Q.1 - How much institutional resistance did SCAR face from elected politicians/government outside of law enforcement?
A.1 - Not much when you omit law enforcement & Department of Corrections.
Q.2 - Before he sold out, how were relations between Alan Caron and the rest of SCAR?
A.2 - Generally good until around mid-1974 when relations between Caron and those with a different political perspective became strained.
Q.3 - Were there any other political divides within SCAR and the broader leftist movement?
A.3 - The left was rife with political divisions & sectarianism. SCAR eventually reflected some of this: liberal v radical, reform v revolution, above ground v underground, which way forward, community organizing without getting sucked into the system.
How would you characterize the kind of harassment SCAR faced?
4 - Petty to deadly serious. Spontaneous to premeditated.
Q.5 - What did you (and SCAR in general) think about:
Q.5a - The Weather Underground
A.5a - General core membership support of WUO's propaganda of the deed & their anti-imperialist political line. However, we also saw them as a breed apart because of their upper middle class/elite college backgrounds.
Q.5b - Hippies and the back-to-the land movement, especially Scott Nearing
A.5b - General skepticism of the counterculture even as though many of us had flirted with various aspects of the lifestyle. SCAR was not into homesteading/back-to-the-land. We were citified. My one encounter with Scott Nearing (1972) left me with the impression he no longer had much use for radical politics.
Q.5c - The Black Liberation Army
A.5c - the most militant SCAR members favored the BLA. For others it was - BLA who?
Q.6 - Was there any anarchist presence in Maine during the 70s? If so, were there any notable activists?
A.6 - Only in the generic sense. No formal/informal groups that I recall. While SCAR was not anarchist it did have some anarchist tendencies/influences.
Q.7 - How did SCAR operate on a day-to-day basis? How was the org structured?
A.7 - SCAR was incorporated as a non-profit & there were official titles for various individuals at various times. But this was mostly show & for fundraising purposes. From the outset SCAR operated with high energy & commitment. SCAR's hub was a storefront HQ/meeting hall. SCAR had various chapters, the only long besides Portland was Maine State Prison. SCAR published a newspaper, the SCAR'd Times. The organization's "survival programs" were adapted from the BPP's ("survival pending revolution"). There was a core membership and general membership. Decision making was by CONSENSUS. Everyone had to be involved in some aspect of the work to one degree or another (this could be anything from the community bail fund to hawking the SCAR'd Times or Impeach Nixon bumper stickers).
Q.8 - How would you describe SCAR’s goal/how it wants to achieve that goal?
A.8 - Early on a significant part of the core membership favored reforming the prison system through public education & legislation. Others favored more political education, organizing a prison chapter & boots on the ground community work. Eventually the latter view prevailed with SCAR evolving from reform & rehabilitation to "struggle for justice" and "survival pending revolution." After connection the dots: class-race-gender-capitalism-imperialsm the goal became to change the entire system. How to go about this & what to replace the system with were debated throughout SCAR's existence (it folded in 1976).
Q.9 - What was the role of French Canadian emigrants in the creation of such groups? Were there any pro-FLQ sentiments?
A.9 - Several SCAR members had roots in Quebec (e.g my father was born in Quebec). Each of us was influenced by our ethnic, working class life experiences. Sentiments were pro-FLQ, seeing revolutionary nationalism as the spear tip challenging colonialism/imperialism. An important pointer I got from following the FLQ - never stay in a bank longer than 2 minutes when making an unauthorized withdrawal!