US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
People are sheep and a majority don't even pay attention to anything.
Not only that, but the majority of the country is dug in because of decades of propaganda.
Kamala could say some shit like "my policy is to kill whitey" in the debate and I doubt her poll numbers would move.
She might even get a bump from it.
 
Most people won't watch the debate. All they need is to have Kamala to remember and somewhat coherantly fire off some "catch phrase" retorts to Trump.
Bro, she's basically perma-drunk at the time. The fact she'll get words at all is more optimistic than the Minecraft movie turning out good.
 
At the last debate we were at a Veterans assocation bar for Karaoke night. It was on TV with subs on and people were mostly of a mind that both Trump and Biden were poor choices. Also irritation that Policy wasn't being discussed, people didn't want "Trump is Hitler/ Biden is a commie" on repeat for an hour

But it was notable after 3 years of not really mentioning it. Suddenly it was OK overnight for everyone to acknowledge Biden just isn't really all there. I think the fact he struggled to answer anything (making it impossible to hide) was part of the issue. Ironically the must lucid answer Biden gave was over flipping Golf.

I think Trump won't go to the level he went with Hillary. They were former friends and I think he considered her fair target. I don't think he'll treat Kamala like Biden but I think he knows he's gotta go with Policy. I expect some shit flinging but I hope he avoids getting too deep in it.
 
. Also Gish Gallop, which is something I'd never heard before but on DU and other sites they act like it's some long term thing everyone uses.
It's been around for a long time. (1994)

Basically, talking fast about nothing or really stupid shit that doesn't address the point.

 
That's the only reason people will watch--they've been told that a debate can go so badly, it boots a sitting President off a ticket. They want to see if a train wreck will happen again. But everyone's forgetting the media is the one who solidified the train wreck narrative--if they were still on Joe's side, he would have been crowned the winner, no matter what clips Trump posted on Twitter.

But Harris won't be as bad as Biden. She'll look like a draw by comparison, to any undecided voters, so they'll wait for the media to tell them what to think. And the media, glancing nervously at the calendar, will anoint her the winner.

Remember the short lived talking point from the Biden campaign, whining that Trump lied a hundred times but the media wasn't talking about his lies? Now they'll talk about his "lies". Global thermonuclear fact checking will be deployed. Nobody will question anything Kamala said, just praise her for saying it in the face of Trump's bluster.
Have you ever experienced this bitch talking?
 
I completely forgot this town hall was supposed to be a debate, don't worry, they've reminded people of that fact.
Biden has dementia as an excuse. What's Kamala's?
On the crowd... All trump has to do is show up and mother fuckers erupt in patriotic fervor. Its amazing.
Trump literally took a bullet for his country. Why wouldn't he inspire patriotism?
Anything ever come of it or did he just disappear for a bit?
They haven't burned that asset yet.
Anyone know why Democrats are so up and down about Liz Cheney's endorsement. I thought Cheney's were devil incarnate according to Democrats back in 2004-2008.
They need another maverick after McCain died.
B. They genuinely think that this will change some Trump supporters' minds.
They genuinely assume that Trump supporters are retarded.
Kumala has bent the knee to Trump again, agreeing to the deboot rules in a surly, whiny letter to ABC

She knows how fucked she is. Personally I'd say a rule of the debate should be taking a breathalyzer test at the start.
 
This might sound silly, but how did you guys and girls learn about politics, and when did you become conservative?
I spent the majority of my early life holding views that were consistent with classic liberalism. My family was also pretty evenly split politically, with the paternal side very conservative, and the maternal side very liberal (the older ones on the maternal side grew slightly more moderate as time went on, while the younger ones trended more progressive).

Outside of feelings of dislike towards Dianne Feinstein for her anti-2A stances, I was pretty indifferent towards politics up until 2012, when I half-heartedly cast my first ever vote for Mitt Romney. I was turned off by Obama, and thought that Romney’s business background would be an asset when it came to running the country. I remember not being choked up when he lost, though. At that point, I still saw both the DNC/GOP candidates as puppets with the strings being held by the same entity (à la Bill Hicks).

The major awakening came when the HS I attended held a school-wide discussion assembly the morning after Bin Laden was yeeted. This place was far more bleeding-heart leftist than even the extremely leftist college I attended. Anyone could go up to the mic and speak their thoughts during said assembly. Only one person expressed gratitude for his death. The rest of the school lamented the country’s glee at the events, and strongly discouraged celebrating his death. That was the major turning point for me that kicked off a hard, rightward swing that persists to this day.

As far as when my eyes were opened to MSM corruption, it wasn’t during the Trayvon Martin debacle, as others have posted (I wasn’t really paying attention at that time)- it was during the lead-up to the 2016 election, when they went full TDS and pumped up Hillary. That was when I truly realized that the media had zero objectivity.
 
Why does tje left have a respect for McCain? I noticed people on the left talked better about him than on the right
Media rebranded him a hip rebel because they desperately wanted him as the GOP nominee in 2000 instead of Bush. Even when the media got new NPC updates in 2008 telling people to hate McCain, they went back to sucking his dick once the election was over.
 
IIRC, Gish Gallop is a technique creationists use. Like Ray Comfort the banana guy. Overload people with questions so they give a stupid answer.
Destiny uses it most often; luckily, people are catching on to his BS.
Because McCain OK'd ObamaCare. He was the deciding vote. Fucking cuck.
This is an interesting hypothetical I was thinking of a few weeks ago: what if McCain voted to repeal Obamacare before his death or made up with Trump, would the media have still showered him with praise?
 
Most people won't watch the debate. All they need is to have Kamala to remember and somewhat coherantly fire off some "catch phrase" retorts to Trump. Then those that hate Donald who watch her be a trainwreck and those who hate Donald and didn't watch. Will be told that moment "EPICALLY DESTROYED" Trump and that will become fact to them.
Literal moron alert. This isn’t some state primary. This is the presidential debate. They always get good ratings. And this is a Trump debate. Trump debates have pulled in the highest debate ratings of all time, and that doesn’t include streaming views.
 
This is an interesting hypothetical I was thinking of a few weeks ago: what if McCain voted to repeal Obamacare before his death or made up with Trump, would the media have still showered him with praise?
lol what do you think
 
Literal moron alert. This isn’t some state primary. This is the presidential debate. They always get good ratings. And this is a Trump debate. Trump debates have pulled in the highest debate ratings of all time, and that doesn’t include streaming views.
But how many that watch the debates are undecided?

How much do debates actually effect elections?
 
Rabbi Shmuley vs Candace Owens.
Watched the full thing. I'll semi-transcribe the best part. Originally wanted to abridge all of it, but decided, "Y'know what? That's retarded."

I recommend watching it all, it's VERY high quality stuff.

1725522086028.png1725522117971.png
This fella even gives us a Bossmanjack crack tongue for free, unprompted, we're fucking spoiled! It's a sign! I don't know of what, but it's a sign!

Prior to this, the Rabbi wanted sources on Candace claiming Gaza was bombed more than Dresden. Also prior to this, the Rabi spent his time with his opening statements just shitting on the black lady. With that being said.

Rabbi: "Israel is a religion of life. That's why Israel got into this mess for October 7th, they traded 1,000 murderers, including Yaya Sinwar, who Israel saved from a brain tumor, the Hamas Hitler who planned October 7th. They traded 1,000 murders for one guy. My sons are fighting in this war, I know it's dangerous, and they aren't asking for war to stop against Hamas, they're asking for a ceasefire, anyway, Candace said Israel dropped more bombs on Gaza than than on Dresdan??? What's your source for that?"

Candace: "You do realize you just used Dresden as an example to justify what was happenin-"

Rabbi: "NO NO NO NO NO, sources, now! You just made blood libel against the Jewish state!"

Candace: "We can't keep doing this, I'm s-"

Rabbi: "I'M ASKING YOU WHAT IS YOUR SOURCE?"

Pierce: "Bloody hell let her answer."

Candace: "I'm going to respond to what you are saying. This tactic of of when anybody brings up anything that Israel is doing is wrong, you get to just scream 'blood libel,' and 'anti-Semitism,' and 'Oh my gosh it's a blood libel.'

(Note, the Rabbi is chimping out a bit as she brings up what a sperg he is regarding his ethnostate. Pierce has to tard wrangle him.)

Candace: "It is not a 'blood libel,' to talk about the amount of death and the tons of explosives that have been dropped on the civilians in Palestine, okay? That is not a 'blood libel,' against Jewish people. It is a nasty and perverted tactic which essentially says 'I don't have to debate anymore, because I just get to call everybody a person who's accusing me of 'blood libels.' Truly what is happening right now is that the blood of Palestinians is being shed. That is not a libel against the jews. That is a FACT, and a reality against Bibi Yet Yet Nahu and this government which has gone extreme in their response to October 7th. So stop this tactic.'

Rabbi: :lossmanjack:"Ok-okay okay, understood, Pierce, can I now have my turn again? I want the proof, give me your source?"

Candace: "You want the source? Okay." <Begins to go through her laptop and let the rabbi go off on an unhinged rant about Candace unrelated to Gaza.>

Rabbi: <Going off on an unhinged rant unrelated to Gaza, while Candace Ovens is trying not to laugh at him while doing her research.>

Candace: "Would you like a source?" <She has found a source.>

Rabbi: <Ignores Candace>

Pierce: "Bruv she has a source, you wanted a source, she has one."

Rabbi: "She called me demonic, you won't let me speak, ree!"

Pierce: "Let her answer."

Candace: "And let me fact check this source as well. So seventy-thousand-"

Rabbi: "YEAH I WANNA SEE WHERE ISRAEL DROPPED MORE BO-"

Pierce: "Faggot shut the fuck up and let her answer."

Candace: "70,000 tons of explosive have been dropped on the Gaza Strip. Let's see how many tons of explosives were dropped on Dresden. One second."

Rabbi: "You mean she said it and NOW she's fact checking? You're kidding! Right!?"

Candace: "You asked me for a direct source live and I'm going to look it up for you so give me one second."

Rabbi: "I don't have a computer on me!"

Candace: <Makes an incredulous face, shrugs>

Rabbi: "This is a cheat sheet! This is absurd!"

Pierce: "LET HER FINISH AND ANSWER THE QUESTION."

Candace: "So 2,700 Tons of on Dresden in an 800 bomber, air raid, and that is according to Britannica Encyclopedia as a source."

Pierce: "And what was the tonnage of bombs dropped in Gaza?"

Candace: "In Gaza it was 70,000 tons of explosives were dropped in the Gaza Strip and I got that from CNN."

Pierce: "Through the duration of the war to date? Is that the timescale?"

Candace: "Yes, which they're saying has surpassed the Dresden, Hamburg and London during World War 2."
Rabbi: :lossmanjack:<retard scrambling to stop people from acknowledging the severity of Israel's violence>

Pierce: <Has to press the Rabbi to accept the fact Israel was right.>

Candace: "It's also in the New York Times." :)

Rabbi: "She had to look it up! Great debate you're running, Pierce!" <He proceeds to attack Candace's credibility and character, not address her factchecking and source he asked for.>

This guy gets absolutely shat on, and the lie that Candace was okay with what Hitler did gets debunked when it was in fact about separating the concept of nationalism from Nazi ideals. They bring VIDEO EVIDENCE TO HIS FACE. She laughs at how absurd he is. Pierce has none of his bullshit. She even mentions the Tunnel Jews prior to 20 minutes.

"One of the things that I believe is that all the Abrahamic religions have been infiltrated by Satanists. And that is what I've said."
This is a spicy bitch.
 
Last edited:
Kumala has bent the knee to Trump again, agreeing to the deboot rules in a surly, whiny letter to ABC

Holy shit, that article is pretty much a blurb, yet they needed FOUR journalists (including the fat nigger from PBS) to write it? How fucking useless are these people?
IMG_2327.jpeg


Can someone explain why they think unmuted microphones would be good for Kamala? Do they really think the "A BLACK WOMAN IS SPEAKING UH-HUH HONEY" line will hit that hard? Trump absolutely crushed Hillary with unmuted microphones.
They need a moment like that so that it can be chopped into a handy soundbite (given we’re in the TikTok age, and people these days have non-existent attention spans) and distributed widely. The media will do the rest, claiming Kamala absolutely BTFO of Trump, won handily, and is the greatest debater to ever debate.

Whether it works on those who are politically initiated is irrelevant- the goal will be to reach those who are undecideds, low-information, and indifferent to politics with a YASSLAYKWEEN moment in the hopes of getting their lukewarm vote.


Savage still has the most based firing from a news network ever. He got a show on Fox in the late 90's/early 00's and it only lasted a couple weeks because some gay guy called in and Mike told him to go die of AIDS.

Edit-MSNBC, not Fox. Looking back, I have no idea why they ever hired him.
I love this guy.
IMG_2328.jpeg
Pulled from this garbage SPLC article.

The cope in the article’s lede is fucking great, too: “Despite talk show host Michael Savage's astounding bigotry and anti-Semitism, the radio industry can't get enough of him.”
 
That's how we all felt when that happened. To add more, a lot of small businesses in that area had Calhoun as part of their name due to location. When the city and dnr changed the name of the place they bullied all the local businesses there and tried to label them as racist unless they changed there names. Like I said before, no one cared that it was named after John C Calhoun. People saw it as being named after a historical vice president and nothing more. People liked the name because it had a nice ring to it and was a nice place to be during the summer. It's not shocking that the same people that got pissy over it's name burned down the uptown district and that part of Lake Street and Hennepin avenue a few blocks further over George Floyd.
I keep thinking about this, and laughing, because I hear the new name in the Fensler films GI Joe Indian voice.

 
Most people won't watch the debate. All they need is to have Kamala to remember and somewhat coherantly fire off some "catch phrase" retorts to Trump. Then those that hate Donald who watch her be a trainwreck and those who hate Donald and didn't watch. Will be told that moment "EPICALLY DESTROYED" Trump and that will become fact to them.
I mean, you are technically right but practically wrong. A little over a third of registered voters watched the Trump v. Biden debate, with the slant of people who watched -massively- leaning towards independents. If you are 'undecided', these are in fact watched. Technology has only made it easier to watch either in the moment or sometime after. Now, normally this does drop off hard past the first debate but the expected numbers are actually -higher- for the Trump v. Harris debate. Skewing heavily towards more left-wing viewers.

This is really bad for Harris, because the reason there is such an expected uptick is because she has been utterly barren on her announced policies. greats watches of the left-wing are seeing this as their one chance to actually know what they are voting for. Additionally, while most independents and undecideds viewed the last one... its more or less predicted for everyone who is even vaguely unsure to watch this one for much the same reason.

If she -just- does worse than Trump it is going to be more damaging for her than Biden's apocalyptical debate. God help her if she does as bad as Biden did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back