Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 14.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 107 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 170 40.0%

  • Total voters
    425
Does Nick use disposable plates?
View attachment 6701134
This is the second time I am seeing disposable plates for Thanksgiving dinner.
What the actual fuck is wrong with people. How hard is it to drop the dishes into the dishwasher, turn it on?

Considering Nick's kitchen, I would assume he has to use one-time use trash plates because he can't find his dinnerware and cutlery in that hoarder's dream kitchen.
 
This was......................................... interesting.
  • Barnes: "I'm not simping for Rekieta! I'm simping for the constitution!"
  • Viva: "Criminal charges or not, Rekieta desperately does need help and he should be checking himself into rehab."
TLDR: Viva & Barnes are still balldowashers
  • No video just audio (cuz Barnes is post-hospital?)
  • Viva doesn't want to keep talking about Rekieta because it's "too close" to them but then talks about it for an hour
  • Barnes says any attorney esp. @Potentially Criminal, Legal Mindset, and Nate are not for the constitution let alone Nick
    • They need to remove Nick's name from the affidavit and realize it's against anyone's amendment rights
    • Anyone not supporting Nick are grifting and don't understand the law
  • Barnes says ALL of Lawtube owes him a personal apology because he is right but runs around in circles on why and what he's right about (4:00)
  • Barnes goes on again how the mandated reporters were "biased haters"
    • Viva agrees and says Rekieta went after people and that's why he's being targeted
  • Viva says there's no proof of child abuse/neglect because kids say they're hungry all the time
You will lose braincells listening but it does pull back the flap and explain the mentality of these two retards. Listened on 1.75 speed and still heard it clearly.

EDIT:
Forgot the most important point! Around 12:00 both say there is "no white powder on his nose" in the video, NONE! Viva says "he zoomed in and looked really hard to see if he saw it and didn't see any." Both believe that point is "church and social media gossip" and if there really was white powder on his nose in the video, a picture would have been included in the affidavit. WILD!
 
Last edited:
Remind me please, how did that go?
The Promised One?

He did a bunch of videos proclaiming Nick is completely innocent, and didn't have 26 grams of coke in his house.

Then he flipped the fuck out when Nick started openly admitting he was doing cocaine.

He also seemed wholly ignorant of the fact April even existed, and lost his shit ever more when Nick finally admitted she is his girlfriend and he is banging her.

I dunno if he's still around. I haven't seen him in any of Himedall's recent caps. He might have given up.

Remember, they aren't too bright over there in Nick's Locals. It's an insulated hugbox. They only listen to what Nick tells them, and they rarely seek out information on their own.

Is that how his office got to be a disgusting mess with the floor covered in shit? I didn't know Kayla stored her knickknacks in there.
The pictures we have seen suggest everything in that room is his. It's all dude stuff.
 
He's disingenuous. Nobody in their right mind accepts the Kino Casino as a "moral authority." Nobody in this mess is really much of a moral authority. It's all shades of grey.
Of everything since the Cokestream, his comments there were the most flagrantly autistic. What an obliviously flailing spastic.
 
Every time Rekieta posts food pictures I just get flashbacks to Nick Fuentes when he would post pictures of his food with "imagine eating this good."

Someone stated earlier in the thread that Rekieta might end up releasing parts of the bodycam footage himself to reinforce some of his narratives and I think that is absolutely correct now with what he said in Locals about the 8 year old. He will probably cut a 2 second clip showing a cop with a glove touching her hair, and use that 2 seconds to show "See? The cop touched her hair with cocaine hands so that is why she tested positive."
 
I love how he says his daughter wasn't exposed to the cocaine till the day of the raid by the officers. :story:

THE POLICE GAVE MY CHILDREN COCAINE, YOUR ONNER!

My reading is that he's just throwing Kayla under the bus, once more, by insinuating she's a hoarder.
I don't know if she is or not, but I refuse to believe that Nick has no hoarding tendencies himself given the many bottles, books, and unhung painting we see about his home.

He has negged her (though it did not seem like a neg at the time) about how many things she buys. He has mentioned having a shed in their garden that she has full of things and her penchant for LEGO.

He says he'd release "relevant parts" of it. Don't think it will be "fair & balanced."
Nick's face-blurring caveat isn't for the same reason as non-narcissists. Nick wants a reason to refuse to show the video.

The video he says he wants to release supposedly shows a cop rubbing cocaine in his daughters hair. He will never be satisfied that the blurred video shows what the cop did and obscures identity. "I have the blurred video but it obscures how nefarious the cop was in contaminating my daughter. Reducing the blurring reveals too much of my daughters face. I'd release it if I could but I just can't." He can't take responsibility for anything. It's always something outside his control.

Predication:

1. He will not do it because he has to learn how to do the redaction/find a person to do it for him/the person he found ghosted him/he is really busy with his KEEDS/he will be perennially preparing for it (like the 5k gift).

2. He will just not do it because he only meant it and it was true when he said said it--just like when he claimed he was monogamous.

Is he implying the cop fucked up and touched Nick's cocaine and then tussled her hair or deliberately planted enzymes in her hair?
*Touseled. This is one of my grammar and vocabulary triggers. Apologies for the pedantry, but this one (like 'less' and 'fewer') really gets my goat for some reason..

Unless he had to wrestle with the child to really rub in the cocaine to distort the follicle testing, per the requirement of the scientific study linked hundreds of pages back...

I dunno if he's still around. I haven't seen him in any of Himedall's recent caps. He might have given up.

Around posting but not chatting or commenting on anything Nick does. This is the only post or comment from them since the spergout (spoilered below).

1732921061233.png

1732921169067.png
 
Predication:

1. He will not do it because he has to learn how to do the redaction/find a person to do it for him/the person he found ghosted him/he is really busy with his KEEDS/he will be perennially preparing for it (like the 5k gift).

2. He will just not do it because he only meant it and it was true when he said said it--just like when he claimed he was monogamous.
I think he might do it, but it'll be like 10 seconds of a cop touching her head so he can go "SEE!? SEE!?" and then smugly eat a single Dorito.

He can have Ryan censor out her face on like 10 seconds of video. It's not that fucking hard. Even I could probably manage to figure it out (I am not a video editor guy).

What he's banking on is replenishing his fanbase with the biggest idiots who won't take the time to research how that drug test actually works. Sadly, they'll probably be a few that bite.

But it could also be like the Vic thing where he claims he'll tell the full story and ultimately doesn't say shit.
 
This was......................................... interesting.
  • Barnes: "I'm not simping for Rekieta! I'm simping for the constitution!"
  • Viva: "Criminal charges or not, Rekieta desperately does need help and he should be checking himself into rehab."
TLDR: Viva & Barnes are still balldowashers
  • No video just audio (cuz Barnes is post-hospital?)
  • Viva doesn't want to keep talking about Rekieta because it's "too close" to them but then talks about it for an hour
  • Barnes says any attorney esp. @Potentially Criminal, Legal Mindset, and Nate are not for the constitution let alone Nick
    • They need to remove Nick's name from the affidavit and realize it's against anyone's amendment rights
    • Anyone not supporting Nick are grifting and don't understand the law
  • Barnes says ALL of Lawtube owes him a personal apology because he is right but runs around in circles on why and what he's right about (4:00)
  • Barnes goes on again how the mandated reporters were "biased haters"
    • Viva agrees and says Rekieta went after people and that's why he's being targeted
  • Viva says there's no proof of child abuse/neglect because kids say they're hungry all the time
You will lose braincells listening but it does pull back the flap and explain the mentality of these two retards. Listened on 1.75 speed and still heard it clearly.

EDIT:
Forgot the most important point! Around 12:00 both say there is "no white powder on his nose" in the video, NONE! Viva says "he zoomed in and looked really hard to see if he saw it and didn't see any." Both believe that point is "church and social media gossip" and if there really was white powder on his nose in the video, a picture would have been included in the affidavit. WILD!

Dude, I don't know why the reuploader decided to date this video as Nov 28th, but from what I've heard, this audio is from an old stream on May 28th (https://youtu.be/UEHqZJqHBeA?t=527).

Everything you posted is in that May 28th stream, it's nothing new.

 
Given the locals boasting about doing housework and laundry emphasizing the rarity of the occasion, we can confidently assume that no laundry or cleaning has been done since the grandparents came and did it immediately after the arrest.

And given the years-thick layer of dust still visible in the last cooking stream, the grandparents can’t have done much more cleaning than shove a few of the more conspicuous piles of moldy clothes into a closet.
 
Dude, I don't know why the reuploader decided to date this video as Nov 28th
Yeah, the post needs an edit to point out that this stuff is 6 months old.
I was really confused why someone was reposting that old shit, but anyone who is not that up-to-date on the Balldoverse could believe its new.
 
It went like this.
We made some memes out of it

This AI-read copypasta was AMAZING! God, I forgot how GOOD it was! Thank-you for bringing it back to my attention and a goofy smile to my face.

I think he might do it, but it'll be like 10 seconds of a cop touching her head so he can go "SEE!? SEE!?" and then smugly eat a single Dorito.

He can have Ryan censor out her face on like 10 seconds of video. It's not that fucking hard. Even I could probably manage to figure it out (I am not a video editor guy).

What he's banking on is replenishing his fanbase with the biggest idiots who won't take the time to research how that drug test actually works. Sadly, they'll probably be a few that bite.

But it could also be like the Vic thing where he claims he'll tell the full story and ultimately doesn't say shit.

So 'hocus-pocus, out of focus' is the name of the game, and he is taking a page from Binger's book of strategy from the Rittenhouse trial? If he does this, I am making an edit of Nick that teacher conference scene from Incredibles. I am sure the Rittenhouse commentary have some relevant quotes to use.
 
Back