Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
balldoskelly
BALLDOSKELLY
Skelly B&W.jpg
 
@AnOminous

Sorry for the ping again, but this is a genuine question.

If Rekieta keeps calling the prosecution liars in his motions or keeps trying to string things out with endless filings - is it likely the prosecutors will drop any idea of a plea or even try to upgrade charges against him or tack more on?
They can pretty much amend at any time, generally before trial. They are fairly unlikely just to make something up out of spite, though. More likely they'll be less inclined to give a good plea offer. It's unlikely they won't make any offer at all, though. The thing about a motion like this is it more or less requires you to allege an actually deliberate (or "reckless disregard") lie about a material fact that was necessary to get the warrant.

So they're not going to take revenge on him just for saying something he had to say in a motion like this. Now, the unprofessional way they put it is pretty bad. I think when a defense lawyer is going to make allegations like this he should stick to the language of the statutes and case law rather than dance around like a faggot yelling LIAR LIAR.
 
They should play the cokestream in its entirety in the court twice. Once from his channel and once from Cog's channel to show that they are different.

I am sure the jury will appreciate jokes about Minnesotan cancer patients dying, Islamic terrorists and vaginal fluids of judges so much that they'll want to hear them twice. Maybe three times even.
 
They can pretty much amend at any time, generally before trial. They are fairly unlikely just to make something up out of spite, though. More likely they'll be less inclined to give a good plea offer. It's unlikely they won't make any offer at all, though. The thing about a motion like this is it more or less requires you to allege an actually deliberate (or "reckless disregard") lie about a material fact that was necessary to get the warrant.

So they're not going to take revenge on him just for saying something he had to say in a motion like this. Now, the unprofessional way they put it is pretty bad. I think when a defense lawyer is going to make allegations like this he should stick to the language of the statutes and case law rather than dance around like a faggot yelling LIAR LIAR.
Regarding what @N1bbaN3rd says here, what is the likelihood that the prosecution or court may actually play various portions of the cokestream video in court so as to present significant proof of constant consistent intoxication and, thus, child endangerment?
 
A prankster posted his room on Reddit and every woman with the exception of the bigger Dragon Quest fans proclaimed that his room caused tumbleweeds to fall out of their panties. Combine that with his appearance, and you will have to pardon my doubts about him getting any ass.
Maddox can bang the hags that dig the blue slime (duvet).

Nicholas can't bang his hags even after consuming copious amounts of vasodilating blue slime.

They are not the same.
 
Confession. Nick was my nighttime jam for a good while, until one night he was opining on something that was my area of professional expertise. I corrected him on a statement he had made not thinking anything of it. He didn't often interact with comments in the chat unless it was a superchat. He came back at me with such vitriol, proclaiming that he was correct and that I was an idiot. I was shocked at his over the top reaction and I never really watched his nighttime shows again, though I did see some of his trials during the day. When someone tells you who they are, believe them. He is certainly no wammen respecter, and that goes double for a smart wammen
By correcting him publically (in front of his whole chyat) you made him look less than all knowing, classic narc injury, you dared to correct Lord Balldo - and on his own show!
Thats why he seethed at you. Narcs like Nick can put on a personable and friendly demeanor, but they always have to be the smartest and most important guy in the conversation, the mask slips the second they're challenged. Narcissists hate to be made to look foolish or wrong almost as much as they hate being ignored.
 
think when a defense lawyer is going to make allegations like this he should stick to the language of the statutes and case law rather than dance around like a faggot yelling LIAR LIAR.
Wait, do you mean calling for the cop, with good reputation in his county coming from a family of local law enforcement and firefighters, to be fired and cut into pieces, his family hanged and the family land salted is a bad strategy?
 
Wait, do you mean calling for the cop, with good reputation in his county coming from a family of local law enforcement and firefighters, to be fired and cut into pieces, his family hanged and the family land salted is a bad strategy?
That depends. If the lawyer and Barnes have the goal of bleeding Nick dry by turning this into a never-ending appeals case, then there might be a solid strategy behind this by making it all worse.
 
I went back to watch Nick's stream about his motion to better understand what he thinks the Franks motion is about, and I noticed he ended up arguing with himself at one point. So, I made a stupid edit with a Phoenix Wright vibe:

Rekieta Law v. Rekieta Law - The Franks Motion

View attachment 6399261

Brilliant…

If so may though, a slight suggestion. Splice in a clip of Nick doing one of his 50$ nonsensical ad reads that even he can’t help but lol at, at the “to get money from you” part.

The guy is shilling anti woke DOGFOOD FFS! He lost all right to call anyone out for grifting ever again.
 
Does Nick care at all about his kids? I know it sounds aloggy to say he just doesn't care, but I do not believe he does. They are an artifact of his pre fame past life, they are part of the facade he built around himself that he presented to play the traditional and responsible youtuber, and they were a useful tool that helped him build a dedicated following.

But is he excited to see his kids do well, excel at something, or when he sees the younger ones scribbles on construction paper?

They, like his criminal charges, seem to only be an obstacle he must overcome in order to get to watching his wife get buttfucked by strangers while he is doing rails off a beaten up coke whore's ass.

He really sucks.
The answer to the question is invariably no, his 8 year old child tested positive for cocaine, and he is still trying to wriggle out of responsibility. He chose cocaine and swinging over his kids, they are merely an obstacle to the next high now. They were left to go unfed and unwashed while he partook in a hedonistic lifestyle of dangerous drugs and extra-martial sex.

The question I want to know is "Did he ever care?", I'd like to think yes. In the past he was very careful about never showing his kids on camera, and presented himself as never letting anyone but family take care of them. Him homeschooling them and taking them to activities constantly, if he really was doing that, is indicative of some kind of parental care.

He only cares about the kids in as much as they feed his personal ego. They gave him status and respectability that he liked, and to have them taken away and his parental ability questioned is a grave insult to his pride. Narcissists do not care for anything besides themselves.

His children are the newer version of his Transformer toy that was taken away in daycare, and he is throwing a fit in the same manner.

I went back to watch Nick's stream about his motion to better understand what he thinks the Franks motion is about, and I noticed he ended up arguing with himself at one point. So, I made a stupid edit with a Phoenix Wright vibe:

Rekieta Law v. Rekieta Law - The Franks Motion

View attachment 6399261


This deserves all the stickers! Well done! Highly entertaining!

Confession. Nick was my nighttime jam for a good while, until one night he was opining on something that was my area of professional expertise. I corrected him on a statement he had made not thinking anything of it. He didn't often interact with comments in the chat unless it was a superchat. He came back at me with such vitriol, proclaiming that he was correct and that I was an idiot. I was shocked at his over the top reaction and I never really watched his nighttime shows again, though I did see some of his trials during the day. When someone tells you who they are, believe them. He is certainly no wammen respecter, and that goes double for a smart wammen.

I had a similar experience that humanised him as a flawed human, then the 'fuck you, leave stream' pushed me over the edge. What I thought was ignorance in his initial response to me was revealed as narcissistic outrage.

I’m sure Nick will claim nobody clamored to cover it because it was such a slam dunk that all the practicing lawyers knew there was nothing they could criticize.

Meme Copium seems ro have touched on it

LIVE

For some reason the URL copied from YT is putting a 'live' tag in itself that won't embed.
 
"Shoo cuckold goblin! Can't you see I'm fucking Our Wife in here? Give us some privacy."

I never really found this convincing. Swingers tend to pride themselves on the extent to which they negotiate the pozzing of their negholes.

Swinger: "Sir, would you mind if I gave you wife a good seeing to in the traditional missionary position?"
Nick (to Swinger): "I don't think so. I'm flattered that you've asked, but you're not really what we're looking for here. Let me just check for you."
Nick (to Kayla): "Kayla! When you're done fucking that big black buck, would you be interested in doing some pasty white boy from Minnesota? I see you've still got an orifice free, perhaps he could occupy that?"
Kayla: "Glob blob grrr lob slob flobabdob...."
Nick (to Swinger) "OK, she's occupied at the moment, but when the two Jamaican gentlemen are finished, she's happy to 'fit you in', so to speak. But her conditions are as follows:"
- You have to have anal sex with her
- You must wear a device called a Balldo.
- You have to allow her husband (ie me) to watch
- It isn't compulsory but after you're done, you can then have sex with her husband while Kayla watches
- We're streamers, so you have to allow us to film the proceedings and upload the final product to commemorate 5000 subscribers to my locak channel.
Nick (to swinger): "But if that's an acceptible proposal, we're good to go. What do you say? Can I watch as you bang her with the Balldo? I'll be as quiet as Elmer Fudd hunting wabbits! You won't even hear the slap of my wrist as I spank that little monkey. Go on, pretty please. I'm a famous YouTube lawyer, you know. You can tell your pals that you cucked a lawtuber. You can tell them that you cucked the lawpope!"
Swinger: "Nah, I'll pass."
 
Back