- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
Listen up Kiwi Fag. If his daughter just takes his coke without permission, what can a trad dad do?His only consistent position is "it wasn't my fault."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Listen up Kiwi Fag. If his daughter just takes his coke without permission, what can a trad dad do?His only consistent position is "it wasn't my fault."
Really, he could only encourage this sort of mature, responsible stress-management.If his daughter just takes his coke without permission, what can a trad dad do?
Really, he could only encourage this sort of mature, responsible stress-management.
If she's looking after herself like this, it really takes a lot off of his plate.
Listen up Kiwi Fag. If his daughter just takes his coke without permission, what can a trad dad do?
That's exactly what he is. Jokes about his e-god Juju aside.Edit: Oh, Jesus, Rand does come up in this thread since 2019 but I can't find him referencing it. If he did take Ayn Rand to heart then he likely is an atheist larping as a Christian.
I do. She rejected altruism as a moral imperative, and not just as a state mandate (though she certainly rejected the latter as well). A moral imperative is separate from a law, and one can exist without the other.I do not recall whether Rand specifically talked about private altruism.
Especially since, had his daughter asked for some coke, she would have asked in a "faggy manner," thus violating the NAP herself.What do you expect him to do? Violate the NAP?
When I was looking for a clip of Nick talking about Ayn, this popped up. I'd never seen it. It's 57 seconds. Nick's voice.This thread has tried to noodle out a consistent position from Nick, but it is a futile endeavor when he pulls out: 'Well, it was true at the time...' as a post hoc justification and laments how he cannot tell the whole story ..
This is what snapped me out of the Rand-nosis I was under for a year or two of my life. I was and am fully on board with rejecting mandatory altruism. I do however applaud voluntary altruism. At first, I thought I just disagreed with Rand about a few issues on the periphery, but as time went on, I found her increasingly insufferable. My favorite contradiction of hers is that Israel is objectively better than Palestine because it has the mental power to design, build and operate better technologies, but we as Americans should contribute to Israel (her one exception to the "no charity" rule) because they need our weapons of war to win the fight. Which is it? Are they objectively better because their mental superiority allows them better weapons of war or do they need our weapons of war to win the fight?It's easy to say that Rand was only speaking out about mandatory altruism
Da fuck is this? Lolbertcore? Lolbertwave?When I was looking for a clip of Nick talking about Ayn, this popped up. I'd never seen it. It's 57 seconds. Nick's voice.
I'd argue this would be his only consistent position through all of his years streaming:
The broken man is likely to break down and overdose due the fact his life collapsed around him."They abused my principles!"
-Man whose daughter tested positive for cocaine
Junkie brained Nick will literally blame everyone but himself for his failings
2025 is going to be a fun year, he's gonna spiral hard. It's in his junkie nature.
Nick will probably do the Lowtax thing of switching from libertarian to some sort of Democratic Socialist/Bernie Bro if and when the money dries up. It was always the hedonism part that appealed to him, rather than the self-reliance part.Nick has no values other than pleasing himself. "Nick wants what he wants." Any philosophy assigned (self- or otherwise) is just cover and a means to an end for Nick.
It’d call it the My Immortal of political theory, but My Immortal is far easier to get through.Atlas Shrugged is on par with Mein Kampf in regards to being a book that most people who have claimed to have read it, never have.
Ayn Rand is a fucking slog to get through and Atlas Shrugged, in particular, is hilariously bad. It's on par with Battlefield Earth.
Rejection of altruism as a moral imperative is simply inconsistent with Christianity. Especially as, in the case of the U.S., Christianity is practiced under a system of government in which a wall of separation exists between church and state, and the church can't imprison you for defying them. There's your private altruism.
When I was looking for a clip of Nick talking about Ayn, this popped up. I'd never seen it. It's 57 seconds. Nick's voice.
I'd argue this would be his only consistent position through all of his years streaming:
I was thinking more about altruism through generational wealth. Would Nick's trust fund from his grandfather exist under Randian style economics? It wouldn't under communism, it would have been seized (or taxed after death).
I don't mind an economic system that doesn't have a moral imperative to be altruistic. How people give away their own money is their business. That means they can give or tithe to the church of their choice, a relative, etc, etc. I'm not particularly fond of the government deciding which kinds of voluntary altruism is most preferred through "tax deductions." But make no mistake, Nick is a welfare recipient of his grandfather.
An interesting deep dive would be to see what government benefits Nick has applied for or received. If Nick is living off of some post-tax lump sum of money, he may have zero income. Just a pot of cash. The government uses income (sometimes just wage income), not wealth, as their test. He may qualify for medical care and food subsidies based on that.
He's probably just confusing Moses and Noah. You know, because they both had arks.This includes his belief that three of the five books that make up the Pentateuch were authored by Noah.
I use Filmot to search YT transcripts. I suggest 'Atlas' as a search term on his channel.
He has alleged he was 'on foodstamps' when he and his wife were 'poor'. I doubt this.
He is recorded publicly as taking a COVID-era loan government loan that was forgiven. I recall him and Beard having a show about how people could apply for it.
I'd wager its about appearances.If he doesn't want to be Christian can't he just. . . not be? People leave Christianity all the time.
Or is choosing to leave a religion you don't want to be a part one of the those normal people things, like cleaning your kitchen and not storing your cocaine where your kids can reach, that Nick is too cool for?
The trad-west/statue-twitter/krist-iz-kang grift has been dead for awhile, it can't possibly be lucrative for him anymore.
I would argue that this is only because he isn't the government.When I was looking for a clip of Nick talking about Ayn, this popped up. I'd never seen it. It's 57 seconds. Nick's voice.
I'd argue this would be his only consistent position through all of his years streaming:
Look, he may be the dad that made insane personal sacrifices for his kid, but he'll never be the cool dad that lets his daughter do cocaine like Nick is.I know we’re in a bit of a content drought right now, but I saw this tweet from Randazza. I wonder if he’s ever bitched about having to drive his kids around to random police officers like his client.
View attachment 6792192
Thank you for the update @Potentially CriminalTwo updates from the Sean front wrt Rekieta.
1. Elissa posted a clip from Sean's Xmas Day stream.
- Sean goes over the legal process after the presumed guilty plea next month and likely sentencing in February. He qualifies everything with "probably by the end of February we'll be all done unless he gets charged with other stuff and that's a whole other saga".
- He mentions the likelihood of a PSI (Presentencing investigation). "The judge is gonna want to know who is Nick?... The court is gonna wanna know a lot of things about him." I found this funny. Can the prosecution cite the Farms?
2. Tonight he was asked about the hacking at 17:14 responding to this superchat:
View attachment 6792309
"From what I've been told their stuff is still pending and it's set to happen...it'll be in the new year from probably what I guess."
I know nothing ever happens and I shouldn't get my hopes up, but if Nick gets through all the drug and child endangerment business with a neat little plea deal only to cop worse punishment through being a dumb cunt who somehow thought it was fine to use another person's Google account, let alone a party involved in his numerous legal matters(!!!), this is going to be an outstanding year ahead.Two updates from the Sean front wrt Rekieta.
1. Elissa posted a clip from Sean's Xmas Day stream.
- Sean goes over the legal process after the presumed guilty plea next month and likely sentencing in February. He qualifies everything with "probably by the end of February we'll be all done unless he gets charged with other stuff and that's a whole other saga".
- He mentions the likelihood of a PSI (Presentencing investigation). "The judge is gonna want to know who is Nick?... The court is gonna wanna know a lot of things about him." I found this funny. Can the prosecution cite the Farms?
2. Tonight he was asked about the hacking at 17:14 responding to this superchat:
View attachment 6792309
"From what I've been told their stuff is still pending and it's set to happen...it'll be in the new year from probably what I guess."