Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 110 24.0%

  • Total voters
    458
You would think admitting he was bullshitting after all that time he wasted with his disclosures would be pretty bad for his "please don't sanction me" pleading and the case in general. But if there is anything I learned from the Melinda Scott business it is that the legal system operates under esoteric moon-logic. Magic 8balls are more reliable than federal judges.
For all Melinda's insanity she rarely acted in true Bad Faith or committed wholesale fraud upon the court. She was insane and refused to believe what was in front of her. And shrieked a lot.
 
For all Melinda's insanity she rarely acted in true Bad Faith or committed wholesale fraud upon the court. She was insane and refused to believe what was in front of her. And shrieked a lot.
For all of her many, many, many, many faults losing the suit and her husband vacating the contents of his skull did seem to mellow her into a more traditional 'I'm a poor widow with nineteen starving children, please save our pure Jewish blood' grifting.
 
So, since Greer now can't testify as a witness in his own case, what happens when it's his turn during the trial? Does he just stand up, rest his case, and sit down again?
Rusty has no witnesses so he has no way to authenticate any evidence, unless Hardin calls a witness he can cross, and Hardin doesn't have to put Null or anyone on the stand.

Best he can do is get judicial notice that a copyright exists and sit down.

God I hope this goes to a jury. This could be the funniest shit ever.
 
Rusty has no witnesses so he has no way to authenticate any evidence, unless Hardin calls a witness he can cross, and Hardin doesn't have to put Null or anyone on the stand.

Best he can do is get judicial notice that a copyright exists and sit down.

God I hope this goes to a jury. This could be the funniest shit ever.
No discovery other than the two phone numbers was provided. He can't present anything.
 
I've fallen into a case law rabbit hole tonight and I'm going to take a moment to fangirl Justice Gorsuch again.

When a party feels at liberty to disobey not just a discovery request but two court orders compelling production of the same material in its control, weeks or months (as in this case) pass without progress in the litigation. Hours, days, weeks of lawyers' time are consumed at great expense. Focus shifts from the merits to the collateral and needless. This is not speedy, inexpensive, or just. Just the opposite. And no doubt tolerating such behavior would encourage only more of it. But there is such thing as discovery karma. Discovery misconduct often may be seen as tactically advantageous at first. But just as our good and bad deeds eventually tend to catch up with us, so do discovery machinations.
 
Come on now.

"On the hard-ship Kiwifarms, Sonic the Hedgehog has blue arms..."
You can't just leave it at that.

I don’t think his family had any clue this legal case was going on at all, never mind that Russ had them in mind to be witnesses.
This is exactly what happened.

Poor Russ’s dad had a phone call from a lawyer absolutely out of the blue, talking about a legal case he had no clue about.
Given the timeline, I think Nathan may have called him before Scott returned Hardin's call. What I wouldn't give to hear that conversation.

His family now won't have to be interrogated about shit they have no knowledge about, saving them and Russ a great deal of embarrassment when he's already on thin ice with the court.
Reminder: Russ doesn't give a damn about his family. He doesn't know his brother's address, probably not his sister's either. I believe this is a conscious choice on their part and their parents have honored their wishes.
Any failure in their testimony wouldn't have embarrassed him, it would have made him angry that they failed him yet again. He has no gratitude for anything they have ever done for him. He described a visit to a hooker as the first time he had felt loved.

Don't forget, the world owes Russell just for his very existence.
 
1734643601809.png
You're out of line and you have Crossed the line and you may even be over the line!

lmao why the fuck did he include some tranny forum discussion about KF? This is amazing.
That caught my eye too. I think this is a 300D backgammon move to "dox" Hardin in the same way (no u school of law) his "witnesses" have been "doxed" because the tranny forum is saying "Someone doesn't want his name on this crap".

Edit:
In before ass-face amends the complaint to say: Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms THE HARDSHIP, and Matthew Hardin, a Lawyer.
Matthew "The Hardship" Hardin
 
ah hahahaha!!! apparently, greer finally agreed to that meet and confer with mr. hardin!

So Russ isn't testifying and neither are his witnesses. He's going to present what at trial, exactly?
but, but, but, muh tenth circuit ...

He's probably going to argue KF bullied his witnesses into silence, and that the only reason he signed that filing was to protect them from further "bullying".
in which case, i've no doubt that mr. hardin has already secured statements from both witnesses that they've not been harassed in any way, that they have no information to offer, and that they do not wish to participate.

is it just me, or is greer's signature starting to look more and more like a giant ...
1734773904682.png
 
He has no gratitude for anything they have ever done for him. He described a visit to a hooker as the first time he had felt loved.
That's actually fucking disgusting.

I knew the way he'd orchestrated all this meant they only learned they were being called as witnesses once Hardin got in touch. Just a complete disregard for whatever they might have going on.

I hope they exile him for Christmas. Grotesque, human detritus.
 
So, since Greer now can't testify as a witness in his own case, what happens when it's his turn during the trial? Does he just stand up, rest his case, and sit down again?
If there's ever a trial in like 2035, you can say and try a lot of bullshit in a courthouse. I would imagine Greer would try to call someone or something, but then it would be to Hardin to object that that's a bullshit undisclosed witness. But there would've been plenty of motions to throw this shit in the trashcan for having literally zero evidence to support it before it would ever come to that. If this gets that far, then everything is off the table and the judge might just be the first witness to present evidence of plights or something retarded.
 
Matthew "The Hardship" Hardin
Please somehow include this in the next merch run.

I hope they exile him for Christmas.
He sort of already is. They pulled out all the stops to help him move far away from them and he wasn't at his sister's wedding. He's never been back for any family celebration.
They also appear to have stopped helping him financially some time ago evidenced by him grovelling to his local Temple for money.
I sincerely hope this is the final straw for them and they cast him out completely.

If anyone cares enought to get him a tombstone when the time comes, the inscription should read:

Russell Godfrey Greer
Date*
What have you done for me lately?​



*Lol. Never had one he didn't pay for.

Edited because connection issues
 
Last edited:
Greer has stated in writing to Hardin he has no documentation or other physical evidence. - this is where I assume related to the show cause... He could still produce this evidence now? Idk. I'm lost in the retard sauce of this case.
Greer can still produce undisclosed evidence, but if he does, Hardin gets to depose his family members. Greer really doesn't want his brother and father to go on record (despite them being the only disclosure he has made).
 
I realize that, which is why I asked. The notion of a lawyer asking the court to have the plaintiff in a case undergo a competency hearing amuses me. I wanted to know if it's even technically possible to request.
There's even a rule for it. FRCP 35.
(1) In General. The court where the action is pending may order a party whose mental or physical condition—including blood group—is in controversy to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner. The court has the same authority to order a party to produce for examination a person who is in its custody or under its legal control.
Etc.

It would actually have to be relevant to the case, though.
 
Back