He'll have to give an allocution of guilt under oath as to the fact that establish guilt. So if he later claims he lied under oath, he'd be admitting to perjury.
The problem is Nick wants to make utterly retarded arguments that would wreck your reputation, so he has to import some dingbat to do it.
He did put it in the filing, in the most half-assed and cursory way imaginable, then abandoned it at the actual hearing.
No because I'm good at picking marbles. I'm not chump.
Barnes had an excuse. He was butthurt after getting kicked to the curb. Cracky was just being a (now non-practicing) lawtuber and lumped himself in to avoid debating his own opinion. Barnes has never been wrong!
Yeah but this is smartest person in any room, nonpracticing Lawpope of the Interwebs Nicolas Rekeita. He'll have some fiendishly well thought out lawyer doublespeak where he can scoff and say "Huh huh(!) Yeah of course I plead guilty because no innocent person has ever had to plead guilty, isn't that funny guys? How weird would it be if I plead guilty because the other option would have allowed all those kiwipedos footage of my kids if I didn't"
This is why I think he'll just take an L instead of getting a plea deal. IIRC the court cannot accept a guilty plea if you imply you're an innocent man coerced into it. Nick's been doing that the entire time arguing state conspiracy on his streams so I wouldn't even offer a plea deal. Not that my legal opinion is worth the bandwidth used to post it.
This is where we get into "Alford Plea" territory, which has been discussed at length in this thread. However, to summarize, an Alford Plea is basically saying "I am not guilty, but the evidence is so overwhelming that I am accepting a plea deal." This is different from "Nolo Contendere," which is "I choose not to defend myself and instead allow the court to make a judgement based on the existing facts and evidence." Alford Pleas are not allowed in all jurisdictions, and even in jurisdictions they are allowed, the court is not required to accept them.
Just watch me. I'll dismiss the criminal case with my left hand, and win my civil suit with my right. I'll take a Dorito.......AND EAT IT!
He’s now the practicing Cuckpope of the Interwebs, Nicholas Rekieta. According to Nick, he never had a law channel. Looking closer at that statement, that was him admitting to having a cuck channel. Just what you’d expect from the smartest guy in the room.
Minnesota has them. Nick's behavior throughout the case makes it less likely the judge will accept it, but it's not that uncommon to allow it, so I suppose it's still possible.
"I'm Nick Cuckieta of Cuckieta Law, a small cuck firm in central Minnesota."
And all he had to do was own it. He could have had a redemption arc at some point. Sure he would not have his original views but he could have gotten some of them back. Blame the degeneracy on drugs and alcohol and at least act like he was sorrowful. He made it a fuck ton worse on himself.
Could have worked a "gyatt" in there and it would be bussin fr fr no cap.Nick thought he could do better than the Omnibussy so he went for that Franks-clussy but then found out the Franclussy STANKS and can’t go back to the omibussy
Yes I hate myself for typing this too
If it wasn't for the whole "26 grams of cocaine" thing, none of this would have happened. We'd probably be reading about a horrific accident because Nick fell into the k-hole while driving. Or a nine year old who overdosed on ketamine or MDMA.
