Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 59 16.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.5%

  • Total voters
    356
Probably planning a Frank's hearing or some other nonsense 'masterstroke'
I just can’t fathom it, you didn’t show up to court, I am not sure you can appeal traffic court(and why would you when you got criminal cases and more fines from other lawsuits) but you still keep on choosing the most retarded option out there. On one hand I am embarrassed this is how a middle aged father of 5 acts, but on the other hand I wanna see how retarded this man can go.
 
Nick is really good at hiding and obfuscating shit. You might be assuming Sean knew things he didn't.

Possible, but one would think Sean was at least paying attention to the person he was associating with for professional reasons. My initial point was more about observational skills.

Essentially, I don't know what Sean knew, but I know what he was present for. Sean could have been distracted by his own chat or the like, has a poor memory, or just plain wasn't invested in the streams he was on with Nick. In any case, he doesn't seem very reliable not in that he is lying about anything, but he seems to either not be that observant or playing some kind of politics. Sean's legal insight does seem to be good though, and he also seems to be more impartial in what he covers.

As for Nick being very good at obfuscating things, it seems like he was a popular rallying point against certain people like Maddox, Binger, Ron Soye, and Montagraph. This would create a halo effect in which Nick looks better then he really is due to a bias against his targets, and even among his peers the bar is pretty low when it comes to looking wholesome.

That said, I can't say I know of any Christian trad-dads who are as publicly inebriated, belligerent, conceited, hateful, and heretical while being close friends with the likes of Drexel or Juju the Cow. A lot of this was on display before the summer of 2022. It seems to me that somewhere between not wanting to judge someone for their actions or the company they keep they lost the ability to recognize these warning signs.

Sean's a big boy who defends the worst criminals imaginable in a real job.

He's often said that sometimes people guilty of the most horrible crimes can still be worthy of... [insert word like compassion, sympathy, understanding, respect]. That may explain your questions regarding Nick and Sean's relationship.

That being said, the concern is worthwhile. Recently there have been some good studies on the rise of corruption in government, the Internet, and corporations. The research has proven unambiguously that the motivation is 'everyone does it, why not me?' Cue bribes, blackmail, extortion, cooking books, online fraud, etc.

Nick's morality issues when Sean was often on his channel may apply to "corruption" broadly, however, it's a stretch to require Sean to do a purity test on Nick after a day of defending a drug dealer who shot someone.

I always assumed that Sean engaged with Nick for the grift. (They also align with politics: right-of-center skepticism of the government and individual rights.) Sean's channel is far too small considering his efforts and other LawTubers' success. The fact that far more people watch Kurt and Runkle baffles me.

My take: Sean's engagement with bad Internet actors is between him and his God.

Agreed, Sean was engaging with Nick on a professional basis for professional gain. Also, I don't mean to single Sean out here. Sean wasn't the only one doing it and Nick likely ended up with more goodwill from some of Sean's fanbase due to his optimism, rightly or wrongly so. Such is the way of social currency. I also agree that Sean's channel should see more growth given his knowledge and general good humor.

As for Sean's standards for people considering his line of work, this again puts him at a disadvantage (especially if Nick would have to shoot someone before being considered a bad person). One likes to think that Sean has more sense than that, but there really is no accounting for what passes for good/decent in LawTube or IRL.

I do find Sean likable though, even if I am cautious of him. From what I've seen, Sean is trying to maintain some integrity despite whatever disadvantages he may have and seems to be doing quite well at the moment. While final judgement belongs to the Lord, I am still compelled to use discernment in my understanding of others to avoid being led astray.

I'm not asking Sean to prove himself to me. I'm just voicing my own assessment.

Nick was actively selling himself as the man with the Midas touch and promoting the idea that associating with him would benefit people who wanted to grow their own online audience. At the time, it was substantially true and it's not that different to other forms of networking for your own advancement.

Farmers spent an enormous amount of time immersed in Nick's streams but I don't think the same is true of youtubers who have real life jobs, or even of most other streamers. Some of the stuff which was incredibly obvious to us early on wouldn't necessarily have been so apparent to those who weren't consuming large volumes of Nick's content in real time.

Indeed. Nick would claim to pay people in exposure as part of the incentive to join his show which is somewhat reasonable on a professional level. Networking and trading in social currency happens in a lot of professions.

Nick was also likely incentivizing a transactional relationship likely because those are the only relationships he seems to understand (even with he parasocial lewding LOCALS). Nick has no real friends and likely doesn't even really know what those are. Sean, on the other hand, does strike me as someone who actually has friends outside of YouTube.

Nick used to stream a lot, making it easy to bury certain streams. One could argue that even the farms didn't have the time to go through all of it. Some farmers appear to have just gotten highlights from clip channels or whatever was already posted here (a lot still do).

In Sean's case I just kept coming across him in relevant clips concerning Nick's real character coming through or other warning signs. Sean would usually use humor to (successfully) break the tension because he does seem like a good guest. Given what Sean was exposed to I mostly wonder how much of the experience he actually retained.

In a way, one can't really blame Sean too much for mentally repressing Nick's more embarrassing streams during his decline.
 
AFAIK Sean already had an account on the farms and was fine having it be unknown while posting in the thread. This sudden shift to making a new account and [potentially] portraying himself is suspicious. What's the incentive? It could be Nick. It could be still life. It could be Kayla. It could be KALEA. It could be Cynthia. It could be TiC. It could be Felton. It could be anyone.

What's odd is how readily people believe it is who they are claiming to be and have done so since his first post, unless they are in on it, of course.
I mean he can have both accounts be active and only use the Potentially Criminal account when he wants to say something specific.
 
I think it’s the oppositional disorder thing.
“If those RATS are going to micromanage me, a qualified and famous lawyer, then they can deal with my traffic ticket legal matter too.”
 
1 more of Nicks' handful of LOCALS supporters drops:

1729208591807.png
 
ClaireBere
Thanks for the footage, found another rare dance from the Cuckpope within, the cuck step:
Cuck Step.gif
…apparently there is a clip of Rekieta accidently leaving his mic on and telling off one of his kids. Anyone have a lead on how I can find that?
The clip I remember of Rekieta being rude to his kids is this one:
View attachment 6532699

But there’s another with a hot mic where one of his children is crying because he’s Thotstreaming.
Timestamp: 3:38:13
These are the ones I remember.
I remember one more instance of Nick being rude to one of his kids during a stream. It was just a short time before the arrest on his April 11th, 2024 stream. At a few points, Nick dons this bizarre flat affect including while being rude to his kid, & afterwards when talking at the audience in an increasingly disturbed manner:

He was lowering his vocal register often then, to the point that other streamers made note of it in their coverage of Nick. The majority of people ITT found that stream (in particular) difficult to watch. His behavior was extremely hectic & disturbing. Elissa also shared a clip of Nick malding after an interaction with his kid during that stream.
When he started doing shit like the troonish thotstream it should have been a lot more obvious…

It turns out he was already traumatizing at least one of his kids with his weird, degenerate bullshit and even stealing her toys for his coomstream, then mocking her when she cried about it. It got worse to the point almost everyone finally noticed it, but the spiral had been going for some time beforehand.
Hardcore agree, looking at that thotstream bullshit now immediately made me think it should have been blatant. Hindsight & all that. Living with this wretched creature, the cuck of Minnesota, must be certain hell.
 
I just can’t fathom it, you didn’t show up to court, I am not sure you can appeal traffic court(and why would you when you got criminal cases and more fines from other lawsuits) but you still keep on choosing the most retarded option out there.
You can typically appeal traffic cases, but generally it's more money than it's worth if the penalty isn't that big a deal.

However, in his case, I don't know if he can appeal after a deliberate no-show and an order to show cause. I think every defense he could raise is waived at this late stage.

You appeal legal error by the court. Not you being a retard.

What's weird here is he's apparently paid every one except that one.

It's funny though. Nick's traffic cases were a big deal in this thread a year ago, and now discussing them seems almost silly. Maybe petty, even.

Harsh.
Dude was already announcing he was unsubscribing, he didn't need to rub it in like that.
I actually almost respect them for saying that.

They've got a point in that if you're giving Nick money now, you're just helping to pay for his drug habit and alcoholism. You're enabling him.

Of course, I think they should have unsubbed a while ago. Unless you can't cancel and get a prorated refund.
 
Last edited:
That's for the court to decide :really:
You know who else could decide? Nick himself, on October 13, 2022. When he decided to say it. In front of someone he has antagonized publicly since. Someone who has reiterated Monty is not a pedophile. Someone who is not alone in claiming there is no evidence of Monty of being a pedophile (Null and Sean), and they don't have lawsuits against them from Monty, just the guy who said it and has repeated the claim repeatedly.

Thank you!

Around 5 hours and 50 minutes in to the October 13th, 2022 stream.

View attachment 5772770
Funny and weird how that works.
 
I sincerely don't want him to die or go to prison. I'd like to see him get better, and part of that includes accountability.
Accountability will end in divorce. I don't see how any honest self respecting marriage can survive watching the other spouse railing or getting railed while doing rails. They have to continue living in fantasy land to maintain the relationship and that's why there will be no voluntary "getting better".
 
You can typically appeal traffic cases, but generally it's more money than it's worth if the penalty isn't that big a deal.
Here you can end up with a greater penalty by going to court than by just paying the fine. It's only worth doing if you have a genuine defence.
 
A member of my wife's family came over earlier today. Total normie who knows nothing about gay internet drama. We started talking about Puff Daddy and celebrities fucking up and in the middle of the conversation they go, "Have you heard of this internet lawyer...Rekieta Law? I guess he was huge and was some Christian streamer who is now doing drugs and sleeping with a bunch of different women cheating on his wife."
Rekieta is fucked. I can't stress how bad it is that this family member knows about his degeneracy. This is what the mainstream world knows when it comes to Nick.
 
Back