reddit General

To be fair, I'll call him, er, her, a potential pedophile.
HR shrews tormenting the autistic by blithely speaking hatefacts makes me smile.
>Mystery flavour arab woman wears hijab with palestinian pattern
>Joos want to control the hospital
This is a pattern with reddit posts.
>Normal person does normal things.
>Neurotic loses their mind about it.
>Normal person does the bare minimum to accommodate the neurotic
> Reeeeeing continues
 
Usually I don't bother scrolling through the comments because it's a borderline-unreadable mess when the archives take away your ability to collapse comment trees, but holy shit the further down you go the more frothing-at-the-mouth deranged it gets.

Today I learned your average redditor holds kids accountable for their parents' political beliefs. Crazy seeing anyone rightfully calling out the OP's petty behavior get heavily downvoted.
 
Today I learned your average redditor holds kids accountable for their parents' political beliefs. Crazy seeing anyone rightfully calling out the OP's petty behavior get heavily downvoted.
Reddit hates kids. If a redditor has a chance to make a kid upset they'll do it. If this story is real and not just a Neets idea of a power fantasy.
 
Today I learned your average redditor holds kids accountable for their parents' political beliefs. Crazy seeing anyone rightfully calling out the OP's petty behavior get heavily downvoted.
You think they'd have some sympathy considering every one of these fucking freaks claims their own parents were Hitlernazi twanzfobe abusive rapists.
 
Dumbass zoomer doesn't know how to use a computer and expects college to wipe his ass.
View attachment 6427003
computers are racist.png
computers are racist zoomers.png
 
I’m going to insert some of my own opinions on this post: I don’t think that seeing Mickey as a male and Minnie as a female because of their clothes/names/voices necessarily means that you think that gender is a social construct. I do, however, think it means that gender roles are artificial to an extent. What might be considered to be “masculine” attire by one society could be considered to be “feminine” by the next. Same goes for names (they don’t objectively have a gender).

I do think men and women generally tend to sound different and that is rooted in biology, so I would assume that a character is a specific gender because they sound like that gender. However, there are cases where someone can sound like the opposite sex and dress/look like the other gender (ex. Many traps in anime). When that happens, I’ll label that character’s gender as whatever they’re biologically stated to be, regardless of how feminine or masculine they sound/look.

Gender roles socially constructed, but gender itself is a biological reality. If a woman is named Nathan and dresses up as a guy, then her gender is still clearly female despite having masculine attributes.
I think you have a point. The comparison I would make is with the concept of "adulthood". This is a concept that's socially constructed, and what age groups are defined as adults depends massively on what culture and period in history you're talking about, but it's also informed by certain biological realities. Virtually all cultures will give a different social status to 20 year olds than 10 year olds because of the developmental changes that occur between these two ages.

In our current society we decided that age is 18. There's nothing that happens on a person's 18th birthday that magically turns turns someone into an adult, but we collectively decided that age was the one at which most people could be given more rights and responsibilities. I don't think it's a coincidence that 18 is generally when someone finishes puberty.

"Gender roles" are the same thing. They are created by society, but they also aren't made up out of thin air. That's why they are always broadly similar (the mother mainly looks after the kids, the father 'provides for the family', etc.) even if the specifics are different.
 
Less coomertalk, more reddit postsing

View attachment 6440923View attachment 6440928View attachment 6440925

>Mystery flavour arab woman wears hijab with palestinian pattern
>Joos want to control the hospital
The dude deleted his account, but I gurantee he had a history of supporting Democrat and progressive policies, both of which has encouraged this. Retard is probably a victim of his own voting.

"I allowed savages to enter in the name of diversity and now theyre attacking me! How could this happen?"
 
I’m going to insert some of my own opinions on this post: I don’t think that seeing Mickey as a male and Minnie as a female because of their clothes/names/voices necessarily means that you think that gender is a social construct. I do, however, think it means that gender roles are artificial to an extent. What might be considered to be “masculine” attire by one society could be considered to be “feminine” by the next. Same goes for names (they don’t objectively have a gender).

I do think men and women generally tend to sound different and that is rooted in biology, so I would assume that a character is a specific gender because they sound like that gender. However, there are cases where someone can sound like the opposite sex and dress/look like the other gender (ex. Many traps in anime). When that happens, I’ll label that character’s gender as whatever they’re biologically stated to be, regardless of how feminine or masculine they sound/look.

Gender roles socially constructed, but gender itself is a biological reality. If a woman is named Nathan and dresses up as a guy, then her gender is still clearly female despite having masculine attributes.
Nigger, you need to go back.
 
Apparently if you think Mickey Mouse is a boy and Minnie is a girl, then you’re agreeing that gender is a social construct. What do you all think?
View attachment 6442495
tbh if you haven't seen baby Mickey Mouse's genitals, you just haven't been on the internet long enough. He's public domain now so it's canon.
 
I’m going to insert some of my own opinions on this post: I don’t think that seeing Mickey as a male and Minnie as a female because of their clothes/names/voices necessarily means that you think that gender is a social construct. I do, however, think it means that gender roles are artificial to an extent. What might be considered to be “masculine” attire by one society could be considered to be “feminine” by the next. Same goes for names (they don’t objectively have a gender).

I do think men and women generally tend to sound different and that is rooted in biology, so I would assume that a character is a specific gender because they sound like that gender. However, there are cases where someone can sound like the opposite sex and dress/look like the other gender (ex. Many traps in anime). When that happens, I’ll label that character’s gender as whatever they’re biologically stated to be, regardless of how feminine or masculine they sound/look.

Gender roles socially constructed, but gender itself is a biological reality. If a woman is named Nathan and dresses up as a guy, then her gender is still clearly female despite having masculine attributes.
Kill yourself.
 
Back