- Joined
- Oct 2, 2016
Those animated avatars could've been done by someone else, or by Shmorky himself.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those animated avatars could've been done by someone else, or by Shmorky himself.
Note Mastgrr is the song remixer not the animator.
Uh, that account has more animations. Are you telling me you believe Shmorky did all this work for her and yet they've never publicly interacted even once despite being so very active on twitter? 'Sandy' doesn't even have Shmorky followed.Yeah I honestly don't know. I say Shmorky made the video but it could've been based on Partydog's drawings/style created for the Sandypants persona.
Better b careful, you might get Twitterbanned for that. No bully!
Uh, that account has more animations. Are you telling me you believe Shmorky did all this work for her and yet they've never publicly interacted even once despite being so very active on twitter? 'Sandy' doesn't even have Shmorky followed.
want you to really picture this - picture Shmorky, in that trademark voice, gritting his teeth and saying "How do you like the way my cock feels inside you, you filthy slut!" Because I've heard it. I've been there. It was just surreal.
Yeah, Thanks for nothing.No I'm saying Sandy IS Shmorky and Party Dog did drawings for "her". At least, initially; it's possible after the "Sandy Pants style" was set Shmorky picked up from where Party Dog left off.
I just think there are too many subtle similarities to say Partydog drew nothing for Sandy/Shmorky.
Asexual is just something gross people say to rationalize the fact no one wants to have sex with them tho.Are you asexual now? This is the sort of trauma which I imagine would make someone unable to ever enjoy sex again.
It's far more suspicious Sandypants has no background in animation and yet seems pretty good at it, than Shmorky drawing in a more detailed artstyle.
He has learnt his lesson of what happens when you're lenient with furries!I just fucking love @Lowtax's fervent hatred of Babyfurs
He's like, my new hero now.
My humble deduction, based on animation teaching experience, is that I think Sandy and Shmork are indeed the same artist.
Or at the outside possibility, these are two artists who have have jammed on the project together. Perhaps.
It's little details like the critter's snouts and poses that are classic Kelly "trademarks."
Kelly has a keyframing "bounce" style that is very much recognisable...
Lowtax is usually in a coma, though. He only achieves consciousness every month or so.
Yeah, Thanks for nothing.
Nobody was really questioning this.
It's actually fairly easy for a reasonably versatile artist to change art styles. They do it all the time, and Dave's more versatile than people give him credit for.
What's more difficult for an artist to change is their sense of dynamism and the way they portray organic movement, whether it's animated or not. The "Cooking by the Book" animation has a lot of Shmorkyisms--the wolf poses with that exaggerated arm swing (ala Business Cat) as well as that bent forward arms back shouting pose that Dave always uses. Also, there's a really accomplished part of the animation where the lamb turns around in surprise, which you can compare with the recent devil girl animation (I think it was from late December) on the bughutt Twitter.
Any one of those things in the video wouldn't convince me by itself, but there are three in a video by an artist who was supposedly just learning to animate and who just happens to share all the same kinks with Dave (including highly specific stuff like a fascination with middle-age pussy).
I am going to have to agree, someone with Shmorky's experiences could easily fake Sandypants style, I don't pretend to have that level experience in art and animation but I could.It's actually fairly easy for a reasonably versatile artist to change art styles. They do it all the time, and Dave's more versatile than people give him credit for.
What's more difficult for an artist to change is their sense of dynamism and the way they portray organic movement, whether it's animated or not. The "Cooking by the Book" animation has a lot of Shmorkyisms--the wolf poses with that exaggerated arm swing (ala Business Cat) as well as that bent forward arms back shouting pose that Dave always uses. Also, there's a really accomplished part of the animation where the lamb turns around in surprise, which you can compare with the recent devil girl animation (I think it was from late December) on the bughutt Twitter.
Any one of those things in the video wouldn't convince me by itself, but there are three in a video by an artist who was supposedly just learning to animate and who just happens to share all the same kinks with Dave (including highly specific stuff like a fascination with middle-age pussy).
I could imitate the "Sandypants style" too despite only drawing once every few months; I'm not saying Shmorky can't do that. He clearly did it in that one animated music video with the obvious Shmorky-looking poses.I am going to have to agree, someone with Shmorky's experiences could easily fake Sandypants style, I don't pretend to have that level experience in art and animation but I could.