Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Captain Manning]

Not so. Johnny from The Room was actually a nice guy (laughing at stories of women being hospitalized notwithstanding) who didn't wilfully enter a cuckold relationship.

He also had way better coping skills than Nick.

Like do you guys remember that time he was accused of hitting Lisa (but he did not hit her, he did NOT)?

He was pretty angry, but he managing to snap out of it after seeing Mark.



Anyways, Nick would probably call Mark a nerd and tell him to kill himself.

 

[RodgerDodger]

With what? They took his guns.

His cooking is weapons grade, and possibly a war crime.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

No matter how big your show was, you will never be as charismatic or funny as Dick.

I mean I have a deeper range of jokes than just “Women are fat”

 

[Oh Darn]

They might not at the guilt determination stage, but it's probably relevant to sentencing.

I didn't realize that the judge had that much discretion -- if the hair test isn't brought up by the prosecution at all, can the judge factor it into sentencing ? My assumption is if it's not going in front of the jury it's not entered into evidence

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

I mean I have a deeper range of jokes than just “Women are fat”

All kiwis do, we can always pull out a slur

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

I wonder if Nick has ever read the letter Ronald Reagan wrote to his son Mike prior to the latter’s marriage. Balldo is exactly the kind of POS who could read it and feel not a scintilla of shame. Money quotes:

‘You’ve heard all the jokes that have been rousted around by all the “unhappy marrieds” and cynics. Now, in case no one has suggested it, there is another viewpoint. You have entered into the most meaningful relationship there is in all human life. It can be whatever you decide to make it.

So true. Instead of following Reagan's words, Nick emulated his behavior. He might as well have been absent from his child's birth (after a shotgun wedding) to fuck around with his old girlfriend, as Reagan was in the case of Patricia Reagan's birth to Nancy.

 

[AnOminous]

I didn't realize that the judge had that much discretion -- if the hair test isn't brought up by the prosecution at all, can the judge factor it into sentencing ? My assumption is if it's not going in front of the jury it's not entered into evidence

No, it has to be evidence of record. But evidence of record can be entered at the sentencing stage as mitigating or aggravating factors to argue what guidelines sentence should be given, or even to argue for a deviation upward or downward from the guidelines.

So sometimes evidence would be prejudicial, or just not useful, at the guilt determination stage but entirely appropriate for sentencing, in the case of a sentence decided by the jury (capital cases and some others). Deviation from sentencing guidelines generally requires evidence of record established by the jury beyond the usual beyond a reasonable doubt standard (Booker/Apprendi).

Since Nick is challenging basically everything in the case (despitedly incessantly admitting to it in public), part of knocking out reasonable doubt if they swore up and down that no child was exposed to cocaine, the test is bullshit, the bedroom was locked 24/7 with armed guards at the door, etc., then the actual presence of cocaine metabolites in the hair of a child kind of knocks that argument out.

So it's probably going to come up at some point especially if Nick keeps up his lameass teenager caught with drugs excuses and lies.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

You used to like a guy who looked UP to Dick

Speak for yourself. We are the minority, but many of us called out Dax as unfunny and pathetic years ago, long before KF was ready to believe it. Nick got the same kind of pass for a long time, but not from everyone.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

He claims that other lawyers on YT with whom he had conversations (presumably about his case) established privilege, so they are being unethical by talking about his case.

huehuehuehuehuehue. It takes more than just talking.

A retainer establishes privilege

So can a consultation.

 

[DumbDude43]

Of course, Balldo is far too arrogant for this.

same as with all the other "simply do XYZ and you will get out of this mess" options he was given - his arrogance, his ego, his narcissism get in the way
he is a great example for why pride is the deadliest of sins

 

[Fapcop]

Drexel does talk a lot and tends to exaggerate (especially about the quality of women he gets), but there is evidence of grooming in his past in addition to his own admissions. We even have Taylor's profile for a BDSM website (Fetlife).

Drexel talks big, and if there is a source for his grooming beyond stories he has told, I sure as shot never have seen it.

But when the rubber hit the road and there was actual drugs, degen sex and grooming opportunities, he noped the F out.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

So can a consultation.

“The only thing you retain is sandwiches you struggle to order off the Denny’s menu, Sean”

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Ex-Rekieta fans can't condemn me about the people I used to listen to.

"Ex" is an important distinction here. You said that Juju the Cow, man who gets fucked in the ass while dressed as a cow, is funny (which he is - but to laugh at him, not to laugh with him) and charismatic (he isn't).

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

You know when they say Kayla bakes I wonder if she's just making boxed shit that requires no real critical thinking.

Boxed brownies don't count as knowing how to bake!

 

[Melty Butter]

Stallyn 19 clipped some relevant information from today's STMS wrt Melton and Nick's "hacking". (I don't know where this stuff goes anymore. The case thread? Aaron's thread? Melton's thread? Anyway, it seems relevant for possible future charges against Nick.)

• As expected, Aaron met with the St. Cloud police yesterday. (They gave him a danish.)
• Police confirmed that this "sounds like a crime"
• He was instructed to go home and finish uploading all the information from his devices. He did.
• He laughed at April's schitzo posting and Ralph blaming him for the federal warrant implying that he had nothing to do with it (??? - I'm not sure where KF is landing on that)
• He does not think April's tweets sound like her but said that others (who knew/know her) say that they think it was her

 

[SpergioLeonne]

huehuehuehuehuehue. It takes more than just talking.


So can a consultation.

How do you define a consultation? Is it really such a low bar that the “this is not legal advice” disclaimer is necessary?

I mean I’m sure that the primary purpose of that disclaimer is beside the point of defining a consultation, but like, for example, do you have to call a consultation a consultation to establish privilege?

 

[Folgers Can]

They might not at the guilt determination stage, but it's probably relevant to sentencing.

I didn't realize that the judge had that much discretion -- if the hair test isn't brought up by the prosecution at all, can the judge factor it into sentencing ? My assumption is if it's not going in front of the jury it's not entered into evidence

Sort of: in Minnesota felony sentencing the procedure upon conviction is to schedule a sentencing hearing a month or so out so that the convict can get set up with a probation officer who interviews them, interviews other affected parties like the victim (if any) and family, researches any other relevant background information like prior offenses (if any) and the CHIPS case, and files with the court a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) report laying out their findings and nonbinding recommendations for the judge to consider. There would be an opportunity for briefing by both the defense and the prosecution about what to do with the PSI report, but oftentimes the judge would perfunctorily rubber-stamp whatever it calls for. In that sense the hair test could come up again through the PSI independent of what the state saw fit to present for purposes of getting a conviction, especially if Nick stays true to form by smugly mouthing off to the PSI officer from day one and then screeching from the rooftops to the entire iInternet about how the PSI officer LIED!!!

The catch is that this process doesn't apply to gross misdemeanors automatically and I'm sure Nick's lawyers would raise hell if the PSI strays too far outside its proper scope of the felony drug charges, but the prosecutor will hopefully be smart enough to use the intertwined relationship of the drug possession and the child endangerment to affirmatively request that the gross misdemeanor be rolled into the PSI process, in which case it is statutorily mandatory to grant that request:

609.115 PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION. § Subdivision 1. Presentence investigation. (a) When a defendant has been convicted of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, the court may, and when the defendant has been convicted of a felony, the court shall, before sentence is imposed, cause a presentence investigation and written report to be made to the court concerning the defendant's individual characteristics, circumstances, needs, potentialities, criminal record and social history, the circumstances of the offense and the harm caused by it to others and to the community. At the request of the prosecutor in a gross misdemeanor case, the court shall order that a presentence investigation and report be prepared. The investigation shall be made by a probation officer of the court, if there is one; otherwise it shall be made by the commissioner of corrections. The officer conducting the presentence or predispositional investigation shall make reasonable and good faith efforts to contact and provide the victim with the information required under section 611A.037, subdivision 2. Presentence investigations shall be conducted and summary hearings held upon reports and upon the sentence to be imposed upon the defendant in accordance with this section, section 244.10, and the Rules of Criminal Procedure.

If that method could be used to bring the hair test and any other aggravating factors more squarely into sentencing considerations then, it's well within the judge's discretion to go up to a year of confinement for the gross misdemeanor even if the felony has a presumptive suspended sentence. Unlikely, but comfortably nestled in the warm blanket that is an abuse-of-discretion standard of review upon appeal. Some more digging in MCRO could find myriad instances of sentencing that stiff in a Section 609.378(1)(b)(2) case, but just for starters two minutes of googling finds the following as just one random example in a case where the kid wasn't even exposed and just happened to have "access" to the part of the house where the drugs were hidden:

The district court sentenced Wierson to 128 months for conspiracy to sell a controlled substance in the first degree, and to 365 days for child endangerment. ... The state charged Wierson with child endangerment under Minn. Stat. § 609.378, subd. 1(b)(2) ... The state argues that the circumstances proved were sufficient to give rise to an inference that the child lived at the residence and that Wierson was guilty of child endangerment by allowing the child to have access to an area where Wierson possessed methamphetamine.
State v. Wierson, 2019 WL 4409392 (Minn. App. Sept. 16, 2019) (rev'd on other grounds)

 

[LanternsNSongs]

"Ex" is an important distinction here. You said that Juju the Cow, man who gets fucked in the ass while dressed as a cow, is funny (which he is - but to laugh at him, not to laugh with him) and charismatic (he isn't).

Was he not a regular on the Dick Show, did livestreams with Dick, go to his live events and commented on his legal troubles extensively when you were watching? Was Dick good and all then but suddenly became the worst most unfunny man to grace the internet when Rekieta became 'it'? The sheer hypocrisy in this thread, tsk tsk.

 

[BathTubShine]

He laughed at April's schitzo posting and Ralph blaming him for the federal warrant implying that he had nothing to do with it (??? - I'm not sure where KF is landing on that)

KKK lands on: Ralph is a fat retard.
Ralph is warranted for contempt of court, judge told Ralph to stop recording the proceeding. Ralph didn't comply and now judge wants Ralph arrested.
Aaron Cuckholte has no blame here.
Side note: Ralph screeching April to sue Aaron for "same thing" is funny, because Aaron was just watching clips of April's proceeding, not recording it.

Team Baldo taking L's left and right.

 

[Mouse Cop]

Ralph blaming him for the federal warrant implying that he had nothing to do with it (??? - I'm not sure where KF is landing on that)

Yeah, Aaron does not have the power to issue arrest warrants lol. I'm not sure how Ralph got it into his head that Aaron is somehow responsible for this. At the absolute most you could say that maybe Aaron told the judge or whoever about Ralph's restream, but even that is pure speculation. Anybody could have told the judge, or the judge could have found it himself.