Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 70 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 160 40.2%

  • Total voters
    398
Aaron Imholte LEAKED his own Twitter DMs on his Monday morning show.

Aaron has been exposed as being in DMs with Potentially Criminal, Meme Copium, and Rekieta Twitter alog "Crackieta", which was covered by Chad Zumock.

aaron_leak.png
(as highlighted by MiseryClips on Twitter)

On October 9, either Aaron or "Crackieta" messaged the other beginning with: "FUCK YES! Tell Sean and Ashton that [...}"
On October 10, Aaron appears to have messaged Sean: "I keep my therapist employed, which [...]"
On October 12, either Aaron or Meme Copium messaged the other beginning with: "Sure, if something is told to me in [confidence...]"

Aaron was also in the process of booking an appearance with Jesse in the leaked DMs.

I can't find the clip in question (maybe it was pulled when people realized it had a DM leak in them) and I am not going through Aaron's show to try to find it in there. I'd say there was a decent chance Nick was in Melton's chat in the hope of discussing the DM leak earlier in the day, but from reading the title and description of Melton's stream, the self-proclaimed expert on Aaron Imholte missed the leaks.

showercallalert.jpg

@Potentially Criminal, you are subject of a SHOWER CALL ALERT, which means that the latest analyses suggest you are at high risk of receiving shower calls or texts in the next 24 hours.
Please consider immediate precautions, such as muting your devices.
 
Aaron Imholte LEAKED his own Twitter DMs on his Monday morning show.

Aaron has been exposed as being in DMs with Potentially Criminal, Meme Copium, and Rekieta Twitter alog "Crackieta", which was covered by Chad Zumock.

View attachment 6526334
(as highlighted by MiseryClips on Twitter)

On October 9, either Aaron or "Crackieta" messaged the other beginning with: "FUCK YES! Tell Sean and Ashton that [...}"
On October 10, Aaron appears to have messaged Sean: "I keep my therapist employed, which [...]"
On October 12, either Aaron or Meme Copium messaged the other beginning with: "Sure, if something is told to me in [confidence...]"

Aaron was also in the process of booking an appearance with Jesse in the leaked DMs.

I can't find the clip in question (maybe it was pulled when people realized it had a DM leak in them) and I am not going through Aaron's show to try to find it in there. I'd say there was a decent chance Nick was in Melton's chat in the hope of discussing the DM leak earlier in the day, but from reading the title and description of Melton's stream, the self-proclaimed expert on Aaron Imholte missed the leaks.

View attachment 6526421

@Potentially Criminal, you are subject of a SHOWER CALL ALERT, which means that the latest analyses suggest you are at high risk of receiving shower calls or texts in the next 24 hours.
Please consider immediate precautions, such as muting your devices.
Aaron continues to rival Nick himself in incompetency
 
I can't find the clip in question (maybe it was pulled when people realized it had a DM leak in them) and I am not going through Aaron's show to try to find it in there.
aaron_leak.pngStallyn19 - Steel Toe.png
It was a Stallyn19 clip that got deleted. Stallyn19 is a clipper, so why would he delete this one? He doesn't appear in the DMs as far as I can see. 🤔

EDIT: The clip still exists on Odysee:
The leak is @11:50.
DMs.png
 
Last edited:
His dick is limp, we all know that, he can't get it up.

But he used to have one source of power, and that was streaming. Now, he has no access to it. All he can do is cuck.

He can no longer harness a mighty horde of followers and minions, because he told them to fuck off and they did.

All he can do is silently cope, silently seethe, impotently rage against his detractors. Unlike DSP, he no longer even has a platform.
View attachment 6525432
Ooo that image might make me dig out old level editors for Doom or Descent 1 replacement for flaming skull (doom) or wepon fire (descent)
 
Quite the opposite. I was replying to someone saying it was "facts" and how I was wrong because of facts. There were no facts. We know nothing about when Nick and Kayla's address changed. It's certainly not "fact" that it's related to the criminal case. I'm just pointing it out that it's a guess just like my opinion is a guess. I'm not insisting anything other than it's opinion, not facts.
Understand I am not saying it is a bonafide fact that his address changed because of the criminal case. You are correct that correlation doesn't mean causation.

I am saying that the facts in front of us now suggest he had the Spicer address before denied denied denied, and now he's got the Wilmar address afterwards, with Bob as a C/O. I believe that is @Balldo's Gate's point as well, but I don't want to speak out of turn.

I would be willing to rethink the disastrous course the criminal criminal case has taken is what led to that change if it could be shown the change happened beforehand, but went unnoticed. But even then, the fact that Bob is now receiving his official legal correspondence still suggests tard-wrangling. Along with the fact he's not streaming. I simply do not believe Nick is not streaming because he suddenly realized it's a bad idea.

My other issue is you saying that if Bob were tard-wranging Rekieta, re-upping his bar card would be a "top priority."

Nick is facing a felony criminal charge, and two civil cases (CHIPS and Monty). None of which are going particularly well for him. He never uses his fucking law license anymore. He keeps his name on the books so he can say "I'm a lawyer." It's an appeal to authority thing for him. Credentialism.

In 2024, given the utter trash fire that is his life now, a rational person would consider re-upping his bar credentials to be the least of his worries.

Especially if, as @AnOminous suggests, he's looking at a suspension following a felony conviction anyways. It would be a waste of time and money to re-up now if his intention is to plead (which I must confess, is looking more likely). It might even be beneficial for him not to re-up, and accept a voluntary suspension before a mandatory one is imposed (assuming that's a thing he can do that would moot a mandatory suspension). He can claim that he suspended himself.

That's what always baffled me about the lawtubers (Joe Lawgic and Legal Vices) that criticized others for covering Nick's drama. It was fine when they were covering Johnny Depp or even some random that ran afoul of the law. But suddenly they canot understand why people would have any kind of interest in Nick's case. It was all so FUNNY and WEIRD to them.
Also, Megan Fox.

It's ridiculous that a "journalist" that makes her bones over human misery would cry about the Farms being mean to Nick Rekieta. Or anybody, for that matter.

That's pretty typical for her ilk though. You could cite Taylor Lorenz, and countless others.

Null is right that journos are scum. It's not they care about human misery, it's that they want a monopoly on reporting on it. The Farms is competition that isn't "on message" and free.

Aaron has been exposed as being in DMs with Potentially Criminal, Meme Copium, and Rekieta Twitter alog "Crackieta", which was covered by Chad Zumock.
Honestly, I always assumed he was in the DMs of multiple people. Including some of those. He's a dope for sharing his screen like that though.
 
Last edited:
Dont think it's quite narcissism. The play was a decent enough idea on paper,
No, it was absolutely awful. They had no proof or even a credible way to confuse the issue. There wasn't a hint of lying or even "well he explained things in a poor way"

Well, he thought it worked. Therefore he was an expert on all things Franks.

So in reality, he did the exact opposite of what had actually worked in the past? I missed that. (I don't really think there was a viable claim there wasn't probable cause in the current case but it was better than that Franks nonsense.)
The case he was trying to talk about, based on what people helping me search MCRO found, is this case: 34-18-14
Screenshot_20241015_124654_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

In this case Nick challenges everything like he did recently. He makes a Franks claim that the cops lied. The judge torches that argument
Screenshot_20241015_124339_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

He did beat the drug charge based on a lack of probable cause
 

Attachments

Because they're morally bankrupt, just like their cokehead eternal teenager internet-son.

Make bank off the backs of other people going through the legal system, now it's their turn, and suddenly they don't understand why that audience would be interested in literally the same kind of thing as always.

(insert Joe Lawgic Jew joke about protecting their own here)

The most generous (and undeserved) interpretation is that they are caught up on a bandwagon. They have 'principles' they think they live by, but when those ideas come to a conclusion that goes against their desires, they rationalise it away.

I think a lot of people do this. I include myself. It is easy to do. A lot of people did this with Nick. This is why having someone objective (and who you will listen to) is important.

There's not a chance in hell they haven't been contacted by weens, so they'll be aware of the online scrutiny. Nick has probably bragged to them previously about the size of his audience and his financial success, so they probably do somewhat understand the public interest in things which would otherwise be largely private matters.

Probably. I would venture a few idiots might have.

I fully expect Nick to whinge about it. I am waiting to throw the clip of his response to voice actor 'death threats' in his face.

Post it, or shut up because it didn't happen.

Aaron Imholte LEAKED his own Twitter DMs on his Monday morning show.

Aaron has been exposed as being in DMs with Potentially Criminal, Meme Copium, and Rekieta Twitter alog "Crackieta", which was covered by Chad Zumock.

View attachment 6526334
(as highlighted by MiseryClips on Twitter)

On October 9, either Aaron or "Crackieta" messaged the other beginning with: "FUCK YES! Tell Sean and Ashton that [...}"
On October 10, Aaron appears to have messaged Sean: "I keep my therapist employed, which [...]"
On October 12, either Aaron or Meme Copium messaged the other beginning with: "Sure, if something is told to me in [confidence...]"

Aaron was also in the process of booking an appearance with Jesse in the leaked DMs.

I can't find the clip in question (maybe it was pulled when people realized it had a DM leak in them) and I am not going through Aaron's show to try to find it in there. I'd say there was a decent chance Nick was in Melton's chat in the hope of discussing the DM leak earlier in the day, but from reading the title and description of Melton's stream, the self-proclaimed expert on Aaron Imholte missed the leaks.

View attachment 6526421

@Potentially Criminal, you are subject of a SHOWER CALL ALERT, which means that the latest analyses suggest you are at high risk of receiving shower calls or texts in the next 24 hours.
Please consider immediate precautions, such as muting your devices.

@Potentially Criminal if you are gay-opping, that's gay. You know the story of Darth Balldo the Degenerate.

View attachment 6526483View attachment 6526484
It was a Stallyn19 clip that got deleted. Stallyn19 is a clipper, so why would he delete this one? He doesn't appear in the DMs as far as I can see. 🤔

EDIT: The clip still exists on Odysee:
The leak is @11:50.

Stallyn19 has an agenda. Most people do.
 
It was a Stallyn19 clip that got deleted. Stallyn19 is a clipper, so why would he delete this one? He doesn't appear in the DMs as far as I can see. 🤔

EDIT: The clip still exists on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@stallyn19:3/steel-toe-kevin-brennan-chad-zumock-vs:c The leak is @11:50.
Good work. I was able to tell by the WATERMARK in the bottom right in the same spot as Cog's infamous WATERMARK that it came from a clip from that channel on YouTube that had been deleted or unlisted... Does that mean that it was ALTERED?

In this case Nick challenges everything like he did recently. He makes a Franks claim that the cops lied. The judge torches that argument

He did beat the drug charge based on a lack of probable cause
As I pointed out when the order dropped a few weeks ago, the Barneswalker did worse than Rekieta did because at least Rekieta was able to request a dismissal on general probable cause grounds and request a Franks hearing on shaky "He said they were a concerned citizen but they're not a concerned citizen!" grounds at the same time.

In fact, if you look at these cases (he represented the co-defendant too) Rekieta appears to have done as good a job as you could expect under the circumstances.

I'm glad Sean keeps his therapist employed
:really: Sean keeps his baker employed, too. That's because Sean is FAT!

@Potentially Criminal if you are gay-opping, that's gay. You know the story of Darth Balldo the Degenerate.
He's a streamer who's been on shows with Aaron. It's not reasonable to expect a streamer with his own thread to not be in contact with any other streamers who have their own thread just because he uses the forum. He's exchanged messages with Nick too.

I am saying that the facts in front of us now suggest he had the Spicer address before denied denied denied, and now he's got the Wilmar address afterwards, with Bob as a C/O. I believe that is @Balldo's Gate's point as well, but I don't want to speak out of turn.
Somebody picked up on it as a result of the notice. It's not clear when exactly it changed. From examining Kayla's case, it's clear that the city changing could have been noticed before hand, but nobody would be looking for that without some sort of heads-up. My only point is there is no reason to believe Nick has secretly moved while pretending not to have moved, and a lot of reason to believe that he has not.
 
Back