he words weren't harsh or clearly towards Ukraine, meaning the typical media take seems a bit clickbaity.
That's what I'm guessing happened, I still haven't seen the full quote + context, but I'm guessing he gave some vague generic "killing people outside of the war zone is bad".
I mean it would have been better if he called Putin a dickless cuck who can't defeat a smaller nation, but that's not traditionally very good statecraft.
> the comments on the objectives of SMO and blown up general completely ignored
> even though virtually all of NATO is at war with us, it's too expensive for them to produce enough shells or something
> our economy and production only got stronger, Russia will not look weak in the eyes of Trump
> we will ignore what others demand and will only pursue our national interests
> we haven't lost in Syria because we were fighting with terrorists and the people who took over are not terrorists xaxaxa
> everyone in and around Syria are begging us to keep our bases there, but we have to think about that
Translate from vatnigger cope:
> We have other generals, who cares. As long as I have control over the media I can keep lying about the SMO, why would I give a solitary fuck about my own citizens?
> We purposely started the war while Scranton, Mesquite, and Parsons were off-line for upgrades. Now that Scranton and Mesquite are partly back online and spinning up to full production, we are pretty well fucked once Parsons is back online and Camden scales up, so if you could let us win before hand, that'd be great. This was supposed to be over before you could start running those things full tilt, and its got us over a barrel because we know from all the lend-lease we got what's coming once things spin all the up. But we have serious faith the the Eurocucks will get bored and decide they need to give their niggers bigger welfare checks.
> What's left of our uninsured fleet of ancient, rusting tankers will make sure we are getting foreign currency worth more than the paper its printed on.
> BRICS is future because everyone will do what we say.
> We've won hugely in Syria, freeing up a bunch of troops and equipment so we can win even more in our SMO. Why would we want to waste resources on foreign bases we don't need now that the terrorists are defeated? With our help I might add. HTS only took over because we, Russia, was bombing ISIS.
> Iran is begging us to try to give them some way to keep smuggling weapons to Hezbollah. Turkey is going to tell us to go fuck ourselves, and I'm not sure there is enough of an economy left to buy off E-dog but we're going to try. Previous generations of Russians had success buying off the Turks with large numbers of supple prepubescent boys, and Putin is willing to make the sacrifice of tapping into his personal reserve if it will help.