Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
imo its one of the more endearing things I've seen I don't necessarily see it as meanspirited everyone appears to be havin a laugh. Wouldn't be shocked if biden did it to spite kamala a little.Oh god what the fuck. I thought the original picture and 3 second video were a joke. This is sad. Not sad in that I feel Biden being put through humiliation rituals isn't warranted, but sad in that this is who is allegedly running the country.
God kill me now.
Here's a police report from Springfield detailing 4 Haitians stealing 4 geese.Except every single proof has been debunked, like the schizo lady from Canton, or the Goose Man of Columbus, their only "first hand" witness is some people at a town hall meeting, which isn't proof.
Yeah, people are that always pissed over stuff like this, I don't get it. These leftists just hate Trump and want him to suffer. Like they'd crucify him.imo its one of the more endearing things I've seen I don't necessarily see it as meanspirited everyone appears to be havin a laugh. Wouldn't be shocked if biden did it to spite kamala a little.
View attachment 6406065
I mean just look at that smile the nigga knows what he's doing in this shot lmao.
Good thing liberals are fat. Their man-flesh is more tender.Please notice "often favored" to clearly imply there's times where it isn't the case. And also please understand the point is that they are willing to hurt animals at all for their rituals. There is nothing stopping them from extending this practice to whatever is available to them.
After ten minutes of searching to see if there's anything else besides the pet eating rumors, I found there's an entire thread dedicated to archiving Haiti and its problems that I think will serve as a good backbone to understanding just how fucked things are, because remember, these are the people that are now in Springfield, Ohio, and you can NOT separate the two.
View attachment 6406018
Cannibalism is ON THE TABLE, people.
The Late, Great, Hannibal Lecter, he'll have ya' for dinner!
Bigoted Boomers in 2001 were asking for the middle east to be glassed.
Perhaps this is leverage, so if Kamalah really wants a second debate she needs to debate in a more neutral environment.Trump seems uninterested in a second debate. I expect the same people doom posting about his bad performance last night will doom post him not doing another debate.
View attachment 6405111
sure but until then why make myself miserable while I'm still gulag free? If its my fate so be it but as long as the 7/11s and bike paths are still open I'll make the most of it until then.That's assuming the Harris regime will allow you to live your life in any capacity. What will realistically happen is we will be jailed, tortured, and/or forced into re-education camps like the J6 protestors were.
What's funny is that these people are literally taking white people's jobs because the white people in town have been suffering from the drug epidemic for a long time now, and there's a video clip of a factory owner giving high praise to the Haitians because they actually show up on time and do their job.Let’s say none of it’s true. You’re still dealing with feral unemployed criminals who want nothing to do with you or your way of life. They shouldn’t have to be literally killing and eating pets to get run the fuck out of town.
He literally endorsed Kamala in the same message where he stepped down.I know this is never gonna happen, but god do I wish Biden out of spite and dementia pulls a RFK and endorses Trump.
View attachment 6406074
Black women do.I watched this muted at first and thought it was an actual woman, then I saw "her" getting aggressive and confrontational and realized it was a dude. They can pretend to he true and honest women all day but women don't behave like this.
There's an inherent problem to this, resistance is punished and demonized BY THEM WONDERFUL NGOS, and you have no official support from the higher ups and their attack dogs known as the police. They'll cover it up like they did that goose shit (thank you @Harvey Danger for posting it so I didn't have to,) and force parents to say they wish their kid was killed by a white guy so there's no animosity for the CLEAR, DELIBERATE, TAKEOVER that's happening to a small town. AWAY from the rich liberals, in their private neighborhoods.Seriously though, if your community isn't able to resist mud cookie eating orcs and Liberal Eye of Sauron, does it deserve to live?
Wow, really? Almost like that was a joke! Really doing your best to show why you earned that pink triangle today, huh?He literally endorsed Kamala in the same message where he stepped down.
so they took over a part of seattle just not a very big part. im starting to second guess trump's performance. he was debating journalists too.
The last people I'm going to trust are those who are in the position to enrich themselves on a scheme that imports the third world. There's hundreds of local residents saying it is happening, and the officials who claim it isn't happening is because they aren't going to investigate themselves for their own scheme. The only residents I've seen denying it is the fucker who hoped his kid was killed by a white boomer (compromised by DoJ CRS) and a factory owner (stands to profit off importing the third world).Then trust the dozens of local residents and city officials that have denied it.
Claim:
The main takeaway from the ABC News ambus— er, presidential debate last night? That someone should sue the network for creating a hostile workplace environment.
The evening was supposed to offer Kamala Harris and Donald Trump an opportunity expose themselves to the public and explain their positions on various policy matters that are important to the public.
In the event, it was an event in which the immoderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis, repeatedly pecked at and corrected, or pretended to correct, one candidate, Donald Trump, while passing over lie after lie after lie emitted by Kamala Harris.
Trump did not say “there were fine people on both sides” at Charlottesville. He did not “incite an insurrection” on January 6. He has not proposed instituting a nationwide ban on abortion. His tax cuts are not a “tax cut for billionaires.” He did not say that there would be a “bloodbath” if he lost the election. He has not threatened to weaponize the DoJ to go after his political opponents: on the contrary, he has suffered from that very process, overseen an egged on by the Biden-Harris administration. Here was a good round up of oft-repeated lies about Donald Trump, many of which were eagerly recycled by Kamala Harris last night.
This morning, everyone is asking, “Who won?” but that is not really the relevant question. Harris came to the podium with four or five set strength-through-joy speeches that she inserted into her performance. Substituting a contemptuous rictus-cum-moue for her signature cackle, she attacked Trump but never made it over the hard place that has her firmly tied to the disastrous policies of the last four years.
“We are not going back,” her campaign says, but it has been she who helped execute the vary things she says she doesn’t want to return to: the catastrophic border failure of the Biden administration, the humiliating Afghan withdrawal in which thirteen Marines were slaughtered and we instantly transformed the Taliban in top the best armed terrorist group in the world, the budget-busting inflation and cost of living increases, and on and on.
Harris communicated the simulacrum of brittle cheeriness. Trump maintained a grim sobriety throughout the evening. I missed the wry humor he often brings to his rallies and interviews. He might have been better served had he adopted a more light-hearted approach.
But in the end he was right to be solemn. The country really does face an existential threat, or rather several existential threats: in the economy, in the crisis of mass migration, abroad in the threat of war. Harris represents the ostrich approach of burying one’s head in the sand. It is true that prophets tend not to be honored in their own countries. I am not sure how much of the public will be swayed by Harris’s hectoring, contentless promises. Her performance apparently impressed the pop singer Taylor Swift, who after the debate told the world she was was voting for Harris.
Still, I am not sure that there was a clear winner last night. There was, however, a clear loser, and that was ABC News, which thanks to the performance of Miuir and (especially) Davis demonstrated once and for all that ABC is just a partisan propaganda machine in the pocket of the anti-Trump lobby. It was a shameful performance on the part of that cratering network.
But but actually, the illegal migrants are BETTER and more deserving than actual Americans! Don’t care, if they’re so great they can fuck off and fix Haiti.What's funny is that these people are literally taking white people's jobs because the white people in town have been suffering from the drug epidemic for a long time now, and there's a video clip of a factory owner giving high praise to the Haitians because they actually show up on time and do their job
Again, all of this shit is easy to say when Kamala doesn't have 3 people ganging up on her and constantly digging up shit that's been debunked.How Kamala Harris won the debate comfortably
The vice president was controlled and effective where Trump was angry, defensive and rambling.
If Kamala Harris is elected president — and that’s a big “if” since the race is still tight — she won it on the debate stage in Philadelphia Tuesday night. True, her answers were often vague, but they were also inspirational and forward-looking. She avoided the “word salads” that have so often marred her (rare) comments without a teleprompter. She was clear and articulate throughout.
Harris showed the skill of a professional politician as she avoided being pinned down on her most extreme policy pronouncements from 2019-2020, often denying she ever made them. Trump could have pressed her on those but seldom did.
Harris effectively stressed her winning position on “women’s right to choose” and damned Trump for his position. (She misstated his views on in-vitro fertilization, but he rebutted her on that.) She also underscored her support for Obamacare, a smart position nationally, and tied it to John McCain’s vote, a smart position in the swing-state of Arizona.
Most important of all, Harris displayed the control, sureness and coherence voters demand of their president and commander-in-chief. Demonstrating her ability to occupy the Oval Office was job number one in the debate — and Kamala Harris accomplished it.
Donald Trump, by contrast, hurt himself time and again. He was constantly angry and defensive, qualities that engage his rallies but alienate all Democrats and many Independents, especially women. On the plus side, he repeatedly emphasized his main points on immigration, crime and endless wars — all winning issues for him. He made a strong case that he would encourage fracking, a vital issue in Pennsylvania, and that a Harris administration would kill it. (She denied it.)
But all too often Trump’s points were obscured by his hyperbole, fulminations and digressions.
That’s how he managed to submerge was should have been a central argument, “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” That vital point got lost in the weeds. His weeds. In fact, Harris managed to flip the meaning of that phrase, saying it was all part of her opponent’s “backward-looking campaign.”
Trump’s strongest moment came at the beginning of his closing statement. To paraphrase, “If you’ve got all these great ideas, Vice President Harris, why haven’t you done them in the three and a half years you and Biden have held office?” Great point. But instead of emphasizing it, Trump let that winning argument trail away. He should have nailed it down by giving specific data on immigration and then repeating his question. He should have done the same thing with inflation, real income and rebuilding the military to deter enemies. Buttress the points with some data and then repeat the damaging question. He didn’t. He simply returned to his fulminations and exaggerations, which Harris had already labeled a tired, old act.
If Harris’s principal theme was that another Trump presidency would be backward-looking, the former president gave her plenty to work with. Asked about whether he won the 2020 election, he should have said, “I have some views about that, but, like voters all across America, what I really want to focus on is the upcoming election. I want to explain why I would make America more prosperous and peaceful and why my opponent would not.” Instead, Trump decided to relitigate 2020. He was preaching to the choir, alienating undecided voters and indulging his own sense of victimization and righteous indignation. It is not a winning debate strategy.
How did the moderators do? Not well, though many viewers (and all Harris supporters) will disagree. They certainly asked a series of vital questions and should get credit for that. But they also did something they never should have done: they intervened repeatedly to correct one of the candidates. Go ahead, guess which one. All the interventions were against Trump. David Muir and Linsey Davis did it some five or seven times, depending on how one counts their intrusions. They said nothing critical of Harris. That bias matches the results of a study by the Media Research Center’s study, which reports ABC News coverage of Harris has been 100 percent positive since she replaced Biden. Their coverage of Trump has been 93 percent negative.
Even if you are a Harris fan and say that Trump lied and Harris didn’t, it is not the job of the moderators to intervene and rebut one candidate. During the debate, that’s the job of the other candidate. After the debate, it’s the job of other journalists and the opposing campaign.
But biased moderators weren’t Trump’s biggest problem. Neither was Harris’s smooth, commanding performance. Trump’s biggest problem was himself. His answers were angry, defensive, rambling and undisciplined. He spoke like he was addressing a rally of the faithful, not millions of voters unsure who to vote for or whether to vote at all. Trump’s reckless performance will be costly. He blew his best opportunity of the campaign and will have to work hard to recover. Kamala Harris did exactly the opposite and will surely build on the momentum. She seized the opportunity in Philadelphia, won the debate easily and increased her chances of capturing the biggest prize of all.