative women exist and are willing to join the movement if we can keep our moids and scrotes in-check.
 
Even the chapter you linked from Lundy's book is not about intuition whatsoever, its about women ignoring or rationalising away signs of abuse, and having to make it visible to them, I have no idea how that strengthens your argument.

Jonathan Haidt's observation that man is a rationalizing animal, not a rational animal, is much more useful here. There is a deeper instinct that makes the woman want to be with an abusive partner, so much so that she rationalizes away the black eye he gave her.
 
As I have mentioned previously, intuition is something women have made up to make up for being deficient in everything. You can't measure intuition therefore it's impossible to prove that women are worse at it than men. Take that, patriarchy.
 
I have never ever seen women sniff out an abusive partner
I have time and time again seen them sniff themselves into a relationship with one
really obvious ones, too, guys recognised to be interpersonally extremely grug, short fused, insecure and tyrannical; obvious bad eggs people have to conform around, as men are often willing to, to build towards and maintain a social stasis that's not breaking into fights every day - it's like other men's wariness of their chosen suitor is the real seal of approval they're looking for
 
Last edited:
I have never ever seen women sniff out an abusive partner
I have time and time again seen them sniff themselves into a relationship with one
really obvious ones, too, guys recognised to be interpersonally extremely grug, short fused, insecure and tyrannical; obvious bad eggs people have to conform around, as men are often willing to, to build towards and maintain a social stasis that's not breaking into fights every day - it's like other men's wariness of their chosen suitor is the real seal of approval they're looking for
It’s probably because you’ve only ever seen the mechanism fail. It’s hard to quantify what happens to an abusive male after they’re rejected, unless they make an incel.is account and start scheming about their day of retribution.

Again, it’s not a perfect system. No evolutionary system is.
 
I have never ever seen women sniff out an abusive partner
I have time and time again seen them sniff themselves into a relationship with one
really obvious ones, too, guys recognised to be interpersonally extremely grug, short fused, insecure and tyrannical; obvious bad eggs people have to conform around, as men are often willing to, to build towards and maintain a social stasis that's not breaking into fights every day - it's like other men's wariness of their chosen suitor is the real seal of approval they're looking for
Whoa, cool it with the sexism. She can fix him.
 
Since we are now talking about evolution I wanted to offer a bit of perspective: Evolution doesn't happen within just thousands of years and humanity hasn't been "human" for most of our genetic lineage. Primitive instincts like those that control sexual attraction developed across millions of years through different mammal, ape, and then hominid species. Criminals, deadbeats, and similar failures today would have been great choices back when we were hunter-gatherers or apes throwing shit and eating each other.

Hominids appeared six million years ago, Homo Sapiens only 300,000 years ago. Only 5,000 years ago did we start recording knowledge. Our time as civilized beings is less than 1% of the time we have been on two legs. Human society is a beautiful miracle, and its survival depends on more factors than just those human survival depends on. Humanity won't go extinct if we were all 80 IQ retards, as that still puts us right on top of the food chain.

The lines of social evolution and biological evolution aren't the same. @The Ugly One has hit the nail on the head several times already in that we didn't evolve in a modern world with all these luxuries and tools at our disposal. The human mind that until now had been useful to secure our genetic lineage thanks to enhanced survival skills born from foresight, logic, and rationality stops being useful when it decides that it doesn't want children because "muh career" or "men bad".
 
we didn't evolve in a modern world with all these luxuries and tools at our disposal
I also agree with his take that a rapidly changing environment can cause a “genetic gauntlet.”

My observations are as follows:

1) The modern woman has been endowed with rights and liberties never-before seen in human history.

2) The rapidly changing modern environment has caused what we can all agree on is a “crisis of reproduction.”

3) Studies show that a female victim of abuse’s intuition that the abuse is going to escalate or turn murderous is more reliable than any other observable factor.

4) There is a growing minority of men (incels). Who come from all walks of life and experience hundreds or thousands rejections of women. When they gather together, they are subject to increasingly violent ideation regarding women and several of them have become prominent spree killers.

My monkey brain has spotted a pattern and concluded that certain violent, abusive men give almost all women the “ick” and can’t get laid to save their life. I think this is the root cause of the modern reproductivity crisis.
 
My monkey brain has spotted a pattern and concluded that certain violent, abusive men give almost all women the “ick” and can’t get laid to save their life. I think this is the root cause of the modern reproductivity crisis.
There wouldn't be a single mullato baby if this was the case.
 
Unilateral blame against men. What do you know, it's all men's fault.
Nope, not all men are incels who experience hundreds or even thousands of rejections. I’m even saying that most men are decent because only a minority of them are incels.

What I’m saying is if literally every woman rejects you, there might be something genetically defective about you.
There wouldn't be a single mullato baby if this was the case.
Au contraire, rape, slavery, and arranged marriages are viable methods of reproduction. Evolution doesn’t care. A shame all three have fallen out of favor recently. Quite the crisis in reproductivity.
 
My monkey brain has spotted a pattern and concluded that certain violent, abusive men give almost all women the “ick” and can’t get laid to save their life. I think this is the root cause of the modern reproductivity crisis.
Most incels are low T beta males, the types to look at the ground when women pass them on the street, they aren't violent types. The niggers with 20 violent felony convictions are the ones getting laid.

How delusional can one person be?
 
Back