Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Hold the phone. I'm catching up now. So has Drex just bailed on Nick then? I thought those two were ride or die.
When Drexel found out about the drugs his nigga sense started tingling and he instinctively sought to avoid prison, stalker child
 
The addict label really short circuits all of Nick’s complex explanations and narratives and that makes him seethe so bad.
yes, you could practically taste the seethe when he was ranting about how unfair it is to be labeled an addict and how mean people are for not listening to him saying that it's not true (all while completely ignoring the huge pile of evidence that's out for all to see and which just screams "A D D I C T")
 
yes, you could practically taste the seethe when he was ranting about how unfair it is to be labeled an addict and how mean people are for not listening to him saying that it's not true (all while completely ignoring the huge pile of evidence that's out for all to see and which just screams "A D D I C T")
The Rekieta has immunized himself to all criticism. But call him an addict and watch how he recoils. He has been found out.
 
Last edited:
yes, you could practically taste the seethe when he was ranting about how unfair it is to be labeled an addict and how mean people are for not listening to him saying that it's not true (all while completely ignoring the huge pile of evidence that's out for all to see and which just screams "A D D I C T")
"I'm not an addict, I can stop whenever I want!" is not only something Nick said, but the most cliched thing an addict can say

It's one of the go to lines writers pick when they want to show someone is an addict, up there with "I'll suck your dick for a nickel"
 
I'll also push back a bit on what it does. It doesn't just lower inhibitions. It completely rewires your pleasure, reward and risk brain chemistry. Deep in, you can't feel happiness without it. Further in, you no longer feel happy with it, just less terrible
Addicts can be kind, generous loving people.

Nick isn’t, because he’s not just an addict he’s also a cunt, a cuck and a narc.
Proclivity for anal sex
WHAT?!?

Nick is into anal?! And here I thought I couldn’t think any less of him.

(Though in retrospect, OF COURSE he’s into that. God and evolution gives you a perfectly lovely vagina to put your penis into? You can bet that Nick would go: “FUCK YOU! Nobody tells me what to do! I’ll put my penis up the shitter!”)

I’ll just chalk this one up to even more evidence of Nick being possessed by evil spirits.
Demons and evil spirits crave the foul and sin. Try to debase the possessed and those around them. Nick soiling himself with degenerate anal sex and befouling Kayla’s rectum with disgusting sexual perversion is music to satans ears.
 
I just checked and their CPS case 34-JV-24-96 review hearing is scheduled for 11/22/2024. As the date approaches, an accurate date and time will be on the court calendar. https://www.mncourts.gov/Documents/Calendars/8/kandiyohi/dailyCalendar.pdf
Yes, and there will be a status conference at least ten days before the hearing and then you file your official reviews and recommendations. Normally this is a "Good work! Here's what we want from you over the next six months. If everyone agrees, the judge will release the kids to you and we'll check in next month."

Forgive the necromancy but I'd marked my calendar per the above posts and figured it's time for that update now that the roster spans 11/18/2024 to 11/25/2024:


Unsurprisingly there is still nothing upcoming for Rackets, or for any KCHHS appearances matching that case number, whether for November 22nd or even anything close, so either (A) the predictions above about a rigid schedule for a standard six-month review hearing were mistaken as far as the Minnesota process is concerned; (B) whatever stipulated settlement was said to have "resolved" (but not closed) the case also agreed to some sort of extraordinary review schedule; or (C) the hearing is still set in the normal timeframe but Balldo got everything so super-duper-double-secret-probation sealed that it doesn't even so much as ping a generic hearing roster that clearly contains numerous other KCHHS appearances of the CHIPS variety (e.g. emergency protective care, permanency, etc.) publicly airing out the dirty laundry of whatever poor bastards didn't deserve the cushy "public figure" special treatment that is reserved only for the lofty heights of a disheveled bum streaming preparation of overpriced hamburger helper to a piddling hugbox audience in the dozens. Lucky him.

@RudyRayMoore: if you were purporting to have started off with any sort of inside information, a little more may be needed to make any sense out of this.
 
Last edited:
I hold that if Chris merely killed his wife he probably could have framed his defense as her being abusive to him as well as the kids. His wife was a batshit munchie mom who basically burned money like Nick snorted coke.
I'm sorry to further this off topic CW shit but if you have it in you to do what CW did to those children- both the killings and gruesome disposal, you are 1millionX worse than a munchie MLM bitch and cannot claim any high ground or garner sympathy.

That kind of monster is not even in the league of whatever the wife was up to.
 
From a purely objective view, I don’t think anybody could’ve predicted this outcome for Nick. I have to admit, It’s a little disturbing to see him go from a seemingly dorky harmless guy, to endangering his children and getting into hard drugs, particularly at his age.

I know a lot of former-fans have been giving him shit, saying he’s a narcissist, and awful human being, etc. Which is understandable, however 80% of what he says can be chalked up to him being an addict. Not an excuse, but the distinction is important. Again, the transformation of his family is disturbing. Nick had a lot going for him, and I find it hard to believe that all of this awful shit happened just because Nick is smug and a ‘bad guy’. Some people believe that his whole persona was a lie now, and that he was actually a horrible person underneath, but that doesn’t make sense. This type of corruption seems utterly abnormal, and it makes me fear the worst has happened to the Rekeitas. I hope one day we will find out what happened to make him lose it so hard.

I was never a fan (wasn't even aware of him until people started fainting in the church pews around here a couple of years ago), so I also speak without attachment to him.

"What happened" is that he's an asshole, and he likes being an asshole.

Amusingly, if there is an incoming divorce arc, he won't be able to publicly blame Kayla, regardless. Parental disparagement (particularly publicly aired) and parental alienation never goes over well in family court. It's forbidden in standard divorce agreements. He probably knows this. Cue trying to construct a narrative to blame Aaron.
Even the most famous textbook narcissist, our President (don't come at me, that's not a political opinion, just observable fact; he's been consistent and predictable for decades), is in control of himself enough and smart enough not to disparage the mothers of his kids. Sometimes the right thing to do coincides with self-interest and is the better strategic* approach. Nick, however, lacks discernment, and his emotionality is his achilles' heel (one of several).

But parental alienation is not just criticism or blame , and though public disparagement can be a part of it, it's not ipso facto alienation:
Parental alienation goes beyond simply saying bad things about a parent to the child. Alienation occurs when one parent uses constant and relentless tactics such as allegations of abuse, child protection reports, making children feel guilty about loving or having fun with their other parent, telling children that the other parent is the cause of the family problems, etc. to drive a wedge between the alienated parent and the child. The goal of the alienating parent is usually to convince the child that their other parent is such a terrible human being that the child is better off not having any contact with them.



*Side-gripe: wtf autocorrect/spellcheck. I first mistyped "stretgic" and it passed it as fine, then when I highlighted to correct suggested "stretti." Because that's for sure the most likely thing I meant. Tech is so fucking dumb.
 
Addicts can be kind, generous loving people.
Not whilst they are in a using stage. People in the throes of addiction are as self-centered and awful as they come. I say this as someone who has a lot of sympathy for people actively battling addiction, even when they slip and have to start again. It's tough, but when it's got a hold of them it makes people into monsters.

This is why I think Nick's character defects aren't a result of the addiction, because despite being forced to undergo a period of sobriety by the state - allegedly the testing has ended and he immediately relapsed - he displayed no contrition, no admission that his drinking and drug usage negatively effected his life. He has, as far as I am aware, never apologized for what he put his kids and parents though - that's our fault, the pastors fault, Alisha Sweeps fault...

Even when you see addicts relapse immediately, before they do they usually at least express an understanding of what their addiction did to them and their family.
 
"I'm not an addict, I can stop whenever I want!" is not only something Nick said, but the most cliched thing an addict can say

It's one of the go to lines writers pick when they want to show someone is an addict, up there with "I'll suck your dick for a nickel"
Nick would fit in great in that Law and Order meme scene: "I have relationships with women men, and sex with men women."
Fun fact: if you want to be admired, try doing something admirable, instead of being an absolutely worthless piece of shit scumbag.

Even the most famous textbook narcissist, our President (don't come at me, that's not a political opinion, just observable fact; he's been consistent and predictable for decades), is in control of himself enough and smart enough not to disparage the mothers of his kids. Sometimes the right thing to do coincides with self-interest and is the better strategic* approach. Nick, however, lacks discernment, and his emotionality is his achilles' heel (one of several).
Trump is absolutely in love with himself and wants to be seen as a bigly great guy. However his approach to achieving this couldn't be more different than Nick's. Nick tears people down so that he can be king of the rubble while Trump wants to raise people up. Hell there are so many comparisons to be made between Nick and Trump that it's a bit crazy. "Small loan of 1 million dollars" and Trump actually did something with it compared to Nick's trust fund only serving to fund the existence of children he hates. Teetotaler vs crackhead. Trump can deal with actual fucking mob guys in the real estate scene and come out the other side not disadvantaged or compromised, Nick gets shaken down by Ricardo and Romaine. Trump loves hot women but even though Melania has done nude photography she exudes class while April looks like she crawled out of a trailer park and we call Our Wife gollum for a reason. Trump likes shiny things but his golden toilet is probably a better investment than the paintings that sit on the floor. There's probably much more here but I've gone on longer than I thought I would.
 
Why not both. Plenty of terrible people are also addicts, it just makes their behavior even worse.

I've never met somebody with a personality disorder who didn't use drugs/alcohol to excess on a daily basis. Determining whether their cuntish behaviour is a product of the drug use or the personality disorder is a fool's errand. Best to just cut them out of your life whenever possible.

Not whilst they are in a using stage. People in the throes of addiction are as self-centered and awful as they come.

I've known people in the throes of addiction who didn't act like selfish, self-centred cunts, but they're extraordinarily rare.
 
Last edited:
Everything entailed is fictional writing based on alleged real events.

Nick of d’Balldoviles: A Funny and Weird Tragedy

Lore noun
: a particular body of knowledge or tradition
: something that is learned:
: traditional knowledge or belief
: knowledge gained through study or experience
:something that is taught

: the space between the eye and bill in a bird or the corresponding region in a reptile or fish, usually us plural

Many videos and much audio has been made about Nick Rekieta. Maybe you have never heard of him. Maybe you have in passing. Or maybe you know his tale more intimately.

I know his tale, his lore. I know it well. All too well.

Would you, too, like to know the lore of Nicholas Robert Rekieta?



Chapter 1

“Maddox, you dumb, pedophile faggot!”

The handsome and smart lawyer’s face was dimly lit by the cool cathode ray of his computer monitor. Overhead, a smattering of recessed ceiling lighting in the indoor back porch illuminated the room behind him. The hilarious opening joke escaping from his whiskey-scented lips.

A barrage of scathing legal analysis was about to be unleashed from his fingertips, facts that cut deeper than the finest butcher knives. Maddox would die a literally metaphorical death of a thousand cuts.

Did he have “it?” You know, “it?!” The ability to make a great video that would go viral enough for someone, as great and renowned as the viral comedic-mastermind Dick Masterson, to notice? He did. He knew he did.

He had it when he played tee ball and knocked out a pitcher and when he was a cheerleader in college and routinely wowed the crowd with his performances and even when he “accidentally” fingered some all too willing female cheerleaders.

The words flowed forth like a river breaking a dam. Retard, dumbass, moron, faggot and so many other brilliantly constructed put-downs.

He took a drink of whiskey to calm his nerves. His hand was shaking - Provigil, which he brilliantly took for his heat allergy and definitely not because he thought it would prevent gout or whatever, often causes that.
I am literally doing this. Piece by piece. Day by bidet.

April, call me. I have a welding torch, chains, hydraulic presses, mops, buckets, drainage ditches and a remote bunker where no one can hear you scream.
 
New Instagram story from April:

IMG_0256.jpeg
 
I've known people in the throes of addiction who didn't act like selfish, self-centred cunts, but they're extraordinarily rare.
It really depends on what it is they are using. There are plenty of reasonably happy cheerful and outgoing high functioning alcoholics. The happy friendly drunk is a thing. Alcohol just tends to amplify what is already there. In the same way habitual Marijuana users tend to be a fairly mellow and inoffensive bunch, if they are limited to Marijuana. For the most part the only thing offensive about them is that stench of burning skunk that is weed.

I've never met a habitual cocaine user that wasn't a raging cunt or sociopath. Stimulants seem to bring out the absolute worst in anyone.
 
I've never met somebody with a personality disorder who didn't use drugs/alcohol to excess on a daily basis. Determining whether their cuntish behaviour is a product of the drug use or the personality disorder is a fool's errand. Best to just cut them out of your life whenever possible.
I have, and they are scary and harder to deal with because they can hide it better.
They are usually narcissistic control freaks who won’t touch drugs/booze because it puts them at a disadvantage when it comes to manipulation. Some PD types actually tend to be attracted to users or addicts because they are easier to gaslight and control). Vanity can also play a role because drug users and drunks are looked down upon traits and appearances are everything to them, so refraining from vices gives them a sense of superiority (and again another reason some love to be around addicts or less sober type people). They will even pretend to indulge in booze or drugs to encourage everyone around them to get uninhibited, or let their guard down, but themselves.

Given Nick’s particular brand of PD I was a bit surprised he went so off the rails with the drugs and booze, because he has that strong superiority and control freak aspect. He had seemed to really lean into that Christian patriarch of a large family schtick, but again, those types are usually the strict sadistic disciplinarian types. Nick seems to abhor discipline in all forms, not just for himself. (Or at least I hope, his kids have enough on their plate without Nick secretly being a sadistic disciplinarian.
I consider someone who dishes out discipline or punishment according to whims and mood, not an understood, reasonable set of rules and conduct, a sadistic disciplinarian. Sadistic disciplinarians always have personality disorders, but not everybody with a PD is a sadistic disciplinarian.

But it is true that he’s trash whether sober or not, the drugs and booze just amplify his worst impulses and he can’t fool anyone with his false facade. Getting labeled as an addict really gums up how he works.
 
Forgive the necromancy but I'd marked my calendar per the above posts and figured it's time for that update now that the roster spans 11/18/2024 to 11/25/2024:

A cross-post to the legal thread may be in order, FYI.

As for the rest, I expect we will know thr issue of Nick's review by his passive-aggressive seething and various leaks. Nick is very transparent--especially when he tries to be clever.


As for all the people talking about 'good addicts' or 'affectionate, I am not sure if you mean shithead mates at work or you are a pimp with prostitutes, but they basically only care about themselves and the substance and fail hard in any caregiving responsibility role.
 
Back