UK Jack the Ripper breakthrough as DNA 'finally unmasks serial killer after 136 years' - Every. Fucking. Time.

lmao.png

This is the face of the world's most infamous serial killer according to an author who has been studying the Jack the Ripper case for close to 30 years.


Ripper researcher Russell Edwards has used new facial remodelling technology to create this CGI black and white image of how the killer would have looked at the time.

It was after Mr Edwards used DNA evidence from the shawl of one of his victims to "prove" that Jack the Ripper was actually Aaron Kosminski, a Jewish immigrant from Poland who was one of the key suspects at the time of the horrific Whitechapel murders.

Now, in a second book on the case, Mr Edwards claims not only to have conclusively identified the Ripper, but also the reason why he mutilated his victims in such a way and how he evaded justice.

Jack the Ripper butchered and murdered at least five women in the Whitechapel area of east London over just a four month period from August to November 1888.

Three victims had internal organs removed, which led to a theory that the killer had some anatomical or surgical skills.

Police actually investigated the brutal killings of 11 women, mainly prostitutes, from April 1888 to February 1891, known as the Whitechapel murders.

It is widely agreed that the third to the seventh of them, known as the Canonical Murders, were definitely carried out by the Ripper.

Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes, and Mary Jane Kelly were killed over nine weeks from August to November 1888.

They all had their throats cuts, post-mortem injuries, including to the vagina, and body parts were taken from Chapman, Eddowes and Kelly. So, how did Mr Edwards "confirm" Kosminski as the Ripper?

PC Watkins was the officer who discovered the heavily mutilated corpse of the Ripper's fourth victims Catherine Eddowes on September 30 1888 on a pavement in Mitre Square.

Her head was nearly severed and her nose cut open. She was his second victim on the same night. A silk shawl she had was covered in blood.

Nearly 120 years later in 2007, Mr Edwards, a north London businessman, found the alleged shawl on auction in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk.

Curious, but sceptical, he bought it and found it remarkably preserved with what appeared to be blood and even semen stains still on the garment.

It was later established that as her body was taken to the morgue, acting Police Sergeant Amos Simpson took it as a somewhat macabre "gift" for his wife, Jane.

Although she never wore it, it remained in the family for generations and was auctioned off by Sergeant Simpson’s great-great-nephew David Melville-Hayes.

Mr Edwards was surprised that such an ornate silk scarf, decorated with flowers would have been Ms Eddowes', as she was a poverty-stricken drunk

Yet, the design and dyes used appeared to be like those of the time produced in St Petersburg. This caused Mr Edwards to consider if it could have actually been a possession of Ripper suspect Kosminski, who hailed from the Russian empire.

Could he have left it at the scene, he wondered. So began a lengthy series of DNA tests on the presumed blood and semen stains, with the help of distant relatives of the victim and suspect.

Remarkably, there was a positive match for the blood stains and an unnamed direct descendant of Ms Eddowes.

A request to exhume Kosminski’s body was declined, however, the DNA found in the semen stains was also a match for one of Kosminski's sister’s descendants.

This, says Mr Edwards, is conclusive proof as to the identity of Jack the Ripper - a case that remained unsolved since 1888.

Kosminski was born on September 11, 1865, making him 22 and 23 at the time of the murders. He grew up in Klodawa, near Warsaw, the youngest of seven children, with his father dying when he was aged just eight.

His mother remarried and records suggest he may have been sexually abused by his stepfather. In 1882, six years before the murders, the family fled to the East End of London to escape anti-Semitism that was spreading across eastern Europe after the death of Tsar Alexander II a year earlier.

During the murders investigation, the Dr Robert Anderson, head of the London Criminal Investigation Department, had designated Kosminski as key suspect as the killer.

Previously confidential police reports, that were published in 1894 as the Macnaghten Memorandum, recorded that detectives believed he had a "great hatred of women, specially of the prostitute class, and had strong homicidal tendencies".

Butm even then political correctness made them reluctant to accuse a Jew, due to the potential fallout of antiSemitism.

With no known photographs of Kosminski’ ever found, Mr Edwards then contacted his descendants to obtain as many historical family portraits as possible to feed them into a sophisticated computer programme which has created his likeness based on the appearance of close relatives.

The new image shows a young man with short hair, high cheek bones and a piercing stare.

Further research by Mr Edwards has since uncovered how he believes the serial killer evaded justice due to his brother's involvement in freemasonry, and even why the mutilations took place.

In February 2023 he received several photographs, including one of 15 men all with handlebar moustaches and dressed the same in suits with an overgarment. They were revealed to be members of the Lodge of Israel, an order of Freemasonry set up for Jewish immigrants in Britain.

One of them was Kosminski’s eldest brother, Isaac, who was a wealthy tailor who had moved to London in 1870 and changed his last name to Abrahams. Remarkably, in an ancient Masonic Code, the "Master Mason", called Hiram Abiff, was murdered by three assassins, known as "The Juwes" for refusing to give up his secrets.

The fable led to the creation of thee Masonic blood oaths giving descriptions of mutilations, such as cutting throats, removing tongues, and "That my left breast had been torn open and my heart and vitals taken."

Mr Edwards is convinced that the Ripper was not a random mutilator, but was carrying out these Masonic instructions.

He also believes that the Masonic connections of his brother were probably what prevented his younger sibling's arrest, to avoid the fallout against the Jews.

More alarmingly, the Ripper left another clue at the Eddowes murder scene. Nearby scrawled in chalk was the mysterious phrase

"The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing."

With the word Juwes, spelt in the same Masonic way.

Kosminski was never arrested and in 1890, after suffering a suspected schizophrenic breakdown, in which he threatened his sister with a knife, he committed to Colney Hatch lunatic asylum in North London.

He died 28 years later in the Leavesden Asylum, Hertfordshire.

Naming Jack The Ripper: The Definitive Reveal by Russell Edwards is out now published by Rowman & Littlefield.


src / arc
 
Hmm didn’t they say it was impossible to trace the DNA to a specific person without a shadow of a doubt?
Maternal descendants testing from this thing is impossible, imagine the time and amount of any DNA. Mitochondrial DNA can be shared by thousands of people.

So yeah, a grifter.

Another idea would be David Cohen (John Doe for jewish suspects back then), with the real name being Natham Kaminsky:

"a bootmaker living in Whitechapel who had been treated at one time for syphilis, and who could not be traced after May 1888, whilst records of Cohen began that December. Fido suggested that police officials confused the name Kaminsky with Kosminski, resulting in the wrong man coming under suspicion."
"Cohen was described as a violently antisocial, poor East End local.
Cohen exhibited violent, destructive tendencies while at the asylum, and had to be restrained. He died at the asylum in October 1889."
 
Last edited:
JFC, are we still doing this Jack the Ripper thing? Get over it, already.
Fraid thats impossible. While not the OG serial killer by any means, Jack was the OG focal point for media hysteria around serial killers, and thus drew in every "crime solving" grifter round the world like moths to a flame. Was true in 1888, and has been true each and every year since then.

The whole "this is who this infamous unknown killer REALLY was" field is just a somewhat more socially respectable variant of the Conspiracy Theory genre, albeit with plenty of crossover as this article's babbling about the freemasons demonstrates, in that it markets a superficial feeling of "i'm one of the few who knows the REAL truth that only a handful of maverick experts are brave enough to exposit on for fear of censure, unlike these brainless sheep around me who just meekly accept the official narrative and those cowards who refuse to accept the truth even when they see it" to self important autists and schizos addicted to believing anything and everything that contradicts whatever they think is the official narrative, even when this shit utterly contradicts all the other shit they consoom or even itself.

It is mostly harmless when focused around shit in the distant past like Jack the Ripper or The Black Dahlia murder or Zodiac wherin the suspects are all dead, however a good currentyear example of this shit happening and being used as an excuse to fuck over innocent people is like the Kendrick Johnson case where a dumb nigger getting himself killed like a dumb nigger has been jumped upon by crime conspiracy speds as some evil coverup and turned into a lawsuit bandwagon by his dumb nigger family and their supporters against various random "suspects" which they are still pushing to this day. You could also look to the recent "lynching" in north carolina where the nigger in question necked himself with a rope he was seen buying in walmart on camera in a majority black town, and yet is STILL being screeched about as KKK lynching being covered up by the local (and also black) sheriff on social media.
 
Last edited:
Maternal descendants testing from this thing is impossible, imagine the time and amount of any DNA. Mitochondrial DNA can be shared by thousands of people
Yeah this article ad is really waffly about the DNA evidence. I want to see what they actually have before I believe a Ripper grifter who is pushing his new book. The scarf story is suspect anyway.
Another idea would be David Cohen
There was also that Jewish butcher Jacob Levy, also violent and ended up in an asylum. Lotta crazy violent Jews in that area.
 
Until I see better evidence, I consider Jack the ripper to be unsolvable.
It was Aaron Kosminski.

He was identified by a witness who saw him with one of the murdered prostitutes minutes before her estimated time of death. He refused to testify against Kosminski when he found out Kosminski was Jewish. The police had no choice but to release him, but they put him on 24/7 surveillance. Guess what happened? There were no more killings. Aaron Kosminski was later committed to an asylum where he eventually died.

I've forgotten his name now, but one of the higher ups in charge of Scotland Yard at the time stated in his autobiography that the police knew who the killer was, but had to release him and that he was now dead. He further states that it wouldn't be in the public's interest to release the killer's name. I suspect because he knew there would be a riot against the polish Jewish community like there was when the newspapers were claiming Jack The Ripper was a local Jewish butcher known by the nickname of "leather apron."
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering even if back then the case was so high profile no one wanted for it to be solved since it would cost the media a lot of potential money. It became some sort of an historical myth that the entire allure is the mystery.

As for the thread, DNA evidence even today are not easy to use as conclusive in court, and that's before the massive year difference and using a surrogate person to test.
 
There was also that Jewish butcher Jacob Levy, also violent and ended up in an asylum. Lotta crazy violent Jews in that area.
Whole load of eastern euro/jewish rapefugees in that part of London at the time, along with a fucktunne of syphilis and an endless well of cheap hooch and cheaper hookers. Perfect sneeding ground for batshit violent retards to develop.

He was identified by a witness who saw him with one of the murdered prostitutes minutes before her estimated time of death. He refused to testify against Kosminski when he found out Kosminski was Jewish
IIRC this was just the speculation of the officer who suspected Kosminski, and the whole witness statement is kinda sketchy given how the suspect described immediately shouted an anti-jew slur at the witness and then had a homie chase him away, which combined with just how many attention whores were spamming statements at the cops at the time muddies the waters substantially.

If the witness was not fake and gay however either in what he claimed to see or in existing, then it makes the whole thing sound kinda like an archetypical angry pimp and his muscle, which makes me wonder whether any self declared ripperologist has gone down the road of the murders being the result of organised criminals either making examples of uppity hos, or killing the hos of a rival pimp on their turf. I mean this would explain the "we didnt see or hear jack shit" behaviour of locals quite nicely and could also tie up a bunch other loose ends, especially if you assume some level of collusion with corrupt cops or journalists like you see with other organised crime rings.
 
Last edited:
It was after Mr Edwards used DNA evidence from the shawl of one of his victims to "prove" that Jack the Ripper was actually Aaron Kosminski, a Jewish immigrant from Poland who was one of the key suspects at the time of the horrific Whitechapel murders.
the meme magic around Shia LaBeouf would have still been in full swing. Even better if it came out 5 years ago because then we'd have had some rest back then.
I don’t know what’s weirder. Shia LaBeouf got meme magic connected with Jack the Ripper or meme magic predicted P-Diddy was fucking Justin Bieber up the ass.
 
Alrighty, following on from my "was this just a case of the literal pimp hand being taken too far?" train of thought I did some googling and turns out there is insneed a latter day suspect that fits the bill....assuming the one and only saucebook on him is not just spinning bullshit like every other expose book on why [INSERT SUSPECT HERE] is 1000% the real ripper

To go through the factoids this guy was (allegedly)
  • anuddah polish jew
  • had syphilis
  • had an extensive criminal record
  • might have been in london during the murders, was in new york shortly afterwards
  • was extremely active in organised crime and maintained contacts with corrupt cops
  • was a massive psycho, especially to women
  • fled to south africa from new york where he inadvertently kicked off a century tradition of prison rape that continues to today
  • ran an international brothel empire
  • liked taunting the press by writing troll letters
  • randomly decided to spy for the russians in late WW1 like two seconds before the russian revolution, and was promptly captured and shot by Austria-Hungary
Here is an article from the time this totally-not-a-grift book was published surmising the generalities. The problem with this particular theory as I hinted is that all of this is sourced to one single writer and his book on the subject, and from the article I linked it seems he seemed overly insistant that this guy was jack the ripper solely due to extremely weak circumstantial evidence and some frankly dubious claims about the guy and how powerful/influential he was, as this article notes.

With regards to my prior suggestion though I genuinely cant find much of anything with regards to the notion the murders were more akin to grisly cartel violence aimed at terrifying competition/keeping hos in line than a lone serial killer, and honestly its moot as all the hypothetical evidence should this be pursued is long gone.
 
joos aside i dont fully buy into it being the same shawl. i cant imagine someone gifting his wife a shawl that still has cum and blood stains on it
19th century people were weirdos. Pickpockets literally stole shit like used handkerchiefes and public baths for bums "recycled" water even though they knew dangerous diseases spread via water. A bit of cum crust wouldn't bother them.
 
Hmm didn’t they say it was impossible to trace the DNA to a specific person without a shadow of a doubt?

More than one person can come up positive in a DNA matching test, because it's not a 100% allele-for-allele test. That's why you need other evidence than just "random person whose DNA happened to match." In this case, sounds like the other evidence fits.
 
The only thing this schizophrenic is missing from his grift is tying the killer to the Royal Family in some way. A Polish Jewish immigrant with ties to the freemasons? was he also a lizard and a vampire?
Nah, it's actually pretty plausible this was the real Jack the Ripper. Unfortunately, there's no further evidence and this guy just happens to be really good at drumming up publicity for his claims every few years.
 
That's be weird if they are, because they don't allow Catholics.
IIRC thats due to the Catholic Church's antipathy towards the ole Stonecutters, last I checked the only religious stipulation is some nebulous "belief in a supreme being" and that there are unspecified numbers of juden and kebab members.

The Eternal Polack strikes again!
Yeah, that the killer was likely a polish jew has been long accepted as downright probable due to the volume of polish jew suspects and generally sketchy polish jews in the area. This is surprisingly uncontroversial in the ripperologist and general IRL murder mystery sphere.
 
joos aside i dont fully buy into it being the same shawl. i cant imagine someone gifting his wife a shawl that still has cum and blood stains on it

I know that keeping macabre mementos was trendy at the time. But a shawl covered in blood and jizz is a little much. Maybe she was really into weird stuff? Who knows.

I don't know if I buy this story yet. There's been so much Jack the Ripper claims over the years. The fact that an exhumation request was refused makes me wonder if the authorities aren't buying it. You can't just dig up a grave without just cause.
 
Back