- Joined
- Jul 12, 2021
The retarded AI banter version of the breakfast question right here

"If the Academy Awards had been hosted in Venice, how would you have felt?"
"But...they're not hosted there. I don't understand the question."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The retarded AI banter version of the breakfast question right here
Missed opportunity on not naming it "Chris P."Oh, look!
View attachment 6707461
Moepi took his picture off LinkedIn, blanked his account and changed his name to "Chris J", making it useless!
What a buffoon.
Since I don't think his actual name was ever posted here, I believe this is what the link used to be:Oh, look!
View attachment 6707461
Moepi took his picture off LinkedIn, blanked his account and changed his name to "Chris J", making it useless!
What a buffoon.
Someone has made this with it recently:The chinese released a text-to-video model, and contrary to other video models, it's apparently completely uncensored. They also open-weighted a LLM called QwQ which seems more capable at 32b than o1 to me, working the same way. While the west is pearl clutching, the chinese just establish facts and nobody seems to address it.
Yeah my sweetheart started a community called r/ethicallivingvampires and so far it's just us but you can hang!
Imagine being 5 replies down and being unable to use the word "Nigger" without being banned.
it's actually one of the most discussed. you just stop at the skim at surface level discussions.that I don't see being made as often in those circles
Many of them don't know, many of them don't care and only use the "theft" argument because it's convenient at the moment. Try bringing up Google Translate and reading through all the excuses they make for what is basically the same thing as any other generative AI, down to the data scraping. "It's so bad that it doesn't compete with translators so it's okay", "it's useful so it's okay", "translation isn't the same as art", "you can't steal a language"... it's my litmus test for whether someone is against AI out of principle or just mad because it can do their job now.As much as it's fun to watch fat fetish artist sperging about how AI taking away their "job" or whatever, there's actually one interesting argument that I don't see being made as often in those circles: the way AI is used nowadays is just another example of big tech data theft. I mean, Google has been training their model for YEARS using ReCAPTCHA and Google Photos, or did you think those 15 GB of free storage were out of sheer good will?
I mean if you willingly post your artwork on websites like DA or art station for years who's TOS say that they can use their artwork for whatever they want I don't have any sympathy.As much as it's fun to watch fat fetish artist sperging about how AI taking away their "job" or whatever, there's actually one interesting argument that I don't see being made as often in those circles: the way AI is used nowadays is just another example of big tech data theft. I mean, Google has been training their model for YEARS using ReCAPTCHA and Google Photos, or did you think those 15 GB of free storage were out of sheer good will?
Same thing as the people complaining about Adobe using its users' artworks for AI training. Like, who the fuck even pays for Adobe nowadays?I mean if you willingly post your artwork on websites like DA or art station for years who's TOS say that they can use their artwork for whatever they want I don't have any sympathy.
Even channels that aren’t content farms use AI voices. Whether or not it’s YouTube itself makes no difference.https://old.reddit.com/r/youtubedra...ube_is_now_replacing_creators_original_voice/ (archive)
Youtube is now adding AI voices to their already machine-learning translated subtitles on videos. Reddit is, naturally, mad because... there might be a mistranslation or will somebody think of all the youtube video dubbing jobs that will be lost
Someone think of the non-english language video essayists! Could you trust AI with telling you what to think instead of mindless drones going for mass appeal of their audience?
Nothing was ever mistranslated before machine learning.
View attachment 6730732
The voice actors who wouldn't have been hired for dubbing things that aren't popular surely are the biggest losers
View attachment 6730739
Think of the accentorinos! & Accessibility Features are actually there to taunt the disabled, right?
View attachment 6730748
WE'RE NOT OKAY WE'RE NOT OKAY WE'RE NOT OKAY BECAUSE WE JUST ARE OKAY
View attachment 6730787
The feature I can simply not use is literally making my day worse every single day!
View attachment 6730811
The big models are trained just using scraped internet data, rather than data from user accounts. And Google has always been open about the real purpose of reCAPTCHA; anyone who hasn't noticed that during the past 20 years is a retard.As much as it's fun to watch fat fetish artist sperging about how AI taking away their "job" or whatever, there's actually one interesting argument that I don't see being made as often in those circles: the way AI is used nowadays is just another example of big tech data theft. I mean, Google has been training their model for YEARS using ReCAPTCHA and Google Photos, or did you think those 15 GB of free storage were out of sheer good will?
For a very loose, emotionally-driven, not-legally-accepted definition of theft, yes.the way AI is used nowadays is just another example of big tech data theft.
This is shallow vibes-based thinking without looking at reality. Unlike NFTs, AI has an active and thriving use case. I wouldn't exactly decry crypto either since it's the only reason you're able to post on this site at all.The reality is that the real reason this AI Bubble is being pushed is just so IT-Related merchants can do what they did with the NFT bubble before this, and the Crypto Bubble before it too.
What, are you expecting them to say "no it's not, Google search is so great?" It's shit because of specific bad decisions Google has made unrelated to the tech itself. Ironically it would probably provide better information if it just gave you an answer from the LLM rather than summarizing search results.If you wanna see how far the AI Brainrot someone is, just tell them that the AI model that google made has made google search shit.
I'm not some AI doomer but I can agree with them on the fact that these AI dubs are going to suck ass. Even the best of the best AI voices (openAI/elevenlabs) still don't get inflections right. It's almost certainly gonna be worse with non-English languages, too. Imperfect auto-captioning + imperfect AI voicing = no bueno. Would rather see YouTube put their time into not actively making the app more dogshit than it already is. Wish this bubble would just either pop or stop following the law of diminishing returns already.https://old.reddit.com/r/youtubedra...ube_is_now_replacing_creators_original_voice/ (archive)
Youtube is now adding AI voices to their already machine-learning translated subtitles on videos. Reddit is, naturally, mad because... there might be a mistranslation or will somebody think of all the youtube video dubbing jobs that will be lost
Someone think of the non-english language video essayists! Could you trust AI with telling you what to think instead of mindless drones going for mass appeal of their audience?
I wouldn't expect them to be good. I will, like a normal adult, simply not use this feature instead of acting like it's the end of the world. Reddit constantly manufacturing hysteria is just really funny to me.I can agree with them on the fact that these AI dubs are going to suck ass... Would rather see YouTube put their time into not actively making the app more dogshit than it already is