Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.8%

  • Total voters
    380
Tell them about the requirements and process for getting a driver's license in Germany.
That would be a bit too off topic and a janny would be me over the head with a mop or broom.
But I imagine telling them about driving license requirements and HU&AU would completely blow their minds.

There is about a 0% chance the kids are back in the home school co-op.
To be honest, I would be more surprised to learn the kids are actually permanently at the Nick Rakieta residence without supervision.
He is still cagey with the details, so I would bet that Nick has a permanent adult supervisor in the house and he cannot slack off.
I would also expect that CPS made it clear the kids need to go back to their routine and that includes the home-school co-op.

The Scandinavian incel prudes from church are the best thing that can happen to the kids, much better humans than their parents.
 
Great question.

There is about a 0% chance the kids are back in the home school co-op. (I believe this thread has proven - using Nick's own words on streams - that the co-op families are members of the church that reported Kayla and Nick.)

The next best option is the Christian school in Wilmar, which the eldest child already attended. (Tuition is about $9K/year. This means Nick or Bob has a $45K bill for all five on their hands.) I say "best" because it gets them out of that home and into a structured environment with a wider community.

It's worthwhile pausing on what these children have had to witness.
  • Loss of a responsible caregiver who, by all accounts, adored and fed them. (Nanny #1)
  • Parents descending into dangerous levels of addiction
  • Parents entering into a polycule (no one can convince me that the eldest children didn't know)
  • Cops invading their home and arresting their parents in front of them
  • Being ripped from their home for 7 weeks
  • Losing their church community
  • Losing the only school community they've ever known
That's not even counting the child who tested positive for coke as well as good questions that this thread has considered: 1) Are all 5 back in the house? 2) Do Nick and Kayla have the children full-time?

If I'm right and they are in the Christian school, good. It's a tiny bright light.

They were with Kayla's parents while they were definitely out of Nick's house and care, and the reason in favour of keeping them there was that they would be able to continue with the church and school community because her parents attended the same church.

This is rubbish assuming that they are not in the same church and schooling system. The only exception might be the youngest that was reported upon belief of her not being schooled at home.
 
>Balldo copes and seethes
>Whines about school teacher related PTSD
>Teacher force fed him jell-o
>YouTube recommends wholesome video of coony eating jell-o
coon.jpg
The algorithm works in mysterious ways and for once I like it.
 
Personally I’m 50/50 on whether Nick is still using. His sperging on Twitter and drunk spelling certainly implies it.

OTOH, he’s constantly seething and seems depressed from the lack of drink, and seems to be in that kind of mood that anyone who’s ever dealt with a bitter, dry drunk can recognize.
It's also possible Nick drank and did coke so much that he now just has permanent holes in his head and will always sound drunk.
 
He also exclusively streams about his 'drama', maybe put out literally any other content and people would have something else to discuss.
What content could he feasibly put out at this point?
He’s proven without a reasonable doubt that he has close to no understanding of the legal system and might be hands down the worst lawyer ever, so he can’t do “lawsplaining” anymore
He can’t drink and do drugs publicly anymore, so he can’t do his degenerate streams
He burned nearly all of his bridges so he can’t rely on other people making content for him

Outside of his drama he has nothing to stream about. His career is completely over
 
Private schools are that cheap in America? Why do people still go public?
By people I mean people concerned with the state of public schools. Obviously if everybody would go private, the prices would skyrocket.
Most people can't afford it, and it's cheap where he lives because he lives in the middle of nowhere. Decent private schools in metro areas are around 20-30k/year.
 
Anyone familiar with Rule 25 assessments in Minnesota? I did a bit of a cursory search, found someone advertising basically that he can make sure you aren't declared an addict

http://comprehensiveassessmentmn.com/

From what I can tell, Rule 25 assessments appear to be a way for the state to identify who will qualify for funding for treatment if they are uninsured or underinsured. 'Michael' seems to be able to bill your insurance company (maybe also the state?) for the service that he provides -- which, as you say, seems to be focused upon maximizing your benefits while minimizing any claim that you have a serious problem. Perhaps people use his service to try and convince their employers that although you've been rolling into work drunk, you don't actually have a problem?

Otherwise, I'm not sure why anyone would give much of a fuck about who thinks what? Generally, most addicts I've known insist that the only important diagnosis is the one you give yourself. People can lie to the world and to themselves about their drug and alcohol use. Nobody gives a fuck. Drink and drug yourself to death if you like. Nobody cares. If you don't believe you have a problem, keep on doing what you're doing.

Child Protection Services are really going to care about what you do, not what you did. So they're going to be doing some degree of ongoing monitoring. It seems unlikely to me that trotting out a paid shill will have any impact on that one way or another. In reference to Nick's possession charge, it's a bigger issue. If you've got an ounce of coke in the house and you aren't consuming it like a fucking maniac, you're looking like a dealer or a sex trafficker.
 
What content could he feasibly put out at this point?
He could copy the lawtube commentary format from several channels that would allow him to record his commentary on legal proceedings.
There are several interesting cases going on, the Sarah Boone case for example, which has been a lot of drama with just the pre-trial motions.

He could, in theory, change his format to making videos that his Locals get early access to for a few days, then it premiers on Youtube and he only streams once per week to talk to his fans and answer questions about the cases he is covering and block all other commentary.

If he begs some of the other lawtubers they WILL show up as 1 on 1 guest on his show to discuss the cases, if he promises to stick to case analysis and not sperge about other shit.

I am confident that if Nick was fully invested in a "getting clean" plan and going about his Youtube career with a sensible approach that cuts out the distractions and focuses him back on the content people actually want to see, then he has a real chance of managing it. Even if he only pulls in a third or a fourth the viewer numbers he had in his prime, it would still be a successful YouTube channel by most standards.

[EDIT] For all of the above to have a realistic chance he would have to find a therapist and sort our his braindamage.
 
He could copy the lawtube commentary format from several channels that would allow him to record his commentary on legal proceedings.
There are several interesting cases going on, the Sarah Boone case for example, which has been a lot of drama with just the pre-trial motions.

He could, in theory, change his format to making videos that his Locals get early access to for a few days, then it premiers on Youtube and he only streams once per week to talk to his fans and answer questions about the cases he is covering and block all other commentary.

If he begs some of the other lawtubers they WILL show up as 1 on 1 guest on his show to discuss the cases, if he promises to stick to case analysis and not sperge about other shit.

I am confident that if Nick was fully invested in a "getting clean" plan and going about his Youtube career with a sensible approach that cuts out the distractions and focuses him back on the content people actually want to see, then he has a real chance of managing it. Even if he only pulls in a third or a fourth the viewer numbers he had in his prime, it would still be a successful YouTube channel by most standards.

[EDIT] For all of the above to have a realistic chance he would have to find a therapist and sort our his braindamage.
Nick doesn't want to do law streams anymore

He thinks sitting at his computer, drinking, and talking to his friends a few hours a day is too boring to justify a 7 figure income.
 
Private schools are that cheap in America? Why do people still go public?
By people I mean people concerned with the state of public schools. Obviously if everybody would go private, the prices would skyrocket.
Church schools (pan-Christian, Evangelical and Catholic, mostly) are usually subsidized by their church organizations. Quick googling says the average is $12K/yr. Similarly, charter schools charge a smaller tuition and are generally subsidized by the government.

While one can make a case that these schools can be better, they're not always. Parents can avoid the SJW and LGBTQ+ issues yet these schools often don't require proper degrees for teachers and are lacking in many other respects: enough kids for teams, stocked libraries, football fields, enough gyms, support for learning differences, ESL, etc. (That's also why the tuition is fairly affordable.)

Private schools that are not subsidized by the government or churches generally charge over $20K/student.

(Meanwhile, the MN public school system ranks fairly well based on outcomes. The bar is admittedly low, but it ranks around #15 vs other states.)
 
Private schools are that cheap in America?
Not good ones, mostly.
Why do people still go public?
There are excellent public schools.
By people I mean people concerned with the state of public schools.
Everyone should be concerned about public schools, bc they are a public good.
Obviously if everybody would go private, the prices would skyrocket.

From what I can tell, Rule 25 assessments appear to be a way for the state to identify who will qualify for funding for treatment if they are uninsured or underinsured. 'Michael' seems to be able to bill your insurance company (maybe also the state?) for the service that he provides -- which, as you say, seems to be focused upon maximizing your benefits while minimizing any claim that you have a serious problem. Perhaps people use his service to try and convince their employers that although you've been rolling into work drunk, you don't actually have a problem?
This is right. They're required for people who want the state to pay for their treatment (which they're often doing on the heels of a DUI or other legal trouble as a result of being an addict). Most people are TRYING to get in/covered if not insured. The assessment is also not just for addiction - it aims to identify dual diagnosis disorders, etc. Out of pocket for a month at Hazelden (or any in-patient place) ran around $30k 10 years ago.
 
(I think this is the actual “interesting” part of it for Nick)

Nick thinks his case is so interesting because it involves the most unique individual to have ever caught charges, himself. If Nick Rekieta wasn’t at the center of it, guaranteed, it would hold no fascination whatsoever for Nick.
 
Not good ones, mostly.
This is very regional. The northeast has very expensive (and very good) private schools, the top end of which can approach the same level of tuition as private universities. California has copycats of those schools which are trying to raise their prices but still have to be cheaper. Outside of those two areas, private schools are less good (still better on average than public schools) but reasonably affordable.

It appears that $9k/year is actually a touch above average for Minnesota: https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-private-school
 
Nick thinks his case is so interesting because it involves the most unique individual to have ever caught charges, himself. If Nick Rekieta wasn’t at the center of it, guaranteed, it would hold no fascination whatsoever for Nick.
But if it was a Hollywood celebrity 3 years ago he'd do his best to fake enthusiasm to grift superchats.
 
This is very regional. The northeast has very expensive (and very good) private schools, the top end of which can approach the same level of tuition as private universities. California has copycats of those schools which are trying to raise their prices but still have to be cheaper. Outside of those two areas, private schools are less good (still better on average than public schools) but reasonably affordable.

It appears that $9k/year is actually a touch above average for Minnesota: https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-private-school
I stopped responding because I dont want to turn this into a discussion about private schools but the fee should fluctuate along the lines of the average white income of the area - which I would guess make the majority of the customers outside metro areas - so if that´s the average, or a little above, tuition must fluctuate around 10-15% of the family budget which is pretty cheap compared to the situation in my country.
And of course everybody should be worried about the state of public schools but doing so wont wish it into reality instantly and there seems to be a notion on the right that the situation is unbearable for some.
Ultimately, student quality is the overwhelming predictor for success anyway, outweighing budget by a mile, so I would believe just taking your kid away from something that taints its morals should be more important than how many math olympics your school won.
 
Back