Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

I believe you're thinking of Brolylegs, who is American and does have arms

View attachment 6461696

He passed away last year
Holy fuck. This thread, of all threads, to learn about this. What a guy. Had the pleasure to meet him in person many years ago and get absolutely destroyed in SF4. For those who don’t know, this guy famously competed against LowTierGod and made LTG look like a DEI hire. LTG then, in typical black person fashion, went on to make fun of the dude who whooped his ass in a fighting game by using his mouth. Truly low IQ ape behavior.
 
1727481231867.jpeg
Lol, based Nippon will NOT play your DEI slop
 
That depends if you think Ubisoft will make good decisions in the future. Because the trend seems to be they will continue to make bad decisions and sink their already worthless stock even lower.

View attachment 6457202

If you bought at the peak in early 2021, you would have lost almost 90%. Imagine spending $90 and getting $9 back. If you bought at the previous peaks in 2018 and 2019 and held onto them, you'd lost even more.

View attachment 6457207

To make matters worse, Ubisoft's already worthless stock value went down almost 20% because of the delayed release of Assassin's Creed Shadows.

Is now a good time to buy Ubisoft stock? It seems like they are doubling down on woke DEI and shitting on Japanese culture and history (the one-legged Torii gate is just the most recent example) so I think their share price will go down even more.

My advice? Literally buy any other stock and you'll be ahead. At least Gamestop was a funny meme. Ubisoft is also funny, but for the wrong reasons.
>women oust the chud executives making their games not suck(making Bayak the protagonist of Origins, having male options in Odyssey and Valhalla)
>immediately goes to shit

Who would have thought.
 
Unsure if it's mainly because the hobby has been mostly marketed to boys/men
No, it was marketed to everyone. Games were new, they didn't know who the market would be. Boys stuck around after the video game crash and the companies that survived had to cater to their audience.

Old vidya ads looked like:
games ad 9yvk5ilpvu921.jpggames ad ataripromo.jpggames ad f23f904da4814ee7590bfab74154c763.jpggames ad Intellivision-Ad-825x510.pnggames ad italy_odissea.jpggames ad itt_box_top.jpggames ad magnavox-odyssey-GameCrate-3.jpggames ad post-13-0-18721200-1537731738.jpggames ad stories1.png

In most ways old vidya advertising would be Sweetbaby's wet dream if it wasn't for the lack of negroes and trannies.
 
No, it was marketed to everyone. Games were new, they didn't know who the market would be. Boys stuck around after the video game crash and the companies that survived had to cater to their audience.

Old vidya ads looked like:
View attachment 6464463View attachment 6464464View attachment 6464465View attachment 6464466View attachment 6464467View attachment 6464468View attachment 6464469View attachment 6464470View attachment 6464472

In most ways old vidya advertising would be Sweetbaby's wet dream if it wasn't for the lack of negroes and trannies.
Yeah, I mainly threw that in because I know we have a lot of bleeders on this forum that came for the tranny hate, but tune out if you say women are terrible consumers in entertainment without suggesting some factors for which they may not be accountable. It's definitely the other two reasons I listed.

Dames just don't like shooting bad guys and saving princesses, Atari and Nintendo really did try inclusive marketing in video game infancy. At least Maxis and Natsume found a niche market with lifesims.
 
Yeah, I mainly threw that in because I know we have a lot of bleeders on this forum that came for the tranny hate, but tune out if you say women are terrible consumers in entertainment without suggesting some factors for which they may not be accountable. It's definitely the other two reasons I listed.

Dames just don't like shooting bad guys and saving princesses, Atari and Nintendo really did try inclusive marketing in video game infancy. At least Maxis and Natsume found a niche market with lifesims.
That's the most misguided and retarded part about the general rhetoric. Why would corporations, at the infancy of games, settle for 50% of the market out of some kind of misogynistic spite when they could go for 100% of the market?
 
View attachment 6467822
All over the news today, DQ3 interview pretty much confirming what we already know.

Original poster:
https://x.com/saou0345/status/1840243748007219257

It's only a few minutes but it's quite insightful.

Interviewer: Rules vary from country to country. When trying to sell widely, there's the issue of having to comply with the strictest regulations.

Cosplay woman: We never even thought about that in the past...

Once upon a time, Japanese game companies used to make Japanese games for Japanese audiences. They didn't even think about things like overseas gamers or exporting the game. Or if they did, it was just an afterthought. They would just hand over the license to the foreign publisher and let them do the job of translating, marketing etc and in return they get some pocket change. Once upon a time, Japanese game devs would actually be surprised that their Japanese game would naturally become popular with overseas gamers. "I didn't make this game for you but I'm happy you like it just as much as we Japanese"

If the modern game industry is to survive, I think we should return to those days. Make what you want for the audience you want. If your game is good, gamers outside your intended audience will find out about it. The same way if your anime is good, Westerners will try to source bootleg VHS tapes to watch it with fan translations. Trying to please the "modern audience" has been proven to be failures many times before in the past like Capcom and the PS3 DmC reboot or recently like Square Enix and Forspoken.
 
1727635451144.png
1727635339957.png
Well, you see, the people imposing these restrictions on you? They don't want people to be immersed. They want people to be as miserable as they are. Hence, the uglification of your work to fit their standards.
1727635580953.png
And I agree with you. But again, the people you are working with DON'T.
But there's also a big problem. There are no people of colour in the game beyond people from the Cuman tribe, a Turkic people from the Eurasian Steppe. The question is, should there be? The game's makers say they've done years of research and found no conclusive proof there should be, but a historian I spoke to, who specialises in the area, disagrees. "We know of African kings in Constantinople on pilgrimage to Spain; we know of black Moors in Spain; we know of extensive travel of Jews from the courts of Cordoba and Damascus; we also know of black people in large cities in Germany," the historian, Sean Miller, tells me. Czech cities Olomouc and Prague were on the famous Silk Road which facilitated the trade of goods all over the world. If you plot a line between them, it runs directly through the area recreated in Kingdom Come. "You just can't know nobody got sick and stayed a longer time," he says. "What if a group of black Africans came through and stayed at an inn and someone got pregnant? Even one night is enough for a pregnancy."
It's not conclusive proof but it's readily available doubt to undermine Warhorse's interpretation. What muddies the water further is whose interpretation it overridingly is: creative director, writer and Warhorse co-founder Daniel Vavra's. He has been a vocal supporter of GamerGate and involved in antagonistic exchanges on Twitter (collected in a ResetEra thread). More recently, he wore the same T-shirt depicting an album cover by the band Burzum every day at Gamescom 2017 - a very visible time for him and his game. Burzum is the work of one man: Varg Vikernes, a convicted murderer and outspoken voice on racial purity and supremacy. He even identified as a Nazi for a while.
Try telling this faggot that Kingdom Come: Deliverance is "just a game".
1727636220564.png
Try telling these faggots that Ion Fury is "just a game". I could go on.
 
Endymion makes a dire warning:


Summary: S&B bombing is what did Ubisoft in, not SW: O (though it did not help either). AC:S is making massive changes, including a rework on Yasuke if not an outright removal of his character. The broken Torii gate was the most embarassing aspect of the whole fiasco (if only because there was no way to hide it) though they were also warned about putting hip-hop as Yasuke 's battle theme song. BUT, the biggest thing revealed about this whole industry is that NEARLY EVERY COMPANY will double down on DEI and woke stuff. They will just hide it from the marketing and the early game until after you cannot refund. BRILLIANT PLAN!!! BRILLIANT I SAY!!! If you just ignore of all the flaws in it that is. The flaw that insiders/leakers exist. The flaw that such a plan prevents virtue signaling. The flaw that this tactic works at best only once. The flaw that many people wait for their favourite (possibly anti-woke) YTers to review games. AND YOU JUST KNOW THAT THEY CONSIDER THEMSELVES GENIUSES FOR COMING UP WITH THAT PLAN!!!
 
Back