Feeding the pug at 2am, what is wrong with this freak household? Why keep an animal when you're just going to lock it in the bathroom and neglect it? At least the skunks and raccoons skelly snuffed out had a fulfilling life until they roamed into the wrong druggie freak's backyard.
Does it matter at all how Rekieta got access to Aaron's data? Didn't Aaron admit it was because he had logged into his account on Rekieta's computer? If so, that means that Rekieta was essentially "given" access to Aaron's account.
That's retarded. If I go to a cafe, connect to their public wifi and go to the bathroom without turning my laptop off, that doesn't give the cafe owner rights to access all my files and snoop around in my porn history to find Serbian HRT supplies and tranny goon folders.
More interestingly, he confirms that Rekieta told EVS (amongst a group of people) that the reason his daughter tested positive for cocaine was because the cop who tested the cocaine had touched her hair
X |
A
This is once again 100% retarded. The cops would have to soak her hair with urine from a cocaine addict, and I would even doubt the result will go above cutoff (500pg/mg) this way. This is insane and unrealistic.
Benzoylecgonine is detectable in a urine test by up to 3 days typically. A segmented hair test takes the length, a sample from it, they perform a decontamination protocol and then pulverise it.
I'm almost tempted to get someone to soak normal hair samples in fresh coke addict urine just to see what a GC-MS yields. Almost.
So where's the bodycam footage then? Shouldn't we see the cop literally soaking her hair in a container of cocaine-addict piss? The hair was taken from a discrete area randomly, so the cops need enough urine to soak all of her hair in it.
Typically an adult excretes 1000ml of urine a day, how much of it did the cops collect for this insane plan? Would 2 litres be sufficient?
Benzoylecgonine (which his daughter tested for) is metabolised in the human body and excreted through urine. Simply rubbing cocaine powder onto someone's hair would not yield this metabolite. The guy that questioned the cop's chemistry knowledge when they asked if his DNA would show up in the seized cocaine samples and read 40 SCIENCE PAPERS came up with this retardation.
By the way, this is the judge that signed off the initial search warrant. He's got a nice "rap sheet" of chemistry and medical related past employment.
I'd love to see his reaction when skelly suggests that cops gave his daughter a cocaine addict golden shower, long enough to show benzoylecgonine at >5000pg/mg, which is 10 times the cutoff.
Edit: I was right.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29471142/
However, assessments of wash efficacy made with real hair samples, as opposed to artificially contaminated samples, provide a different perspective, and demonstrate how rarely external contamination affects the interpretation of results. Data from a large number of hair samples from crack cocaine users, confirmed the usefulness of our protocol to remove most of the externally deposited cocaine. The data showed that hair levels of cocaine and benzoylecgonine in crack cocaine users were overall high with ratio of benzoylecgonine to cocaine in all samples above 0.1. The wash residue concentrations of cocaine ranged from not detected to 21ng/mg with a median of 0.5ng/mg. Cocaine was detected in the wash residue in 105 out of 138 samples. The wash to hair cocaine ratio ranged from not detected to 0.36 with a median of 0.02. The wash to hair cocaine ratios were below 0.07 in 133 cases. The five cases that produced wash to hair ratios above 0.1, one sample was at 0.11, three at 0.13 and one at 0.36, possibly because these cases were at the lower end of cocaine levels, however, we could not rule out that the hair was contaminated.
A very basic decontamination protocol where hair samples was soaked in contaminants pushed the result to below 0.36ng/mg=360pg/mg, which is below the cutoff at 500pg/mg.
They are citing 100pg/mg (0.1ng) as their cutoff level. It's typically either 100 (federal workers), 150 (workers), 300 (medical professionals) or 500 (hair follicle test).
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part026/part026-0163.html
Regardless of what skelly wants to cope and seethe about, contaminated samples can be adequately assessed.
According the lab's protocol and patents, they decontaminate the sample. The wash liquid can be tested as well.
To clarify: I keep saying "cocaine addict urine" because I am just not convinced that gloves with traces of cocaine rubbed onto someone's hair will yield >5000pg/mg (greater than five thousand) in results.
Cope and seethe retard skelly.
