Bigot Brigade Something Awful and Friends - The roller-coaster train-wreck embarrassing downfall of a Web 1.0 giant and its tick offspring like from Cloverfield

SA and their FYAD subforum may find this place weird and creepy, but a FYAD superstar befriended DemoniusX for a year, started a website full of masturbation tips for fat guys in order to get DemoniusX to write articles for it, and even bought and sent him a masturbation device.

You can't just say that and not post a link to the website.
 
By this point they're probably so used to lazy ironic shitposting that editing an older post doesn't cross their minds.
It turned out that he was just confused because a bunch of posts from the Shmorky thread were moved to this one because they were about SA, so it was hard to follow.

SA and their FYAD subforum may find this place weird and creepy, but a FYAD superstar befriended DemoniusX for a year, started a website full of masturbation tips for fat guys in order to get DemoniusX to write articles for it, and even bought and sent him a masturbation device.
They also trolled a guy to suicide, don't forget.


edit: Oh, and looks like GBS is continuing to slowly drift back to the SJW Catlady Era, with the modding of Troposphere - a "lesbian" who likes "girl dick" and Overwatch porn and who is already probating for "the r word."

It was nice to have a break from the suffocating SJW shit and ludicrously strict moderation for a few years there at least. (I don't think it will ever go back fully though. I mean, there was a time when a thread called "Minority Perspectives in Gaming" was not only NOT laughed off the forums but it was popular and taken seriously lol).
 
Last edited:
YOU'RE A LOOSE CANNON SEX COP
upload_2017-1-5_18-49-56.png


(incidentally, 'Loose Cannon' is his stripper name.)
 
SA and their FYAD subforum may find this place weird and creepy, but a FYAD superstar befriended DemoniusX for a year, started a website full of masturbation tips for fat guys in order to get DemoniusX to write articles for it, and even bought and sent him a masturbation device.
The pot calling the kettle a nígger.
How tardspergilicious do you have to be to spend so much time and effort "trolling" someone?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Meowthkip and Sammo
You know, when I said that 'retard' would get added to SA's nono list eventually, I didn't think it'd be only a few days later.
View attachment 171139
That was clearly just a pretense though. He'll probably get chain probated into oblivion for not using proper punctuation for questioning the moral superiority of the goon hivemind.
 
Remember when Something Awful was the largest hive of scum and villainy you will find anywhere? lmao

Heed papa_november's warning and stay away from this rotting cesspool of flame!
View attachment 171280
View attachment 171281
View attachment 171282
View attachment 171283
View attachment 171285

Except that we're way smaller than SA.

Except that SA members used to buy accounts for friends/family members of internet trainwrecks in the hope of getting them to come spill the beans - and some, like Kevin Haven's brother, did.

Except that SA used to target people who weren't necessarily self-promoting attention whores. The Zombaby thread is a good example of this. It's still one of my favourite internet trainwrecks but it's not like Zombaby's mum was out begging for pitybux, and a whole lot of poop touching was involved in both finding out who fathered the child and the aftermath.

Except that SA - not KF or ED - is where pictures of Uli's sister and information about her life have been posted. It's also the site where pictures from dead baby memorial pages were posted.

I never really understand why any site which spends much of its time mocking internet trainwrecks feels in any way superior to other sites which do the same. It always just seems like a pathetic attempt at "it's OK when we do it".
 
I never really understand why any site which spends much of its time mocking internet trainwrecks feels in any way superior to other sites which do the same. It always just seems like a pathetic attempt at "it's OK when we do it".
Oh, but they're not like that anymore! They pride themselves on that.

Isn't that just fucking sad?
 
Except that we're way smaller than SA.

Except that SA members used to buy accounts for friends/family members of internet trainwrecks in the hope of getting them to come spill the beans - and some, like Kevin Haven's brother, did.

Except that SA used to target people who weren't necessarily self-promoting attention whores. The Zombaby thread is a good example of this. It's still one of my favourite internet trainwrecks but it's not like Zombaby's mum was out begging for pitybux, and a whole lot of poop touching was involved in both finding out who fathered the child and the aftermath.

Except that SA - not KF or ED - is where pictures of Uli's sister and information about her life have been posted. It's also the site where pictures from dead baby memorial pages were posted.

I never really understand why any site which spends much of its time mocking internet trainwrecks feels in any way superior to other sites which do the same. It always just seems like a pathetic attempt at "it's OK when we do it".

They had an article on Julianna Wetmore, for Christ's sake.

This is all that remains of it on the site.
 

You can see the original right here: https://web.archive.org/web/20060905143531/http://www.somethingawful.com/index.php?a=3995

I always wondered- what was the straw that broke the camel's back and made them remove the article? Was it troll's remorse? Legal action? I wonder how they even managed to keep rolling with such an edgy concept in the first place, let alone peer-approve and publish it.

Speak of the devil, the comic in this article (the only thing that remains in the blanked version of the article) is drawn by none other than Shmorky. That means Shmorky was gleefully in on this gratuitous lampooning of a disfigured little girl. What an upstanding Social Justice Hero.

Something Awful sure is garbage.
 
You can see the original right here: https://web.archive.org/web/20060905143531/http://www.somethingawful.com/index.php?a=3995

I always wondered- what was the straw that broke the camel's back and made them remove the article? Was it troll's remorse? Legal action? I wonder how they even managed to keep rolling with such an edgy concept in the first place, let alone peer-approve and publish it.

Speak of the devil, the comic in this article (the only thing that remains in the blanked version of the article) is drawn by none other than Shmorky. That means Shmorky was gleefully in on this gratuitous lampooning of a disfigured little girl. What an upstanding Social Justice Hero.

Something Awful sure is garbage.

Peer reviewed? lol

That was 2 years after the poison womb incident

http://www.somethingawful.com/news/were-all-gonna/

and two years before Zombaby

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3121857

so it was an edgy concept which goons found entertaining over a prolonged period of time.
 
To clarify, I meant peer-reviewed insofar as Lowtax assumedly looked at it and said, yeah, let's put this up on our popular internet site.

Also wow, I didn't even know about these other things. Real classy. How are these people so high-and-mighty again?
 
To clarify, I meant peer-reviewed insofar as Lowtax assumedly looked at it and said, yeah, let's put this up on our popular internet site.

Also wow, I didn't even know about these other things. Real classy.

Stile, Rotten and Ogrish were the more extreme "edgy" sites of the time so tasteless articles about dead/deformed kids probably didn't seem all that bad to any of the writers by comparison. Nor to the readers - those were hugely popular articles/threads.
 
You can see the original right here: https://web.archive.org/web/20060905143531/http://www.somethingawful.com/index.php?a=3995

I always wondered- what was the straw that broke the camel's back and made them remove the article? Was it troll's remorse? Legal action? I wonder how they even managed to keep rolling with such an edgy concept in the first place, let alone peer-approve and publish it.

Speak of the devil, the comic in this article (the only thing that remains in the blanked version of the article) is drawn by none other than Shmorky. That means Shmorky was gleefully in on this gratuitous lampooning of a disfigured little girl. What an upstanding Social Justice Hero.

Something Awful sure is garbage.

Speaking of Shmorky I notice the Awful Link of the day is Charlie from all dogs go to heaven crying while pooping in a diaper.

That can not be a coincidence.
 
Back