Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

Say it ain't so that Sandypants is Shmorky! (Kind of saw it coming)

Back in the day Sandypants was SUPER popular on FA. If you recall her character sheet, there's a lot of character art from other people on it -- Sandypants got a lot of fanart, so I would not say that Shmorky blew all his funds on commissions.
I even think my girlfriend at the time drew Sandy fanart.

Because Sandy appears to be sweet and feminine she was much more approachable and thus had a wider fanbase. Do you think this is why Shmorky began to deviate to being more feminine? A cute little sheep would be a lot less creepy to interact with than an awkward and balding rabbit in a diaper (Dave Bunny was a tragic character design).

It would be a lot easier to lure people in that way.
 
Say it ain't so that Sandypants is Shmorky! (Kind of saw it coming)

Back in the day Sandypants was SUPER popular on FA. If you recall her character sheet, there's a lot of character art from other people on it -- Sandypants got a lot of fanart, so I would not say that Shmorky blew all his funds on commissions.
I even think my girlfriend at the time drew Sandy fanart.

Because Sandy appears to be sweet and feminine she was much more approachable and thus had a wider fanbase. Do you think this is why Shmorky began to deviate to being more feminine? A cute little sheep would be a lot less creepy to interact with than an awkward and balding rabbit in a diaper (Dave Bunny was a tragic character design).

It would be a lot easier to lure people in that way.
It's how Dobson started out with CattyN.
 
@Mandarys_Milan

I remember you thread on SS you mention dave had a idea for a cartoon show about girl wizard but the only premisis was that a boy couldnt go to a sleep over so she made him into a little girl.

The problem with "artist" like shmorky is that they are lazy and only do work that interests them. Fuck I've browsed alot of the sandy pants shit posted here, the only funny thing I've seen of shmorkys work posted here is the yoshi, toad breakfast joke...and knowing what i know about the author its not even funny because scat fetish.

I liked watching the Cartoon Network shows with my nephews and my friends children because its clear the people behind them pack in little jokes that go over kids heads. for the last few years I ve been impressed with the steven universe stuff its constructed rather well, and for the most part they know how to be...."subversive" and the key to that is subtlety.

I dont see shmorky being able to pull that off for a second. Give him a kluff show and how long before we get a fucking porn or piss scene? How long can he hold himself back?

Do a show with those lambs and wolf characters how long before the are pissing and shitting and fucking?

A few years ago I had a creative type ask me for money. He wanted to make some kinda film or youtube video. He was/is a washed up video FX guy who got his start doing fan films back in the day. I told him I would loan him some money, if he gave me 1) a script and 2) a spread sheet budget. While he was suppose to be working on these things I did some research saw the mountain of work this shit was, decide i wasnt gonna loan him money but hey at least he ll have a script to show other people.....guess what he never got back to me with ether of those two things.

Another time he hit me up with an idea for a fan star trek video and he told me the premise I pointed out it sounded just like that porno they made a few years back and I got an earfull on why i had to be negative.

If he had a show, as a means to indulge his perversions, it would mean he'd have to trop the trans shit have a more public face and just put more work into targeting and grooming his victims. Whats gonna save people is his laziness.
 
Just posted this in the SA thread, but it belongs here too. Thanks to goon Sex Cop, Shmorky now has a theme song.
song.png

song2.png

song3.png
 

In that one, Sandy talks about being turned on by mature hairy pussies. I am certain that I saw in this thread a screencap of or link to Dave saying that he was into hairy middle-age pussies, I just don't know where to find it again.

That's not a smoking gun, but it is a strangely specific fetish.
 
Not sure about the timeline here, but have you ever seen this doll, @Mandarys_Milan ?
View attachment 171345

Edit: More.
View attachment 171353

Edit2: Those pictures weren't taken by SandyPants, but by the crafter.

Somehow this thing is the creepiest thing I've seen here. I feel like I'm going to get possessed just looking at it and those vagina hooves are disgusting.

Man, I confess to being 100% weong about this. I don't know, in a way it's a relief to know there aren't more of these pantspissing shiteaters. We should be graeful for small mercies.

It may be just me, too, but the "Tanks, Mee" is almost the most disturbing part of that. Like the fggt can't keep from infantilizing himself for even the time it takes to say goodbye.

Sorry, but I'm afraid the sub-subculture is 100% real. Unless Shmorky was at Rainfurrest and managed to put on at least 10 elaborate disguises and single-handedly destroy the convention.
 
Well isn't this interesting.
View attachment 171316

So let's get something straight here. This Sandy pseudonym wasn't exactly subtle.

I think this means kc fucking green was knowingly chatting it up with a babyfur.

Just how deep does this rabbit hole go?
I KNEW IT
We are getting closer to finding kc's daiper porn stash.
I'm so excited
 
What I don't get: why would he create a new persona with a (mostly) distinct art style to indulge his furry pedo fantasies, but continue to draw Klurf diaper porn in his original style anyway? Is there anything that's definitely linking the two?

Although they've been definitively linked since this post, wanted to touch on the split anyway, as that wasn't addressed. SA was likely a big reason for that. To whatever extent the admins there were willing to ignore any rumors about him, that was almost certainly contingent on there being some degree of separation between any furry pedo shit and SA itself. And whatever any of you might think of SA today, back in its earlier years there were indeed some mighty purges and witch hunts for any furry/pedo/generally unsavory crap. In order to continue indulging those fetishes he'd have needed to create a persona and style entirely distinct from what he was doing at SA, lest the goons take notice and start looking a bit too hard in his direction.
 
there is some speculation that the feverfew posts from SA are the Shmorkster himself.

Some dime-store analysis:
1) Makes it a point to call out Lowtax for 'abandoning a friend'
2) Calls shmorky a celebrity with a celebrity lifestyle
3) Still defending horrific artwork as 'commissions'
4) completely disregards Mandrys_Milans view of their relationship and says Shmorky was the abused party

Seems fishy...:blart:
 
Although they've been definitively linked since this post, wanted to touch on the split anyway, as that wasn't addressed. SA was likely a big reason for that. To whatever extent the admins there were willing to ignore any rumors about him, that was almost certainly contingent on there being some degree of separation between any furry pedo shit and SA itself. And whatever any of you might think of SA today, back in its earlier years there were indeed some mighty purges and witch hunts for any furry/pedo/generally unsavory crap. In order to continue indulging those fetishes he'd have needed to create a persona and style entirely distinct from what he was doing at SA, lest the goons take notice and start looking a bit too hard in his direction.

IIRC SA goons were generally able to pass over the few diaper pics that were dug up during the Todd thing since there weren't a ton of them we were aware of. His excuse of needing to take commissions from disgusting furries to survive was accepted because furries were the bane of SA at the time. He made himself sound like a victim about it, too. We were willing to accept that he had to pay rent and the trade off was that he had to draw crinkle furs. If a big cache of pictures or a chatlog like what's been posted here had been discovered, the outcome would have been different.

I would be willing to believe that he spun off his identity as a diaperklurf so he could have plausible deniability among goons. It took @Soliloqueef coming forward with proof to actually link the two identities.
 
there is some speculation that the feverfew posts from SA are the Shmorkster himself.

Some dime-store analysis:
1) Makes it a point to call out Lowtax for 'abandoning a friend'
2) Calls shmorky a celebrity with a celebrity lifestyle
3) Still defending horrific artwork as 'commissions'
4) completely disregards Mandrys_Milans view of their relationship and says Shmorky was the abused party

Seems fishy...:blart:

I'm just catching up on that thread, and yeah my first thought reading those posts was "oh hey it's shmorky".
 
I haven't bothered to read feverfews posts because they're very long and autistic but they're probably just some tumblr faggot who believes that transwomyn can do no wrong. I doubt Shmorky's dumb enough to rereg and defend himself when it would be easy for Lowtax to identify him
 
Although they've been definitively linked since this post, wanted to touch on the split anyway, as that wasn't addressed. SA was likely a big reason for that. To whatever extent the admins there were willing to ignore any rumors about him, that was almost certainly contingent on there being some degree of separation between any furry pedo shit and SA itself. And whatever any of you might think of SA today, back in its earlier years there were indeed some mighty purges and witch hunts for any furry/pedo/generally unsavory crap. In order to continue indulging those fetishes he'd have needed to create a persona and style entirely distinct from what he was doing at SA, lest the goons take notice and start looking a bit too hard in his direction.

I was thinking about the Todd Goldman "art thievery incident".. Dave made the Peaches FA account March 2007. The Todd Goldman Plagiarism thing is documented on wikipedia as happening April 2007. I seem to remember reading somewhere that Goldman tried to dig up dirt on Dave and stumbled upon some diaperfur art, then tried to "soil" Dave's reputation.

I wonder if Dave abandoning his Peaches account and switching to Sandypants had anything to do with this.. Hence the dramatic, less likely to be traced art style change, etc. Dunno, just a thought.
 
I was thinking about the Todd Goldman "art thievery incident".. Dave made the Peaches FA account March 2007. The Todd Goldman Plagiarism thing is documented on wikipedia as happening April 2007. I seem to remember reading somewhere that Goldman tried to dig up dirt on Dave and stumbled upon some diaperfur art, then tried to "soil" Dave's reputation.

I wonder if Dave abandoning his Peaches account and switching to Sandypants had anything to do with this.. Hence the dramatic, less likely to be traced art style change, etc. Dunno, just a thought.
That is entirely possibly but I'm not so sure about it at the same time. I think just Todd found whatever was on the ED article at the time which was old DaveBunny stuff from the early 2000's, rather than finding Peaches.

Edit: While you're around, do you happen to have any further incriminating e-mails from him?
 
Back