Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[DavidS877]

At this rate I'm going to run out of disk space.

Here's the mobile-friendly-version.

 

[obsdj]

It's just as likely those positive reviews, if they actually did exist at any time, were prank reviews and Good Reads recognized that and had them removed.

If you look at the Goodreads page for his book and the reviews that ARE there, it becomes apparent that he left himself a 5-star review...which isn't there anymore.

Most likely that was the only one removed. Now I REALLY want to see the (possibly made-up) correspondence between Greer and Goodreads, especially any reply they may have sent him.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

It's just as likely those positive reviews, if they actually did exist at any time, were prank reviews and Good Reads recognized that and had them removed. Or, assuming they were real once again, the people who posted those reviews changed their minds and removed them of their own volition (if that's a feature of Good Reads, I don't know).

Or as proved above the only positive reviews were from Russ himself, which Good Reads likely removed because Russ sucking himself off isn’t good or read.

Russ needs to subpoena Ricky T. It’s the missing link between the Good Reads and the Bad Reviews!

 

[not william stenchever]

Or as proved above the only positive reviews were from Russ himself, which Good Reads likely removed because Russ sucking himself off isn’t good or read.

Russ sucking himself his cock.

 

[CEO of Gay]

How much more bullshit does Russ need to attempt with faked emails before Hardin is justified in subpoenaing Google and any other email providers supposedly involved for transmission logs to authenticate the emails that Russ is claiming are proof that Kiwifarms, a website, is infringing his copyrights?

Actually, never mind Russ supposedly sending emails to himself or otherwise attempting to fake emails. If Russ offers emails as evidence, is Hardin justified in subpoenaing Google, et. al. for transmission logs and other technical details to authenticate those emails? Is impeachment of evidence the relevant term of art here?

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Well the good thing about the big delay is hopefully it should give Hardin some breathing room to recoup the costs of being fucked around by greers nonsense; since realistically Russtard has nothing to actually pay Hardin back with other than his smelly shitbox car that he lives in.

Isn't he renting that car from the ride share app he is working for? I don't think Russ owns a pot to piss in.

 

[SCV]

So I remember seeing his working hours before and thinking 6am - 3pm was a bit of weird schedule (what is he, a garbage man? Way to honest work for russ). But re-reading this I think he's just fucking lying about his working hours because Hardin is offering to meet with him starting at 6am his time. But of course he just-so-happens to be "working" 6am-3pm pacific time and it coincides perfectly with normal business hours in EST. His working hours should be pretty easy to verify right?

I see no issue with him allowing himself the maximum amount of time possible to get all of his ducks in a row if the day in court ever comes. Russ will rue the day he ever tried to fuck with such a well-oiled relentless and thorough opponent.

I know this is clown world and the Hardship needs to provide zealous defense and all but does anyone here really believe this is going to trial? Much less a jury trial? Seriously?

With permission from Mr. Hardin, I am reposting this here:
View attachment 6803075

So is it safe to assume things like this that get posted here are known to the defense and you/null/hardin don't need to be tagged to point them out?

I'm very surprised that Hardin never brought the following post of Russell's to the judges attention, where he flat out states that the point of the suit is to bankrupt Null:

View attachment 6802813

I'm
7

Sent from my iPhone, I

 

[The Dude]

Or as proved above the only positive reviews were from Russ himself, which Good Reads likely removed because Russ sucking himself off isn’t good or read.

Russ needs to subpoena Ricky T. It’s the missing link between the Good Reads and the Bad Reviews!

Yep. I assumed as much, which is why I said alleged positive reviews and used quotation marks, because no one in their right mind would leave any work of Russhole's a positive review that wasn't an ironic prank review or something. This is just like when he would "like" his Facebook posts because he believed it would get the ball rolling to get other people to "like" his post and have it gain traction. He's a fucking delusional lunatic.

 

[4090 Chad]

Is there any point where Greer’s actions of willful disregard for orders from the Judge and non compliance with procedure could result in criminal contempt?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Is there any point where Greer’s actions of willful disregard for orders from the Judge and non compliance with procedure could result in criminal contempt?

Possible, technically yes. But why would the Judge do that. Russ is the moving party. The Plaintiff. The Judge has much more efficient remedies. Up to and including dismissing Russ's lawsuit and assigning him costs. Russ would actually need to commit some major attempt at fraud on the court to get a Judge pissed off enough to send it over for prosecution.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Is there any point where Greer’s actions of willful disregard for orders from the Judge and non compliance with procedure could result in criminal contempt?

I kinda doubt it since Greer will just plead "I'm just fuckin stupid ya hona. I don't know nuffin about the legal system even after paralegal school and being involved in countless lawsuits".

 

[Suah Noteb]

If you look at the Goodreads page for his book and the reviews that ARE there, it becomes apparent that he left himself a 5-star review...which isn't there anymore.
View attachment 6803993
Most likely that was the only one removed. Now I REALLY want to see the (possibly made-up) correspondence between Greer and Goodreads, especially any reply they may have sent him.

So to clarify, the only form of harassment that Greer can point to is that one or more five star reviews were removed from goodreads about his book, Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy, with comments by Greer on other reviews suggesting that the five star reviews may have been falsified - something that most review places would include in their automatic removal policies.
Honestly it will feel like a whole different era when this lawsuit is over

 

[FamicomGorby]

So to clarify, the only form of harassment that Greer can point to is that one or more five star reviews were removed from goodreads about his book, Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy, with comments by Greer on other reviews suggesting that the five star reviews may have been falsified - something that most review places would include in their automatic removal policies.
Honestly it will feel like a whole different era when this lawsuit is over

Also people emailing him pictures of Hitler. I guess it's possible Greer has sent more to Hardin that we haven't seen, but from Hardin's latest motion it's clear that it's barely any when Greer said he had "a lot" of evidance.

 

[Suah Noteb]

Also people emailing him pictures of Hitler. I guess it's possible Greer has sent more to Hardin that we haven't seen, but from Hardin's latest motion it's clear that it's barely any when Greer said he had "a lot" of evidance.

Was it that "everyone I don't like is hitler" children's storybook meme?

 

[Happy Little War Painter]

I just want the judge to get a big spike, spear the greer end to end and start roasting a big ugly moebius syndrome turkey roast inside of the courthouse.
is that too much to ask?
View attachment 6803584

This image will probably be in his next filing.

 

[cromit]

So to clarify, the only form of harassment that Greer can point to is that one or more five star reviews were removed from goodreads about his book, Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy, with comments by Greer on other reviews suggesting that the five star reviews may have been falsified - something that most review places would include in their automatic removal policies.
Honestly it will feel like a whole different era when this lawsuit is over

He’s citing to this as evidence that his book had some kind of nebulous market value above and beyond being laughed at. Never mind that the number of reviews, or even good reviews, on a book in general, let alone from GoodReads in particular, does not directly translate into sales, and that sales don’t directly translate into dollars. Plus, there’s no proof that any specific person left any particular review, or that any specific bad review was from a farmer, or that any bad review was fraudulent, or that any bad and/or fraudulent review on one site is attributable to A Website, or that any actions outside of A Website can be attributed to Null, or that Null encouraged or incited the bad reviews on A Website or any site, or that any of this, literally any single part, has anything to do with contributory copyright infringement. Complete underpants gnome logic.

Edit: although, it now occurs to me that God’s Favorite Idiot thinks he’s found a way to get around his harassment claims being dropped by saying the harassment isn’t a claim, but instead is his damages. It’s so profoundly stupid, which is what makes me think this is what he actually believes. Again, he’s managed to underpants gnome himself into “be made fun of, sue KF, ???, profit.” More like dog science. “I didn’t do the thing enough times. It will work. You will see.”

 

[The Dude]

Also people emailing him pictures of Hitler. I guess it's possible Greer has sent more to Hardin that we haven't seen, but from Hardin's latest motion it's clear that it's barely any when Greer said he had "a lot" of evidance.

When Shit-Lips says he has "a lot of evidence", it's exactly the same as his claims to being "out a lot of money" on his works: utter delusional bullshit. It's all made up in his misshapen head.

Was it that "everyone I don't like is hitler" children's storybook meme?
View attachment 6804206

Except in Russhole's case the book would be "Everything Bad in My Life is Kiwi Farms (a website)".

 

[thegunbuilderguy]

"What, you actually want to see the evidance?"

I hope that typo was intentional

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

...why you are so aggressive...

I'm guessing Rusty is completely unfamiliar with the terms "zealous" when it comes to the legal system. He appears to be familiar with the concept of "Time is money" so that is another reason why he should understand the need for this Drool Dog & Paralyzed Face Pony show to get on the fucking road since he has literally dragged his feet every single fucking inch of the way.

I look forward to him completely losing his shit if he provides e-mail evidence and Hardin requests the headers and routing/authentication information to prove that the e-mail came from who it says it came from, given that everyone knows that Rusty is absolutely not above blatantly creating very poorly constructed false evidence to support his point (such as everyone's favorite fat Milwaukee piggy, Pat "Negro Baconmaster" Tomlinson).

Was it that "everyone I don't like is hitler" children's storybook meme?
View attachment 6804206

I am absolutely going to make that book some day, as God is my witness.

Possible, technically yes. But why would the Judge do that. Russ is the moving party. The Plaintiff. The Judge has much more efficient remedies. Up to and including dismissing Russ's lawsuit and assigning him costs. Russ would actually need to commit some major attempt at fraud on the court to get a Judge pissed off enough to send it over for prosecution.

Give him time. I have a feeling the "Rusty produces completely made up garbage as evidence" arc is just about to start. I'm sure a judge would likely get to that point quickly if one of the participants in the case begins filing "evidence" that is completely fabricated (and poorly so at that).

 

[Ted's of Beverly Hills]

I don't think Russ owns a pot to piss in.

Getting a lien against the retard (and ideally getting him finally recognized as the vexatious litigating cocksucker that he is) is worthwhile in itself, pour encourager les autres.