💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.7%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 275 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 162 23.7%

  • Total voters
    684
This was......................................... interesting.
  • Barnes: "I'm not simping for Rekieta! I'm simping for the constitution!"
  • Viva: "Criminal charges or not, Rekieta desperately does need help and he should be checking himself into rehab."
TLDR: Viva & Barnes are still balldowashers
  • No video just audio (cuz Barnes is post-hospital?)
  • Viva doesn't want to keep talking about Rekieta because it's "too close" to them but then talks about it for an hour
  • Barnes says any attorney esp. @Potentially Criminal, Legal Mindset, and Nate are not for the constitution let alone Nick
    • They need to remove Nick's name from the affidavit and realize it's against anyone's amendment rights
    • Anyone not supporting Nick are grifting and don't understand the law
  • Barnes says ALL of Lawtube owes him a personal apology because he is right but runs around in circles on why and what he's right about (4:00)
  • Barnes goes on again how the mandated reporters were "biased haters"
    • Viva agrees and says Rekieta went after people and that's why he's being targeted
  • Viva says there's no proof of child abuse/neglect because kids say they're hungry all the time
You will lose braincells listening but it does pull back the flap and explain the mentality of these two retards. Listened on 1.75 speed and still heard it clearly.

EDIT:
Forgot the most important point! Around 12:00 both say there is "no white powder on his nose" in the video, NONE! Viva says "he zoomed in and looked really hard to see if he saw it and didn't see any." Both believe that point is "church and social media gossip" and if there really was white powder on his nose in the video, a picture would have been included in the affidavit. WILD!
 
Last edited:
Remind me please, how did that go?
The Promised One?

He did a bunch of videos proclaiming Nick is completely innocent, and didn't have 26 grams of coke in his house.

Then he flipped the fuck out when Nick started openly admitting he was doing cocaine.

He also seemed wholly ignorant of the fact April even existed, and lost his shit ever more when Nick finally admitted she is his girlfriend and he is banging her.

I dunno if he's still around. I haven't seen him in any of Himedall's recent caps. He might have given up.

Remember, they aren't too bright over there in Nick's Locals. It's an insulated hugbox. They only listen to what Nick tells them, and they rarely seek out information on their own.

Is that how his office got to be a disgusting mess with the floor covered in shit? I didn't know Kayla stored her knickknacks in there.
The pictures we have seen suggest everything in that room is his. It's all dude stuff.
 
He's disingenuous. Nobody in their right mind accepts the Kino Casino as a "moral authority." Nobody in this mess is really much of a moral authority. It's all shades of grey.
Of everything since the Cokestream, his comments there were the most flagrantly autistic. What an obliviously flailing spastic.
 
No doubt, Nick's dishwasher repair man died of pancreatic cancer and he doesn't clean dishes out of respect to his memory. And you thought the paper plates were because he was lazy - what assholes you all are.
 
Every time Rekieta posts food pictures I just get flashbacks to Nick Fuentes when he would post pictures of his food with "imagine eating this good."

Someone stated earlier in the thread that Rekieta might end up releasing parts of the bodycam footage himself to reinforce some of his narratives and I think that is absolutely correct now with what he said in Locals about the 8 year old. He will probably cut a 2 second clip showing a cop with a glove touching her hair, and use that 2 seconds to show "See? The cop touched her hair with cocaine hands so that is why she tested positive."
 
I love how he says his daughter wasn't exposed to the cocaine till the day of the raid by the officers. :story:

THE POLICE GAVE MY CHILDREN COCAINE, YOUR ONNER!

My reading is that he's just throwing Kayla under the bus, once more, by insinuating she's a hoarder.
I don't know if she is or not, but I refuse to believe that Nick has no hoarding tendencies himself given the many bottles, books, and unhung painting we see about his home.

He has negged her (though it did not seem like a neg at the time) about how many things she buys. He has mentioned having a shed in their garden that she has full of things and her penchant for LEGO.

He says he'd release "relevant parts" of it. Don't think it will be "fair & balanced."
Nick's face-blurring caveat isn't for the same reason as non-narcissists. Nick wants a reason to refuse to show the video.

The video he says he wants to release supposedly shows a cop rubbing cocaine in his daughters hair. He will never be satisfied that the blurred video shows what the cop did and obscures identity. "I have the blurred video but it obscures how nefarious the cop was in contaminating my daughter. Reducing the blurring reveals too much of my daughters face. I'd release it if I could but I just can't." He can't take responsibility for anything. It's always something outside his control.

Predication:

1. He will not do it because he has to learn how to do the redaction/find a person to do it for him/the person he found ghosted him/he is really busy with his KEEDS/he will be perennially preparing for it (like the 5k gift).

2. He will just not do it because he only meant it and it was true when he said said it--just like when he claimed he was monogamous.

Is he implying the cop fucked up and touched Nick's cocaine and then tussled her hair or deliberately planted enzymes in her hair?
*Touseled. This is one of my grammar and vocabulary triggers. Apologies for the pedantry, but this one (like 'less' and 'fewer') really gets my goat for some reason..

Unless he had to wrestle with the child to really rub in the cocaine to distort the follicle testing, per the requirement of the scientific study linked hundreds of pages back...

I dunno if he's still around. I haven't seen him in any of Himedall's recent caps. He might have given up.

Around posting but not chatting or commenting on anything Nick does. This is the only post or comment from them since the spergout (spoilered below).

1732921061233.png

1732921169067.png
 
Predication:

1. He will not do it because he has to learn how to do the redaction/find a person to do it for him/the person he found ghosted him/he is really busy with his KEEDS/he will be perennially preparing for it (like the 5k gift).

2. He will just not do it because he only meant it and it was true when he said said it--just like when he claimed he was monogamous.
I think he might do it, but it'll be like 10 seconds of a cop touching her head so he can go "SEE!? SEE!?" and then smugly eat a single Dorito.

He can have Ryan censor out her face on like 10 seconds of video. It's not that fucking hard. Even I could probably manage to figure it out (I am not a video editor guy).

What he's banking on is replenishing his fanbase with the biggest idiots who won't take the time to research how that drug test actually works. Sadly, they'll probably be a few that bite.

But it could also be like the Vic thing where he claims he'll tell the full story and ultimately doesn't say shit.
 
This was......................................... interesting.
  • Barnes: "I'm not simping for Rekieta! I'm simping for the constitution!"
  • Viva: "Criminal charges or not, Rekieta desperately does need help and he should be checking himself into rehab."
TLDR: Viva & Barnes are still balldowashers
  • No video just audio (cuz Barnes is post-hospital?)
  • Viva doesn't want to keep talking about Rekieta because it's "too close" to them but then talks about it for an hour
  • Barnes says any attorney esp. @Potentially Criminal, Legal Mindset, and Nate are not for the constitution let alone Nick
    • They need to remove Nick's name from the affidavit and realize it's against anyone's amendment rights
    • Anyone not supporting Nick are grifting and don't understand the law
  • Barnes says ALL of Lawtube owes him a personal apology because he is right but runs around in circles on why and what he's right about (4:00)
  • Barnes goes on again how the mandated reporters were "biased haters"
    • Viva agrees and says Rekieta went after people and that's why he's being targeted
  • Viva says there's no proof of child abuse/neglect because kids say they're hungry all the time
You will lose braincells listening but it does pull back the flap and explain the mentality of these two retards. Listened on 1.75 speed and still heard it clearly.

EDIT:
Forgot the most important point! Around 12:00 both say there is "no white powder on his nose" in the video, NONE! Viva says "he zoomed in and looked really hard to see if he saw it and didn't see any." Both believe that point is "church and social media gossip" and if there really was white powder on his nose in the video, a picture would have been included in the affidavit. WILD!

Dude, I don't know why the reuploader decided to date this video as Nov 28th, but from what I've heard, this audio is from an old stream on May 28th (https://youtu.be/UEHqZJqHBeA?t=527).

Everything you posted is in that May 28th stream, it's nothing new.

 
Given the locals boasting about doing housework and laundry emphasizing the rarity of the occasion, we can confidently assume that no laundry or cleaning has been done since the grandparents came and did it immediately after the arrest.

And given the years-thick layer of dust still visible in the last cooking stream, the grandparents can’t have done much more cleaning than shove a few of the more conspicuous piles of moldy clothes into a closet.
 
It went like this.
We made some memes out of it

This AI-read copypasta was AMAZING! God, I forgot how GOOD it was! Thank-you for bringing it back to my attention and a goofy smile to my face.

I think he might do it, but it'll be like 10 seconds of a cop touching her head so he can go "SEE!? SEE!?" and then smugly eat a single Dorito.

He can have Ryan censor out her face on like 10 seconds of video. It's not that fucking hard. Even I could probably manage to figure it out (I am not a video editor guy).

What he's banking on is replenishing his fanbase with the biggest idiots who won't take the time to research how that drug test actually works. Sadly, they'll probably be a few that bite.

But it could also be like the Vic thing where he claims he'll tell the full story and ultimately doesn't say shit.

So 'hocus-pocus, out of focus' is the name of the game, and he is taking a page from Binger's book of strategy from the Rittenhouse trial? If he does this, I am making an edit of Nick that teacher conference scene from Incredibles. I am sure the Rittenhouse commentary have some relevant quotes to use.
 
You'd think they would have given up by now.
after the for sure 100 percent going to happen franks hearing was DENIED its obvious he was a lying sack of shit so he might as well spin some yarns tbh, just go full paul bunyan and hoop snakes at this point fuck it
 
Dude, I don't know why the reuploader decided to date this video as Nov 28th, but from what I've heard, this audio is from an old stream on May 28th (https://youtu.be/UEHqZJqHBeA?t=527).
Oh, thank God. You observation here makes things a little bit more sane.

I was taken aback by the idea of them continuing with this bullshit now. You'd have to be insane at this point. They're both grifters, but the grift probably ain't gonna last much longer.

Nick is likely gonna plead out, and I'm sure Nick or White has informed Barnes of that at this point.
 
Seems like only 5 people total in the court room. K, Tiki, and the 3 balldo clan. Nick tried to bring a bottle of "coke" into the court room but was DENIEDDDDDDD.
I just want to touch on this tidbit from the hearing because it's so amusingly bizarre to me. I know Nick gets dunked on for being a "fake lawyer" and all that jazz, but dude is a licensed attorney, has been inside a courtroom and should be aware of basic courtroom etiquette. Why does he need to be told not bring shit into back like he's some random schmuck who got pulled in for drunk driving? I mean it's funny that the bailiff gave him a bit of a felting, but holy shit, dude should know better. Then again, if he knew better, he wouldn't be in this mess in the first place

The interview did make me feel slightly sympathetic for Kayla though. She's in a hell of her own making and deserves whatever the court throws at her, but it sounds like she's the only one of the 3 who appears to be even slightly remorseful about the whole thing. Not being a massive sperg on X/Twitter probably helps with that perception too when you compare her to Nick and April.
 
More LOCALS Nick conversation.

He talks about the bodycam footage.

Cropped.jpg


Fucking called it. So basically Nick will get to trot out the old excuse of protecting his kids from people like his own Locals member ever knowing how to best stalk their prey, as the reason why he'll get all the benefit out of the footage that he wants, while cutting out anything and everything inconvenient to his narrative. Whatever happened to his obsession with the "rule of completeness"?

This is about all we'll ever get to see, and his room-temp-IQ audience will fall for it hook, line, and sinker:

MinistryOfTruth.jpg


"CASE CLOSED!"
 
Last edited:
I love how he says his daughter wasn't exposed to the cocaine till the day of the raid by the officers.

This is like the old joke about Pierre, Pierre the Cocksucker.

"I gave my daughter cocaine on just ONE occasion and that happens to be the day that the cops show up wanting to do hair tests!"

Speaking of which, hair tests can pinpoint the date on which the cocaine was consumed. If Rekieta is so convinced that the cops were responsible for the outcome of the test, surely he'd be happy to have the test's outcome revealed publicly, so we can all know the date on which the test shows her having taken the cocaine?

I won't be holding my breath though.
 
Back
Top Bottom