Mega Rad Gun Thread

Well, looks like my debit card got yanked on Firearms Direct Club, buying merch from Null, or at a gas pump. Hard to tell which one, but make of that what you will.

Also, look at this fucking thing

Screenshot_20241008-173148.png
 
Last edited:
I'm currently infatuated with s&w model 59 and it's younger brother's, but I'm debating between them and a CZ 75. Can anyone tell me how they compare or their experience with the 59's?
I like my 5946, despite being double action only.
Aim Surplus has some police trade-ins available, iirc, and Mec-Gar still makes magazines.


I think Smith finally dropped support for these, so pick up a sideplate now while you can, mine was actually broken right out of the box, an old "NIB" one that had never been fired at that.

Other than the lack of a rail as those were way before this pistols time, its been a reliable stainless brick with probably the best DA pull I've ever felt on a DAO pistol short of HK's light LEM. No "double strike" capability so I imagine works sort of like the Sig DAK and not HK's LEM.

I like my 5946 better than my CZ PO1, which is basically a CZ75 with a rail. The CZ is fairly accurate, but the finish is really shitty (an Eastern Euro gun staple, AK's from the proper place have a shitty finish, too.)

Both guns are accurate, but the CZ will be easier to get parts for, if and when you need them. The stock DA CZ trigger is long and shitty, which you can tune out a little bit with a lighter hammer spring, but the SA pull is quite nice.

I shoot both of them about the same.

I don't think that you're gonna find a CZ75 for $400 unless its seriously clapped-out, so the Smiths are going to be cheaper over all.

Good luck finding one in 10mm for less than a testicle tho, a Tanfo Witness in 10 would probably be better if you want to shoot it.
 
Suppressors and SBRs are overrated. The main appeal is the government not wanting you to have them.

I have several suppressors and a few SBRs, the only one I use anymore is my 9mm with a can because it’s still short and actually quiet. I have a .22 SBR with a can, but I don’t really use it.
Regular Rifle Caliber SBRs do suck ass. My 10 1/2 inch 5.56 is basically useless without a suppressor or gimmick linear compensator.

Suppressors are fun though. Subsonic ammunition + a suppressor will never not be cool as hell. Even on pistols.
Short rifles are obnoxious without a suppressor and still not hearing safe with one, and when you put a can on it becomes the same length as a full sized rifle. Rifle cans heat up very quickly, becoming a hazard, and causing mirage.
I’ve never understood this either. I can only assume the 10-12” rifle exists only to make vehicle entry and exit easier.
 
Suppressors are fun though. Subsonic ammunition + a suppressor will never not be cool as hell. Even on pistols.
Subsonic .300 BLK is cool to shoot. I had the chance to shoot someone's suppressed 7" .300 BLK AR with 220gr subs and the sound of the bolt cycling was louder than the muzzle blast. It was impressively quiet.
 
help me out with MP5 optics fellas. the HK style irons are the greatest to have blessed my vision. i'm putting holes within holes with them, but i yearn for something illuminated. lightweight and magnified, even. i love their prisms but no way PA's SL3x has the eye relief for something like the HKParts raised mount. should i just go for broke, say fuck the iron sights and sell enough jenkem for an ACOG? maybe a mini? would the gun itself being made by MKE matter? should i shit myself and do nothing?
edit: maybe even put buffalo bore +P+ 147gr for coyote business?
ACOGs are antiquated technology at this point with little benefit. Basically a waste of money.
not exactly but i haven't had a hands on, eyes on experience with optics that work particularly well with astigmatism other than something like an EOTECH or PA prisms.
Try out a green dot sight. They work way better with astigmatism.
The barrel is hovering just above my dick. If a bullet goes off I will surely die, which is why I’m not putting one in the chamber just yet.
This speaks more to issues with fundamental skills. Your gun isn't going to just go off in the holster (well, unless you're one of those guys that carries a P320). If your gun goes off while you're carrying it, you done goofed. Look down at the holster, clear the way with your off-hand, watch the gun go into the holster. Build this routine and confidence will follow.

Carrying with an empty chamber can get you killed. Take the time to practice and train on your fundamentals. Train, train, train. If you think you've trained enough, shut up and train some more. Training's the duct tape of the firearms world.
 
Last edited:
Try out a green dot sight. They work way better with astigmatism.
I think this is very dependent on someone's astigmatism, because I tried a Holosun green pistol dot and it was no better than a red dot to my eyes. I have the starburst style astigmatism. Both red and green starburst for me.

Other than etched reticles, EOTechs look the best to my eyes.
 
This speaks more to issues with fundamental skills. Your gun isn't going to just go off in the holster (well, unless you're one of those guys that carries a P320). If your gun goes off while you're carrying it, you done goofed. Look down at the holster, clear the way with your off-hand, watch the gun go into the holster. Build this routine and confidence will follow.

Carrying with an empty chamber can get you killed. Take the time to practice and train on your fundamentals. Train, train, train. If you think you've trained enough, shut up and train some more. Training's the duct tape of the firearms world.
Or just carry 1 to 5 o'clock like a normal human being.
 
VSSM
1728483371603.png
1728483462542.png

ASM
1728483548140.png

VSK-94
1728483575986.png

Sureshot 2.1 Chassis from a recent Kalashnikov Concern marketing video
1728483613035.png

Green Suppressed A545 with suppressor and thermal
1728483654642.png

New HK, not released only leaks
1728484470288.png

Import configuration SCAR
1728485191619.png
New DIY FRT Option in the works, The F.A.S.T or "Dorito Trigger" by GunCAD Dev Stubbs.
-Standard Selector and FCG
-Requires a "clearance cut in the upper" and a "Notch on the side of the side of the BCG"(?)
1728485369242.png

Another early rendering of a Bullpup bolt action AR
Now with 30 degree offset magwell
1728485843967.png

New entrant into the world of Printed AR lowers, no info at this time
1728486797066.png

I can't think of a witty antisemetic quip for this image
1728487990351.png

An Insane man is working on a pistol thingy that fires mini shells, here is the magazine, about the same length as a glock 19 mag
1728488061768.png

Famas said to be from the personal gun collection of Uday Hussein
1728488184904.png

Printed P322 to CP33 magazine adapter
1728488327774.png

AM-17 prototypes
1728488504133.png
1728488523683.png

Recently Sig inaugurated a new ammo plant at Arkansas, at the event commemorating it they had this display that shows two very interesting pieces of information.
-A US Unit or organization has in at least testing quanitities adopted the Sig LMG-762 (which is the 7.62 variant of the LMG-6.8 which the Army adopted as the XM250), AFTER the acceptance of the XM250
-The Jews in the zionist entity has also received the LMG-762 AND The MMG-338 in at least testing quantities
1728488699651.png

3DPrint.com cites a study that claims that by the year 2032, a full 29% of the by then 1M suppressors sold in America annually will be 3D Printed
Comparison to AUG
Videos
 
I vehemently disagree that the ACOG is antiquated and a waste of money. They have a lot of benefits that other optics don't offer, such as never needing batteries (unless you get the LED model) and their rugged construction. There was a Marine during the GWOT who took a 7.62x39mm round to his ACOG, blasting a sizable hole in the side, and it didn't even lose zero. He was able to stay in the fight and didn't even realize his optic had been shot until they had returned to base and he went to clean his rifle, which is when he saw the hole and realized what had happened. That optic was sent back to Trijicon who sent him a replacement and put the damaged optic in their Hall of Fame. I think they're a great option for anyone who wants a simple, rugged optic for a fighting carbine or PCC and doesn't want a red dot.
 
I vehemently disagree that the ACOG is antiquated and a waste of money. They have a lot of benefits that other optics don't offer, such as never needing batteries (unless you get the LED model) and their rugged construction. There was a Marine during the GWOT who took a 7.62x39mm round to his ACOG, blasting a sizable hole in the side, and it didn't even lose zero. He was able to stay in the fight and didn't even realize his optic had been shot until they had returned to base and he went to clean his rifle, which is when he saw the hole and realized what had happened. That optic was sent back to Trijicon who sent him a replacement and put the damaged optic in their Hall of Fame. I think they're a great option for anyone who wants a simple, rugged optic for a fighting carbine or PCC and doesn't want a red dot.
the only thing I dislike about the ACOG is the fibre optic which gets far too bright to shoot at range, but also the battery version exists so this is a non-issue. ACOG's are still probably the king of fixed mag. Prism optics.
 
I vehemently disagree that the ACOG is antiquated and a waste of money. They have a lot of benefits that other optics don't offer, such as never needing batteries (unless you get the LED model) and their rugged construction. There was a Marine during the GWOT who took a 7.62x39mm round to his ACOG, blasting a sizable hole in the side, and it didn't even lose zero. He was able to stay in the fight and didn't even realize his optic had been shot until they had returned to base and he went to clean his rifle, which is when he saw the hole and realized what had happened. That optic was sent back to Trijicon who sent him a replacement and put the damaged optic in their Hall of Fame. I think they're a great option for anyone who wants a simple, rugged optic for a fighting carbine or PCC and doesn't want a red dot.
the only thing I dislike about the ACOG is the fibre optic which gets far too bright to shoot at range, but also the battery version exists so this is a non-issue. ACOG's are still probably the king of fixed mag. Prism optics.

If they only made a 1x version of the ACOG.

I guess that is a red dot in a nutshell but they have some sort of method for shooting at close quarters with an ACOG.

And I learned while looking into ACOGs, that there are different designs for the same 4x32 which either suits the M4A1 or the M16A4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dean Pentel
If they only made a 1x version of the ACOG.

I guess that is a red dot in a nutshell but they have some sort of method for shooting at close quarters with an ACOG.

And I learned while looking into ACOGs, that there are different designs for the same 4x32 which either suits the M4A1 or the M16A4.

Trijicon makes a wide variety of ACOG models, from the 1.5x compact model all the way up to the 6x DMR/GPMG model. And every model comes with a wide variety of reticles for 5.56x45mm, .300 Blk, 7.62x39mm, and 7.62x51mm. I believe the 1.5x and 2x compact ACOGs even have a more generic cross hair style reticle that have no BDC hashmarks better suited for close quarters shooting with a subgun or PCC, since those types of weapons aren't typically used for engaging targets at longer ranges, so compensating for bullet drop isn't a concern.

I've actually been considering getting either a 3.5x or 4x ACOG for my MWS308 and putting it on a quick change mount that will retain zero when removed and replaced so that I can swap the Aimpoint Comp M4 for it when I want magnification. I do have a second upper for it that has an Elcan Spectre TR scope that I plan on building up as a DMR with a 20" barrel for when I really want longer range, but I wouldn't mind being able to have magnification on the primary upper without the extra weight of a magnifier and having bullet drop compensation.
 
the only thing I dislike about the ACOG is the fibre optic which gets far too bright to shoot at range
piece of tape is used to cover parts of the fiber optic.
If they only made a 1x version of the ACOG.
RX series (RX-01, et c), SRS, and the dual illumination RMR are functionally an ACOG (sort of) as an unmagnified red-dot. the whole "advanced combat optical gunsight" sort of implies some level of magnification with a reticle that allows ranging and acquisition/PID with minimal adjustment for the shooter.
 
Well either in a moment of madness or brilliance I ordered 300 rounds of 40 S&W. 150 is 165 aluminum case Blazer, the other 150 is brass case 180 grain Blazer. It was cheap enough so I bought it lol. I'm basically getting all the ammo and accessories before I get my sd40 2.0. Probably going to get one extra 14 round factory mag since the gun only comes with one of those, and a holster.
 
They've been on sale for months on end here to the point where shops can't get rid of their shit in 9x19, .40, or .45, I think their reputation took a major hit after the coof when everyone's ammo was rushed out the factory. I've got no opinions but I've heard they were occasionally crap.
praying for u rn
 
They've been on sale for months on end here to the point where shops can't get rid of their shit in 9x19, .40, or .45, I think their reputation took a major hit after the coof when everyone's ammo was rushed out the factory. I've got no opinions but I've heard they were occasionally crap.
praying for u rn
It's all range food anyway, if it jams so be it, it's cheap fodder to start my 40 horde. But thank you for the prayer lol.
 
-A US Unit or organization has in at least testing quanitities adopted the Sig LMG-762 (which is the 7.62 variant of the LMG-6.8 which the Army adopted as the XM250), AFTER the acceptance of the XM250
-The Jews in the zionist entity has also received the LMG-762 AND The MMG-338 in at least testing quantities
Probably because someone realized the 6.8x51 is DoA and that they have access to MILLIONS of rounds of 7.62 NATO..... Hmmm 🤔
 
Back