Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Pentamidine]

"I didn't do nuffin, those are pixels on my nose from the altered video! I swear!"

While we've all been focusing on the cocaine plainly on Nick's nose, it's also roughly 3 hours of Nick being clearly and obviously high on a stimulant. Even if the pixels were compression or edited in or whatever, he's coked out right in the open for everyone to see and Pomplun says as much in his affidavit. Pomplun also watched several streams going back months on Nick's channel and watched him become gaunt and strung out. Also people were reporting him to CPS for driving while high, for having lost weight very quickly, for neglecting his kids, etc. all of which are consistent with cocaine use.

And no, Pomplun didn't lie. AT WORST he left out an immaterial fact, because where he saw the video is largely irrelevant. Compression/muh pixels didn't make Nick visibly blitzed out of his mind.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

While we've all been focusing on the cocaine plainly on Nick's nose, it's also roughly 3 hours of Nick being clearly and obviously high on a stimulant. Even if the pixels were compression or edited in or whatever, he's coked out right in the open for everyone to see and Pomplun says as much in his affidavit. Pomplun also watched several streams going back months on Nick's channel and watched him become gaunt and strung out. Also people were reporting him to CPS for driving while high, for having lost weight very quickly, for neglecting his kids, etc. all of which are consistent with cocaine use.

And no, Pomplun didn't lie. AT WORST he left out an immaterial fact, because where he saw the video is largely irrelevant. Compression/muh pixels didn't make Nick visibly blitzed out of his mind.

That's why Nick is desperately throwing everything at the wall to get that video thrown out. It ruins him.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

While we've all been focusing on the cocaine plainly on Nick's nose, it's also roughly 3 hours of Nick being clearly and obviously high on a stimulant. Even if the pixels were compression or edited in or whatever, he's coked out right in the open for everyone to see and Pomplun says as much in his affidavit. Pomplun also watched several streams going back months on Nick's channel and watched him become gaunt and strung out. Also people were reporting him to CPS for driving while high, for having lost weight very quickly, for neglecting his kids, etc. all of which are consistent with cocaine use.

And no, Pomplun didn't lie. AT WORST he left out an immaterial fact, because where he saw the video is largely irrelevant. Compression/muh pixels didn't make Nick visibly blitzed out of his mind.

Yep, which is why Nick is trying to discredit Pomplun so that nothing he says can be used against him, or under the specter of "Pomplun lied about this, would you trust him to be truthful about this other thing?"

And always remember that Nick is always arguing things in the court of public opinion. This is as much a filing for this case for his audience, so that he can play the victim later on and claim

"The judge had it in for me. He did not let me challenge the warrant! They violated my rights, but I took the deal to protect my family, I am the bigger man!"

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Holy mother of god, the retards are really going for Chewbacca defense. It is completely irrelevant what channel Pomplun watched the video on, where they retrieved a copy from. When I go and watch Alien 27 in the cinema like a good paypig I get to see THE MOVIE, which is identical to all other copies of THE MOVIE, even it the physical medium it is saved on differs. This is such a fucking moron argument.

The slightly less retarded version of this argument from Nick is that they used different source videos at different points of time and argue a chain of evidence violation. (Evidenced by different channel branding and video titles in the State's screenshots)

The weakness however, is that this makes the issue at hand: 'Are the videos sustainably different?' , and that is the question Nick I'd furiously dancing around making the central issue. Ignoring the lower standard than trial evidence standards for a warrant, thr differences are probably inconsequential.

I don't understand what the judge is supposed to say about this. It clearly is an accurate archive of Nick's video. The detective clearly said that it was removed from Nick's channel. If anything, these archives (Both Backwards internet and All cap) and the dozen other archives on the internet are materially identical to the original stream.

He is trying to argue 'hocus pocus out of focus' from the Rittenhouse trial and bamboozle the judge with technical bullshittery above their understanding.

He is full of wind and fury, but signifying nothing in this tantrum.

No. That wasn't what happened.

Rekieta himself said that was an actual oversight of some kind with the receipt not being processed or whatever which they had to get resolved. He's brought this up on multiple occasions.

In this new situation, a docket entry saying the matter was taken under advisement was added, which suggests the clerk believed nothing was being filed either.

Posters were highly skeptical and opined on how Nick had 'lied' and was 'throwing Kayla under the bus' with a 'divorce arc incoming' while Nock was seething that they were wrong.

Nick ended up smugly crooning over his 'W' when the reord was updated.

The point is that definitive statements on how thr court records work should be tempered by knowledge that governments work about as well or worse than other bureaucracies.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

What was altered Nick? Please explain you fucking moron. That is such a gingerbread nigger defense. "I didn't do nuffin, those are pixels on my nose from the altered video! I swear!"

Nick's only argument here seems to be "well nothing was actually altered BUT what if it had been??!"
Well if it actually had been altered then Nick might have more of a case, not a very strong one but he might have had one, as things stands he has no case. This is what happens when you get the unholy combination of an English major and a Law Degree, some pedantic asshole that can throw a dictionary at you and then straight faced lie to you about the contents.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

There was a point near the end of the Rittenhouse trial where the prosecution used a copy of a video that was lower resolution or something causing that day's controversy for all the talking heads, I can't really remember all the details but do remember it happening during Nick's coverage. It'd be interesting to find his reaction to that to see if he's just doing the same thing here. "Not the original video! Must throw it all out! The prosecution LIED!" or something along those lines.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapruder_film

Director Oliver Stone paid over $85,000 to the Zapruder family for use of the Zapruder film in his motion picture JFK (1991).[24]

That's a lie! The original 8mm film wasn't spliced with the Stone's film. A COPY was.

The film has been featured in films and other media, such as the Oliver Stone film JFK. A closeup from the portion of the film showing the fatal shot to Kennedy's head is also shown in the Clint Eastwood film In the Line of Fire.[46]

Again, neither of these films contains any portion of the Zapruder film. They feature A COPY of the film. THE film sits safely in the National Archives: 'The original Zapruder film is part of the Kennedy Collection and is in the custody of the Motion Picture Sound and Video staff, at the National Archives at College Park.'

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

The slightly less retarded version of this argument from Nick is that they used different source videos at different points of time and argue a chain of evidence violation. (Evidenced by different channel branding and video titles in the State's screenshots)

The weakness however, is that this makes the issue at hand: 'Are the videos sustainably different?' , and that is the question Nick I'd furiously dancing around making the central issue. Ignoring the lower standard than trial evidence standards for a warrant, thr differences are probably inconsequential.

Nick's problem is that Franks requires a show of cause, which he studiously avoids.
I do not think there is any form of "chain of evidence" even remotely relevant here, because "I saw the video of Nick high as a kite" and "Here is the video of Nick high as a kite" do not have to come from the same source, as long as the videos are the same.

If Nick had been able to show that the videos differ in a material way relevant to the warrant, then it would have been an easy slam dunk. But it is not, because it is the same video.

[EDIT] I am very much looking forward to Femboy Mindset, Fatjokes Sean and Redface Kurt covering this in detail with legal opinions.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

If Nick had been able to show that the videos differ in a material way relevant to the warrant, then it would have been an easy slam dunk.

Even then I'm not sure - as long as a reasonable person watching it would believe it is the deleted privated video.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I don't understand what the judge is supposed to say about this.

"CASE DISMISSED!"

This appears to confirm part of Nick's BS argument that they used archives from other channels.

What I don't understand is why Nick filled to argue that they used multiple DIFFERENT archives. One screenshot (the one with the 'watermark' overlay) is clearly from Cog's channel, but the video title of the ones you post are from a different channel.

It looks like the KCPD may have been sloppy in their archiving and not used a consistent video source. I expect some 'video is video' logic was going on.

Probably because if they pointed out that the video and the screenshot were taken from two different channels, but that those two separate videos on two separate channels were effectively identical, then that strongly suggests that the original stream (which Nick didn't even bother to take down off all his platforms) was effectively identical as well.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

There was a point near the end of the Rittenhouse trial where the prosecution used a copy of a video that was lower resolution or something causing that day's controversy for all the talking heads, I can't really remember all the details but do remember it happening during Nick's coverage. It'd be interesting to find his reaction to that to see if he's just doing the same thing here. "Not the original video! Must throw it all out! The prosecution LIED!" or something along those lines.

They were using pinch-and-zoom on an Apple device to attempt to show a small feature (a pointed gun or smth???). The issue was that digital zoom potentially adds data via pixel interpolation algorithm that is unable to be understood and could be incorrect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapruder_film

That's a lie! The original 8mm film wasn't spliced with the Stone's film. A COPY was.


Again, neither of these films contains any portion of the Zapruder film. They feature A COPY of the film. THE film sits safely in the National Archives: 'The original Zapruder film is part of the Kennedy Collection and is in the custody of the Motion Picture Sound and Video staff, at the National Archives at College Park.'

I want to see Nick argue some retarded Ship of Theseus:

It is actually an entirely new video, your honour, because as the hard drive is overwritten, new bits ans bytes take the place of the old. FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE MANIFEST!

Or:

My skin cells have regenerated, so I am NOT the same person on camera! CHECKMATE, ATHIESTS!

 

[Mind Goblins]

There was a point near the end of the Rittenhouse trial where the prosecution used a copy of a video that was lower resolution or something causing that day's controversy for all the talking heads, I can't really remember all the details but do remember it happening during Nick's coverage. It'd be interesting to find his reaction to that to see if he's just doing the same thing here. "Not the original video! Must throw it all out! The prosecution LIED!" or something along those lines.

IIRC, that was drone footage with Kyle in the far-off distance that the prosecution was claiming had him pointing his rifle at a protester standing on top of a bus. The defense argued that the video was so pixelated when zoomed in at a level where you could see Kyle that it was impossible to tell whether the "gun" he was pointing was actually his gun or just the strap slung across his body. I think it was ruled to be inadmissible because too much of what the prosecution was trying to argue was created from zoom-in algorithms trying to pretty up the picture.

ETA: I can totally see Nick relying on the same concept to get reuploads of his stream thrown out as evidence, but to me that ignores the fact that there was at least a full day of expert testimony in the Rittenhouse trial on this subject that has not (and possibly can not, unless that's what the Franks they're arguing is for. IDK, IANAL) happened at this point, and that much of what was shown in these reuploads and used by Pomplun to get the warrant was behavioral, not just the "pixels" on his nose, which mysteriously only show up on and track his nose from the point alleged and not as white noise elsewhere in the video.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Just did a simple google search . . . just because. Here's what I happened to find.

Interesting KAYLA is the one that named their group Qover . . . with a Q.

So what you're telling me is that the Qover isn't a silly letter replacement but rather a compound phrase hidden as one?

For context, here is the full entry from the article:



The Q has to be used with the symbol of the spade (like the queen of spades from a deck of cards) for it to signify exclusive sex with black men.

Nick's MO is to make dealing with him very annoying. It could work on people less spiteful than farmers, but somehow I don't see that working on the court.

Agreed.

Nick's primary tactic is to be as difficult to deal with as possible so as to induce incompetence in his opposition. This is about all he can do at this point, given his own incompetence.

 

[August Levasseur]

All it took was Ana being called a bleeder, breeder and a chest feeder for her to come to her senses.

Once a bleeder, breeder, and chest feeder, but now a bonafide sneeder

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

You Scandinavian incel prudes, don’t you know that when you reupload a video, classic white spots appear on the nose like this?

Don’t you know it’s very common after reuploading streams to appear under the influence of stimulants?
Nick didn’t need to make this argument because it was obvious.


Life doesn’t work the way you think it does, kiwi fags.

 

[Swole McPole]

He has a more antagonistic relationship with the Farms, so he gets a more critical or hostile eye from many. He has directly challenged the Farms on several occasions and engaged in mockery.

Yes, I remember his challenge that people couldn't dox him. That went well, didn't it. He was outed in seconds. Personally, I've always thought he was a dishonest grifter who needs to pay his credit card debts instead of fleeing the country. He was also a first line loyal balldo washer for the longest time, so his judgement is pretty well worthless but he's definitely identified the Farms as the source of his info from time to time.

I’m really shocked by how Ana and Jimmy Dore do more than parrot DNC talking points.

Hasn't Dore started unashamedly wearing the MAGA hat?

 

[Vibralldo]

You Scandinavian incel prudes, don’t you know that when you reupload a video, classic white spots appear on the nose like this?
View attachment 6398178

Don’t you know it’s very common after reuploading streams to appear under the influence of stimulants?
Nick didn’t need to make this argument because it was obvious.

View attachment 6398182
Life doesn’t work the way you think it does, kiwi fags.

Look, Kiwifags, video compression just makes you look like you're completely fucked off your tits on cocaine when in the original video you're completely coherent and sober.

Nick didn't read the animesuckscopeandsneed chat 20 times in a row, that was the compression, you prudes!

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I don't like Mindset, but he deserves some credit for joining with Josh in the request to open up Rekieta's trial to the cameras and to gain access to the bodycam footage. He's shouted out the Farms on more than one occasion, IIRC.

He fucking made out like KF were his interns doing menial research at his bidding. Andrew d’Adesky benefits from comparison with Nicol (typo and it stays) Rekieta, but that’s not saying much.

 

[dustnight]

I knew she would slowly turn into /ourgirl someday.

soon...

 

[Major]

Chunk and the other losers on the network remain disingenuous dishonest scum, but Ana has been growing increasingly based over the last year or so. Actual Justice Warrior has done a pretty good job of covering her journey.

She looks like a little dollie there with her frilly dress and rosy red cheeks. How cute