Let me introduce you to a very unbiased, definitely not written by paid editors article. This is actually a very deep rabbit hole that needs special inspection but I'll keep it short here.
Glyphosate (aka Monsanto's Roundup)
I would post screenshots of it was limited to a few sentences but the entire article is written in favor of glyphosate, almost advertisingly. There are more than one article dedicated to the chemical. There's even a section called "Misinformation campaigns" in the main article:
Yup, an antivaxxer is against glyphosate so if you oppose the safety of glyphosate, you are an antivaxxer.
Anyone who adds anything that claims glyphosate is harmful to humans (WITH SOURCES) gets reverted. If you add sources that prove Monsanto is behind the research that claims glyphosate is safe, you get reverted too. You think these are deranged, well,
anything slightly paints glyphosate negative gets reverted by the usual "MEDRS" excuse. Glyphosate is safe and it's not up to debate!
There's a second article called
Roundup, again, written in its favor. Even a
THIRD ARTICLE! All three repeat "glyphosate dindu nuffin, glyphosate causes no cancer, everyone else is lying, trust Monsanto". Chemical that interferes with biological processes is neither toxic nor carcinogenic because the producers say so. Chemical companies are notoriously trustworthy and they never lie about their products.
Yeah this shit is more than 100% carcinogenic and the article is written and protected by paid editors. The editors should be investigated.
Edit: Glyphosate has been recently linked to Parkinson's disease,
mentioned in the Talk page and got the MEDRS hammer.