Arguments against racism rely on the existence of souls

Also nigger IQ is so low and they are overly aggressive without any reason you will notice this pattern with time once you learn how to deal with nigger ass
What's your IQ?
Anglosaxons did have an empire where the sun never sets.
The rest of the world is basically animalistic.
Wait a fucking second. You're holding up the Anglos as the definitive apex of the White race?!??!? :lit:
 
Why do racist men typically hate women too?
Most of them never had to develop "morality" or skills. Women never evolved past stoneage tribal behavior and if you give them power over men they will turn entire civilization back to tribal size and constant warfare. Basically a walking incubator that selects "best genetics" for reproduction which usually for most cases is just most violent. The mentality and morality will always fit their reproductive goal and protection of self and never the actual quality of life, future of family and so on.
If you are a woman, everything you do is inherently justified and at the same time you can't be held responsible for anything.
Dude, you got problems. You need to sort yourself out before you try sorting out everybody else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
Because things like the ability to metabolize Omega-3 fatty acids, the ability to metabolize lactose, the ability to metabolize alcohol, susceptibility to various cancers, fast-twitch muscle formation, bone density, average age of menarche, average age of menopause, serotonin production, and on and on and on aren't any more "negligible" than frontal cortex neuron density or limbic system development.
Black Africans and white Italians can both have sickle cell anemia, all manner of genetic quirks and diseases can be found across different ethnic groups.
Nearly every single thing you care to measure has measurable differences across ethnic groups, so the argument that there are no significant differences between races, therefore there probably aren't any measurable cognitive differences, proceeds from a false premise.
Never said that.
The argument that genetic differences are fictional
Never said that either.
Neural development, which is what IQ testing is a proxy for measuring, is well-known to have three major factors:
  1. Diet
  2. Childhood trauma
  3. Genetics
North Koreans have an extremely poor diet (and, I suspect, awful childhoods). They aren't just 5 points dumber than South Koreans; they're also shorter and thinner. This doesn't somehow prove that the maximum height a human can grow to given an adequate childhood diet has nothing to do with genetics, which it obviously does, and is very much due to genes whose distribution varies geographically.
So what you're saying is that genetics are not the be-all, end-all factor for human development.
Mullatos in america are result of owners raping the negroid cotton workers to make more docile workers.
Buck breaking is a modern myth invented by black supremacists, slavers raped their slaves for simple carnal reasons and not to traumatize them into being better workers.
Vietmaricans are result of us armed man raping local peps, same as wapanese. Offspring is shunned in these societies yet it's only you here something revering in it.
"revering in it?" At no point in this thread did I give an opinion on whether admixing was good or bad, only that it was possible. Why are you race realists so poor at gauging the actual intentions or beliefs of the people arguing with you, and why do you take such stabs in the dark anyway?
Different races separate themselves even in nearby areas. Mexicans, africans, indians etc....
Muslims and Christian denominations do this too, but it's not over what race you are.
The take that mixing is natural is absolutely retarded and globalistic.
I'm sure your ancestry is clean of Neanderthal or Denisovan DNA.
 
I'm sure your ancestry is clean of Neanderthal or Denisovan DNA.
You are worse than a woman that's trying to take a pick at your past to make herself look right and smart.

Muslims and Christian denominations do this too, but it's not over what race you are.
Because ironically, they try to kill everyone that's not like them.

"revering in it?" At no point in this thread did I give an opinion on whether admixing was good or bad, only that it was possible. Why are you race realists so poor at gauging the actual intentions or beliefs of the people arguing with you, and why do you take such stabs in the dark anyway?
I have doubts of your "noble and honest" intentions. It's like another tranny thread about messed up chromosomes makes you sometimes woman if you are born a man, pedophiles trying to explain attraction to kids is just like something between father and son and so on ...
It's not a stab in the dark, I have many experiences dealing with people just like you.

There are viable offsprings between rapefricans and gorrilas/chimps, not that there's much difference between them anyway. If you took a sample size of that local set you'd see that there's admixture and is therefore possible and "natural".
Realistically these hybrids, same as negrokins and other mullatos are genetic dead end and disliked by both groups. They have no future since birth and it's only alphabets forcing it.
Without judische influence all white societies purify themselves - Iceland, sweden, netherland, meaning that the natural state of white nations is to be white.

Buck breaking is a modern myth invented by black supremacists, slavers raped their slaves for simple carnal reasons and not to traumatize them into being better workers.
You don't buck break a fertile woman/servant or maid.
Tamer mullatos that are easier to work with is something known for centuries. Ironically, they are also smarter than their pureblood brotherkin.

Black Africans and white Italians can both have sickle cell anemia, all manner of genetic quirks and diseases can be found across different ethnic groups.
Lower parts of italy, sicily and other infested zones have negroid-arab admixture, as do french, due to constant ottomanic invasion.
 
You are worse than a woman that's trying to take a pick at your past to make herself look right and smart.
Fuckin' wut?
I have doubts of your "noble and honest" intentions.
Never claimed to be noble and honest either. Again with straw grasping for a motive. Why do you do that?
It's like another tranny thread about messed up chromosomes makes you sometimes woman if you are born a man, pedophiles trying to explain attraction to kids is just like something between father and son and so on ...
That is such a bullshit out of pocket false equivalency lmao.
It's not a stab in the dark, I have many experiences dealing with people just like you.
Lmao sure you do.
You don't buck break a fertile woman/servant or maid.
Tamer mullatos that are easier to work with is something known for centuries. Ironically, they are also smarter than their pureblood brotherkin.
You mean to tell me second generation slaves are more docile than first generation slaves? It can't be because the first generation possess a frame of reference as to what freedom is like, it must be because they're purebred.
Also, doesn't this argument defy your earlier claim that race mixing is bad?
There are viable offsprings between rapefricans and gorrilas/chimps, not that there's much difference between them anyway. If you took a sample size of that local set you'd see that there's admixture and is therefore possible and "natural".
I can't tell if you're taking the piss or if you really believe Africans can procreate with gorillas and chimps. Just in case it's the latter, they can't because those two species have a different count of chromosomes.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gog & Magog
He isn't wrong. The kids of yesterday's puritans are now the Woke. They created their own puritanical religion, and even kept "video games bad" as a core tenant.

They created a new form of Christianity. With all of the judgement and zealotry with no room for forgiveness, grace or even God Himself.

The funnier part is that this new faith resembles their Saturday Morning cartoon villain vision of Christianity more than Christianity itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PochiaTheGreyknight
Fuckin' wut?

Never claimed to be noble and honest either. Again with straw grasping for a motive. Why do you do that?

That is such a bullshit out of pocket false equivalency lmao.

Lmao sure you do.

You mean to tell me second generation slaves are more docile than first generation slaves? It can't be because the first generation possess a frame of reference as to what freedom is like, it must be because they're purebred.
Also, doesn't this argument defy your earlier claim that race mixing is bad?

I can't tell if you're taking the piss or if you really believe Africans can procreate with gorillas and chimps. Just in case it's the latter, they can't because those two species have a different count of chromosomes.
I think you're being baited. Ignore his gay British ass before it's too late.
 
Black Africans and white Italians can both have sickle cell anemia, all manner of genetic quirks and diseases can be found across different ethnic groups.
Does the existence of a small number of women with size 10 feet prove there's no meaningful difference between male and female foot sizes? Does the occasional albino Bantu prove Icelanders and Bantus have no difference in melanin production?

Because that's the retard-tier argument you're making. Cherry-picking outliers doesn't invalidate statistics.
 
Last edited:
Does the existence of a small number of women with size 10 feet prove there's no meaningful difference between male and female foot sizes?
This comparison and every other one including the one with the mule are so tortured, contorted and abstracted from the original point they're attempting to refute that they defeat their own purpose. How are you going to prove race realism with sexual dimorphism?
Because that's the retard-tier argument you're making. Cherry-picking outliers doesn't invalidate statistics.
Actually yes it does, it's a scientific concept called "the exception proves the rule." If there exists an exception to the laws of physics, it ceases to be a law because the evidence defies it.
 
This comparison and every other one including the one with the mule are so tortured, contorted and abstracted from the original point they're attempting to refute that they defeat their own purpose. How are you going to prove race realism with sexual dimorphism?
You seem to have trouble connecting ideas with other ideas, generalizing concepts as abstractions, and understanding the difference between population-level statistics and examples. Are you a woman?

Race realism is based on observing population-level statistical differences, then observing that these differences are heritable. You think this can be refuted by cherry-picking example, e.g. "Italians can get sickle-cell anemia." If a statistical difference between populations can be proven to be a fiction by observing examples appear in both populations, then that argument works on any population. (I hope you are still following me at this point; though your past posts suggest you are probably lost now.) The argument would work, for example, on male and female populations.

Actually yes it does, it's a scientific concept called "the exception proves the rule."

I roll a 6 sided die 5000 times and calculate the average. It's 3.5.
I roll a 10 sided die 5000 times and calculate the average. It's 5.5.

I conclude that, on average, a 10-sided die rolls higher values than a 6-sided die. I then roll each die once. The 6-sided die comes up with a 3, and the 10-sided die comes up with a 1. Did this incident disprove my observation about the averages?
 
You seem to have trouble connecting ideas with other ideas, generalizing concepts as abstractions, and understanding the difference between population-level statistics and examples. Are you a woman?
You have trouble recognizing the dissonances in your comparisons and understanding why they don't work. Are you a nigger?
Race realism is based on observing population-level statistical differences
No it isn't, race realist faggots are emotionally invested in their narrative like left wing anti-racists and like to pretend their opinions are scientific fact. All throughout this thread you and every other race realist retard have been doggedly fighting arguments I never made, making garbage one-liner comparisons that fall apart under cursory scrutiny and pearl clutching over my caliber and motives as your main points of refutation.
If a statistical difference between populations can be proven to be a fiction
Oh look, a perfect example of arguing against a point I never made.
(I hope you are still following me at this point; though your past posts suggest you are probably lost now.)
Spoken like a true Redditor.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: capitalBBustard

Arguments against racism rely on the existence of souls​

Chat is this the most retarded thing ever written on this website?

Here's my argument against racism: it's retarded to care so much about people who cause no harm to you. I know about South Africa and all the shit going over there, but I don't live in South Africa. I also know about the 13%/50% meme, but it's straight-up misinfo.
Trannies are by far more likely to harm people, esp minors, due to their obsession with their "transness". I don't even care if it's autogynephilia or gender dysphoria, but either way the end result is that most trannies will groom minors who they think might be an "egg" or some shit like that.
 
The Civil Rights movement relied on Christian morality of seeing all souls as equal in God’s eyes even if we weren’t all equally capable.

The weakening of Christianity’s place in Western culture has undermined that argument and anyone going surprisedpikachuface.jpg over the resulting resurgence of racism is a fucking moron.
It's true. That's why leftist atheists are so stupid when they say Christianity is white supremacist since Christianity is largely responsible for the atrocious world of anti-racism we live in thanks to its denial of racial reality.
If locals roll out the red carpet for everyone, but refuse to do it for you because of your race, it would be totally justified for you to be indignant.
No it wouldn't. They have no obligation to serve every foreigner. Every race has a right to its own homelands, and in these homelands they should have the right to establish segregated spaces. I think the South went overboard with segregation, but that doesn't mean the current model of banning segregation as evil is correct either.
Who has the most Cro-magnon DNA nowadays? The Baltics?
Cro-Magnons are extinct as an independent race because of being invaded by other racial populations. The diversity of humanity thus diminished, just like it did when races that existed into the 20th century vanished. Yes, some Cro-Magnon admixture remains in whites, but there have been no pure Cro-Magnons for countless centuries.
I also know about the 13%/50% meme, but it's straight-up misinfo.
Lmao did you get this from a leftist website? Blacks are overall more dangerous than whites. The stats speak for themselves, no matter how special pleading you use. The only reason troons are more harmful is because the average troon has other mental illnesses and because they're very active on the internet, unlike blacks who do their raping and molesting offline.
 
Back