Zoosadist Million Pity / Baby Monkey Hate / 0chan.life / Million Tears / EvilUnveiled / VidLii - YouTube Monkey Torture horrorshow, a horrible rabbit-hole of international zoosadism. Now featuring fresh milk from monkeyfuckers themselves!

[Orthodox]

Only 24 months max? Seriously?

I hope they get raped and catch the Anally Injected Death Sentence

 

[OS Ghost]

24 months, that's it? No wonder they think they can keep doing this shit.

 

[Ruzzbot69]

I knew this place would liven up when the sentencing of those two dropped. I'm not sure if there are any more pending big cases like this. Those two were part of the original investigation by LFT, AFP and BBC as well, so it's been a long time coming. There was no way they'd get a suspended sentence. They literally commissioned the torture, instead of just watching it, so they had a direct hand in shaping that sadistic community. Even that other guy from UK earlier this year got like 2 years just for uploading 3 videos. They're trying to set a precedent and deter others from joining. All these news stories will definitely persuade at least a few of them to leave for good.

For the monkeyfuckers reading this, know that there is nowhere to hide. You will be found, it's the only way this is gonna end if you continue.

 

[Caesare]

Louisiana still has laws on the books with a potential statutory maximum of 20 years for simple possession of any amount, going up to life for a third strike. I doubt anyone actually gets this but it's possible.

While simultaneously having laws which decriminalize simple possession. They really ought to update their books.

I'm too lazy to provide the exact criteria. So you'll have to find it here. But you can end up serving insane amounts of time for drugs still.

Thanks for posting, that is a very interesting reference. The five year minimum, as far as marijuana goes, is for possession of 220 lbs. I know you were exaggerating to make a point, but that's a big jump from smoking a little weed. That's like, cartel levels of distribution.

Even still though, it's just pot. According to that reference, it's the same 5 years for all that pot as it is for 100g of heroin. Think of how many fatal overdoses a 100 grams of heroin could potentially cause.

That being said, I personally don't think any amount of wheeling and dealing narcotics is comparable to intentionally torturing a defenseless living thing.

 

[gay]

Nah, fuck 'em. I don't care what your reason is. If you're going to abuse animals for any reason, you deserve the Pearl Fernandez treatment
View attachment 6641877

i watch quite a bit of true crime and i always follow up on what happens with people who harm children and they always fucking suffer immensely in prison.

Spoiler: one of my favorite excerpts of prison justice.

 

[Space Lazer Shark]

I just think it could benefit from proper regulation. It's not any different from IRC only it's more easily accessible.

If anything its probably easier for the feds to monitor what's going on in any given groomcord server.

 

[Osama Bin Laden]

i watch quite a bit of true crime and i always follow up on what happens with people who harm children and they always fucking suffer immensely in prison.

just like how God intended it to be

 

[Yamaha YM2612]

We do, you can be angry about more than one thing.

Sure you CAN but I rarely find the reactions to such atrocities to be equal

I never see people exhibit aggression toward child abusers in this way

 

[VitaminDsupplements]

Sure you CAN but I rarely find the reactions to such atrocities to be equal

I never see people exhibit aggression toward child abusers in this way

Then you haven't looked at the Reiketa thread

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

Nice to see them getting stopped and put away... with the potential for quite a long amount of time.... hmmm

 

[DrNow]

Sure you CAN but I rarely find the reactions to such atrocities to be equal

I never see people exhibit aggression toward child abusers in this way

Yes you do. You know you have. You know ‘creep catchers’ and ‘pedo hunters’ get tremendous support and mainstream platforms with people calling for whoever they catch to face prison justice. You know Dateline ran a phenomenally successful series around this theme. You claim to not be new, so you also know how frequently zoosadists and child predators overlap and how this forum features threads dealing specifically with child abusers.

You know the response you’d be met with in pretty much any setting if you advocated for child abuse.

You know the revulsion something like CSAM inspires in people.

Yet most people haven’t even heard the word zoosadism. What is your issue? Would you prefer awareness wasn’t raised?

You came to this thread, dealing with a specific example of depravity, and decided you’d try and undermine it.

I can’t help but think you are doing what zoosadists do, that thing where they shift focus to a crime greater than their own in order to distract from the subject at hand. However, giving you the benefit of doubt, perhaps you can produce some examples of this site being insufficiently opposed to child abuse.

 

[Yamaha YM2612]

Yes you do. You know you have. You know ‘creep catchers’ and ‘pedo hunters’ get tremendous support and mainstream platforms with people calling for whoever they catch to face prison justice. You know Dateline ran a phenomenally successful series around this theme. You claim to not be new, so you also know how frequently zoosadists and child predators overlap and how this forum features threads dealing specifically with child abusers.

You know the response you’d be met with in pretty much any setting if you advocated for child abuse.

You know the revulsion something like CSAM inspires in people.

Yet most people haven’t even heard the word zoosadism. What is your issue? Would you prefer awareness wasn’t raised?

You came to this thread, dealing with a specific example of depravity, and decided you’d try and undermine it.

I can’t help but think you are doing what zoosadists do, that thing where they shift focus to a crime greater than their own in order to distract from the subject at hand. However, giving you the benefit of doubt, perhaps you can produce some examples of this site being insufficiently opposed to child abuse.

Revulsion is not the same as actual reaction and i wasn't talking about this site in particular, I was mire referring to the capped reactions in the post I quoted

Keep your conspiracy theories for yourself and 4chan

 

[Random Internet Person]

Only 24 months max? Seriously?

24 months minimum would have been way too low, having it be the max is beyond a joke

15 and 24 months ?? That's IT? Animals feel pain and fear just as humans do. The punishment for harming animals for sick pleasure should be just as great as harming humans.

Honestly, I’m not sure what circumstances or statutes were used to sentence, but every time I hear about a conviction, the length is usually something where I go “glad I never have to think about this asshole again” because these crimes are always seeming to be a case where whatever legal sentence will never seem to be enough since the only thing that’ll satisfy the enraged will apparently be “death by being chased and mauled by (insert wild and most dangerous species of the animal that was abused. And hadn’t been fed for the longest time.)”

That or the Brazen Bull, but adjusted to be the animal you abused (so if you abused dogs, you’ll be thrown into not a snorting Bull, but a wolf howling at the full moon).

 

[Obstacle]

15 and 24 months ?? That's IT? Animals feel pain and fear just as humans do. The punishment for harming animals for sick pleasure should be just as great as harming humans.

I sympathize, Cats, as an Englishman, my reflex is to be fascinated by animals; if I spot a novel fowl or beastie it makes me smile and clap like a happy infant.
However, I'd caution against intent based legislation; I think perhaps a system of law founded purely on the nature of the act is what we need, to remove the leeway of judges to impute their own motivations onto the crime, as I don't really trust their judgement, for various mostly political and ethnographic reasons.
Based purely on the traditional status of animals as property (personal or state), which additionally thinks and feels, and may be a "member of a household" in a broad sense this should, put serious harm or unlawful killing of them in the range of mid-range serious offenses against persons, as the affect of killing an animal, particularly a privately owned specimen has wide-reaching effects beyond the killing of that single animal.
Your animals are your charges, and often your friends, sometimes also they are your livelihood.
However, the principle of ensuring that animals are treated with dignity should not supercede out ultimate meta-goal of sustaining and furnishing our own lives with fat steaks and leather boots, without which we would surely perish.
And law must ultimately be for the good of those who keep it, practical and productive, and animals must be beneath humans under the law, because they cannot keep it themselves, which is why I would stop short of treating the killing of an animal the same as the killing of a human being.
How short is debatable though.

 

[Cronkle]

Yes you do. You know you have. You know ‘creep catchers’ and ‘pedo hunters’ get tremendous support and mainstream platforms with people calling for whoever they catch to face prison justice. You know Dateline ran a phenomenally successful series around this theme. You claim to not be new, so you also know how frequently zoosadists and child predators overlap and how this forum features threads dealing specifically with child abusers.

You know the response you’d be met with in pretty much any setting if you advocated for child abuse.

You know the revulsion something like CSAM inspires in people.

Yet most people haven’t even heard the word zoosadism. What is your issue? Would you prefer awareness wasn’t raised?

You came to this thread, dealing with a specific example of depravity, and decided you’d try and undermine it.

I can’t help but think you are doing what zoosadists do, that thing where they shift focus to a crime greater than their own in order to distract from the subject at hand. However, giving you the benefit of doubt, perhaps you can produce some examples of this site being insufficiently opposed to child abuse.

check his post history, nobody should even reply. It's all ragebait from a newly registered account. They could at least attempt to be funny if they're going to attempt to troll. The whole bit is just "I pretend to not see objective facts... I never see people exhibit aggression toward child abusers in this way, and no that's not a pink triangle by my username you must be crazy haha I got you so good bro"

 

[The Antikike]

@DrNow wrote:


This would be fantastic were it not for the short sentences.

My takes on some of this:

View attachment 6644123
Oh, bullshit. All she had were wet panties, just like the first time around.

oh no, the consequences of my own actions! im going INSANE AAAACK

 

[DrNow]

ultimate meta-goal of sustaining and furnishing our own lives with fat steaks and leather boots, without which we would surely perish.

There being no equivalency between eating a steak and a raping a baby monkey with a toothbrush is a hill I am willing to die on. And I’m a vegetarian. I understand the point you are making, but I think we can safely say zoosadism is its own unique, depraved sphere of activity.

I don’t believe sentences should be administered based on outrage. However, they should have a deterrent effect and the fact this situation amounts to an epidemic at this stage should have been taken into account. It is not the target of their abuse and torture fantasies that is our primary concern, it’s that they have these fantasies and act upon them to begin with. Also that they have an established track record of escalation.

They will continue to escalate, without sufficient deterrent.

Sentencing should not be based on emotion, but where it falls woefully short of the mark (okebro and arguably Noelle) we are not unreasonable to note this.

 

[VasonJoorhees]

That sentence is literally a slap on the wrist. The UK is so cucked

 

[A shitty ass clover]

They should be locked for life. If they can do that to animals they shouldn't be in society at all.

 

[Elderly beef taco]

Sadly, this is pretty typcial for animal abuse cases.
There was one ages ago here (not a PL as this is common) where a lady was hoarding horses in the guise of a rescue. She was letting them starve in a field and only feeding one or two as i recall. Well, she got a fine and told she can't have animals anymore.
Cue a few years later and she started another "horse rescue" near a town i was working in, as she used to buy a tiny amount of feed once a week for her 40+ rescues. She was caught and again, slap on the wrist and animals taken.
Last i heard she was buying horses again.