UK Jack the Ripper breakthrough as DNA 'finally unmasks serial killer after 136 years' - Every. Fucking. Time.

lmao.png

This is the face of the world's most infamous serial killer according to an author who has been studying the Jack the Ripper case for close to 30 years.


Ripper researcher Russell Edwards has used new facial remodelling technology to create this CGI black and white image of how the killer would have looked at the time.

It was after Mr Edwards used DNA evidence from the shawl of one of his victims to "prove" that Jack the Ripper was actually Aaron Kosminski, a Jewish immigrant from Poland who was one of the key suspects at the time of the horrific Whitechapel murders.

Now, in a second book on the case, Mr Edwards claims not only to have conclusively identified the Ripper, but also the reason why he mutilated his victims in such a way and how he evaded justice.

Jack the Ripper butchered and murdered at least five women in the Whitechapel area of east London over just a four month period from August to November 1888.

Three victims had internal organs removed, which led to a theory that the killer had some anatomical or surgical skills.

Police actually investigated the brutal killings of 11 women, mainly prostitutes, from April 1888 to February 1891, known as the Whitechapel murders.

It is widely agreed that the third to the seventh of them, known as the Canonical Murders, were definitely carried out by the Ripper.

Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes, and Mary Jane Kelly were killed over nine weeks from August to November 1888.

They all had their throats cuts, post-mortem injuries, including to the vagina, and body parts were taken from Chapman, Eddowes and Kelly. So, how did Mr Edwards "confirm" Kosminski as the Ripper?

PC Watkins was the officer who discovered the heavily mutilated corpse of the Ripper's fourth victims Catherine Eddowes on September 30 1888 on a pavement in Mitre Square.

Her head was nearly severed and her nose cut open. She was his second victim on the same night. A silk shawl she had was covered in blood.

Nearly 120 years later in 2007, Mr Edwards, a north London businessman, found the alleged shawl on auction in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk.

Curious, but sceptical, he bought it and found it remarkably preserved with what appeared to be blood and even semen stains still on the garment.

It was later established that as her body was taken to the morgue, acting Police Sergeant Amos Simpson took it as a somewhat macabre "gift" for his wife, Jane.

Although she never wore it, it remained in the family for generations and was auctioned off by Sergeant Simpson’s great-great-nephew David Melville-Hayes.

Mr Edwards was surprised that such an ornate silk scarf, decorated with flowers would have been Ms Eddowes', as she was a poverty-stricken drunk

Yet, the design and dyes used appeared to be like those of the time produced in St Petersburg. This caused Mr Edwards to consider if it could have actually been a possession of Ripper suspect Kosminski, who hailed from the Russian empire.

Could he have left it at the scene, he wondered. So began a lengthy series of DNA tests on the presumed blood and semen stains, with the help of distant relatives of the victim and suspect.

Remarkably, there was a positive match for the blood stains and an unnamed direct descendant of Ms Eddowes.

A request to exhume Kosminski’s body was declined, however, the DNA found in the semen stains was also a match for one of Kosminski's sister’s descendants.

This, says Mr Edwards, is conclusive proof as to the identity of Jack the Ripper - a case that remained unsolved since 1888.

Kosminski was born on September 11, 1865, making him 22 and 23 at the time of the murders. He grew up in Klodawa, near Warsaw, the youngest of seven children, with his father dying when he was aged just eight.

His mother remarried and records suggest he may have been sexually abused by his stepfather. In 1882, six years before the murders, the family fled to the East End of London to escape anti-Semitism that was spreading across eastern Europe after the death of Tsar Alexander II a year earlier.

During the murders investigation, the Dr Robert Anderson, head of the London Criminal Investigation Department, had designated Kosminski as key suspect as the killer.

Previously confidential police reports, that were published in 1894 as the Macnaghten Memorandum, recorded that detectives believed he had a "great hatred of women, specially of the prostitute class, and had strong homicidal tendencies".

Butm even then political correctness made them reluctant to accuse a Jew, due to the potential fallout of antiSemitism.

With no known photographs of Kosminski’ ever found, Mr Edwards then contacted his descendants to obtain as many historical family portraits as possible to feed them into a sophisticated computer programme which has created his likeness based on the appearance of close relatives.

The new image shows a young man with short hair, high cheek bones and a piercing stare.

Further research by Mr Edwards has since uncovered how he believes the serial killer evaded justice due to his brother's involvement in freemasonry, and even why the mutilations took place.

In February 2023 he received several photographs, including one of 15 men all with handlebar moustaches and dressed the same in suits with an overgarment. They were revealed to be members of the Lodge of Israel, an order of Freemasonry set up for Jewish immigrants in Britain.

One of them was Kosminski’s eldest brother, Isaac, who was a wealthy tailor who had moved to London in 1870 and changed his last name to Abrahams. Remarkably, in an ancient Masonic Code, the "Master Mason", called Hiram Abiff, was murdered by three assassins, known as "The Juwes" for refusing to give up his secrets.

The fable led to the creation of thee Masonic blood oaths giving descriptions of mutilations, such as cutting throats, removing tongues, and "That my left breast had been torn open and my heart and vitals taken."

Mr Edwards is convinced that the Ripper was not a random mutilator, but was carrying out these Masonic instructions.

He also believes that the Masonic connections of his brother were probably what prevented his younger sibling's arrest, to avoid the fallout against the Jews.

More alarmingly, the Ripper left another clue at the Eddowes murder scene. Nearby scrawled in chalk was the mysterious phrase

"The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing."

With the word Juwes, spelt in the same Masonic way.

Kosminski was never arrested and in 1890, after suffering a suspected schizophrenic breakdown, in which he threatened his sister with a knife, he committed to Colney Hatch lunatic asylum in North London.

He died 28 years later in the Leavesden Asylum, Hertfordshire.

Naming Jack The Ripper: The Definitive Reveal by Russell Edwards is out now published by Rowman & Littlefield.


src / arc
 
I know that keeping macabre mementos was trendy at the time. But a shawl covered in blood and jizz is a little much. Maybe she was really into weird stuff? Who knows.

I don't know if I buy this story yet. There's been so much Jack the Ripper claims over the years. The fact that an exhumation request was refused makes me wonder if the authorities aren't buying it. You can't just dig up a grave without just cause.
I member a rather notorious instance where some shitty author and archetypical rich BPD skank randomly decided that a somewhat famous victorian painter was actchully Jack the Ripper because of his spoopy paintings.....fucking seriously.....which indicated he had a mutated penis......again fucking seriously.....all of which caused him to hate women and thus become the Joker or something, and after straight up destroying one of his paintings to mine for DNA evidence she proudly filmed a documentary series that revealed the DNA evidence did not 100% prove he *wasnt* the guy who wrote the "Dear Boss" letters and thus he was totally the killer

EDIT: Well googling imaging her was a fucking mistake...
1728401939017.png
 
Last edited:
The fact that an exhumation request was refused makes me wonder if the authorities aren't buying it. You can't just dig up a grave without just cause.
There is a somewhat similar case regarding digging up remains to get DNA evidence. The Boy in the Box from Philadelphia. The kid was placed in a random potters field and there was a community funded effort to move his remains to a more formal grave site so they dug him up and moved him in the late 1990s. This was right when DNA was becoming critical evidence in cases so one of the members of the Vidocq Society or maybe even the Philly Police asked for DNA samples to be taken. In the short timeframe between the late 50s to 1998 the DNA was heavily degraded and it took a serious scientific effort to reconstruct it that ended in 2022 that finally led to the kid finally being identified via genealogy website databanks.

Digging up this Jack the Ripper suspect would be largely pointless at this point when they can vector it through genealogy databanks like they did with the Golden State killer. One of the interesting aspects of most of these serial killer cases is that they almost always have a short list of a few suspects and the police know its one of the suspects and the other two are just incidentally there as options. They knew who the Golden State Killer was for almost 50 years but they couldn't pin the crimes to him until DNA evidence matched with his niece who did a 23andme test at some point. We have the same dynamic with Jack the Ripper, the police are certain it was this guy and were unable to pull together enough evidence and witnesses to do charges and the DNA searches flagged on extended family.
 
which indicated he had a mutated penis
He did have a mutilated penis from a botched fistula operation as a child though, she didn't make that up. It's unknown to what extent he was damaged though. He did visit east end prostitutes a lot.
IIRC this was just the speculation of the officer who suspected Kosminski, and the whole witness statement is kinda sketchy given how the suspect described immediately shouted an anti-jew slur at the witness and then had a homie chase him away, which combined with just how many attention whores were spamming statements at the cops at the time muddies the waters substantially.

If the witness was not fake and gay however either in what he claimed to see or in existing, then it makes the whole thing sound kinda like an archetypical angry pimp and his muscle, which makes me wonder whether any self declared ripperologist has gone down the road of the murders being the result of organised criminals either making examples of uppity hos, or killing the hos of a rival pimp on their turf. I mean this would explain the "we didnt see or hear jack shit" behaviour of locals quite nicely and could also tie up a bunch other loose ends, especially if you assume some level of collusion with corrupt cops or journalists like you see with other organised crime rings.
Haillie Rubenhold wrote the Five recently which looks into the backgrounds of the victims and nearly all of them had had above average social mobility in early life, better educational opportunities than most women of their class, but then had various bad stuff happen to them that lead to them being homeless. Which is significant seeing how many homeless women there actually were in the area. I can't remember if Eddowes was one of them but probably and so she may have had the shawl from when she was doing better in life. Rubenhold also argues that they weren't prostitutes and that some of the slashes match defensive wounds from if you're curled up sleeping on the ground and they may just have been sleeping rough, so they weren't necessarily prostitutes at all.

If he has the shawl, which was on display at the Ripper museum, does that mean that he owns or is connected to that place? because last I checked it's not public information who owns it. It's on cable street, the historical site of the cable street riots between jewish people, communists, and nazis in the 1930s, and they originally applied for planning permission claiming they were setting up a museum that would showcase the jewish and feminist roots of the area; then it opened at it was a Jack the Ripper tourist trap.
 
If he has the shawl, which was on display at the Ripper museum, does that mean that he owns or is connected to that place? because last I checked it's not public information who owns it. It's on cable street, the historical site of the cable street riots between jewish people, communists, and nazis in the 1930s, and they originally applied for planning permission claiming they were setting up a museum that would showcase the jewish and feminist roots of the area; then it opened at it was a Jack the Ripper tourist trap.
I was only vaguely aware of the hubbub surrounding that museum but fucking lol I was not aware of just how hilariously skeezy the whole affair was

The application featured illustrations of suffragettes and equal pay campaigners, and made reference to the closure of Whitechapel's Women's Library in 2013, saying that this museum would be "the only dedicated resource in the East End to women’s history". The application stated: "The museum will recognise and celebrate the women of the East End who have shaped history, telling the story of how they have been instrumental in changing society. It will analyse the social, political and domestic experience from the Victorian period to the present day."
When covers were removed from the site in 2015, local residents were shocked to instead see a "Jack the Ripper Museum"
a Hallowe'en event at which visitors were invited to pose for photographs with actors playing the killer and his mutilated victims
"We did plan to do a museum about social history of women but as the project developed we decided a more interesting angle was from the perspective of the victims of Jack the Ripper."
"women are boring so we decided to focus on the guy killing them" :story:

Also from the looks of it the Museum opened up a year after the guy got the shawl from an auction, but it would make sense if an object alleged to belong to a victim had been in a previous ripper museum.

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA YOU GOTTA BE FUCKIN SHITTING ME
The museum was founded by Mark Palmer-Edgecumbe, a former head of diversity for Google.
 
Last edited:
I see this claim being made every ten years or so. At this point, I would permantely consider it closed because there's no real way to solve this case considering every single suspect and officer is dead.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
But I thought they were treated terribly and everyone was antisemitism personified? Are you saying I was lied to?
i'll be the fag and say i thought that. At least in the Victorian era, the idea that jews were such a protected class by the 1880s they could literally get away with murder is shocking to me. from what i assumed of that era, anyone not anglican in london was already sus.
exhibited violent, destructive tendencies while at the asylum
the fact that all the suspects seem to end up in the asylum anyways is sort of funny, it does make you think about how many "unsolved" murders are just ones that were done by people caught a little bit later and no one ever updated the numbers. like how people don't factor in how many "missing" people are found
He further states that it wouldn't be in the public's interest to release the killer's name. I suspect because he knew there would be a riot against the polish Jewish community like there was when the newspapers were claiming Jack The Ripper was a local Jewish butcher known by the nickname of "leather apron."
pretty hilarious that even in the 1880s the UK were spineless faggots willing to cover up horrible crimes so minorities don't get their feelings hurt.
More than one person can come up positive in a DNA matching test, because it's not a 100% allele-for-allele test. That's why you need other evidence than just "random person whose DNA happened to match." In this case, sounds like the other evidence fits.
since they have multiple polish jews as suspects wouldn't this not even rule out the other suspects because chances are this polish jews' descendants married another polish jew
 
Someone (I think on the Farms) postulated that a local priest was Jack the Ripper. At the time seminaries taught more than just theology, including stuff like naturalism and medicine, and some of the cuts were done in such a way as to indicate professional study of anatomy.
 
Didn't somebody make this claim like 3-4 years ago? What happened with that?
Kosminski has been flagged as a suspect pretty much since the murders took place, contemporary inspectors noted him as a significant person of interest. He's seen as one of the 'safest' bets but it's a fool's errand trying to make a definitive proveable claim 140 years on. Even the assertion that the 'canonical five' were committed by the same guy isn't definitively known.

Well someone did the murders. Might as well have been him as any of the other suspects - it’s not like we’re suddenly going to find out is it?
Or multiple someones. There's a whole slew of 'Whitechapel Murders' that took place at the same time period and same neighbourhood beyond the 'canon' Jack murders, including a handful of disembodied torso incidents. It's entirely possible there was an entirely unrelated serial killer operating at the same time. Trying to disentangle it all with the primitive forensic police work available at the time is effectively impossible.
 
Last edited:
Back