Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

And she's still looking for attention. Christ!

them to have the right to buy babies from women who rent out their wombs

So no man has a right to his children? Or did you forget the part about the child being produced via IVF using his sperm and her egg? If you must criticize surrogacy, can you do so without the end conclusion being no man has a right to his children?

 

[Max Free]

At least try to argue.

At least try to not to acknowledge the psychopath who wishes death upon people for merely disagreeing.

 

[God of Nothing]

Woman also get abandoned way more if they develop cancer or some other serious illnesses while in marriage.

This study has never been repeated to my knowledge despite its frequent citing and is ancient in terms of scientific data and the overall climate of sexual dynamics.

You know, it's amazing how frequently loose data is used in this debate, granted it is used much the same in every other one. You have people claiming to use science from those who don't even understand the scientific method who laugh at surveys on one hand when they don't support their claims yet fervently defend them as the only reliable source when the opposite is true. My favorite is just saying a study exists and never citing it. Because you know they'd be all up your ass about it if you were ever that retarded.

 

[Dawdler]

At least try to not to acknowledge the psychopath who wishes death upon people for merely disagreeing.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

This study has never been repeated to my knowledge despite its frequent citing and is ancient in terms of scientific data and the overall climate of sexual dynamics.

You know, it's amazing how frequently loose data is used in this debate, granted it is used much the same in every other one. You have people claiming to use science from those who don't even understand the scientific method who laugh at surveys on one hand when they don't support their claims yet fervently defend them as the only reliable source when the opposite is true. My favorite is just saying a study exists and never citing it. Because you know they'd be all up your ass about it if you were ever that retarded.

To most people, data is only as useful as far as it agrees with them.

EDIT: Also been reading the thread above, rather than just jumping to the latest message and responding to that like the ADHD retard I am.

If you don't have kids, then you're not a dead end. You could have brothers and sisters and a good uncle to their kids. If you don't have that, and you make no other mark on the world, then you're a dead end. Sorry geneslop but you gotta get out of the pool, and you don't get a say in what happens to it afterwards.

 

[Dawdler]

This study has never been repeated to my knowledge despite its frequent citing and is ancient in terms of scientific data and the overall climate of sexual dynamics.

Thanks for the input.
I am aware about such issues which are even more prevalent in countries without universal healthcare as it is cheaper to divorce and "abandon" your spouse than to share medical bills which will ruin the living standards of both so the whole "study" is clouded by it, same as modern divorce stats.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

I just read that study, and as an actual scientist, with research experience; I'm legit laughing at the error bars that seem to be near enough bigger than their data. N=500? Lmao. That's not a study, how long did it take them to find these patients willing to take part? Five years apparently. Mad.

I like that they also identify 8 other studies that don't agree with their findings; but then just casually breeze over that issue; and also offer no real explanation. Their data indicates that they find most of the impacted area is around younger couples; they can't sus out why though? Jeez, why might younger couples, where there is a high degree of commitment in theory, but little practical joining, have a trend where they might break up more on the mans side? It's not like cancer treatments frequently can damage the womens fertility.

I'd like to offer a suggestion: The drugs kill the ladies baby maker, and the man goes 'Oh, no sorry I want kids; and since I'm willing to marry I am actively looking to settle down.' So he dips because of that. I'm assuming their data is even valid though, when by the rest of the studies around it, it isn't lol. To be fair, those studies also have uptakes of less than 500, so that study did pretty well. There's a 2022 literature review that seems to support my idea, where the rates of babymaker breaking cancers caused a spike in divorces during and right after treatment. I'd expect to see something similar with testicular cancer among married couples but longer term as the fertility options for storing mens reproductive material are just better; so there's probably a longer attrition window.

It's sociology; it's not a real study.

Though it is absolutely fucking vile to divorce a spouse over them going through something rough like cancer, or losing a job.

 

[Dawdler]

I understand the commitment, but the original purpose was to shut that twat up.
Sociological research is usually full of holes and is basically the horoscope and snake oil of the science world, it's just a giant waste of everyone's time.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

I understand the commitment, but the original purpose was to shut that twat up.
Sociological research is usually full of holes and is basically the horoscope and snake oil of the science world, it's just a giant waste of everyone's time.

Most science is tbh.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

We have a faggot-hate thread.

In other news, women be shopping:

View attachment 6720376

what the fuck

As Roller Tomato says, your wife will bring a date to your funeral.

Under le ebul Christian patriarchy, we ruthlessly suppressed fags. The basic problem with giving women any power over society's threat-management apparatus (the police, the military, etc) is that they're extremely prone to the argument, "But look at this predator's big, sad eyes! We should let him in near the children!" They have proven over and over to lack the emotional fortitude to apply necessary ruthlessness to external threats.

It always kills me that people read the book of Genesis and the only thing they take away from the Garden of Eden is autistically screeching about what the word Day means, while missing the absolutely fantastic lessons about human nature it teaches.

 

[The Hardest R]

We’ve seen six gorillion articles in recent years about people outright making shit up in studies in order for it to pass “peer review.” Very little actual science gets done unless it can be made for a profit. Otherwise it’s just soyence that conforms to the proper ideology and who do you trust, the (((elites))) or your lying eyes?

 

[Chunky Salsa]

We’ve seen six gorillion articles in recent years about people outright making shit up in studies in order for it to pass “peer review.” Very little actual science gets done unless it can be made for a profit. Otherwise it’s just soyence that conforms to the proper ideology and who do you trust, the (((elites))) or your lying eyes?

I have my name on a paper about pyrochemistry; my sole contribution was that I got Steak Bakes every thursday morning and chatted with the guy designing the crucible lol. Academia is a fucking racket.

 

[666NASTYFUCKINGFREAK666]

I don't particularly care about women; they're not very interesting. They can be funny though (not Amy Schumer humor though)

I assume they feel the same way, our hobbies just don't really align except perhaps with sports and cooking/gardening (though its likely that it is a hobby for one and a means to the end for the other) and some fluke things like a guy being into ballet or a woman who likes cars.

 

[Éamonn Ceannt]

Well in a way it's true she is. Gay man do women things like cooking, cleaning better than actual women and with less complaints and women hate competition.

No they don't becasue they are men even if they are piteoga.

They are also beneficial to the state as they are perfect work slave. No kids to spend money on and aren't a drain on healthcare. Women are a total drain on society and social systems, just slightly better than immigrants.

Homosexuality, like feminism, is a cancer upon society. They caused Rome to fall, or at least I'm pretty sure that's waht Pat Buchanan said once so I'm going with that.

I don't particularly care about women; they're not very interesting. They can be funny though (not Amy Schumer humor though)

Name one woman who is intentionally funny anmd actually funny. I dare you. Feminists who make me laugh because of how crazy they are don't fucking count.

 

[666NASTYFUCKINGFREAK666]

Name one woman who is intentionally funny anmd actually funny. I dare you. Feminists who make me laugh because of how crazy they are don't fucking count.

The women on here are pretty funny. I love @JambledUpWords 's bait threads and some woman in the MHT was talking about how she thinks male rape is hilarious and cited John Wayne Gacy's clown rapes and even though it took me by surprise I thought it was pretty lulzy.

 

[Éamonn Ceannt]

The women on here are pretty funny. I love @JambledUpWords 's bait threads and some woman in the MHT was talking about how she thinks male rape is hilarious and cited John Wayne Gacy's clown rapes and even though it took me by surprise I thought it was pretty lulzy.

I meant like the funny people you know. Like Larry David. Whsts the term called?

 

[The Ugly One]

Name one woman who is intentionally funny anmd actually funny. I dare you. Feminists who make me laugh because of how crazy they are don't fucking count.

Carol Burnett's not dead yet.

You convince no one because nothing in your argument speaks to the instinctual level of people. Nothing inside a men triggers when thinking about the survival of their "genes" and nobody makes decision about their future on a pure rational level that isn't motivated by at least some emotion. "Have kids for the future of your country" is a better argument than what you are constantly try to pull of, because at least it speaks to the tribal instinct people have.

You guessed it, I post here in the Woman-Hate Thread to try and change America's disastrous fertility rates.

What fucking future is this, then?

A future populated by the kinds of people who sailed around the world and invented the microchip and who are still doing things as opposed to a future where niggers are shitting on their burned-out ruins.

The idea of ‘beating your non-procreating competitors’ admittedly carried significant weight in 1684, or if you happen to be a lion, panther or a tribesman in a remote African shithole.

Right now, in modern 2024, it is fucking irrelevant.

"It's fine if the future is entirely niggers because maybe my wife might divorce me," the absolute state of the right.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

Carol Burnett's not dead yet.

She had fantastic writers, but she's the exception that proves the rule. If any Kiwi's haven't seen the Carol Burnett show, it may be old but I highly recommend it. Smother's Brothers too, if we're talking about old funny people, moderns just aren't the same.

 

[DavidS877]

losing a job.

If you don't divorce them immediately then you're going to be much worse off when they can whine to the courts that you've been supporting them for a year or more because they were too lazy to find a new one.

 

[DOUBLE_WHEEL]

Gay man do women things like cooking, cleaning better than actual women and with less complaints

This is just men in general. The top chefs of the world are straight men and I don't know how we would figure out who the top cleaners are, but I'm not going to allow faggots to take credit for all male achievements.