Possession of cocaine and a firearm technically. Theres where the endangerment charge comes from. He’s so fucking dishonest.
Fully healthy child according to a man that (allegedly) self doses cocaine because it "helps" him
Nick must be the only dumbass on earth to not understand at a basic level that being wasted off your ass and high on narcotics while in charge of your kids is child endangerment. Would enjoy seeing someone besides a drug user say the kid is normal and fully healthy. Seems like this whole mess partially started because mandatory reporters thought otherwise.
The Court is saying that the Applicant did not make ANY argument for WHY extraordinary relief should be granted. He simply asked for extraordinary relief.
I'm pressing X for the time being considering the thumbnail:
Iirc, Kayla said April lived there, lol.
This is just speculation.
Believe it or not having 26.67 grams of cocaine, unknown brown substances, weed gummies, firearms, and sending children to quack chiropractors IS child endangerment.
No matter what he does for the rest of his life, he will forever be known as the man whose nine-year-old daughter tested positive for cocaine. If only somebody, a friend perhaps, had warned him to pull up from his nosedive while there was still time.
And Russell Greer has a better record on appeal.
Look, being a kid is really stressful, okay? You remember what it was like.
"Why it is a complete coincidence that my daughter tested positive for cocaine while I, myself, have been known to occasionally buy commercial quantities and store it merely feet away from her bedroom. I once knew a child who died of Turnip overdose - and the fact her father was a Turnip farmer was perplexing and again, entirely coincidental."Possession of cocaine and a firearm technically. Theres where the endangerment charge comes from. He’s so fucking dishonest.
“No nerd I did not endanger my children with a shitload of cocaine while having firearms. The constitution says I have a right to have firearms while I’m high as shit off this fine Bolivian marching powder! And the fact my child tested positive for also being on it is irrelevant to my case!”
Maybe Russell can give nick pointers on how to successfully appeal. In return Nick can give Russell a turn with April.
He's probably planting the seeds for his strategy of blaming it all on Aaron.
I'm not SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAN but I indeed believe the Barneswalker made nothing resembling an argument germane to the central point of the petition, i.e. why does THIS case merit immediate review?
And as I pointed out, so what? Whatever indicia there are for such a thing, a "watermark" that wasn't even a watermark wouldn't be it, so basically, so what? Maybe the issue is unresolved, but immediate review of this case isn't going to resolve it.
It sure can be frustrating to see him run away from any accountability but that can also be quite funny. With every new development Nick has to make longer leaps in logic and dig deeper into his barrel of bullshit to explain away reality. It's gotten to the point where I look forward to seeing what nonsense he will come up with next to excuse what he's done.
The 9 year old with seizures that happened to test positive for daily use levels of cocaine is perfectly normal and healthy.
I think the novel bit that they argued (and appellate court ignored) was that relying on a livestream video for probable cause is a novel application of evidence. This was mentioned by the trial court judge though. This was a shitty case to make precedent so it was a 'No.' I can imagine another case appealed after verdict where livestream recordings was used as evidence without testimony by the person making the recording. IANAL but the trial court mentioned it so I suspect it's a real law type thingy.
